Since iOS 13, showsRouteButton from MPVolumeView has been deprecated
let vv = MPVolumeView()
vv.showsRouteButton = false
Warning is :
'showsRouteButton' was deprecated in iOS 13.0: Use AVRoutePickerView instead.
Apple is telling me to use AVRoutePickerView for routing, which makes no sense as in my case I do not want to use any routing stuff, I only want to hide it.
It seems there's no more not deprecated way to do this.
If it's deprecated it should be hidden by default else apple should allow us to hide it...
Am I right to say it's an apple API error ?
For now just to remove the warning and the default route button I used this immediately after initializing the MPVolumeView.
if volumeView.value(forKey: #keyPath(MPVolumeView.showsRouteButton)) as? Bool == true {
volumeView.setValue(false, forKey: #keyPath(MPVolumeView.showsRouteButton))
}
I check via key value paths if the value of showsRouteButton is true and sets it to false if it is.
Safe and forward compatible
In iOS 15.0 the route button of MPVolumeView shows the route button as a subview. The safest way to get rid of it without a deprecation warning is to look for the button and hide it:
volume.subviews.first(where: { $0 is UIButton })?.isHidden = true
Unlike just ignoring the warning or setting the value with key-value coding (as suggested by #spasbil), this will not crash the app in a future iOS release where Apple may have removed the deprecated showsRouteButton. However, it has the disadvantage of leaving an empty space right of the slider.
Setting the value through key-value coding does lead to a visually more satisfying solution, where the slider extends over the full width of the MPVolumeView. Using a #keypath expression as suggested by #spasbil shows the same warning in Xcode 13.0. Using a String literal rather than a #keypath expression, as suggested in a comment, avoids this warning. It does not resolve the danger of crashing on future iOS releases where showsRouteButton will have disappeared.
Apple never tells us when they will remove a deprecated property, but they rarely do it in a minor release. So we can hope that showsRouteButton will stay around at least for iOS 15.* releases. A forward compatible way to get rid of the route button is therefore:
if #available(iOS 16, *) {
volumeView.subviews.first(where: { $0 is UIButton })?.isHidden = true
} else {
volumeView.setValue(false, forKey: "showsRouteButton")
}
We might need to get back to this during the next major release beta season, presumably next summer. In the meantime, use this at your own risk. In the unlikely case that Apple removes the property in a later release of iOS 15.*, your app will crash. In the more likely case that showsRouteButton stays available but deprecated in iOS 16, your MPVolumeView will leave some unwanted space until you bump up the availability check.
This works for me, not sure if it robust:
import MediaPlayer
extension MPVolumeView {
/// Compiler warning 'showsRouteButton' was deprecated in iOS 13.0: Use AVRoutePickerView instead.
/// But the route button will show by default if we don't set it false.
/// We can set by key value to silent the warning. But also need prevent Apple remove the key in the future.
func hideRouterButtonIfNecessary() {
let bugKey = "showsRouteButton"
var count: UInt32 = 0
guard let properties = class_copyPropertyList(MPVolumeView.self, &count) else { return }
for i in 0..<Int(count) {
let property = properties[i]
let name = property_getName(property)
let str = String(cString: name)
if str == bugKey {
self.setValue(false, forKey: bugKey)
break
}
}
free(properties)
}
}
Related
I have a small iOS app that I wanted to compile for macOS with Catalyst.
The app is working properly on the Mac, but it's a calculator app, so I wanted to be able to enter the numbers with the keyboard in addition to clicking on the buttons.
I searched and found that the override of pressesBegan was the good way to do it. But if I implement Apple's example at https://developer.apple.com/documentation/uikit/mac_catalyst/handling_key_presses_made_on_a_physical_keyboard?changes=_8
like this
override func pressesBegan(_ presses: Set<UIPress>, with event: UIPressesEvent?) {
// Run backward or forward when the user presses a left or right arrow key.
var didHandleEvent = false
for press in presses {
guard let key = press.key else { continue }
if key.charactersIgnoringModifiers == UIKeyCommand.inputLeftArrow {
//runBackward()
didHandleEvent = true
}
if key.charactersIgnoringModifiers == UIKeyCommand.inputRightArrow {
//runForward()
didHandleEvent = true
}
}
if didHandleEvent == false {
// Didn't handle this key press, so pass the event to the next responder.
super.pressesBegan(presses, with: event)
}
}
in my Appdelegate class, I've got an error for the instruction key = press.key:
Value of type 'UIPress' has no member 'key'
Reading the documentation of the class UIPress, I don't see any key member in XCode documentation (UIKit>Touches, Presses and Gesture>UIPress), but I see it on
https://developer.apple.com/documentation/uikit/uipress
??
