does anybody know how to figure out the assembly versions (not file versions) of loaded assemblies if I have a full memory dump?
Suppose I have a full dump of the .net process and I found two assemblies with the same name loaded in one AppDomain. I need to know what versions those assemblies have.
The SOS commands !dumpmodule, !dumpassembly and !dumpdomain do not provide that kind of information or I just missed something.
Thank you in advance.
You could try the !SaveModule SOS command. This takes the start address of an assembly and creates a new file (the name of which is given by you) to save the contents of the assembly. You could then use something like .NET Refletor to open the file, and it might give you the .NET version somewhere in there. This SO question has some details on that:
How to find out which version of the .NET Framework an executable needs to run?
As for the !SaveModule command, here's a blog article that describes how to use it:
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/tess/archive/2006/05/18/601002.aspx?PageIndex=2
Related
I've just written the first version of a workflow activity that will run Resharper's Code Issues on the projects and parse the output to display the issues as build warnings and errors.
At first, I was going to just call Resharper's command line and parse the resulting xml manually. After fiddling with the dlls in Resharper's SDK (through disassembly mostly), I found a way to parse the results using it's own public classes, which I figured was a much more elegant and safe way to do this.
The first problem I have is that that nuget package is absolutely huge. There is 140mb of files in there, which to me is absurd for a single, unpartitioned package. There seems to be such heavy coupling between them that by using just a few model classes and the parser class, I have to drag a dozen or so of those dlls along, some of them which seemingly have nothing to do with the main dlls I need. This is not a show stopper though, I'm struggling with something else now:
In the end, I managed to track down the dependencies I needed to 41 assemblies (which is, again, insane, but alas). Initially, I tried removing everything and adding the missing references one by one, but this turned out to be unreliable, still missing some indirect references, even after compiling successfully. Then, I decided to code a small console application to find all referenced assemblies in the main Resharper assemblies I used, which gave me the 41 references I mentioned. This is the code I used to find every dependency.
Since these are custom activities we are talking about, I decided to create a unit test project to validate them. Using these 41 references only, everything works correctly.
When I added the activity to the build workflow though, and pointed the build controller to the source control folder containing the required assemblies, every time I schedule a build, the process fails stating that I need one extra dll from Resharper's SDK. For example, this is the first one it asks:
Could not load file or assembly 'AsyncBridge.Net35, PublicKeyToken=b3b1c0202c0d6a87' or one of its dependencies. The system cannot find the file specified. (type FileNotFoundException)
When I add this specific assembly to the TFS folder, I get another similar error for another dll, and this keeps going on and on.
What I wanted to know is how can I know exactly which assemblies a workflow XAML will need in order to run correctly? My custom activity dll has two specific CodeActivities and a XAML only activity that uses these two. This XAML acticity is what I'm directly using in the modified workflow template.
I see that besides the references in my project, the XAML activity also contains a TextExpression.ReferencesForImplementation section, with some assembly names. I've run my dependency finder program on those dependencies too, and the results are the same 41 assemblies already at the TFS folder.
Meanwhile I'll go with having the whole SDK into the custom assemblies folder, but I would really like to avoid this in the future since it has such an enormous amount of unneeded and big dlls in there.
First, we have request for our command line tool to support workflow activity and we decided to implement just plain MsBuild task which is universal and works in TFS too. Task and targets files are included in ReSharper CLT 8.2.
Second, if you still want to implement workflow activity it's pretty easy to do with new API in CLT, designed specially for custom processing of found issues - http://confluence.jetbrains.com/display/NETCOM/Custom+InspectCode+Issue+Logger.
And last, but not least, you do not need to put in VCS binaries of ReSharper SDK package.
Use NuGet's restore package functionality.
If you have any other questions I'll be glad to answer them.
A custom activity is being load and run by .NET CLR like any other .NET program. If the stack trace reports a missing file, then it's required by the CLR and you can't change this fact without refactoring your code.
Having an entire SDK references in the custom assembly folder doesn't make sense. I would prefer GAC deployment over huge binaries folder in the source control. Or maybe consider having these activities running an pre\post build scripts in MSBuild or PowerShell.
This is the error messsage I get.
I know it's kind of an eye roller, that it's difficult nigh impossible to tell what I may need without the source, but it seems like a deployment problem as people that installed the Qt SDK can run it. Plus, I figured I'd have better luck asking here than with a chinese developer that speaks google-english.
So here's what I've done:
I installed the MSVC2012.
I used a program called cffexplorer to see what the exe was looking for. I have the 7 or so .dlls that are at the top of the tree.
I found a recent (jun 2013) qwindows.dll from elsewhere on my system and put it in ./plugins (I've tried this file in ./, ./plugins, and ./plugins/platforms
I created a qt.conf with the following data (I determined the format from an existing Qt based app that works)
[Paths]
Plugins = plugins
Yet, I continue to get this message. Any suggestions on what I might look for to clear this up?
