This must be something really silly and basic, but the cgo docs (and google fu) have left me stranded. Here's what I am trying to do: I want a GO function to call a "C" function using 'import "C"'. Said "C" function needs to store the address of a "C" string (malloc or constant - neither has worked for me) into an argument passed to it as *C.char. The GO function then needs to convert this to a GO string. It actually does work, except I get this:
panic: runtime error: cgo argument has Go pointer to Go pointer
If I run with GODEBUG=cgocheck=0, it all works fine. If I leave as default:
strptr = 4e1cbf ('this is a C string!')
main: yylex returned token 1
yylval.tstrptr 4e1cbf
stringval token "this is a C string!"
The problematic line seems to be:
yylval.stringval = C.GoString(yylval.tstrptr)
What little I can find about C.GoString, it left me with the impression that it allocates a GO string, and fills it in from the "C" string provided, but that seems to not be the case, or why am I getting a complaint about 'Go pointer to Go pointer'? I've tried a number of other approaches, like having the "C" function malloc the buffer and the GO function do C.free() on it. Nothing has worked (where worked == avoiding this runtime panic).
The GO source:
package main
import (
"fmt"
"unsafe"
)
// #include <stdio.h>
// int yylex (void * foo, void *tp);
import "C"
type foo_t struct {
i int32
s string
}
var foo foo_t
func main() {
var retval int
var s string
var tp *C.char
for i := 0; i < 2; i++ {
retval = int(C.yylex(unsafe.Pointer(&foo), unsafe.Pointer(&tp)))
fmt.Printf("main: yylex returned %d\n", retval)
fmt.Printf("tp = %x\n", tp)
if retval == 0 {
s = C.GoString(tp)
fmt.Printf("foo.i = %d s = %q\n", foo.i, s)
} else {
foo.s = C.GoString(tp)
fmt.Printf("foo.i = %d foo.s = %q\n", foo.i, foo.s)
}
}
}
The "C" source
#include <stdio.h>
int yylex (int * foo, char ** tp)
{
static num;
*foo = 666;
*tp = "this is a C string!";
printf ("strptr = %x ('%s')\n", *tp, *tp);
return (num++);
}
What's interesting is that if the GO func stores into foo.s first, the 2nd call to yylex bombs with the panic. If I do s and then foo.s (depending on whether I check retval as 0 or non-zero), it doesn't fail, but I'm guessing that is because the GO function exits right away and there are no subsequent calls to yylex.
#include<stdio.h>
#define engine_exhaust_gas_temperature_raw 100
#define engine_exhaust_gas_temperature_scaled 20
#define Sum(x, y) ( ( x )+ ( y ) )
int main(){
printf("%d",engine_exhaust_gas_temperature_raw);
return 0;
}
I am working on MISRA C Rule 5.4 Macro identifiers shall be distinct for which I need the list of the names of all the macros defined in a C program as strings.
For ex: In the above code I will need:
[ "engine_exhaust_gas_temperature_raw", "engine_exhaust_gas_temperature_scaled", "Sum"]
Is there any way to get this list using clang AST?
I have found that we can use clangs https://clang.llvm.org/doxygen/classclang_1_1Preprocessor.html Preprocessor class to get the iterator to macros but even this is not producing any output for me. I have used it in the below code. What am I missing here?
bool distinct_macro_identifier(CompilerInstance *C_I, ASTContext *Context){
auto st= C_I->getPreprocessor().macro_begin()->getFirst()->getName();
auto x= C_I->getPreprocessor().macro_begin()->first;
llvm::outs()<<x->getName()<<"\n";
auto p= C_I->getPreprocessor().getMacroInfo(x);
p->dump();
return true;
}
You can compile it with this command:
clang++ -E -dM -nostdlib file.cpp
I had this code in one my view controller:
int randomNumber = (arc4random() % 1) + 6;
Because I will need it on more places, I decided to made it as function.
But I did it as C function, old habits die hard.