I didn't find any report of the message "Value of type 'UIPress' has no member 'key'" on Internet
I figured out my problem.
I had an old version of XCode (11.3.1) which didn't know UIPress.key.
After upgrading to XCode 11.4.1, all is OK.
I don't really understand the reason, because I can compile the code for iOS 12.4, before the availability of the property key (Apple's documentation claims iOS 13.4+). But it works now !
The following tests works fine on iOS 11. It dismisses the alert asking permissions to use the locations services and then zooms in in the map. On iOS 10 or 9, it does none of this and the test still succeeds
func testExample() {
let app = XCUIApplication()
var handled = false
var appeared = false
let token = addUIInterruptionMonitor(withDescription: "Location") { (alert) -> Bool in
appeared = true
let allow = alert.buttons["Allow"]
if allow.exists {
allow.tap()
handled = true
return true
}
return false
}
// Interruption won't happen without some kind of action.
app.tap()
removeUIInterruptionMonitor(token)
XCTAssertTrue(appeared && handled)
}
Does anyone have an idea why and/or a workaround?
Here's a project where you can reproduce the issue: https://github.com/TitouanVanBelle/Map
Update
Xcode 9.3 Beta's Changelogs show the following
XCTest UI interruption monitors now work correctly on devices and simulators running iOS 10. (33278282)
let springboard = XCUIApplication(bundleIdentifier: "com.apple.springboard")
let allowBtn = springboard.buttons["Allow"]
if allowBtn.waitForExistence(timeout: 10) {
allowBtn.tap()
}
Update .exists to .waitForExistence(timeout: 10), detail please check comments.
I had this problem and River2202's solution worked for me.
Note that this is not a fix to get the UIInterruptionMonitor to work, but a different way of dismissing the alert. You may as well remove the addUIInterruptionMonitor setup. You'll need to have the springboard.buttons["Allow"].exists test anywhere the permission alert could appear. If possible, force it to appear at an early stage of the testing so you don't need to worry about it again later.
Happily the springboard.buttons["Allow"].exists code still works in iOS 11, so you can have a single code path and not have to do one thing for iOS 10 and another for iOS 11.
Incidentally, I logged the base issue (that addUIInterruptionMonitor is not working pre-iOS 11) as a bug with Apple. It has been closed as a duplicate now, so I guess they acknowledge that it is a bug.
I used the #River2202 solution and it works better than the interruption one.
If you decide to use that, I strongly suggest that you use a waiter function. I created this one in order to wait on any kind of XCUIElement to appear:
Try it!
// function to wait for an ui element to appear on screen, with a default wait time of 20 seconds
// XCTWaiter was introduced after Xcode 8.3, which is handling better the timewait, it's not failing the test. It uses an enum which returns: 'Waiters can be used with or without a delegate to respond to events such as completion, timeout, or invalid expectation fulfilment.'
#discardableResult
func uiElementExists(for element: XCUIElement, timeout: TimeInterval = 20) -> Bool {
let expectation = XCTNSPredicateExpectation(predicate: NSPredicate(format: "exists == true"), object: element)
let result = XCTWaiter().wait(for: [expectation], timeout: timeout)
guard result == .completed else {
return false
}
return true
}
I have an iOS app that makes some small network requests on app launch (resource updates, etc). If the user turns off cellular access for the app in iOS Settings, they get a prompt from iOS about network usage every time they launch. Is there a way to know programmatically that cellular data for this app has been disabled, so that I can disable the requests at startup?
So I found this on the apple dev forums from an Apple engineer (https://devforums.apple.com/message/1059332#1059332).
