I'm creating a roblox game for the first time, but I got an error in my LUA code to the point where it says: unexpected number '0.1' near '.'
ScreenGui.Parent = game.Players.1.LocalPlayer:WaitForChild("PlayerGui")
I'm trying to make a GUI, but in my players folder I have a subfolder called 1, The 1 doesn't get recognized in the PATH, so my question is, how do I make it, so that the 1 gets recognized as an actual PATH/function instead of just a random integer inside the PATH/function?
You cannot use a number in combination with the index operator ..
Correct Lua syntax would be ScreenGui.Parent = game.Players[1].LocalPlayer:WaitForChild("PlayerGui")
I don't know how this is related to player folders and subfolders in Roblox. If using numbers for folder names causes problems, use other names.
Related
The following is my sample code: https://play.openpolicyagent.org/p/oyY1GOsYaf
Here when I try to evaluate names array, it is showing:
error occurred: 1:1: rego_unsafe_var_error: var names is unsafe
But when I define the same comprehension outside the allow rule definition : https://play.openpolicyagent.org/p/Xv0cF7FM8b, I am able to evaluate the selection
[
"smoke",
"dev"]
could someone help me to point out the difference and if I want to define the comprehention inside the rule is there any syntax I need to follow? Thanks in advance
Note: I am getting the final output as expected in both cases, only issue is with the names array evaluation.
The way the Rego Playground generates a query when evaluating a selection is much more simplistic than one might assume. A query will be generated from your selected text, without taking into account where in the document that text was selected. This means that even if you select a local variable inside a rule body, the query will simply contain that variable name (names, in your case); which will be perceived as a reference to a top-level variable in the document's body, even though a rule-local variable was selected. This is why your first sample returns an error, as there is no top-level variable names in the document; whereas the second sample does, and therefore succeeds.
You can test this quirk by selecting and evaluating the word hello on line 3 here: https://play.openpolicyagent.org/p/n5OPoFnlhx.
package play
# hello
hello {
m := input.message
m == "world"
}
Even though it's just part of a comment, it'll evaluate just as if you had selected the rule name on line 5.
I am trying to use the pipe character "|" in SPSS syntax with strange results:
In the syntax it appears like this:
But when I copy this line from the syntax window to here, this is what I get:
SELECT IF(SEX = 1 SEX = 2).
The pipe just disappears!
If I run this line, this is the output:
SELECT IF(SEX = 1 SEX = 2).
Error # 4007 in column 20. Text: SEX
The expression is incomplete. Check for missing operands, invalid operators,
unmatched parentheses or excessive string length.
Execution of this command stops.
So the pipe is invisible to the program too!
When I save this syntax and reopen it, the pipe is gone...
The only way I found to get SPSS to work with the pipe is when I edited the syntax (adding the pipe) and saved it in an alternative editor (notepad++ in this case). Now, without opening the syntax, I ran it from another syntax using insert command, and it worked.
EDIT: some background info:
I have spss version 23 (+service pack 3) 64 bit.
The same things happens if I use my locale (encoding: windows-1255) or Unicode (Encoding: UTF-8). Suspecting my Hebrew keyboard I tried copying syntax from the web with same results.
Can anyone shed any light on this subject?
Turns out (according to SPSS support) that's a version specific (ver. 21) bug and was fixed in later versions.
Was following this guide: http://blog.jgc.org/2012/03/ambient-bus-arrival-monitor-from-hacked.html
Im currently stuck on this bit "The program has three parameters: a comma separated list of bus routes, a bus stop number and a 'walking time'. For example, it's possible to do:
lua ambibus.lua 3,12 50906 2"
The bus that runs near my house is the "G1" and whenever i try to add it in PuTTy is says '=' expected near 'G1'
If i copy and paste the code in the instructions i get "lua: cannot open ambibus.lua: No such file or directory"
Help please
I am following instructions from this link on how to append Stata files via a foreach loop. I think that it's pretty straightforward.
