I think I've done the hard part already: the Github webhook after a push always returns a success message.
I can build manually. But it never builds after the push, because "polling" never happens.
Both the GitHub Hook Log and Git Polling Log say "Polling has not yet run".
Here is my configuration:
Branches to build: refs/heads/checkJenkins
Build Triggers: GitHub hook trigger for GITScm polling, Poll SCM
Build: Execute shell: 'git pull'
Any ideas on how to get the polling started?
A side question: which should be doing the polling when I'm using the webhook in github: the "GITScm polling" or "Poll SCM"? Can I delete one of those settings?
Poll SCM is to scan the repository for changes at regular intervals as specified by the cron under Schedule. So this option is redundant.
Now coming to the hook, is it configured to deliver everything or just the push event? You can hit http://<jenkins_url>/log/all in your browser to see the system log while pushing changes. Towards the bottom of this log, see if Jenkins has received the hook and poked the job. If the hook is not received, reconfigure it at GitHub to send the appropriate events. Else, delete and recreate the job as sometimes Jenkins fails to register a new job to poke on receiving events and at other times a new job itself doesn’t respond to poking.
It's enough to keep only GitHub hook trigger for GITScm polling on, because this is the right option for conditional triggers (following git push as opposed to scheduled as a cron job, i.e. proper polling 1).
As for ideas on how to get the triggering (not polling) started, consult my "pre-flight checklist" here, because it's not a trivial matter.
Side note: feel free to report it to the Jenkins Github Plugin devs if you also think that the word "polling" is misplaced in this option (as per the definition of this term).
Related
Windows Server 2016, Jenkins 2.107.1. We have GitHub repositories, Git repositories not in GitHub, and CVS repositories. This link...Can I restrict poll SCM job to be run only once in a day?, tells me that I can set the polling to happen only once a day (which is all that we want, in that the coders can check in, up to a certain time). It does not tell me how to exit out (not to continue with the rest of the build steps), if there are no changes (and, send out a message that there are no changes and thus will be no build tonight). We are not using pipeline. Thanks.
the poll scm plugin in by default will not run the job if there are no SCM changes, also you will get GIT polling logs to see the detailed information
I try to configure Jenkins. I want a simple behavior: trigger a build on new pull request.
I cannot understand what I missed...
Jenkins version: 2.89.2
At https://ci.mysite.fr/configure :
Still no build triggered:
At https://ci.mysite.fr/job/test-back/configure :
On Github, Webhook is sent and well received by Jenkins:
Nginx Log says the same:
Help please!
Some things to check when debugging this sort of thing:
Check your Jenkins logs to see whether or not Jenkins is receiving the hook and deciding not to take action for some reason.
Check Jenkins security by clicking Manage Jenkins -> Configure Global Security. Open things up as much as you're comfortable doing and see if that changes anything.
Ensure that you're pushing changes to the master branch. For simplification, consider using ** as your branch specifier while you're getting this to work.
Ensure Git is properly configured on your Jenkins host by clicking Manage Jenkins -> Global Tool Configuration
Make sure the user whose credentials you provided can manage hooks and pull from the repo you're interested in.
Run the job manually in Jenkins, ensure that it works.
After you run the job, it should show up as an option in Protected Branches/Required Statuses. In your repo, click on Settings->Branches, select your branch in the Branches section, click Require Status Check to Pass before merging option, and your job should show up in the list which appears.
Webhooks are arguably the most difficult Jenkins feature to test without prior experience, because of gotchas like these (probably their list is incomplete):
New git commit / git push must be made for each pipeline build (repeating a previous one won't trigger a new build even if webhooks are already set up correctly - see below).
First build made after setting up webhook correctly must be manual (no bootstrap from the webhook itself is possible).
First build made after setting webhook correctly must succeed completely for the changes to take effect and for webhooks to start working. This will also cause Jenkins to miss all incoming requests made during the first build of a newly created pipeline.
