Hi I want to create a Google form which i can collect student data,
And i want to make a way to allow my students to only enter one answer one time
in example I want to use this method in the question which asks for the admission number, admission number is a uniqe number which will not be repeated. So if a student enter an admission number that is already entered , I want them to see an error message with "The admission number has been already used"
Issue:
Avoid multiple form responses to be submitted with the same value for a specific form item.
Workflow:
In order to avoid certain responses to be submitted, you have to use some kind of data validation for the Admission number item, as shown in Set rules for your form.
This data validation should be updated every time a form response is submitted, since the newly submitted Admission number should be forbidden in future responses.
In order to update this validation every time the form is submitted, you could use an Apps Script onFormSubmit() trigger, which would then fire a function on every form submission. Let's call this function updateDataValidation.
The onFormSubmit trigger can be installed either manually, following these steps, or programmatically, via executing the function createTrigger from the code sample below once.
Every time updateDataValidation fires, it should do the following:
Find all the previous responses for your Admission number item. You could first retrieve all form responses via Form.getResponses() and then find the responses related to your item by checking its title (see Item.getTitle()).
Transform the array of admission numbers retrieved in previous step into a regex pattern that can be used for the data validation, which could be like this: ^{number1}$|^{number2}$|^{number3}$....
Use TextValidation in order to update the validation rules for your item.
Code sample:
function updateDataValidation(e) {
const itemTitle = "Admission number"; // Name of the form item. Change accordingly
const errorMessage = "The admission number has been already used.";
const form = e ? e.source : FormApp.getActiveForm();
const responses = form.getResponses();
const admissionNumbers = responses.map(response => {
return response.getItemResponses().find(itemResponse => {
return itemTitle === itemResponse.getItem().getTitle();
});
}).map(itemResponse => itemResponse.getResponse());
const numbersPattern = admissionNumbers.map(number => `^${number}\$`).join("|");
const item = form.getItems().find(item => item.getTitle() === itemTitle);
let validation = FormApp.createTextValidation()
.setHelpText(errorMessage)
.requireTextDoesNotMatchPattern(numbersPattern)
.build();
item.asTextItem().setValidation(validation);
}
function createTrigger() {
const form = FormApp.getActiveForm();
ScriptApp.newTrigger('updateDataValidation')
.forForm(form)
.onFormSubmit()
.create();
}
Notes:
In the code sample above, the item Admission number is assumed to be named Admission number. Change that from the code if that's not the case.
In the code sample above, the item Admission number is assumed to be a text item, like Short answer.
Related
I am attempting to programmatically retrieve a list of users (principalType = "User") and their associated appRoleId values for an enterprise app using itsresourceId value from Azure AD. There is a total of ten Users with a combined total of twenty appRoleId values associated with the app. However, when I run my query I receive data for just two users and a combined total of four appRoleId values.
Here's my C# code:
GraphServiceClient myGraphClient = GetGraphServiceClient([scopes]);
// Retrieve the [Id] value for the app. Note [Id] is a pseudonym for the [resourceId] required to retrieve users and app roles assigned.
var servPrinPage = await myGraphClient.ServicePrincipals.Request()
.Select("id,appRoles")
.Filter($"startswith(displayName, 'Display Name')")
.GetAsync()
.ConfigureAwait(false);
// Using the first [Id] value from the [ServicePrincipals] page, retrieve the list of users and their assigned roles for the app.
var appRoleAssignedTo = await myGraphClient.ServicePrincipals[servPrinPage[0].Id].AppRoleAssignedTo.Request().GetAsync().ConfigureAwait(false);
The query returns a ServicePrincipalAppRoleAssignedToCollectionPage (as expected) but the collection only contains four pages (one per User/appRoleId combination).
As an aside, the following query in Microsoft Graph Explorer produces an equivalent result:
https://graph.microsoft.com/v1.0/servicePrincipals/[resourceId]/appRoleAssignedTo
What am I missing here? I need to be able to retrieve the complete list of users and assigned app roles. Any assistance is greatly appreciated.
The issue I was confronting has to do with the pagination feature employed by Azure AD and MS Graph. In a nutshell, I was forced to submit two queries in order to retrieve all twenty records I was expecting.
If you have a larger set of records to be retrieved you may be faced with submitting a much larger number of successive queries. The successive queries are managed using a "skiptoken" passed as a request header each time your query is resubmitted.
Here is my revised code with notation....
// Step #1: Create a class in order to strongly type the <List> which will hold your results.
// Not absolutely necessary but always a good idea when working with <Lists> in C#.
private class AppRoleByUser
{
public string AzureDisplayName;
public string PrincipalDisplayName;
}
// Step #2: Submit a query to acquire the [id] for the Service Principal (i.e. your app).