However, when I try to refer to each f in datafiles in my foreach loop, I receive the error:
invalid `
I've set my working directory and the data is in a subfolder called csvfiles. I am trying to call each file f in the csvfiles subfolder using my local macro datafiles and then append each file to an aggregate Stata dataset called data.dta.
I've included the code from my do file below:
clear
local datafiles: dir "csvfiles" files "*.csv"
foreach f of local datafiles {
preserve
insheet using “csvfiles\`f'”, clear
** add syntax here to run on each file**
save temp, replace
restore
append using temp
}
rm temp
save data.dta, replace
The backslash character has meaning to Stata: it will prevent the interpretation of any following character that has a special meaning to Stata, in particular the left single quote character
`
will not be interpreted as indicating a reference to a macro.
But all is not lost: Stata will allow you to use the forward slash character in path names on any operating system, and on Windows will take care of doing what must be done to appease Windows. Replacing your insheet command with
insheet using “csvfiles/`f'”, clear
should solve your problem.
Note that the instructions you linked to do exactly that; some of the code includes backslashes in path names, but where a macro is included, forward slashes are used instead.
I've got a file with syntactically correct Lua 5.1 source code.
I've got a position (line and character offset) inside that file.
I need to get an offset in bytes to the closing parenthesis of the innermost function() body that contains that position (or figure out that the position belongs to the main chunk of the file).
I.e.:
local function foo()
^ result
print("bar")
^ input
end
local foo = function()
^ result
print("bar")
^ input
end
local foo = function()
return function()
^ result
print("bar")
^ input
end
end
...And so on.
How do I do that robustly?
EDIT: My original answer did not take into account the "innermost" requirement. I've since taken that into account
To make things "robust," there are a few considerations.
First of all, it's important that you skip over string and comment contents, to avoid incorrect output in situations like:
foo = function()
print(" function() ")
-- function()
print("bar")
^ input
end
This can be somewhat difficult, considering Lua's nested string and comment syntax. Consider, for example, a situation where the input begins in a nested string or comment:
foo = function()
print([[
bar = function()
print("baz")
^ input
end
]])
end
Consequently, if you want a completely robust system, it is not acceptable to only parse backwards until you hit the end of a function parameter list, because you may not have parsed backwards far enough to reach a [[ which would invalidate your match. It is therefore necessary to parse the entire file up to your position (unless you're okay with incorrect matches in these weird situations. If this is an editor plugin, these "incorrect" results may actually be desirable, because they would allow you to edit lua code which is stored in string literal form inside other lua code using the same plugin).
Because the particular syntax that you're trying to match doesn't have any kind of "nesting", a full-blown parser isn't needed. You will need to maintain a stack, however, to keep track of scope. With that in mind, all you need to do is step through the source file character-by-character from the beginning, applying the following logic:
Every time a " or ' is encountered, ignore the characters up to the closing " or '. Be careful to handle escapes like \" and \\
Every time a -- is encountered, ignore the characters up to the closing newline for the comment. Be careful to only do this if the comment is not a multiline comment.
Every time a multiline string opening symbol is encountered (such as [[, [=[, etc), or a multiline comment symbol is encountered (such as --[[ or --[=[, etc) ignore the characters up until the closing square brackets with the proper number of matching equals signs between them.
When a word boundary is encountered check to see if the characters after it could begin a block which ends with an end (for example, if, while, for, function, etc. DO NOT include repeat). If so, push the position on the scope stack. A "word boundary" in this case is any character which could not be used a lua identifier (this is to prevent matches in cases like abcfunction()). The beginning of the file is also considered a word boundary.
If a word boundary is encountered and it is followed by end, pop the top element of the stack. If the stack has no elements, complain about a syntax error.
When you finally step forward and reach your "input" position, pop elements from the stack until you find a function scope. Step forward from that position to the next ), ignoring )'s in comments (which could theoretically be found in an argument list if it spans multiple lines or contains inline --[[ ]] comments). That position is your result.
This should handle every case, including situations where the function syntactic sugar is used, like
function foo()
print("bar")
end
which you did not include in your example but which I imagine you still want to match.