I have just started learning Appium automation and I use online tutorials to learn the syntax of various classes.
I thought that this is an official site of appium but when i refer to syntax , it does not work.
http://appium.io/docs/en/commands/interactions/touch/tap/index.html
For example, for tap action with single click below syntax is given but i get an error when i actually use this code. It gives me an error for singleTap. This is just an example. I need source data to lean syntax and functions of each class.
WebElement element = driver.findElement(By.xpath("//*[#text='1. Photos']"));
TouchActions action = new TouchAction(driver);
action.singleTap(element);
action.perform();
The error message is as follows:
The method singleTap(WebElement) is undefined for the type TouchAction.
Related
So In general everything works for me, nevertheless I get an error in my console regarding Getx & Beamer types
Expected a value of type 'GetNavConfig', but got one of type
'RouteInformation'
I think that I know where the RouteInformation comes from:
List<BeamPage> buildPages(
BuildContext context, RouteInformationSerializable state) {
return [HomePage.beamLocation];
}
it is an argument of the buildPages() method, that has to be implimented due to the abstract Beamer class.
On the other hand I think that the
GetMaterialApp
expects a GetNavConfig, but gets a RouteInformation. Im not really sure whether the things that I interpreted are correct. So I have no idea how to do something against the error. How could I fix the problem?
Well, since you're trying to rely on the beamer package instead of the Getx routing management feature, then you do not need the GetMaterialApp, you need to just use the MaterialApp, and for the beamer you need to use the MaterialApp.router.
Getx is a package that offers separate features, you could get state management and dependency injection... working fine without GetMaterialApp.
However, this means that you will not be allowed to use navigation methods such as Get.to() and Get.toNamed(), you cannot use the Get.context, and you cannot use the Getx's bottom sheet and dialogs.
Looking at core code examples of say... Edit Action for SpecificationAttribute. I am looking to replicate this delete function in the same manner in my plugin, however, getting an error.
Getting this error
'IHtmlHelper' does not contain a definition for 'DeleteConfirmation' and no extension method 'DeleteConfirmation' accepting a first argument of type 'IHtmlHelper' could be found (are you missing a using directive or an assembly reference?)
I have used in 3.90 but it getting error in 4.0 asp.net core Has anyone used #Html.DeleteConfirmation in a plugin (on administration side) that could give me a clues
I have a span element in the html like the following;
<span id="myattribute-delete" class="k-button">#T("Admin.Common.Delete")</span>
And trying to use #Html.DeleteConfirmation("myattribute-delete")
I know I probably need to double check my route, by the error is leading me to think the issue is not a routing issue.
As #Stephen stated it's not part of MVC, and it's custom helper by nopCommerce.
#Html.DeleteConfirmation is helper till/in nopCommerce 3.90, but in 4.0 it has been changed to
<nop-delete-confirmation asp-model-id="#Model.Id" asp-button-id="myattribute-delete" />
And that helper located at Nop.Web.Framework.TagHelpers.Adminso you have to add reference of it to your view file.
Since Xamarin.iOS doesn't support code generation at runtime, why do Compile() and DynamicInvoke() work as expected?
For example, the following code works fine:
var lambda = Expression.Lambda(
Expression.Add(
Expression.Constant(1),
Expression.Constant(2)
)
);
var f = lambda.Compile();
var result = f.DynamicInvoke();
// result==3 at this point
Is Xamarin evaluating the expression tree at runtime instead of emitting IL code?
On platforms that support code generation, Reflection.Emit-based LambdaCompiler is used.
If that's not available, the expression is interpreted using the interpreter. For example, there are classes that interpret Constant and Add.
The details of the Xamarin limitations are here.
You don't seem to be using anything in the Reflection.Emit namespace, which is the big no-no. Your code must still be AOT'd. Otherwise, I would imagine it would not work.
But there HAVE been examples of [native] developers thwarting the iOS static analysis tool and circumventing the dynamic code restriction. I tried to locate the article, but couldn't find it.
Anyway, I don't think your scenario exemplifies that. Your code example will still be AOT-compiled.
But you raise a really good question: at what time does the expression get evaluated?
EDIT:
Another SO answer on the same topic: What does Expression.Compile do on Monotouch?
There's also some good info on Expression.Compile() and "full AOT" here:
http://www.mono-project.com/docs/advanced/aot/
EDIT:
After reading some more, I think I know what's going on here. It's not that Expression.Compile() won't work...it's that when your iOS app bundle is subjected to the iOS static analysis tool when you submit it to the app store, it will not pass the analysis, because it is dynamically generating code. So, sure, you can use Expression.Compile(), but don't expect it to be accepted into the app store. But as mentioned by #svick, if you use the "full AOT" compile option, your Expression.Compile() will probably fail at runtime, or perhaps even fail compilation.
This is my first time use syncfusion for asp mvc 5 razor
I want to create a chart, in my learning i found error in my first.
#(Html.EJ().Chart("container").Render())
that is my code in cshtml and this is my error :
Cannot implicitly convert type 'void' to 'object'
how to solve this?
This happens because of specifying the “.Render()”
This structure was followed in Syncfusion Essential studio version 12.1.0.36. But it was changed in the future release.
Please find the below code snippet for initializing a chart control.
[CSHTML]
#(Html.EJ().Chart("container"))
This standard is followed from Syncfusion Essential studio version 12.2.0.36 to current versions.
Thanks,
The parenthesis used in Html helper (#(Html.EJ) defines an explicit expression and the curly brackets(#{Html.EJ) defines a regular C# code block. The difference is that the explicit expression submits its output directly as a part of the HTML mark up and the code block doesn't.
And so if you want to use Render then use your code within the code block ({}).
#{ Html.EJ()
…
.Render()}
Following are the few F# styles of variable naming. I am able to refer first two variable in my F# editor (through intelisense) but not the third variable. This is my first program using F# and just started crawling.
let simple="simple"
let ``let``=10
let ``son's birthday`` ="12/12/2012"
I have reported this issue to Microsoft F# team and they responded with following note "Thanks for the bug report! I can reproduce the issue here, we will follow up on our side with a fix."