Another developer wrote in to DTS and thus I had a chance to
investigate this in depth. Alas, the news is much as I expected:
there is no supported way to detect that your app is in this state.
Nor is there a way to make a "no user interaction" network connection,
that is, request that the connection fail rather than present UI like
this. If these limitations are causing problems for your app, I
encourage you to file a bug describing your specific requirements.
https://developer.apple.com/bug-reporting/
So it looks like it is not possible to detect if cellular data for your app has been turned off.
Edit
I filed a radar for this requesting that it be added. I just got this notification in my radar
We believe this issue has been addressed in the latest iOS 9 beta.
I looked through the API diffs, but so far I can't find the new API.
As of iOS9, the capability to check the setting to enable/disable use of cellular data for your app (Settings/Cellular/AppName) is available using Apple's CTCellularData class. The following code will set cellularDataRestrictedState when it is run initially and then set it and log whenever it changes:
import CoreTelephony
var cellularDataRestrictedState = CTCellularDataRestrictedState.restrictedStateUnknown
let cellState = CTCellularData.init()
cellState.cellularDataRestrictionDidUpdateNotifier = { (dataRestrictedState) in
if cellularDataRestrictedState != .restrictedStateUnknown { // State has changed - log to console
print("cellularDataRestrictedState: " + "\(dataRestrictedState == .restrictedStateUnknown ? "unknown" : dataRestrictedState == .restricted ? "restricted" : "not restricted")")
}
cellularDataRestrictedState = dataRestrictedState
}
Unfortunately (as of iOS11) this seems to check only the state of the app's switch - if your app's switch is set to enabled and the user switches the Cellular Data master switch to disabled, this API will return the app's state as being "not restricted".
Just wanted to add an Objective C version of the above Swift code for future travellers.
- (void)monitorCanUseCellularData {
if (GCIsiOS9) {
CTCellularData *cellularData = [[CTCellularData alloc] init];
NSLog(#"%ld", cellularData.restrictedState);
// 0, kCTCellularDataRestrictedStateUnknown
[cellularData setCellularDataRestrictionDidUpdateNotifier:^(CTCellularDataRestrictedState state) {
NSLog(#"%ld", state);
self.canUseCellularData = cellularData.restrictedState ==2?true:false;
}];
}
}
I have found that the CTCellularData class needs some time to get to the correct value. In my implementation I call the didUpdateNotifier very early after appDidFinishLaunching. By the time my networking call are returning with errors I definitely have a correct value for the restricted state.
class CellularRestriction: NSObject {
private static var cellularData = CTCellularData()
private static var currentState = CTCellularDataRestrictedState.restrictedStateUnknown
static var isRestricted: Bool {
currentState = cellularData.restrictedState
return currentState == .restricted
}
static func prepare() {
if currentState == .restrictedStateUnknown {
cellularData.cellularDataRestrictionDidUpdateNotifier = { state in
currentState = cellularData.restrictedState // This value may be inconsistent, however the next read of isRestricted should be correct.
}
}
}
}
You can detect if cellular data disabled using NWPathMonitor class. (https://developer.apple.com/documentation/network/nwpathmonitor)
let cellMonitor = NWPathMonitor(requiredInterfaceType: .cellular)
cellMonitor.pathUpdateHandler = { path in
self.isCellConnected = path.status == .satisfied
}
Adding to dirkgroten's answer, you can use the Apple Reachability class, found here:
https://developer.apple.com/Library/ios/samplecode/Reachability/Introduction/Intro.html
It uses SCNetworkReachability, and is very straight forward to use, it will detect connectivity via Cell and WiFi as you will need to check both at start up.
There are lots of frameworks out there that will give you the status of your network connectivity, and of course you can roll your own. I've found AFNetworking to be one of the best. It has a singleton class called AFNetworkReachabilityManager that abstracts some of the complexities for you. Specifically you'll want to look at the two boolean properties:
reachableViaWWAN
reachableViaWiFi
There is also a reachability changed status block that you can set:
– setReachabilityStatusChangeBlock:
AFNetworking Github
AFNetworkReachabilityManager
I would like to detect if the user has enabled Reduce Transparency. It's simple you just call the func UIAccessibilityIsReduceMotionEnabled() and it returns a Bool. But my app targets iOS 7 and 8 and this function isn't available on iOS 7.
