Trying to launch a Docker image but it will not launch the process
The command is as follows:
sudo docker run --security-opt seccomp=unconfined blackarchlinux/blackarch
no error message is returned.
I would do the following things
see if my container is running or it is created
$ docker ps or docker ps -a
see if my image is pulled ?
$ docker images
if container is created but not running then I could also check the logs
$ docker logs my-container-name
if you can add in more details, probably would be able to investigate more
You want to start a shell up inside the container and use the tools in there, I assume.
In that case you need to add the -it options and tell docker which program/shell you want to run. Something like
sudo docker run -it --security-opt seccomp=unconfined blackarchlinux/blackarch /bin/bash
I pulled a docker image from https://github.com/snowflakedb/SnowAlert.
But after pulling the Image, I don't see any containers running. I used
docker container ls command and it returned no containers.
Now due to some usecase I want to modify a file inside this docker image.
What is the correct way to do it?
Thanks
Here is what resolved my issue.
After pulling the repository from the github I ran below commands
sudo docker images
This will display the names of existing images. Now copy the Image name in which you need to do the modification.
sudo docker run -it <copied_image_name> bash
This will open a bash where all the files are residing. Do the modification where ever it is required then type exit
Copy the container Id from below command
sudo docker ps -a
Now we need to commit the changes into new Image using below command
sudo docker commit <container_id> <new_image_name>
Thats all
Now do sudo docker images this will display the newly created image with the modified content.
Thanks
Don't confuse image with container: https://phoenixnap.com/kb/docker-image-vs-container.
You need to "up" image to create appropriate container for it: https://docs.docker.com/get-started/part2/#run-your-image-as-a-container
If you want to inspect/edit any container use command (it like ssh to container's server):
docker exec -it CONTAINER_ID bash
To get all docker containers and find their IDs use command:
docker ps -a
I have created docker container for ubuntu:16.04 and spark.
my docker image name TestDocker
using spark application I have copied test.txt to container /opt/ml/ location.
when i am executing below command it is showing like below:
docker images
REPOSITORY TAG IMAGE ID CREATED SIZE
xx.com/decision-trees-sample latest af30271f1528 19 minutes ago 959MB
then i try to execute below command
docker exec -it decision-trees-sample ls /opt/ml
it is showing error.
now I want to check file is copied or not using docker command,is it possible to check?
how can I list(LS) files contain in /opt/ml/ ?
you can launch a shell inside the container with the
docker exec
command, see the doc
https://docs.docker.com/engine/reference/commandline/exec/
For example, if the id of your container is 123abcdef, you may do either
docker exec -it 123abcdef ls /opt/ml
or open a shell inside your container
docker exec -it 123abcdef bash
and then launch ls or find or any other command
Try below steps
docker exec -it decision-trees-sample
then set the environmental variable as
export TERM=xterm
then try with
docker exec -it 123abcdef ls /opt/ml
basically it tell your which kind of terminal you are trying to open.It mainly due to some package not installed regarding terminals, you can also add it to ~/.bashrc file and commit the image.
I agree with above answers and docker exec is only for running containers but If you really want to explore container image content I would recommend using container-diff
container-diff analyze --type=file <IMG> | grep /opt/ml
How can do something like:
docker exec -it 06a0076fb4c0 install-smt
But use the name of the container instead
docker exec -it container/container install-smt
I am running a build on CI server so I can not manually input the container ID.
How can I achieve this?
Yes, you can do this by naming the container with --name. Note that your command with container/container is likely referencing an image name and not the container.
➜ ~ docker run --name my_nginx -p 80:80 -d nginx
d122acc37d5bc2a5e03bdb836ca7b9c69670de79063db995bfd6f66b9addfcac
➜ ~ docker exec my_nginx hostname
d122acc37d5b
Although it won't save any typing, you can do something like this if you want to use the image name instead of giving the container a name:
docker run debian
docker exec -it `docker ps -q --filter ancestor=debian` bash
This will only work if you're only running one instance of the debian image.
It does help if you're constantly amending the image when working on a new Dockerfile, and wanting to repeatedly run the same command in each new container to check your changes worked as expected.
I was able to fix this by setting a container name in the docker-compose file, and rundocker exec -it with the name form the file.
#Héctor (tnx)
These steps worked for me:
This will start the container named mytapir and spawn a shell into the docker container:
docker run -d --name mytapir -it wsmoses/tapir-built:latest bash
Upon docker ps to ensure the docker container is running:
docker exec -it mytapir /bin/bash
Will spawned a shell into an existing container named mytapir.
And you can stop the container as usual docker stop mytapir.
And starting it via docker start mytapir, if it is not running.
