I have a need in my Grails project to map objects from one type (which is typically a Map) to another type (some POGO). There are some great examples for getting this working with Boot Spring, but not a lot for Grails.
I added the following lines to my build.gradle:
compile 'org.mapstruct:mapstruct:1.4.2.Final'
compileOnly 'org.mapstruct:mapstruct-processor:1.4.2.Final'
annotationProcessor 'org.mapstruct:mapstruct-processor:1.4.2.Final'
...
compileJava {
options.annotationProcessorPath = configurations.annotationProcessor
// if you need to configure mapstruct component model
options.compilerArgs << "-Amapstruct.defaultComponentModel=spring"
}
I have a mapper defined as:
#Mapper(componentModel = "spring")
public interface AuthResponseMapper2
{
#Mapping(source = "access_token", target = "token")
#Mapping(source = "token_type", target = "type")
GetTokenResponse toGetTokenResponse(Map map);
}
However, I don't see a generated class for that mapper; when I try to use it, I get a NoSuchBeanDefinitionException. Not sure where to go from here.
Best is to check if a AuthResponseMapper2Impl class is generated by MapStruct. If it is you need to make sure that the package is scanned by Spring Boot and picked up as a component.
In addition to that mapping from Map into a POJO is currently not supported you can follow mapstruct/mapstruct#1072 for this feature request
Related
I need to build a custom command in a Grails 4 application (https://docs.grails.org/4.0.11/guide/single.html#creatingCustomCommands), and I need to get an handle to some Grails Services and Domain classes which I will query as needed.
The custom command skeleton is quite simple:
import grails.dev.commands.*
import org.apache.maven.artifact.Artifact
class HelloWorldCommand implements GrailsApplicationCommand {
boolean handle() {
return true
}
}
While the documentation says that a custom command has access to the whole application context, I haven't found any examples on how to get an handle of that and start accessing the various application artifacts.
Any hints?
EDIT: to add context and clarify the goal of the custom command in order for further recommendation/best practices/etc.: the command reads data from a file in a custom format, persist the data, and writes reports in another custom format.
Will eventually be replaced by a recurrent job, once the data will be available on demand from a third party REST API.
See the project at github.com/jeffbrown/marco-vittorini-orgeas-artifacts-cli.
grails-app/services/marco/vittorini/orgeas/artifacts/cli/GreetingService.groovy
package marco.vittorini.orgeas.artifacts.cli
class GreetingService {
String greeting = 'Hello World'
}
grails-app/commands/marco/vittorini/orgeas/artifacts/cli/HelloCommand.groovy
package marco.vittorini.orgeas.artifacts.cli
import grails.dev.commands.*
class HelloCommand implements GrailsApplicationCommand {
GreetingService greetingService
boolean handle() {
println greetingService.greeting
return true
}
}
EDIT:
I have added a commit at github.com/jeffbrown/marco-vittorini-orgeas-artifacts-cli/commit/49a846e3902073f8ea0539fcde550f6d002b9d89 which demonstrates accessing a domain class, which was part of the question I overlooked when writing the initial answer.
We are having a project where we are using Xtext to generate a grammar and create from this language a java output file.
Next to that we want to create also a kind of json output file. which has another extension.
For this we want to split the generators to not mix the java generation and the json generation.
Is there anyway we can call 2 Igenerators when compiling dsl grammar?
Example:
We have 1 language common which generates java file for this we have one IGenerator2 which calls like standard CommonGenerator.
Now we want to create second generator for json file with CommonLineageGenerator.
I have read several threads now were i found the following
component = org.eclipse.xtext.generator.GeneratorComponent {
register = CommonStandaloneSetup{}
outlet = {
path = "${runtimeProject}/src-gen"
}
}
component = org.eclipse.xtext.generator.GeneratorComponent {
register = CommonStandaloneSetup2{}
outlet = {
path = "${runtimeProject}/src-gen"
}
}
Where the StandaloneSetup contains an override of the Igenerator2 bindings
return Guice.createInjector(new CommonRuntimeModule())
return Guice.createInjector(new CommonRuntimeModule() {
override Class<? extends IGenerator2> bindIGenerator2() {
return CommonTracingGenerator;
}
});
We are also using mwe2 , to generate our language configuration.