In Objective-C, this is how I checked to see if that function exists:
if (UIAccessibilityIsReduceMotionEnabled != NULL) { }
In Swift, I can't figure out how to check if it exists or not. According to this answer, you can simply use optional chaining and if it's nil then it doesn't exist, but that is restricted to Obj-C protocols apparently. Xcode 6.1 doesn't like this:
let reduceMotionDetectionIsAvailable = UIAccessibilityIsReduceMotionEnabled?()
It wants you to remove the ?. And of course if you do so it will crash on iOS 7 because that function doesn't exist.
What is the proper way to check if these types of functions exist?
A proper check for availability has been added in Swift 2. This is recommended over other options mentioned here.
var shouldApplyMotionEffects = true
if #available(iOS 8.0, *) {
shouldApplyMotionEffects = !UIAccessibilityIsReduceMotionEnabled()
}
If you're okay with being a little bit cheeky, you can always open the UIKit binary using the library loader and see if it can resolve the symbol:
let uikitbundle = NSBundle(forClass: UIView.self)
let uikit = dlopen(uikitbundle.executablePath!, RTLD_LAZY)
let handle = dlsym(uikit, "UIAccessibilityIsReduceMotionEnabled")
if handle == nil {
println("Not available!")
} else {
println("Available!")
}
The dlopen and dlsym calls can be kinda expensive though so I would recommend keeping the dlopen handle open for the life of the application and storing somewhere the result of trying to dlsym. If you don't, make sure you dlclose it.
As far as I know this is AppStore safe, since UIAccessibilityIsReduceMotionEnabled is a public API.
You could check to see if you're running in iOS 8 or higher --
var reduceMotionEnabled = false
if NSProcessInfo().isOperatingSystemAtLeastVersion(NSOperatingSystemVersion(majorVersion: 8, minorVersion: 0, patchVersion: 0)) {
reduceMotionEnabled = UIAccessibilityIsReduceMotionEnabled()
}
I don't think there's another way to tell. So in theory, if you were able to check, trying to access the function name without the () would give you nil in iOS 7 and the () -> Bool function in iOS 8. However, in order for that to happen, UIAccessibilityIsReduceMotionEnabled would need to be defined as (() -> Bool)?, which it isn't. Testing it out yields a function instance in both versions of iOS that crashes if called in iOS 7:
let reduceMotionDetectionIsAvailable = UIAccessibilityIsReduceMotionEnabled
// reduceMotionDetectionIsAvailable is now a () -> Bool
reduceMotionDetectionIsAvailable()
// crashes in iOS7, fine in iOS8
The only way I can see to do it without testing the version is simply to define your own C function to check in your bridging header file, and call that:
// ObjC
static inline BOOL reduceMotionDetectionIsAvailable() {
return (UIAccessibilityIsReduceMotionEnabled != NULL);
}
// Swift
var reduceMotionEnabled = false
if reduceMotionDetectionIsAvailable() {
reduceMotionEnabled = UIAccessibilityIsReduceMotionEnabled()
}
From the Apple Developer docs (Using Swift with Cocoa and Objective-C (Swift 3) > Interoperability > Adopting Cocoa Design Patterns > API Availability):
Swift code can use the availability of APIs as a condition at
run-time. Availability checks can be used in place of a condition in a
control flow statement, such as an if, guard, or while
statement.
Taking the previous example, you can check availability in an if
statement to call requestWhenInUseAuthorization() only if the method
is available at runtime:
let locationManager = CLLocationManager()
if #available(iOS 8.0, macOS 10.10, *) {
locationManager.requestWhenInUseAuthorization()
}
Alternatively, you can check availability in a guard statement,
which exits out of scope unless the current target satisfies the
specified requirements. This approach simplifies the logic of handling
different platform capabilities.
let locationManager = CLLocationManager()
guard #available(iOS 8.0, macOS 10.10, *) else { return }
locationManager.requestWhenInUseAuthorization()
Each platform argument consists of one of platform names listed below,
followed by corresponding version number. The last argument is an
asterisk (*), which is used to handle potential future platforms.