(check via docker ps -a)
I tried to start a exited container like follows,
I listed down all available containers using docker ps -a. It listed the following:
I entered the following commands to start the container which is in the exited stage and enter into the terminal of that image.
docker start 79b3fa70b51d
docker exec -it 79b3fa70b51d /bin/sh
It is throwing the following error.
FATA[0000] Error response from daemon: Container 79b3fa70b51d is not running
But when I start the container using docker start 79b3fa70b51d. It throws the container ID as output which is normal if it have everything work normally.
What is the cause of this error?
By default, docker container will exit immediately if you do not have any task running on the container.
To keep the container running in the background, try to run it with --detach (or -d) argument.
For examples:
docker pull debian
docker run -t -d --name my_debian debian
e7672d54b0c2
docker ps -a
CONTAINER ID IMAGE COMMAND CREATED STATUS PORTS NAMES
e7672d54b0c2 debian "bash" 3 minutes ago Up 3 minutes my_debian
#now you can execute command on the container
docker exec -it my_debian bash
root#e7672d54b0c2:/#
Container 79b3fa70b51d seems to only do an echo.
That means it starts, echo and then exits immediately.
The next docker exec command wouldn't find it running in order to attach itself to that container and execute any command: it is too late. The container has already exited.
The docker exec command runs a new command in a running container.
The command started using docker exec will only run while the container's primary process (PID 1) is running
If it's not possible to start the main process again (for long enough), there is also the possibility to commit the container to a new image and run a new container from this image. While this is not the usual best practice workflow (the new image is not repeatable), I find it really useful to debug a failing script once in a while.
docker exec -it 6198ef53d943 bash
Error response from daemon: Container 6198ef53d9431a3f38e8b38d7869940f7fb803afac4a2d599812b8e42419c574 is not running
docker commit 6198ef53d943
sha256:ace7ca65e6e3fdb678d9cdfb33a7a165c510e65c3bc28fecb960ac993c37ef33
docker run -it ace7ca65e6e bash
root#72d38a8c787d:/#
This happens with images for which the script does not launch a service awaiting requests, therefore the container exits at the end of the script.
This is typically the case with most base OS images (centos, debian, etc.), or also with the node images.
Your best bet is to run the image in interactive mode. Example below with the node image:
docker run -it node /bin/bash
Output is
root#cacc7897a20c:/# echo $SHELL
/bin/bash
First of all, we have to start the docker container
ankit#ankit-HP-Notebook:~$ sudo docker start 3a19b39ea021
3a19b39ea021
After that, check the docker container:
ankit#ankit-HP-Notebook:~$ sudo docker ps -a
CONTAINER ID IMAGE COMMAND CREATED STATUS PORTS NAMES
3a19b39ea021 coreapps/ubuntu16.04:latest "bash" 13 hours ago
Up 9 seconds ubuntu1
455b66057060 hello-world "/hello" 4 weeks ago
Exited (0) 4 weeks ago vigorous_bardeen
Then execute by using the command below:
ankit#ankit-HP-Notebook:~$ sudo docker exec -it 3a19b39ea021 bash
root#3a19b39ea021:/#
Here is what worked for me.
Get the container ID and restart.
docker ps -a --no-trunc
ace7ca65e6e3fdb678d9cdfb33a7a165c510e65c3bc28fecb960ac993c37ef33
docker restart ace7ca65e6e3fdb678d9cdfb33a7a165c510e65c3bc28fecb960ac993c37ef33
docker run -it --entrypoint /bin/bash <imageid>
This was posted by L0j1k in the below post and worked for me.
How do I get into a Docker container's shell?
use command
> docker container ls
> docker image ls
Check your Image id and note it down. Here my Image id is "6c929ca002da" , you guys have to use your own Image id instead of mine..
> docker start 6c929ca002da
here our image is in down mode we have to start it first by using image id.
6c929ca002da is my image id
> `docker exec -it 6c929ca002da bash`
after running this command you can see
your image file in running mode like this
root#6c929ca002da
Here I am using root mode go root mode by using command
sudo su
The reason is just what the accepted answer said. I add some extra information, which may provide a further understanding about this issue.
The status of a container includes Created, Running, Stopped,
Exited, Dead and others as I know.
When we execute docker create, docker daemon will create a
container with its status of Created.
When docker start, docker daemon will start a existing container
which its status may be Created or Stopped.
When we execute docker run, docker daemon will finish it in two
steps: docker create and docker start.
When docker stop, obviously docker daemon will stop a container.
Thus container would be in Stopped status.
Coming the most important one, a container actually imagine itself
holding a long time process in it. When the process exits, the
container holding process would exit too. Thus the status of this
container would be Exited.
When does the process exit? In another word, what’s the process, how did we start it?
