We have a system in which the user can start sessions inside a number of docker containers. When they do this their home directory is automatically mounted to the docker container. We can't modify the system which starts the docker containers and mounts the directory.
Our goal is to have one image not automatically mount this container. Is there something that I can do to the image to basically make one directory unmountable?
No. If you can docker run a container, you can always use docker run -v to mount any host directory over any directory, and the original contents of the image will be hidden.
Docker's general model is that the image has somewhat limited powers, but you can specify most things when you start the container. Trying to prevent a volume mount (more frequently asked, trying to force a volume mount) is the opposite of this model; the image has no way to prevent how it will eventually be used.
Related
docker run -ti --rm -v DataVolume3:/var ubuntu
Lets say I have a volume DataVolume 3 which pulls the contents of /var in the ubuntu container
even after killing this ubuntu container the volume remains and I can use this volume DataVolume3 to mount it to other containers.
This means with the deletion of container the volume mounts are not deleted.
How does this work ?
Does that volume mount mean that it copies the contents of /var into some local directory because this does not look like a symbolic link ?
If I have the container running and I create a file in the container then the same file gets copied to the host path ?
How does this whole process of volume mount from container to host and host to container work ?
Volumes are used for persistent storage and the volumes persists independent of the lifecycle of the container.
We can go through a demo to understand it clearly.
First, let's create a container using the named volumes approach as:
docker run -ti --rm -v DataVolume3:/var ubuntu
This will create a docker volume named DataVolume3 and it can be viewed in the output of docker volume ls:
docker volume ls
DRIVER VOLUME NAME
local DataVolume3
Docker stores the information about these named volumes in the directory /var/lib/docker/volumes/ (*):
ls /var/lib/docker/volumes/
1617af4bce3a647a0b93ed980d64d97746878564b141f30b6110d0818bf32b76 DataVolume3
Next, let's write some data from the ubuntu container at the mounted path var:
echo "hello" > var/file1
root#2b67a89a0050:/# cat /var/file1
hello
We can see this data with cat even after deleting the container:
cat /var/lib/docker/volumes/DataVolume3/_data/file1
hello
Note: Although, we are able to access the volumes like shown above but it not a recommended practice to access volumes data like this.
Now, next time when another container uses the same volume then the data from the volume gets mounted at the container directory specified as part of -v flag.
(*) The location may vary based on OS as pointed by David and probably can be seen by the docker volume inspect command.
Docker has a concept of a named volume. By default the storage for this lives somewhere on your host system and you can't directly access it from outside Docker (*). A named volume has its own lifecycle, it can be independently docker volume rm'd, and if you start another container mounting the same volume, it will have the same persistent content.
The docker run -v option takes some unit of storage, either a named volume or a specific host directory, and mounts it (as in the mount(8) command) in a specific place in the container filesystem. This will hide what was originally in the image and replace it with the volume content.
As you note, if the thing you mount is an empty named volume, it will get populated from the image content at container initialization time. There are some really important caveats on this functionality:
Named volume initialization happens only if the volume is totally empty.
The contents of the named volume never automatically update.
If the volume isn't empty, the volume contents completely replace what's in the image, even if it's changed.
The initialization happens only on native Docker, and not for example in Kubernetes.
The initialization happens only on named volumes, and not for bind-mounted host directories.
With all of these caveats, I'd avoid relying on this functionality.
If you need to mount a volume into a container, assume it will be empty when your entrypoint or the main container command starts. If you need a particular directory layout or file structure there, an entrypoint script can create it; if you're expecting it to hold particular data, keep a copy of it somewhere else in your image and copy it in if it's not already there (or, perhaps, always).
(*) On native Linux you can find a filesystem location for it, but accessing this isn't a best practice. On other OSes this will be hidden inside a virtual machine or other opaque storage. If you need to directly access the data (or inject config files, or read log files) a docker run -v /host/path:/container/path bind mount is a better choice.
Volumes are part of neither the container nor the host. Well, technically everything resides in the host machine. But the docker directories are only accessible by users in "docker" group. The files in these directories are separately managed by docker.
"Volumes are stored in a part of the host filesystem which is managed by Docker (/var/lib/docker/volumes/ on Linux)."
Hence volumes are like the union of files under the docker container and the host itself. Any addition on either end will be added to the volume(/var/lib/docker/volumes), not hard copy, rather something like symbol link
As volumes can be shared across different containers, deleting a container does not cascade to the volumes associated with it.