Platform Names:
iOS
iOSApplicationExtension
macOS
macOSApplicationExtension
watchOS
watchOSApplicationExtension
tvOS
tvOSApplicationExtension
I was wondering if there is a method that would allow me to detect from the keyboard container app whether the associated keyboard has been activated in the the device's Settings app.
For example, I am interested in adding a simple "steps" feature inside the container app where step 1 would be "activate the keyboard", and step 2 would be contingent on step 1's completion. As such, I am interested in figuring out whether there is a way to detect whether the keyboard extension is activated?
Thanks!
Here is a method I have used in one of my projects. I think it is what you asked for, hope it helps you.
- (BOOL)isCustomKeyboardEnabled {
NSString *bundleID = #"com.company.app.customkeyboard"; // Replace this string with your custom keyboard's bundle ID
NSArray *keyboards = [[[NSUserDefaults standardUserDefaults] dictionaryRepresentation] objectForKey:#"AppleKeyboards"]; // Array of all active keyboards
for (NSString *keyboard in keyboards) {
if ([keyboard isEqualToString:bundleID])
return YES;
}
return NO;
}
Just in case here is Swift version of Kurt's brilliant and awesome answer:
func isKeyboardExtensionEnabled() -> Bool {
guard let appBundleIdentifier = Bundle.main.bundleIdentifier else {
fatalError("isKeyboardExtensionEnabled(): Cannot retrieve bundle identifier.")
}
guard let keyboards = UserDefaults.standard.dictionaryRepresentation()["AppleKeyboards"] as? [String] else {
// There is no key `AppleKeyboards` in NSUserDefaults. That happens sometimes.
return false
}
let keyboardExtensionBundleIdentifierPrefix = appBundleIdentifier + "."
for keyboard in keyboards {
if keyboard.hasPrefix(keyboardExtensionBundleIdentifierPrefix) {
return true
}
}
return false
}
The current documentation states By default, your extension and its containing app have no direct access to each other’s containers.
It is also stating that the container app can share data with the keyboard in the following fashion:
// Create and share access to an NSUserDefaults object.
NSUserDefaults *mySharedDefaults = [[NSUserDefaults alloc]
initWithSuiteName:#"com.example.domain.MyShareExtension"];
// Use the shared user defaults object to update the user's account.
[mySharedDefaults setObject:theAccountName forKey:#"lastAccountName"];
Read more on this: Communicating and persisting data between apps with App Groups
Obstacle no 1: According to the documentation, for this to work, the RequestsOpenAccess in the plist needs to be set to YES as it would gain the following capability:
Option to use a shared container with the keyboard’s containing app,
which enables features such as providing a custom lexicon management
UI in the containing app
Requesting full access for a simple case like this is definitely not preferred on my side.
Obstacle no 2: Using this knowledge of setting a NSUserDefault, leaves me to think of a method where this can be set in place. But there's no public method indicating an extension is installed. So this is a dead end for now.
--
[Update 1]
Not super relevant but still worth stating: the shouldAllowExtensionPointIdentifier app delegate method in combination with the constant UIApplicationKeyboardExtensionPointIdentifier can deal with disallowing custom keyboards. The extension point identifiers are not unique identifiers of the extension but of their type.
Read more on this: Can I disable custom keyboards (iOS8) for my app?
--
[Update 2]
Another question with same issue, but w/o solution: How to detect an app extension is enabled in containing app on iOS 8?
--
This is a work-in-progress answer stating my findings so far which I hope to be updating coming days should I find a solution.
You can use this function (Swift 3 and 4) to check your custom keyboard extension have open access or not:
func isOpenAccessGranted() -> Bool{
if #available(iOS 10.0, *) {
let originalString = UIPasteboard.general.string
UIPasteboard.general.string = "Sour LeangChhean"
if UIPasteboard.general.hasStrings {
UIPasteboard.general.string = originalString ?? ""
return true
}else{
UIPasteboard.general.string = ""
return false
}
} else {
// Fallback on earlier versions
if UIPasteboard.general.isKind(of: UIPasteboard.self) {
return true
}else{
return false
}
}
}