This page: https://www.saxonica.com/html/documentation/samples/dotnetsamples.html refers to a samples/cs directory. Where can that be found or downloaded?
The samples/cs directory contains some sample applications written in
C#, designed to illustrate use of the Saxon API available in the
Saxon.Api namespace.
I downloaded the Saxonica open source from SourceForge (filename=saxon9-9-1-7source.zip) and don't see it in there. I think it contains the "trans-compiled" code from Java.
It's in the latest saxon-resourcesx-x.zip (example saxon-resources9-9.zip).
I finally figured this out by reading the readme99.txt that is also available on SourceForge.
https://sourceforge.net/projects/saxon/files/Saxon-HE/9.9/
After unzipping it, it also a local html copy of the documentation, for example: C:/Saxonica/Resources/doc/dotnetdoc/index.html
Related
I've been investigation Quartz.Net and reviewing this question on StackOverflow, as well as the code base here
I've downloaded the Nuget Packages Quartz by Marko Lahma, v2.3.3, and it does not contain this the QuartzServer class, yet it exists in GitHub. I'm looking for a complete example using the features of Quartz.Net, as they are defined here, as this page is blank!
See response on "Quartz.Server is not included into Nuget package" issue:
Traditionally the server binary has been only part of the zip package and not in NuGet. So need to address this somehow before final v3.
Probably easiest to build yourself for now. Many want to customize the server any beyond the base template.
I'm getting started with FunScript with a working example. Using Nuget to add the needed libraries, it works well.
In watching a 2013 video on channel9, they are making use of TypeScript.Api<...> to load types from typescript definition files.
I'm however unable to find this type provider anywhere.
Where is it located?
I realized that a good number of the type definitions have been compiled into libraries and available on nuget but I can't really use this since some of the code will be local typescript definition files.
The questions therefore are
Where is the TypeScript.Api<...> type provider?
If it is not available or the best way to use typescript definition, what other options exists.
As Thomas said, the type provider was removed mainly because it couldn't generate generic types, but the idea is to bring it back at some point.
For the moment, though not ideal, you can generate your own bindings following these steps.
Download or clone Funscript repository
git clone https://github.com/ZachBray/FunScript
Build the project
cd FunScript
build.cmd
This needs to be improved but for now you need to zip the .d.ts files you want to convert and then:
cd build\TypeScript
bin\FunScript.TypeScript.exe C:\Path\to\typedefinitions.zip
cd Output
Please note the first time you build the definitions it may take several minutes. Once it's done in the output folder you'll find the compiled .dll libraries with the bindings.
Also, while you're at it. It's better if you use the FunScript version you just build into build\main\bin, as it will probably be more updated than the nuget package.
Good luck and have fun(script)!
There were a bunch of changes in FunScript, so the TypeScript.Api<...> type provider is no longer the recommended way of calling JavaScript libraries from FunScript.
Instead, the bindings for JavaScript libraries are pre-generated and you can find them as packages on NuGet, if you search for the FunScript tag (NuGet search is not very good, so you may need to go through a number of pages to find the one you need...).
If you want to use a local TypeScript definition, then you'll need to run the command line tool to generate the bindings. The F# Atom plugin does this in the build script, so looking there is a good place to start. It has a local copy of various TypeScript bindings in the typings folder (together with the FunScript binaries needed to process them).
I liked the type provider approach much better, but sadly, type providers are somewhat restricted in what kind of types they can provide, so it wasn't all that powerful...
I am trying to find a easy example or introduction to a CSV Type provider. So I followed this link to help me get started. Now I have a Visual Studio 2012 students edition and while documentation says that F# 3.0 has the CSV type provider I am not able to find it. So I am trying to use a type provider for a local CSV File. What I see is that the CSV TypeProvider mentioned does not exist at all. Since the given examples don't really compile I looked around and used something like this to load the oData services :
#r "FSharp.Data.TypeProviders"
///loading a stackoverflow odata type provider
type stackOverflow = Microsoft.FSharp.Data.TypeProviders.ODataService<"http://data.stackexchange.com/stackoverflow/atom">
So this is a bit different from what is mentioned in the example page above. I am not able to see the csv type provider. I use the Visual Studio IDE to list the type providers and csv is not listed. I tried updating the packages using nuget and this still persists. Can anyone point the right documentation on how to work with a csv type provider and also the right updated links where a simple example could be found?
FSharp.Data isn't a built-in library, so you either need to use nuget or manually download the package. See here for more information on where to get it (and how to use it).
If you manually download the project you can put it wherever you want and then simply use a file path to reference it with #r. For a path relative to your project, use the __SOURCE_DIRECTORY__ symbol, otherwise you can simply use the absolute file path of the .dll.
After referencing the dll, you still need to open the namespace, so you need to have open FSharp.Data after you reference the dll.
Alright so this is what I did. I used Nuget to manage references and I installed the FSharp.Data and FSharp.Data.TypeProviders and like #mydogisbox mentioned I then use the open FSharp.Data to load the csv files i.e.
open FSharp.Data.Csv
While this works if I use Nuget, it doesn't work otherwise. So have to figure out how to do that. For now this should suffice I guess.
does anybody know how to figure out the assembly versions (not file versions) of loaded assemblies if I have a full memory dump?
Suppose I have a full dump of the .net process and I found two assemblies with the same name loaded in one AppDomain. I need to know what versions those assemblies have.
The SOS commands !dumpmodule, !dumpassembly and !dumpdomain do not provide that kind of information or I just missed something.
Thank you in advance.
You could try the !SaveModule SOS command. This takes the start address of an assembly and creates a new file (the name of which is given by you) to save the contents of the assembly. You could then use something like .NET Refletor to open the file, and it might give you the .NET version somewhere in there. This SO question has some details on that:
How to find out which version of the .NET Framework an executable needs to run?
As for the !SaveModule command, here's a blog article that describes how to use it:
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/tess/archive/2006/05/18/601002.aspx?PageIndex=2
Is there any way to convert odt documents to doc or rtf on linux without openoffice or any library that relies on having openoffice installed ?
OpenOffice.org and its derivatives (LibreOffice, Symphony, etc) currently have one of the best converters between ODF and the Microsoft formats (besides the ODF support built into MS Office).
If those converters are not an option for you, you can choose between some alternatives: Foremost you might want to check out the KOffice project which also offers command line tools for file conversion:
KOffice - File Filters
Then there is another open source project with a free BSD license available on SourceForge:
OpenXML/ODF Translator
This project offers not only add-ins for Microsoft Office, but also a stand-alone command line version which also runs on Linux.
Then there would also be a different approach: You can automate Google Docs using command line tools:
googlecl: Command line tools for the Google Data APIs
Google Docs file conversion have internally been based on the OpenOffice.org file filters, but as far as I know they have been replaced by Aspose, a library for document formats.
Aspose is available in several versions, and as you have a Linux dependency you might want to check out their Java version.
Aspose.Words for Java
The library has its price, but you won't find another library that is not a full office suite with that quality.
If you don't want to use OpenOffice, Google Docs is your best bet. Cross-platform, web-based, and free, it takes about 2 minutes. You would upload the file, and check convert, then redownload as a doc or pdf (depends on what you want).
http://docs.google.com/
You could try this freeware (Docx2Rtf) and run it under WINE.
Checkout unoconv. It relies on OpenOffice.org its core, but it doesn't rely on any GUI packages. I assume this is what you want?
Use http://zamzar.com/ It has great support for all those formats. And is not reliant on any other installed program.
And of course, being a web page, it will work on any OS.