I have the following code:
let builder = FlurrySessionBuilder.init()
.withAppVersion(appVersion)
.withLogLevel(FlurryLogLevelAll)
.withCrashReporting(true)
.withSessionContinueSeconds(20)
I wanted to increase the number od seconds before the session times out because of the nature of the app I am writing. However, the session timeout is still after 10 seconds rather than the 20 I have specified in my code.
How can I fix this?
Related
I am facing some problem in background service.I have registered the backgrond service like:var service = Ti.App.iOS.registerBackgroundService({url:'/bgservice.js'});
in bgservice.js :I actually want to check the DB(where the data execution time is>8mins) and trigger local notification.But it is not working.So tried a sample first like this,to see how much time the app is active in background:
var timer = setInterval(startsampletest, 6000);
startsampletest();
function startsampletest(){
count=count+1;
Ti.API.info("1.!!!!!*******startsampletest is called for"+count);
}
which gives me only 5 times every 6 seconds so it is executing only for 30 min(please correct me if I am wrong)But in axway documentation it says the bgservice will be active for 10 mins.
Can anyone pls help me on this.I want the app to be active in background for 10 mins.pls let me know if I have made any mistakes.
It is not guaranteed that a background task created by Ti.App.iOS.registerBackgroundService() will run up to 10 minutes,
see: https://titaniumsdk.com/api/titanium/app/ios/backgroundservice.html#background-service-limitations
... typically to no more than 10 minutes.
But more crucial is that
The OS may terminate the background service at any point to reclaim resources.
For longer background tasks under iOS you have to use
the Ti.URLSession module (com.appcelerator.urlSession).
In general, see https://titaniumsdk.com/guide/Titanium_SDK/Titanium_SDK_How-tos/Platform_API_Deep_Dives/iOS_API_Deep_Dives/iOS_Background_Services.html
I use google speech-to-text API to get subtitles from audio, but when audio is too long, normally longer than 60 minutes, it will fail for too many retries.It says: google.api_core.exceptions.GoogleAPICallError: None Too many retries, giving up.
Can someone help me ??
I have tried many time, when audio file is shorter than about 60 minutes, it is OK.
client = speech.SpeechClient()
# Loads audio into memory.
audio = types.RecognitionAudio(uri=gcs_uri)
config = types.RecognitionConfig(
encoding=enums.RecognitionConfig.AudioEncoding.OGG_OPUS,
sample_rate_hertz=48000,
language_code='en-US',
enable_word_time_offsets=True,
enable_automatic_punctuation=True)
# Detects speech in the audio file
operation = client.long_running_recognize(config, audio)
print('Waiting for operation to complete...')
# Get the feedback from Google Cloud API
operation.add_done_callback(callback)
time.sleep(30)
#metadata = operation.metadata
# Every 30 seconds to get back one response
percentile(operation, 30)
response = operation.result(timeout=None)
This is an exception thrown by operation.result() call. The operation.result() call has an internal counter that overflows.
Try to poll operation.done() before calling to operation.result(). The operation.done() is a non-blocking call.
Hope that will be fixed in future releases of google.cloud.speech library.
In my app using iOS 9.2, Swift 2.1 I need to save some data into core data when the app goes to background. For this I registered each of the view controllers in the call path for UIApplicationDidEnterBackgroundNotification notification, with an instance method each for saving respective data.
I read on multiple places that by default the app gets about 5 seconds to finish off the execution and hence we need to use beginBackgroundTaskWithExpirationHandler to extend it to about 5 minutes. Following is an example of the selector method that responds to the above notification.
func applicationEntersBackground()
{
print("Before Extension: \(UIApplication.sharedApplication().backgroundTimeRemaining)")
let taskID = UIApplication.sharedApplication().beginBackgroundTaskWithExpirationHandler(nil)
print("During Extension: \(UIApplication.sharedApplication().backgroundTimeRemaining)")
saveCoreData()
if(taskID != UIBackgroundTaskInvalid)
{
UIApplication.sharedApplication().endBackgroundTask(taskID)
}
print("After Extension: \(UIApplication.sharedApplication().backgroundTimeRemaining)")
}
Following is the results of print() statements
Before Extension: 179.933103708318
During Extension: 179.930266333336
After Extension: 179.922843541659
My doubts are
Why is the remaining time about 180 seconds even before I requested for time extension? I tried multiple times. It is always close to 180 seconds and not the 5 seconds as suggested.
Why doesn't the call to beginBackgroundTaskWithExpirationHandler have any impact on the remaining time?
Once the applicationEntersBackground method of a VC returns, similar notification is sent to another VC's corresponding method. Suppose 180 seconds is the total extended duration and VC1 spends about 10 seconds on notification handling, does VC2 notification handler get around 170 seconds between its beginBackgroundTaskWithExpirationHandler - endBackgroundTask calls?
Between successive invocations of the notification handlers of different VCs, there is obviously a very short period where the extension request is not active. How does the timing play out in this case? Does the 5 second counter (provided it is true) come back to life as soon as an endBackgroundTask call is made, and possibly terminate the application before the next VC can get its notification?
Appreciate any help.
By looking at the documentation for backgroundTimeRemaining:
While the app is running in the foreground, the value in this property remains suitably large. If the app starts one or more long-running tasks using the beginBackgroundTaskWithExpirationHandler: method and then transitions to the background, the value of this property is adjusted to reflect the amount of time the app has left to run.