Now I have file WOC_Random.c with this content
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h> // for arc4random() function
#ifndef WOC_Random_C
#define WOC_Random_C
int randomInt(int startInt, int endInt)
{
int randomNumber = (arc4random() % startInt) + endInt;
return randomNumber;
}
#endif
Now code in my view controller is:
int randomNumber = randomInt(1, 6);
But I have problem in linking, this is error:
duplicate symbol _randomInt in:
/Users/Mac/Library/Developer/Xcode/DerivedData/GuessTheNumber-gjovdrsarctubnbqhczqukvahwgb/Build/Intermediates/GuessTheNumber.build/Debug-iphonesimulator/GuessTheNumber.build/Objects-normal/i386/GTN_FirstViewController.o
/Users/Mac/Library/Developer/Xcode/DerivedData/GuessTheNumber-gjovdrsarctubnbqhczqukvahwgb/Build/Intermediates/GuessTheNumber.build/Debug-iphonesimulator/GuessTheNumber.build/Objects-normal/i386/WOC_Random.o
ld: 1 duplicate symbol for architecture i386
clang: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)
I do have vague understanding, of problem.
But do not know how to fixit ?
So how to fix it, do I need some argument to linker or compiler ?
Also, in case like this when I just have some simple function to implement what is the best way to do it for iOS development, as C function or is it better to do it as class function in Object C ?
You need to add Header file (like WOC_Random.h) in which you will declare the function
int randomInt(int startInt, int endInt);
Then define that function in WOC_Random.c. And then include WOC_Random.h in the class you want to use the function.
I am reading Richard Stevens' Advance Programming in unix environment.
There is a code in thread synchronization category (chapter - 11).
This is code showing is showing how to avoid race conditions for many shared structure of same type.
This code is showing two mutex for synch.- one for a list fh (a list which keep track of all the foo structures) & f_next field and another for the structure foo
The code is:
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <pthread.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#define NHASH 29
#define HASH(fp) (((unsigned long)fp)%NHASH)
struct foo *fh[NHASH];
pthread_mutex_t hashlock = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER;
struct foo {
int f_count;
pthread_mutex_t f_lock;
struct foo *f_next; /* protected by hashlock */
int f_id;
/* ... more stuff here ... */
};
struct foo * foo_alloc(void) /* allocate the object */
{
struct foo *fp;
int idx;
if ((fp = malloc(sizeof(struct foo))) != NULL) {
fp->f_count = 1;
if (pthread_mutex_init(&fp->f_lock, NULL) != 0) {
free(fp);
return(NULL);
}
idx = HASH(fp);
pthread_mutex_lock(&hashlock);
///////////////////// HERE -----------------
fp->f_next = fh[idx];
fh[idx] = fp->f_next;
//////////////////// UPTO HERE -------------
pthread_mutex_lock(&fp->f_lock);
pthread_mutex_unlock(&hashlock);
/* ... continue initialization ... */
pthread_mutex_unlock(&fp->f_lock);
}
return(fp);
}
void foo_hold(struct foo *fp) /* add a reference to the object */
.......
The doubt is
1) What is HASH(fp) pre-processor doing?
I know that it is typecasting what is fp store and then taking its modulo. But, in the function foo_alloc we are just passing the address of newly allocated foo structure.
Why we are doing this I know that this will give me a integer between 0 and 28 - to store in array fh. But why are we taking modulo of an address. Why there is so much randomization?
2) Suppose i accept that, now after this what these two lines are doing (also highlighted in the code) :
fp->f_next = fh[idx];
fh[idx] = fp->f_next;
I hope initially fh[idx] has any garbage value which i assigned to the f_next field of foo and in the next line what is happening , again the same assignment but in opposite order.
struct foo *fh[NHASH] is a hash table, and use the HASH macro as the hash function.
1) HASH(fp) calculates the index to decide where the in the fh to store fp, and it uses the address of the fp and uses the address as key to calculate the index. We can easily typecast the address to the long type.
2) Use the linked list to avoid the hash collisions called separate chaining, and I think the following cod is right, and you can check it in the book :
fp->f_next = fh[idx];
fh[idx] = fp;
insert the fp element to the header of the linked list fh[idx], and the initial value of the fh[idx] is null.