More info
Please be warned that it is not possible to trigger a build using the same build conditions again (at least using a webhook). Therefore you might have a correct webhook setup already, but not find out that it works unless you create a new git commit and push it to the remote repo on Github. If your try to repeat some old push over and over again, by simply pressing the "Redeliver" button in the Recent deliveries section on Github's Webhooks / Manage webhook page, Jenkins will never move beyond the "poke" repo stage, as it requires SCM changes to be detected in order to trigger a new build:
Received PushEvent for https://github.com/mirekphd/<REPO_NAME> from <GITHUB_IP> ⇒ <JENKINS_URL>/github-webhook/
Apr 16, 2021 9:42:12 PM INFO org.jenkinsci.plugins.github.webhook.subscriber.DefaultPushGHEventSubscriber$1 run
Poked <REPO_NAME>
Apr 16, 2021 9:42:13 PM INFO com.cloudbees.jenkins.GitHubPushTrigger$1 run
SCM changes detected in <REPO_NAME>. Triggering #236
For further info on points 2) and 3): see original source.
I have development code repository at bitbucket and another test script code repository at bitbucket. Now I have setup a Jenkins job by linking test code repository. Is there any way to trigger jenkins job automatically on change in development repository ?
You can add the BitBucket Plugin to your Jenkins instance. It will allow you to configure a webhook in BitBucket that will then trigger any Jenkins job listening for that webhook. The plugin's page has a detailed breakdown, but the basics are;
In your repo in BitBucket, create a new Webhook using your Jenkins' url. I believe the url is generally http://[your jenkins url]/bitbucket-hook/
Make the trigger a repo push.
In your Jenkins job, check the box "Build when a change is pushed to BitBucket" under the Build Triggers section.
Now any time you commit to the repo you created the Webhook on, that Jenkins job will be run.
You can also limit what branches trigger commits by parameterizing your Jenkins build to ignore certain branches / keywords / etc if that's something you need for your specific project.
Builds by source changes
You can have Jenkins poll your Revision Control System for changes. You can specify how often Jenkins polls your revision control system using the same syntax as crontab on Unix/Linux. However, if your polling period is shorter than it takes to poll your revision control system, you may end up with multiple builds for each change. You should either adjust your polling period to be longer than the amount of time it takes to poll your revision control system, or use a post-commit trigger. You can examine the Polling Log for each build to see how long it took to poll your system.
Alternatively, instead of polling on a fixed interval, you can use a URL trigger (described above), but with /polling instead of /build at the end of the URL. This makes Jenkins poll the SCM for changes rather than building immediately. This prevents Jenkins from running a build with no relevant changes for commits affecting modules or branches that are unrelated to the job. When using /polling the job must be configured for polling, but the schedule can be empty.
I want to show user details of user who has triggered build on jenkns. I have integrated gitlab and jenkins and gitlab triggers the build on jenkins via web hook. We log in to gitlab through LDAP. Is there any way to show user details got from gitlab on Jenkins ???? Thanks in advance
At the moment, I don't believe this is possible. But it could be implemented.
In most cases where Jenkins jobs are triggered via Git webhook, the job itself is not triggered directly, but rather Jenkins is informed that for a given Git URI, there may have been changes.
Jenkins then polls Git for changes and, if something new was found, triggers a build of the jobs that use that repository. So at this point, various jobs just start, without receiving any special information about the webhook push that happened.
Also, a new build could have been triggered by multiple commits, from several different people, so it may not make sense to show a single person's name as being the one that triggered a build.
However, there are special implementations that understand the webhook payload format of different hosting services (e.g. GitHub, Bitbucket etc.).
Indeed, the GitLab Hook plugin looks like it does this: if you start a build via the /gitlab/build_now webhook endpoint, then on the build page, you'll see why the build started, e.g. "triggered by merge request feature -> develop" or "triggered by push on branch develop with 2 commits".
While it seems that part of the plugin does read an author's name from the payload (presumably for merge requests), this isn't currently shown on the build page.
So you could try implementing this or filing a feature request on the Jenkins plugin.
As a short term workaround, you can also look at the "Changes" page for each build. There you can see which commits were in that build, and the author names should be shown next to each one.
You may have to configure the "repository browser" under the Git section in the job configuration for this to work.
We have a job in a jenkins environment which is triggered based on the changes found in the git source code repository.
When the job is running, the git polling log shows nothing and until the job finishes the execution, polling log doesn't have anything on it.
It always shows log after completing the job and another note is that, enable concurrent builds option is not set to make sure only one build runs at a time.
I would like to understand whether it is a known behavior on jenkins front to halt polling when the job is running and whether the concurrent builds option is enabled or not?
I had a similar problem and discovered this: https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-7423
It looks like it's related to the polls requiring a workspace in order to perform the checkout. You can manually kick off new builds and they will pick up SCM changes.