To answer your questions:
backgroundTimeRemaining stays around 180 while the application is in foreground so you can tell what time you'd have once you start a background task. This value is not an indicator of how long are you allowed to run without a background task.
beginBackgroundTaskWithExpirationHandler has an impact, as you can see, the remaining time decreased (by a small value as the method doesn't take much time)
What matters here is the time passed between the call to beginBackgroundTaskWithExpirationHandler and the one to endBackgroundTask. You can split whatever you need the time interval between your calls, providing you don't exceed the 180s limit
Once you call endBackgroundTask the application will be suspended, regardless it took 2 seconds or 179 seconds.
You can find out more details about application entering background here. I'd recommend going through the documentation, it might clarify other questions you might have on this matter.
To provide some context, the application I'm working on allows the user to record a series of events along a timeline. One important piece of feedback we received from beta testers was that when the user exits the app while recording they'd like the timer to keep up to date for a set amount of time.
For example if the user has recorded 5 minutes and then leaves the app to check an email for 20 seconds, the timer should be 5:20, but it was actually still 5 minutes.
So we've fixed that - the app now would now show 5:20, and this works in the background.
However we can't figure out a way to stop it after a certain amount of time. A user might want the timer to resume if the app is in the background for a short amount of time, but if you leave it in the background for 30 minutes, the timer will update, and I'd like to be able to give the users an optional cut-off time so that the app pauses after a set amount of time.
I've tried listening out for UIApplicationDelegate notifications, but the problem is I'm looking for a point between applicationDidEnterBackground: and applicationWillTerminate, but there's sadly nothing to cater for my needs there.
To summarise, I'd like to have a grace period of 30-60 seconds from applicationWillResignActive: to determine whether or not to pause the timer, or let it keep going.
Would this be possible?
Thanks in advance
It's generally a bad idea to assume your app will be running in the background.
A better way to think about it IMO would be to set a variable to the current time in applicationDidEnterBackground: and check the time interval to now in applicationWillBecomeActive: :
If the interval is bigger that your grace period, have the time backup to when the app was paused.
If it is smaller, update it as if the app was never in the background.
Use dispatch_after to execute a block of code after a certain number of second:
int64_t delay = 30.0; // In seconds
dispatch_time_t time = dispatch_time(DISPATCH_TIME_NOW, delay * NSEC_PER_SEC);
dispatch_after(time, dispatch_get_global_queue(DISPATCH_QUEUE_PRIORITY_BACKGROUND, 0ull), ^(void){
//DO SOMETHING
});
Swift 3.0 Xcode 8.0 Code sample:
Using delegate methods : applicationWillBecomeActive & applicationWillResignActive to capture the time in between.
OR
let deadlineTime = DispatchTime.now() + .seconds(30)
DispatchQueue.main.asyncAfter(deadline: deadlineTime) {
alert.dismiss(animated: true, completion: nil)
}
Hope this helps.
Suppose I use QTPs recovery scenario manager to set the playback synchronization timeout to 0. The handler would return with "continue with next statement".
I'd do that to make sure that any following playback statements don't waste their time waiting for the next non-existing/non-matching step before failing:
I have a lot of GUI tests that kind of get stuck because let's say if 10 controls are missing, their (consecutive) playback steps produce 10 timeout waits before failing. If the playback timeout is 30 seconds, I loose 10x30 seconds=5 minutes execution time while it really would be sufficient to wait for 30 seconds ONCE (because the app does not change anymore -- we waited a full timeout period already).
Now if I have 100 test cases (=action iterations), this possibly happens 100 times, wasting 500 minutes of my test exec time window.
That's why I come up with the idea of a recovery scenario function setting the timeout to 0 after/upon the first failed playback step. This would accelerate the speed while skipping the rightly-FAILED step, yet would not compromise the precision/reliability of identifying the next matching GUI context (which creates a PASSED step).
Then of course upon the next passed playback step, I would want to restore the original timeout value. How could I do that? This is my question.
One cannot define a recovery scenario function that is called for PASSED steps.
I am currently thinking about setting a method function for Reporter.ReportEvent, and "sniffing" for PASSED log entries there. I'd install that method function in the scenario recovery function which sets timeout to 0. Then, when the "sniffer" function senses a ReportEvent call with PASSED status during one of the following playback steps, I'd reset everything (i.e. restore the original timeout, and uninstall the method function). (I am 99% sure, however, that .Click and .Set methods do not call ReportEvent to write their result status...so this option might probably not work.)
Better ideas? This really bugs me.
It sounds to me like you tests aren't designed correctly, if you fail to find an object why do you continue?
One possible (non recovery scenario) solution would be to use RegisterUserFunc to override the methods you are using in order to do an obj.Exist(0) before running the required method.
Function MyClick(obj)
If obj.Exist(1) Then
obj.Click
Else
Reporter.ReportEvent micFail, "Click failed, no object", "Object does not exist"
End If
End Function
RegisterUserFunc "Link", "Click", "MyClick"
RegisterUserFunc "WebButton", "Click", "MyClick"
''# etc
If you have many controls of which some may be missing and you know that after 10 seconds you mentioned (when the first timeout occurs), nothing more will show up, then you can use the exists method with a timeout parameter.
Something like this:
timeout = 10
For Each control in controls
If control.exists(timeout) Then
do something with the control
Else
timeout = 0
End If
Next
Now only the first timeout will be 10 seconds. Each and every subsequent timeout in your collection of controls will have the timeout set to 0 which will save your time.