When executing our compilation it now seems although that he is only taking one Generator. Is there anyway we can accomplish this. A wrapper is also possibility but we really want to avoid of mixing the two types of generations.
kr
With an ObjectMapper (com.fasterxml.jackson.databind) it's possible to specify that it should ignore unknown properties. This can either be done by adding #JsonIgnoreProperties(ignoreUnknown = true) on a class level or by setting it as default behavior in the mapper. However, when doing this in the initialize() method of Application<MyConfiguration> it doesn't seem to have an effect.
ObjectMapper mapper = bootstrap.getObjectMapper();
mapper.configure(DeserializationFeature.FAIL_ON_UNKNOWN_PROPERTIES, false);
It still fails for unknown properties in the configuration file. How does one configure Dropwizard to ignore unknown properties?
The reason configuring DeserializationFeature.FAIL_ON_UNKNOWN_PROPERTIES for bootstrap.getObjectMapper() doesn't have the desired effect is that ConfigurationFactory (the class later on used to parse the configuration) is enabling that particular feature of the object mapper in its constructor (see here):
public ConfigurationFactory(Class<T> klass,
Validator validator,
ObjectMapper objectMapper,
String propertyPrefix) {
...
this.mapper = objectMapper.copy();
mapper.enable(DeserializationFeature.FAIL_ON_UNKNOWN_PROPERTIES);
...
}
It's not possible to change the behaviour of ConfigurationFactory directly but Dropwizard provides means to override the factory that creates it, ConfigurationFactoryFactory, via Boostrap.setConfigurationFactoryFactory(). This allows to replace the real ObjectMapper with a proxy that doesn't allow to override the configuration and pass it to ConfigurationFactory:
bootstrap.setConfigurationFactoryFactory(
(klass, validator, objectMapper, propertyPrefix) -> {
return new ConfigurationFactory<>(klass, validator,
new ObjectMapperProxy(objectMapper), propertyPrefix);
}
);
The code for ObjectMapperProxy that ignores attempts to enable FAIL_ON_UNKNOWN_PROPERTIES it below:
private static class ObjectMapperProxy extends ObjectMapper {
private ObjectMapperProxy(ObjectMapper objectMapper) {
super(objectMapper);
}
private ObjectMapperProxy(ObjectMapperProxy proxy) {
super(proxy);
}
#Override
public ObjectMapper enable(DeserializationFeature feature) {
// do not allow Dropwizard to enable the feature
if (!feature.equals(DeserializationFeature.FAIL_ON_UNKNOWN_PROPERTIES)) {
super.enable(feature);
}
return this;
}
#Override
public ObjectMapper copy() {
return new ObjectMapperProxy(this);
}
}
Note that besides overriding enable to skip FAIL_ON_UNKNOWN_PROPERTIES copy is also implemented (together with an additional constructor) as ConfigurationFactory requires the object mapper to support copying.
While the solution above works it's obviously a workaround and I suggest upgrading to a newer Dropwizard version instead. The new Dropwizard makes ObjectMapper configuration easier to override (e.g. see this Dropwizard commit available in Dropwizard 1.1.x).
You need to disable that feature with:
bootstrap.getObjectMapper().disable(DeserializationFeature.FAIL_ON_UNKNOWN_PROPERTIES);
UPDATE: The feature disable works for the API resources but not for the configuration YAML. Instead, you need to add the annotation below (same as mentioned on the question) to the configuration class:
#JsonIgnoreProperties(ignoreUnknown = true)
I am new to grails and while working with Spring Security LDAP plugin it was identified that it accepts the ldap server password in plain text only. The task in hand is to pass an encrypted password which is decrypted before it is consumed by the plugin during its initialization phase.
I have already searched for all possible blogs and stackoverflow questions but could not find a way to extend the main plugin class to simply override the doWithSpring() method so that i can simply add the required decryption logic for the Ldap server password. Any help here will be appreciated.
I have already seen and tried jasypt plugin but it also does not work well if the password is stored in some external file and not application yml. So I am looking for a solution to extend the Spring security plugin main class, add the required behavior and register the custom class.