The answer is CMD in a dockerfile or command in the following expression, which is bash by default in some images, i.e. ubutu:18.04.
docker run ubuntu:18.04 [command]
docker run -it <image_id> /bin/bash
Run in interactive mode executing then bash shell
For anyone attempting something similar using a Dockerfile...
Running in detached mode won't help. The container will always exit (stop running) if the command is non-blocking, this is the case with bash.
In this case, a workaround would be:
1. Commit the resulting image:
(container_name = the name of the container you want to base the image off of,
image_name = the name of the image to be created
docker commit container_name image_name
2. Use docker run to create a new container using the new image, specifying the command you want to run. Here, I will run "bash":
docker run -it image_name bash
This would get you the interactive login you're looking for.
Here's a solution when the docker container exits normally and you can edit the Dockerfile.
Generally, when a docker container is run, an application is served by running a command. From the Dockerfile reference,
Both CMD and ENTRYPOINT instructions define what command gets executed when
running a container. ...
Dockerfile should specify at least one of CMD or ENTRYPOINT commands.
When you build a image and not specify any command with CMD or ENTRYPOINT, the base image's CMD or ENTRYPOINT command would be executed.
For example, the Official Ubuntu Dockerfile has CMD ["/bin/bash"] (https://hub.docker.com/_/ubuntu). Now, the bin/bash/ command can accept input and docker run -it IMAGE_ID command attaches STDIN to the container. The result is that you get an interactive terminal and the container keeps running.
When a command with CMD or ENTRYPOINT is specified in the Dockerfile, this command gets executed when running the container. Now, if this command can finish without requiring any input, it will finish and the container will exit. docker run -it IMAGE_ID will NOT provide the interactive terminal in this case. An example would be the docker image built from the Dockerfile below-
FROM ubuntu
ENTRYPOINT echo hello
If you need to go to the terminal of this image, you will need to keep the container running by modifying the entrypoint command.
FROM ubuntu
ENTRYPOINT echo hello && sleep infinity
After running the container normally with docker run IMAGE_ID, you can just go to another terminal and use docker exec -it CONTAINER_ID bash to get the container's terminal.
Perhaps too late for this active community, but there are a lot of causes because a container may not execute correctly and exit writing a console message or not. For all the newbies making nodeJS containers I'll recommend you to change the Dockerfile and erase all CMD and ENTRYPOINT you may have, and add only an ENTRYPOINT to ["/bin/sh"] (See my attached test Dockerfile example). Then rebuild the Docker image and run it with the command:
docker run -it --rm your_named_image:tag
Voilà you will be getting inside the container with a shell. Then you can test your app typing the command yourself i.e. node app.js and see what is happening. After you see all is ok, you can then change your docker file and erase the ENTRYPOINT to "/bin/sh" and use yourself i.e ["node","app.js"] or whatever. Always consider the previous answers to this post; When the app inside the container finish it will stop the running container.
Here is an example for my "test" Dockerfile:
FROM node:16.4.0-alpine
ENV NODE_ENV=production
WORKDIR /app
COPY ["package.json","package-lock.json*", "./"]
RUN npm install --production
COPY ./dist .
ENTRYPOINT ["/bin/sh"]
NOTE: My source files for the app (.js) on the local computer are on directory ./dist, so I have to copy at the container as you can see.
In my case , i changed certain file names and directory names of the parent directory of the Dockerfile . Due to which container not finding the required parameters to start it again.
After renaming it back to the original names, container started like butter.
I have a different take on this. I could do a docker ps and see that there is a docker container running, I even tried to restart it, but as soon as I tried to get a session for it with New-PSSession -ContainerId $containerId -RunAsAdministrator It would error out, saying:
##[error]New-PSSession : The input ContainerId xxx does not exist,
##[error]or the corresponding container is not running.
My problem was I was running with network service and it did not have enough permissions to see the container, even though I had given it permissions to run docker commands (with docker security group configuration)
I didn't know how to enable working with containers, so I had to revert to running it as an admin user instead
In my case, I had previously killed the running container with,
sudo docker kill testdeb
So when I exec the container I got the error,
Error response from daemon: Container fcc29295fe78a425155c533506f58fc5b30a50ee9eb85c21031e8699b3f6ff01 is not running
The solution was to start the container with,
sudo docker start testdeb
Now I have a container running ,
sudo docker ps
CONTAINER ID IMAGE COMMAND CREATED STATUS PORTS NAMES
fcc29295fe78 debian "bash" 9 hours ago Up 11 seconds testdeb
Which wasn't previously running
The below approach I tried works in an windows vscode environment.
docker run --name yourcontainer -p 3306:3306 -e MYSQL_ROOT_PASSWORD=your password -d mysql
I see lot of similar answers but adding port number '-p 3306:3306', made the status up and running. You can verify by using the command docker ps -a