// Note the [ServicePrincipals].[id] property is synonymous with the [resourceId] needed to
// retrieve [AppRoleAssignedTo] values from Microsoft Graph in the next step.
// Initialize the Microsoft Graph Client.
GraphServiceClient myGraphClient = GetGraphServiceClient("Directory.Read.All");
// Retrieve the Service Principals page containing the app [Id].
var servPrinPage = await myGraphClient.ServicePrincipals.Request().Select("id,appRoles").Filter($"startswith(displayName, 'Your App Name')").GetAsync().ConfigureAwait(false);
// Store the app [Id] in a local variable (for readability).
string resourceId = servPrinPage[0].Id;
// Step #3: Using the [Id]/[ResourceId] value from the previous step, retrieve a list of AppRoleId/DisplayName pairs for your app.
// Results of the successive queries are typed against the class created earlier and are appended to the <List>.
List<AppRoleByUser> appRoleByUser = new List<AppRoleByUser>();
// Note, unlike "Filter" or "Search" parameters, it is not possible to
// add a "Skiptoken" parameter directly to your query in C#.
// Instead, it is necessary to insert the "skiptoken" as request header using the Graph QueryOption class.
// Note the QueryOption List is passed as an empty object on the first pass of the while loop.
var queryOptions = new List<QueryOption>();
// Initialize the variable to hold the anticipated query result.
ServicePrincipalAppRoleAssignedToCollectionPage appRoleAssignedTo = new ServicePrincipalAppRoleAssignedToCollectionPage();
// Note the number of user/role combinations associated with an app is not always known.
// Consequently, you may be faced with the need to acquire multiple pages
// (and submit multiple consecutive queries) in order to obtain a complete
// listing of user/role combinations.
// The "while" loop construct will be utilized to manage query iteration.
// Execution of the "while" loop will be stopped when the "bRepeat" variable is set to false.
bool bRepeat = true;
while (bRepeat == true)
{
appRoleAssignedTo = (ServicePrincipalAppRoleAssignedToCollectionPage) await myGraphClient.ServicePrincipals[resourceId].AppRoleAssignedTo.Request(queryOptions).GetAsync().ConfigureAwait(false);
foreach (AppRoleAssignment myPage in appRoleAssignedTo)
{
// I was not able to find a definitive answer in any of the documents I
// found but it appears the final record in the recordset carries a
// [PrincipalType] = "Group" (all others carry a [PrincipalType] = "User").
if (myPage.PrincipalType != "Group")
{
// Insert "User" data into the List<AppRoleByUser> collection.
appRoleByUser.Add(new AppRoleByUser{ AzureDisplayName = myPage.PrincipalDisplayName, AzureUserRole = myPage.AppRoleId.ToString() });
}
else
{
// The "bRepeat" variable is initially set to true and is set to
// false when the "Group" record is detected thus signaling
// task completion and closing execution of the "while" loop.
bRepeat = false;
}
}
// Acquire the "nextLink" string from the response header.
// The "nextLink" string contains the "skiptoken" string required for the next
// iteration of the query.
string nextLinkValue = appRoleAssignedTo.AdditionalData["#odata.nextLink"].ToString();
// Parse the "skiptoken" value from the response header.
string skipToken = nextLinkValue.Substring(nextLinkValue.IndexOf("=") + 1);
// Include the "skiptoken" as a request header in the next iteration of the query.
queryOptions = new List<QueryOption>()
{
new QueryOption("$skiptoken", skipToken)
};
}
That's a long answer to what should have been a simple question. I am relatively new to Microsoft Graph but it appears to me Microsoft has a long way to go in making this API developer-friendly. All I needed was to know the combination of AppRoles and Users associated with a single, given Azure AD app. One query and one response should have been more than sufficient.
At any rate, I hope my toil might help save time for someone else going forward.
Could you please remove "Filter" from the code and retry the operation. Let us know if that worked.
I created a form to collect some data. By default the responder to the form gets a PDF summary after submitting the Email. Does anybody know if it is possible to send this summary to a second Email adress I mean a copy of the summary to the form Hoster?
Thanks a lot in advance.
Cheers
Basically repeating what I said in the comments there is no way to add another email address by the UI but you could try to use Apps Script.
You can use a onFormSubmit(), this is a installable trigger that executes every time a form is submitted.