EDIT
Adding the snippet from Grails LDAP Security plugin, which I am trying to override. So If i am successfully able to update the value of securityConfig object before the plugin loads, the purpose is solved.
Some snippet from the plugin:
def conf = SpringSecurityUtils.securityConfig
...
...
contextSource(DefaultSpringSecurityContextSource, conf.ldap.context.server) { // 'ldap://localhost:389'
authenticationSource = ref('ldapAuthenticationSource')
authenticationStrategy = ref('authenticationStrategy')
userDn = conf.ldap.context.managerDn // 'cn=admin,dc=example,dc=com'
**password = conf.ldap.context.managerPassword // 'secret'**
contextFactory = contextFactoryClass
dirObjectFactory = dirObjectFactoryClass
baseEnvironmentProperties = conf.ldap.context.baseEnvironmentProperties // none
cacheEnvironmentProperties = conf.ldap.context.cacheEnvironmentProperties // true
anonymousReadOnly = conf.ldap.context.anonymousReadOnly // false
referral = conf.ldap.context.referral // null
}
ldapAuthenticationSource(SimpleAuthenticationSource) {
principal = conf.ldap.context.managerDn // 'cn=admin,dc=example,dc=com'
**credentials = conf.ldap.context.managerPassword // 'secret'**
}
You don't need to override the doWithSpring() method in the existing plugin. You can provide your own plugin which loads after the one you want to affect and have your doWithSpring() add whatever you want to the context. If you add beans with the same name as the ones added by the other plugin, yours will replace the ones provided by the other plugin as long as you configure your plugin to load after the other one. Similarly, you could do the same think in resources.groovy of the app if you don't want to write a plugin for this.
You have other options too. You could write a bean post processor or bean definition post processor that affects the beans created by the other plugin. Depending on the particulars, that might be a better idea.
EDIT:
After seeing your comment below I created a simple example that shows how you might use a definition post processor. See the project at https://github.com/jeffbrown/postprocessordemo.
The interesting bits:
https://github.com/jeffbrown/postprocessordemo/blob/master/src/main/groovy/demo/SomeBean.groovy
package demo
class SomeBean {
String someValue
}
https://github.com/jeffbrown/postprocessordemo/blob/master/src/main/groovy/demo/SomePostProcessor.groovy
package demo
import org.springframework.beans.BeansException
import org.springframework.beans.MutablePropertyValues
import org.springframework.beans.PropertyValue
import org.springframework.beans.factory.config.BeanDefinition
import org.springframework.beans.factory.config.ConfigurableListableBeanFactory
import org.springframework.beans.factory.support.BeanDefinitionRegistry
import org.springframework.beans.factory.support.BeanDefinitionRegistryPostProcessor
class SomePostProcessor implements BeanDefinitionRegistryPostProcessor{
#Override
void postProcessBeanDefinitionRegistry(BeanDefinitionRegistry registry) throws BeansException {
BeanDefinition definition = registry.getBeanDefinition('someBean')
MutablePropertyValues values = definition.getPropertyValues()
PropertyValue value = values.getPropertyValue('someValue')
def originalValue = value.getValue()
// this is where you could do your decrypting...
values.addPropertyValue('someValue', "MODIFIED: ${originalValue}".toString())
}
#Override
void postProcessBeanFactory(ConfigurableListableBeanFactory beanFactory) throws BeansException {
}
}
https://github.com/jeffbrown/postprocessordemo/blob/master/grails-app/conf/spring/resources.groovy
beans = {
someBean(demo.SomeBean) {
someValue = 'Some Value'
}
somePostProcessor demo.SomePostProcessor
}
https://github.com/jeffbrown/postprocessordemo/blob/master/grails-app/init/postprocessordemo/BootStrap.groovy
package postprocessordemo
import demo.SomeBean
class BootStrap {
SomeBean someBean
def init = { servletContext ->
log.info "The Value: ${someBean.someValue}"
}
def destroy = {
}
}
At application startup you will see log output that looks something like this...
2017-10-23 19:04:54.356 INFO --- [ main] postprocessordemo.BootStrap : The Value: MODIFIED: Some Value
The "MODIFIED" there is evidence that the bean definition post processor modified the property value in the bean. In my example I am simply prepending some text to the string. In your implementation you could decrypt a password or do whatever you want to do there.
