Is there a limit to the number of domains that can be be mapped to a specific Cloud Run service? [closed] - google-cloud-run

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 2 years ago.
Improve this question
The Resource limits for Cloud Run (https://cloud.google.com/run/quotas) lists a max number of SSL certificates (50) but not sure what "per top domain" or "per week" means in this context. Otherwise I have not seen this mentioned anywhere including the Cloud Run FAQ ;)

Domain mapping map your service with your domain. It could be at the top domain (example.com) or at a subdomain (my-service.example.com). In both case, Google Cloud need to generate a valid SSL certificate for the root domain. Let's encrypt is used for this and the certificates are renewed regularly (at least every 90 days).
Thus, you can add up to 50 different top domains per week on Cloud Run service. It's global to your project, it's not for one service.

Related

How do I block all IP addresses from connecting remotely to Cassandra? [closed]

Closed. This question is not about programming or software development. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 6 months ago.
Improve this question
I want access to remote cassandra with one ip address. how can I change cassandra.yaml to block all ip address except ip that I want to connect?
On current Cassandra versions there's no way to block inbound connections. You can (and you must) enable authentication, but it seems that you want to block before Auth phase.

New My Business Account Management API quotas and access [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 1 year ago.
Improve this question
I currently us the Google My Business API with no problems (july 2021).
But Google is migrated this API to several new API. The first one is My Business Account Management API.
In the cloud console, I have activated this API in the project. It's activated, but the request quotas is 0. So, it's unusable.
I found this question which seems to be the same problem, but it didn't work for the moment: Google My Business API return 429 code all time
I filled the form, but no reply.
2 questions:
do I need to do something else to have the access granted to the new API or just activate it in the console project is enough ?
Is the form the right way to ask to increase quotas ?
Thanks a lot for your reply.

How can I make sure my app doesn't get stolen by a developer [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 6 years ago.
Improve this question
I made an app and I don't have the knowledge to add a few things that I want. I found a developer online. How can I protect my app to make sure it doesn't get stolen?
If you give him your source code, no technical measures can stop him from stealing the source code. If he were local to you, you could require him to use a locked-down computer in your own office, but I don't think that is an option for you.
If your app has substantial non-code assets (graphics, sound, databases, etc.) you could give him only the minimal subset of assets necessary for testing.
If the app talks to a server you control, and you don't also give him the code/data to set up his own server, then him stealing your code may be less harmful.
Other than that, you need to consider legal enforcement, not technical enforcement.

Run multiple services inside one docker container [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 6 years ago.
Improve this question
I'm new to docker. I just installed it and I have a question about this , it could be duplicated but I can't found a solution by searching all the forums.
Why it's better to use juste one service (apache, PHP, Mysql...) inside one container?
Because the whole point of Docker is to encapsulate a service within a single image, that you then clone to make instances of. You can clone multiple instances and trivially scale out an application - but it's rare that you need to clone every element of the application like that. It's much more useful to be able to widen your web tier, or your database tier separately.
But the major reason is - a container is an instance of an image. If you update your application, you need to build a new image. It's considerably more useful to be able to rebuild and restart subcomponents of the application, for all the reasons it's a nuisance to have to update your server to 'update'.

TFS CAL User License - Separate Networks [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
So here's the grey area situation.
We have two separate networks which are meant to be kept separate for development purposes and would like to set up TFS servers on both of them. I already know that each server will require it's own license but what about the users?
I've read the whitepaper and still am unclear on the situation.
Do we have to purchase 2 sets of CALs per individual user (one per network) or, since they are going to be the same users on different networks, is it okay install/use the same instance of the CAL on two different networks?
So long as it's 2 networks but one company, then each user only needs one CAL. Also Server's do not require CAL's, they require Server Licenses which you receive 1 per MSDN sub.
So you need 2 Server Licenses, and 1 CAL per user.

Resources