In my previous question I was looking for a way of evaulating complex mathematical expressions in C, most of the suggestions required implementing some type of parser.
However one answer, suggested using Lua for evaluating the expression. I am interested in this approach but I don't know anything about Lua.
Can some one with experience in Lua shed some light?
Specifically what I'd like to know is
Which API if any does Lua provide that can evaluate mathematical expressions passed in as a string? If there is no API to do such a thing, may be some one can shed some light on the linked answer as it seemed like a good approach :)
Thanks
The type of expression I'd like to evaluate is given some user input such as
y = x^2 + 1/x - cos(x)
evaluate y for a range of values of x
It is straightforward to set up a Lua interpreter instance, and pass it expressions to be evaluated, getting back a function to call that evaluates the expression. You can even let the user have variables...
Here's the sample code I cooked up and edited into my other answer. It is probably better placed on a question tagged Lua in any case, so I'm adding it here as well. I compiled this and tried it for a few cases, but it certainly should not be trusted in production code without some attention to error handling and so forth. All the usual caveats apply here.
I compiled and tested this on Windows using Lua 5.1.4 from Lua for Windows. On other platforms, you'll have to find Lua from your usual source, or from www.lua.org.
Update: This sample uses simple and direct techniques to hide the full power and complexity of the Lua API behind as simple as possible an interface. It is probably useful as-is, but could be improved in a number of ways.
I would encourage readers to look into the much more production-ready ae library by lhf for code that takes advantage of the API to avoid some of the quick and dirty string manipulation I've used. His library also promotes the math library into the global name space so that the user can say sin(x) or 2 * pi without having to say math.sin and so forth.
Public interface to LE
Here is the file le.h:
/* Public API for the LE library.
*/
int le_init();
int le_loadexpr(char *expr, char **pmsg);
double le_eval(int cookie, char **pmsg);
void le_unref(int cookie);
void le_setvar(char *name, double value);
double le_getvar(char *name);
Sample code using LE
Here is the file t-le.c, demonstrating a simple use of this library. It takes its single command-line argument, loads it as an expression, and evaluates it with the global variable x changing from 0.0 to 1.0 in 11 steps:
#include <stdio.h>
#include "le.h"
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
int cookie;
int i;
char *msg = NULL;
if (!le_init()) {
printf("can't init LE\n");
return 1;
}
if (argc<2) {
printf("Usage: t-le \"expression\"\n");
return 1;
}
cookie = le_loadexpr(argv[1], &msg);
if (msg) {
printf("can't load: %s\n", msg);
free(msg);
return 1;
}
printf(" x %s\n"
"------ --------\n", argv[1]);
for (i=0; i<11; ++i) {
double x = i/10.;
double y;
le_setvar("x",x);
y = le_eval(cookie, &msg);
if (msg) {
printf("can't eval: %s\n", msg);
free(msg);
return 1;
}
printf("%6.2f %.3f\n", x,y);
}
}
Here is some output from t-le:
E:...>t-le "math.sin(math.pi * x)"
x math.sin(math.pi * x)
------ --------
0.00 0.000
0.10 0.309
0.20 0.588
0.30 0.809
0.40 0.951
0.50 1.000
0.60 0.951
0.70 0.809
0.80 0.588
0.90 0.309
1.00 0.000
E:...>
Implementation of LE
Here is le.c, implementing the Lua Expression evaluator:
#include <lua.h>
#include <lauxlib.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
static lua_State *L = NULL;
/* Initialize the LE library by creating a Lua state.
*
* The new Lua interpreter state has the "usual" standard libraries
* open.
*/
int le_init()
{
L = luaL_newstate();
if (L)
luaL_openlibs(L);
return !!L;
}
/* Load an expression, returning a cookie that can be used later to
* select this expression for evaluation by le_eval(). Note that
* le_unref() must eventually be called to free the expression.
*
* The cookie is a lua_ref() reference to a function that evaluates the
* expression when called. Any variables in the expression are assumed
* to refer to the global environment, which is _G in the interpreter.
* A refinement might be to isolate the function envioronment from the
* globals.