To remove unused volumes:
docker volume prune .
Is there any difference between:
Mounting a host directory into a container path (the path is not exposed as a volume), e.g.:
docker run -v /host/directory:/container/directory my_image command_to_run
Dockerfile of my_image does not include VOLUME ["/container/directory"]
Mounting a host directory into a a container path exposed as a volume:
docker run -v /host/directory:/container/directory my_image command_to_run
Dockerfile of my_image includes VOLUME ["/container/directory"]
I know that volume data persists independent of the container life-cycle. However, since I want to work on my local data from within a container, does that make any difference if the mount-point inside the container is a volume?
There is no difference if you mount the path from the host into the container. The filesystem from the host will be mounted over top of that directory inside the container.
The difference between listing the volume and not listing it inside the image is the behavior of docker when you create an image without specifying a volume. When the volume is defined on the image, docker will create an "anonymous" volume you can see with docker volume ls as a long uuid string. These volumes are rarely useful, so I recommend against defining a volume in the image and instead only defining them on your docker run command or docker-compose.yml definition.
Downsides of defining a volume in the image include:
Later lines in the Dockerfile or in descendant Dockerfile's may not be able to change the contents at this location. Docker's behavior with this varies by scenario and version, so for predictability, once a volume is defined in an image, I consider that directory off limits.
Creation of anonymous volumes are difficult to use and are likely to clutter up the filesystem.
I posted a blog on this topic a while back if you're interested in more details.
what does docker do, when you bind-mount a volume in your docker "run" command,
which is already a managed volume defined in the docker build file/ image?
Example:
dockerfile defines /myvolume as managed volume
then: docker run -v /< my_host_dir >:/myvolume ... /< image >
What I see is that the managed volume is no longer created.
Instead the bind-mount comes through and mounts the host-dir into the container.
What goes on behind the scenes?
Is this documented somewhere and therefor something one can count on?
br volker
The VOLUME statement in a Dockerfile just marks the directory as to be mounted from somewhere else to help users of the image. For example when you create a Database-Image, the user of that image usually wants to persist the date outside of the container.
If you (as the creator of the Image/writer of the Dockerfile) marked a directory as a VOLUME, the user of the image (the one who executes docker run or similar) has an idea, where in the container he should mount a directory from outside.
I have a Docker container and I am trying to make it so that all of the files in /var/www/ on the container will be saved on the host system at a location (/home/me), and vise-versa. Is it possible to have this shared space between the two?
Would you accomplish this with mount points, or is there a better method?
Thanks
You can use volumes for sharing between container and host.
docker run -v /home/me:/var/www <image>
If you have a fixed files/data, you can add to the image using dockerfile or committing after copying into container. If you want to share rw dir between host and container, you need to use the volumes. Your data will also be persisted even if you remove and recreate a new container.
There are three ways that you can do this
Use volumes. Official docs
Burn the files in your image. Basically include the creation of the files inside the Dockerfile. This means every container container from that image will have an initial state of sorts.
Use data-only containers. These are containers without a running process that contain the data that you need. This also uses volumes. But instead of mounting to the host, your containers mount on the data-only container (which in turn mounts on the host if you want to). This answer will be useful
Take a typical data only Docker container:
FROM stackbrew/busybox:latest
RUN mkdir /data
VOLUME /data
Now I have seen a great deal of them that are run like this:
docker run -name my-data data true
The true command exits as soon as it runs, and so does the container. But surprisingly it continues to serve the volume when you connect it with another container via --volumes-from my-data.
My question is, how does that work? How does a stopped container still allow access in it's volumes?
Volumes in docker are not a top-level thing. They are "simply" part of container's meta-data.
When you have VOLUME in your dockerfile or start a container with -v, Docker will create a directory in /var/lib/docker/volumes* with a random ID (this is the exact same process as creating an image with commit except it is empty) and add that random ID to the container's metadata.
When the container starts, Docker will mount-bind the directory /var/lib/docker/volumes/* at the given location for that volume.
When you use volumes-from, Docker will just lookup the volume id and the location from an other container, running or not and mount-bind the directory at the set location.
Volumes are not linked with the runtime, it is just directories that are mounted.
* With newer versions, Docker now uses the vfs driver for storage and /var/lib/docker/volumes/ is used only for metadatas like size, create time, etc. The actual data are stored in /var/lib/docker/vfs/dir/<volume id>