I hope that helps.
After trying Jasypt plugin and BeanPostProcessor solutions unsuccessfully for my use case, I found below solution to work perfectly.
To describe again the problem statement here,
a) we had to keep the passwords in an encrypted format inside properties files
b) and given we were packaging as a war file so the properties must not be kept inside the war to allow automated deployment scripts update the encrypted passwords depending on the environment
Jasypt plugin was a perfect solution for the use case a), but it was not able to cover the b) scenario
Moreover, the Grails LDAP Security plugin was getting loaded quite early hence Bean Post processors were also not helping out here.
Solution:
Created a new class by implementing the interface SpringApplicationRunListener. Extended its methods and parsed the properties file using YamlPropertySourceLoader
Sample code:
YamlPropertySourceLoader loader = new YamlPropertySourceLoader();
PropertySource<?> applicationYamlPropertySource = loader.load(
"application.yml", new ClassPathResource("application.yml"),"default");
return applicationYamlPropertySource;
Once the properties were loaded inside the MapPropertySource object, parsed them for the encrypted values and applied the decryption logic.
This whole implementation was executed before any plugins were initialized during Grails bootup process solving the purpose.
Hope it will help others.
In the C# language, using StructureMap 2.5.4, targeting .NET Framework 3.5 libraries.
I've taken the step to support multiple Profiles in a structure map DI setup, using ServiceLocator model with Bootstrapper activation. First setup was loading default registry, using the scanner.
Now I like to determine runtime what Registry configuration I like to use. Scanning and loading multiple assemblies with registries.
Seems it's not working for the actual implementation (Getting the 202, default instance not found), but a stripped test version does work. The following setup.
Two assemblies containing Registries and implementations
Scanning them in running AppDomain, providing the shared Interface, and requesting Creation Of Instance, using the interfaces in constructor (which get dealt with thanx to the profile on Invokation)
Working code sample below (same structure for other setup, but with more complex stuff, that get's a 202):
What type of couses are possible for a 202, specifically naming the System.Uri type, not being handles by a default type?? (uri makes no sense)
// let structure map create instance of class tester, that provides the registered
// interfaces in the registries to the constructor of tester.
public class Tester<TPOCO>
{
private ITestMe<TPOCO> _tester;
public Tester(ITestMe<TPOCO> some)
{
_tester = some;
}
public string Exec()
{
return _tester.Execute();
}
}
public static class Main {
public void ExecuteDIFunction() {
ObjectFactory.GetInstance<Tester<string>>().Exec();
}
}
public class ImplementedTestMe<TSome> : ITestMe<TSome>
{
public string Execute()
{
return "Special Execution";
}
}
public class RegistryForSpecial : Registry
{
public RegistryForSpecial()
{
CreateProfile("Special",
gc =>
{
gc.For(typeof(ITestMe<>)).UseConcreteType(typeof(ImplementedTestMe<>));
});
}
}
Background articles on Profiles I used.
How to setup named instances using StructureMap profiles?
http://devlicio.us/blogs/derik_whittaker/archive/2009/01/07/setting-up-profiles-in-structuremap-2-5.aspx
http://structuremap.sourceforge.net/RegistryDSL.htm
EDIT:
It seemed the missing interface was actually the one being determined runtime. So here is the next challange (and solved):
I provided a default object whenever StructureMap needs to create the object. Like:
x.ForRequestedType<IConnectionContext>()
.TheDefault.Is.Object(new WebServiceConnection());
This way I got rid of the 202 error, because now a real instance could be used whever structure map needed the type.
Next was the override on runtime. That did not work out at first using the ObjectFactory.Configure method. Instead I used the ObjectFactory.Inject method to overide the default instance. Works like a charm.
ObjectFactory.Inject(typeof(IConnectionContext), context);
Loving the community effort.
Error code 202 means a default instance could not be built for the requested type. Your test code is apparently not equal to your real code that fails. If you are getting an error about Uri, you likely have a dependency that requires a Uri in its constructor. It may not be the class you are asking for - it may be one of that classes dependendencies - or one of the dependencies dependencies... somewhere down the line someone is asking StructureMap to resolve a Uri, which it cannot do, without some help from you.