*
* The implementation rewrites the expr as "return "..expr so that the
* anonymous function actually produced by lua_load() looks like:
*
* function() return expr end
*
*
* If there is an error and the pmsg parameter is non-NULL, the char *
* it points to is filled with an error message. The message is
* allocated by strdup() so the caller is responsible for freeing the
* storage.
*
* Returns a valid cookie or the constant LUA_NOREF (-2).
*/
int le_loadexpr(char *expr, char **pmsg)
{
int err;
char *buf;
if (!L) {
if (pmsg)
*pmsg = strdup("LE library not initialized");
return LUA_NOREF;
}
buf = malloc(strlen(expr)+8);
if (!buf) {
if (pmsg)
*pmsg = strdup("Insufficient memory");
return LUA_NOREF;
}
strcpy(buf, "return ");
strcat(buf, expr);
err = luaL_loadstring(L,buf);
free(buf);
if (err) {
if (pmsg)
*pmsg = strdup(lua_tostring(L,-1));
lua_pop(L,1);
return LUA_NOREF;
}
if (pmsg)
*pmsg = NULL;
return luaL_ref(L, LUA_REGISTRYINDEX);
}
/* Evaluate the loaded expression.
*
* If there is an error and the pmsg parameter is non-NULL, the char *
* it points to is filled with an error message. The message is
* allocated by strdup() so the caller is responsible for freeing the
* storage.
*
* Returns the result or 0 on error.
*/
double le_eval(int cookie, char **pmsg)
{
int err;
double ret;
if (!L) {
if (pmsg)
*pmsg = strdup("LE library not initialized");
return 0;
}
lua_rawgeti(L, LUA_REGISTRYINDEX, cookie);
err = lua_pcall(L,0,1,0);
if (err) {
if (pmsg)
*pmsg = strdup(lua_tostring(L,-1));
lua_pop(L,1);
return 0;
}
if (pmsg)
*pmsg = NULL;
ret = (double)lua_tonumber(L,-1);
lua_pop(L,1);
return ret;
}
/* Free the loaded expression.
*/
void le_unref(int cookie)
{
if (!L)
return;
luaL_unref(L, LUA_REGISTRYINDEX, cookie);
}
/* Set a variable for use in an expression.
*/
void le_setvar(char *name, double value)
{
if (!L)
return;
lua_pushnumber(L,value);
lua_setglobal(L,name);
}
/* Retrieve the current value of a variable.
*/
double le_getvar(char *name)
{
double ret;
if (!L)
return 0;
lua_getglobal(L,name);
ret = (double)lua_tonumber(L,-1);
lua_pop(L,1);
return ret;
}
Remarks
The above sample consists of 189 lines of code total, including a spattering of comments, blank lines, and the demonstration. Not bad for a quick function evaluator that knows how to evaluate reasonably arbitrary expressions of one variable, and has rich library of standard math functions at its beck and call.
You have a Turing-complete language underneath it all, and it would be an easy extension to allow the user to define complete functions as well as to evaluate simple expressions.
Since you're lazy, like most programmers, here's a link to a simple example that you can use to parse some arbitrary code using Lua. From there, it should be simple to create your expression parser.
This is for Lua users that are looking for a Lua equivalent of "eval".
The magic word used to be loadstring but it is now, since Lua 5.2, an upgraded version of load.
i=0
f = load("i = i + 1") -- f is a function
f() ; print(i) -- will produce 1
f() ; print(i) -- will produce 2
Another example, that delivers a value :
f=load('return 2+3')
print(f()) -- print 5
As a quick-and-dirty way to do, you can consider the following equivalent of eval(s), where s is a string to evaluate :
load(s)()
As always, eval mechanisms should be avoided when possible since they are expensive and produce a code difficult to read.
I personally use this mechanism with LuaTex/LuaLatex to make math operations in Latex.
The Lua documentation contains a section titled The Application Programming Interface which describes how to call Lua from your C program. The documentation for Lua is very good and you may even be able to find an example of what you want to do in there.
It's a big world in there, so whether you choose your own parsing solution or an embeddable interpreter like Lua, you're going to have some work to do!
function calc(operation)
return load("return " .. operation)()
end