Ask the developer what compiler was used to build the application. Then you will need the right dll (that was built with the same compiler as the application). Also notice that (by default) the documentation says that qwindows.dll should be in the platforms folder in the same path as your executable, read more here. Depending on whether the developer used a Qt built with angle, you may also need: libEGL.dll and libGLESv2.dll. Dependency walker might help you find dependencies that are not there.
Sometimes in s/w companies, customers provide data in multiple formats. There are linkable and executable data that are said to be "Rehosted" and compiled object files that are said to be "Retargeted". I am trying to understand what rehosting and retargeting mean in this area. Is it similar to the Bootstrap theory in computer science? I have the understanding of the following process (if not incorrect):
PROBLEM:
I need to write a compiler for a new language called "MyLang" to run on PowerPC
Solution:
1. I need to write a compiler for a language "MyLang-Mini"; a subset of "MyLang" to run on PowerPC.
2. I need to write a compiler for "MyLang" using "MyLang-Mini" to run on PowerPC.
3. I run the compiler obtained from no. 1 through the compiler obtained from no. 2 to
obtain the compiler for MyLang to run on PowerPC.
IN BESPOKE "T" DIAGRAM (...ISH):
MyLang PowerPC MyLang PowerPC
MyLangMini MyLangMini PowerPC PowerPC(instr.)
PowerPC(instr.)
What I am getting confused about is rehosting and retargeting. How are they coonected to this concept? What am I rehosting and retargeting if I have some binary data such as .exe or .obj? I would appreciate some detailed explanation if possible please!
I know that this will embark onto "CROSS-COMPILERS", but would prefer expert opinions to be sure.
Thanks in advance.
I now know that in s/w engineering:
REHOSTING - If you have a third-party application linkable/executable that requires usage on your host machine, you do rehosting. The target in this case are most often the same (OS platform, processor, etc.). In worst case, there is a virtualisation required. The rehosted application will run as if it was one of the application running in the host machine
RETARGETTING - If you have a third-party source code, you might need to recompile that to match with your target environment. It may also be that you have third-party .o or .obj compiled models and you want to link them with your source code (retargeted) in order to host it on a host machine. Just like REHOSTED application, it will be as if the application was installed on the host machine.
It will be good to know how this is similar to the compiler rehosting and retargeting. Sorry, I am a newbee is this area and will appreciate even a slap on the wrist.
Where can I find a good reference that explains how to write and install a SxS policy redirecting from one native assembly version to another?
I've already succeeded in building and installing two versions of my native assembly using a wix installer. But I'm not sure how to proceed from here. Most of the information I've found is about managed assemblies and the GAC. Is the procedure I'm looking for identical to that of managed dlls?
Thanks for the help,
Dan
[I'm the current maintainer for Native SxS at Microsoft]
Hi Dan,
A Publisher Policy is a special type of assembly. It's installed in the same way as any other assembly, but with type="win32-policy" and name="policy.MAJMINVERSION.name"
You can read more about it here
or you could look at how the CRT's policy is authored. On my Vista machine, it's located under
%windir%\winsxs\manifests\x86_policy.8.0.microsoft.vc80.crt_....manifest
Since it seems you are authoring a new assembly, providing a publisher policy just yet may not be necessary, as it only comes into play when it comes time to service your assembly (by redirecting old version to new).
We need to get data out of an older accounting system. We have received a dll that gives us access to the data we need. It includes a type library that we have imported.
If we run our test application from the same directory as the accounting system, everything works fine. If we try to run our application from a different directory, we get the following error:
Dynamically Bound RTS
Runtime DLL 'OOPS', version 3.1, entry point oops
not recorded in registry, not found or incompatible with requirements
of dynamically bound COBOL program. Dynamic binding of RTS requires:
Runtime DLL 'OOLSM', at least Version 3.1
Can anybody provide some helpful information on this?
Are we supposed to have some kind of cobol runtime in our directory? Or in the path? Or registered in the registry?
Thanks,
-Vegar
Updates:
Setting the system %path% to include the path to the accounting system seems to do the trick. Including it as a user variable did not have the same effect for some reason.
What Cobol are you using?
I had done this for year with Microfocus NetExpress 3.1, and all works just fine.
I write COBOL DLL to access COBOL data files, and also write Delphi DLL to add new features to old COBOL systens.
And yes, I use to set the runtime path, that is environment variable called COBDIR, there are others,but usually %PATH% and %COBDIR%is enough.
If you give more detais about what COBOL compiler are you using, and how is the dll interface that you are calling, will me ore easy to help you.
And maybe "Dependence Walker" can help you to identify what run time files are missing, if it is.
http://www.dependencywalker.com/
If it works from the accounting app's directory, but not a different one, the first thing I'd try is adding that directory to your path.
Unless it is already loaded into memory, Windows looks for DLL's that a program is requesting in every location listed in its PATH environment variable, and also in the directory the application is located within.