You could try to look at this SO answer, where there is a definition of a trigger and sending a email:
/**
* This function is the one that will be executed every time the trigger is activated
*/
function respondToFormSubmit() {
MailApp.sendEmail ("email#domain.com", "Form Submited: Foo feedback " + Date.now(), "Form Submited: Foo feedback");
}
The setup of the trigger:
var form = FormApp.getActiveForm();
var trigger = ScriptApp.newTrigger('respondToFormSubmit')
.forForm(form)
.onFormSubmit()
.create();
This is a similar question to this link, but slightly different:
Skipping blank emails in Google Apps Script Mail Merge
I have a form/sheet set up that, when the users fills out the form, it generates a receipt email (does not contain the form contents as some receipts do) that is then sent to the recipient. However when the user leaves this field blank I get a form trigger error, which is understandable why the script didn't finish. I am trying to figure out how to keep the script from attempting to send an email when the recipient/email field is blank. Unfortunately, making the email field required on the form is not an option since, oddly, not everyone would have an email address (if this were an option I would certainly just require an email address to be entered).
I have tried the following code snippet based on the link provided above.
// Send Email to recipient(s) declared above in #var sendEmail
if (e.values[11] != null) {
var sendEmail = e.values[11]; //email field column
var subject = "subject message";
var body = "body message";
MailApp.sendEmail(sendEmail, subject, body, {
name: "Community Home Health Care",
body: body,
noReply: true,
})
I have also tried instead of
(e.values[11] != null)
using
(e.values[11] != "")
The remaining code I have omitted (goes above what I have shown) simply takes the form field responses and generates a document converted to a PDF which works as expected. The email section also works, just trying to eliminate the failed script emails I get occasionally.
Thanks
First is an assumption that 12 items are passed (0 through 11) and the email is the last item to be passed. If that is the case, then test that the item is defined with:
if(typeof e.values[11] !== 'undefined')
If you are using the Mail Merge Tutorial linked to in the post you linked to, and using the getRowsData() function to get your form responses, you should be able to use the Header of the column containing the email address such as e.values.emailAddress and get:
if(typeof e.values.emailAddress !== 'undefined')
This may vary based on how your data is defined.
I am currently using Omniture analytics for form tracking.
when i paste the following text on the button click event on the registration.cshtml page it fires only once which is right.
var s = s_gi(s_account);
s.linkTrackVars = 'prop1,prop8,eVar1,eVar8,events';
s.prop1 = 'Registration'; s.prop8 = 'Tier 3|Form Complete';
s.eVar1 = s.prop1;
s.eVar8 = s.prop8;
s.linkTrackEvents = 'event2,event8'; s.events = 'event2,event8';
(s.tl(this, 'o', 'Form Complete'));
but this is not the right way since the user can make some mistakes while filling up the form so technically the form is not complete.
I have added this in a javascript function which checks if the form is valid only then it should fire the omniture call. but in doing so it is getting fired twice.
If it's sending two image requests, then that means the function is being called twice, or you have two s.tl functions somewhere.
I would actually recommend sending the data to SiteCatalyst on the registration confirmation page; that way you know for a fact that the data made it to your servers. If there's form info you'd like to send as well, throw it in a query string and use the getQueryParam plugin to take the query string value and pass it as part of the image request.
I had used the symfony admin generator to create an web application for athletes management. One of the last client's requirement was to add a feature to notice the user and send an e-mail to the administrators when an athlete with the same number is inserted on the database. Until now, the column number of the Athlete table had a unique constraint but the client desires that the athlete can by inserted anyway.
To accomplish that, I was trying to extend the the edit / new actions in order to implement the client requirements.
Here is the code:
public function executeEdit(sfWebRequest $request)
{
$user = $this->getUser();
if(! $user->hasCredential('admin'))
{
$clube_id = $user->getAttribute('id');
$atleta_id = $request->getParameter('id');
$atleta = Doctrine::getTable('Atleta')->find($atleta_id);
if($clube_id != $atleta->clube_id)
$this->forward404();
}
if($request->get('post'))
{
// check if the inserted athlete BI already exists; if so, display a message to the user and send an email to the system admins
$atleta_id = $request->getParameter('id');
$atletaBIExiste = Doctrine::getTable('Atleta')->findDuplicateAthleteBI($atleta_id);
if($atletaBIExiste)
{
// display a notice message to the user
$this->getUser()->setFlash('error', 'Athlete already exists');
// send an email to the system administrator
}
}
return parent::executeEdit($request);
}
Here is my problem: when I execute the edit action, I only want to check for a duplicate athlete number when the HTTP is POST but it seems that never is. I had already sent some exceptions to the output to verify which type is HTTP Request and it seems it is always GET.
The problem you will be having is that when you hit save on the Edit page the information isn't posted to the edit action, it is posted to an action called update.
Have a look at the actions.class.php file in the cache and you will see it.