I'm running a container by sending to docker daemon so it can run a sibling container and in that container I try to run another container and mount a volume to access some data, however in the sibling container, the volume is either empty or the file is converted to a folder...
Running the first container:
$ docker run -v /var/run/docker.sock:/var/run/docker.sock -it example /bin/bash
root#3aa35965846a:/home/node/example# ls some_volume/
test.txt
root#3aa35965846a:/home/node/example# cat some_volume/test.txt
hello
// Running the second container
root#3aa35965846a:/home/node/example# docker run -v /home/node/example/some_volume/:/some_volume/ -it node:10 /bin/bash
root#6a84739fbb92:/# ls /some_volume/
* test.txt
root#6a84739fbb92:/# cat /some_volume/test.txt/
cat: /some_volume/test.txt/: Is a directory
The first time I run the second container the volume is empty, if I try to mount a file directly it is converted to a folder, and after that if I try to mount the folder like the example above, there is only the file I tried to mount earlier and it is a folder.
How is this possible ? If i try to mount a volume outside the first container I don't have any problem, how can I fix this ?
The first path in the docker run -v option is always on the host system. For example, if you
docker run -v /etc:/x busybox cat /x/shadow
it will dump out the host's encrypted password file, regardless of whether you ran this command directly from the host or from a container.
There isn't a way to share an arbitrary directory from one container to another. If the launching container knows something about its own directory structure (in particular that some directory was mounted from a specific host path or named volume) then it can replicate that to the other container, but that's not a generic answer. The other behaviors you're seeing are just a consequence of those directories not existing on the host system.
In general I would advise not using Docker for short-lived processes that principally interact with the outside world through the filesystem. Take whatever program you'd run in the other container, install it in your image's Dockerfile, and run it directly without going through Docker.
If you really can't avoid this workflow, the only thing I've found to work reliably is to docker create the container, docker cp files in, docker start it, and docker wait for it to finish. When it's done, docker cp the result out before docker rm it. That's a kind of painstaking workflow but it gets around the problem of the two containers not sharing any filesystem space.
Related
I was looking for an explanation on the VOLUME entry when writing a Dockerfile and came across this statement
A volume is a persistent data stored in /var/lib/docker/volumes/...
You can either declare it in a Dockerfile, which means each time a container is started from the image, the volume is created (empty), even if you don't have any -v option.
You can declare it on runtime docker run -v [host-dir:]container-dir.
combining the two (VOLUME + docker run -v) means that you can mount the content of a host folder into your volume persisted by the container in /var/lib/docker/volumes/...
docker volume create creates a volume without having to define a Dockerfile and build an image and run a container. It is used to quickly allow other containers to mount said volume.
But I'm having a hard time understanding this line:
...combining the two (VOLUME + docker run -v) means that you can mount the content of a host folder into your volume persisted by the container in /var/lib/docker/volumes/...
For example, let's say I have a config file on my host machine and I run the container based off the image I made with the Dockerfile I wrote. Will it copy the config file into where the volume that I stated in my the volume entry?
Would it be something like (pseudocode)
#dockerfile
From Ubuntu
Run apt-get update
Run apt-get install mysql
Volume . /etc/mysql/conf.d
Cmd systemcl start MySQL
And when I run it
docker run -it -v /path/to/config/file: ubuntu_based_image
Is this what they mean?
You probably don't want VOLUME in your Dockerfile. It's not necessary to mount files or directories at runtime, and it has confusing side effects like making subsequent RUN commands silently lose state.
If an image does have a VOLUME, and you don't mount anything else there when you start the container, Docker will create an anonymous volume and mount it for you. This can result in space leaks if you don't clean these volumes up.
You can use a docker run -v option on any container directory regardless of whether or not it's declared as a VOLUME.
If you docker run -v /host/path:/container/path, the two directories are actually the same; nothing is copied, and writes to one are (supposed to be) immediately visible on the other.
docker run -v /host/path:/container/path bind mounts aren't visible in /var/lib/docker at all.
You shouldn't usually be looking at content in /var/lib/docker (and can't if you're not on a native-Linux host). If you need to access the volume file content directly, use a bind mount rather than a named or anonymous volume.
Bind mounts like you've shown are appropriate for injecting config files into containers, and for reading log files back out. Named volumes are appropriate for stateful applications' storage, like the data for a MySQL database. Neither type of volume is appropriate for code or libraries; build these directly into Docker images instead.
I was trying to run a simple docker container with bind mount, so the application can read and modify data.json file (from host machine). I placed data.json in /home/usr/project and ran the container with
docker container run -it -v /home/usr/project:/app container_name main.exe
project contains 3 files, rest of the 2 files were included in container build. When I try to run the container, it gives the error about the other 2 files being not found. Placing those files in /home/usr/project on local host solves the issue. Since, I want the container to only look for data.json, is there any way I can do it without keeping other 2 files unnecessarily in the bind mount directory
You can map individual files in docker
docker run -it -v /home/usr/project/data.json:/app/data.json alpine cat /app/data.json
And you can even make them readonly inside the container to avoid unwanted modifications
docker run -it -v /home/usr/project/data.json:/app/data.json:ro alpine cat /app/data.json
I am new to docker volumes, and my use case is the next:
I have two different containers running in the same host, and both need to read/write files from it. Is of my understanding that I should use docker volumes, but before I try that, I want to make sure that i can delete files of the host filesystem, from inside the containers (e.g. using a golang app)
Maybe, you should use docker volumes. It can share the directory between the host and containers. For example, you want to read/write the file in /mnt, you can mount the /mnt to container.
docker run -it -v /mnt:/mnt ubuntu:latest touch /mnt/hello.log
now, /mnt/hello.log was created. And you can edit the file /mnt/hello.log in you host filesystem.
Then,
docker run -it -v /mnt:/mnt ubuntu:latest rm /mnt/hello.log
After the command above, the file /mnt/hello.log will be deleted from inside the container.
Actually, you can delete the file in golang, like this:
os.Remove("/mnt/hello.log")
I'm learning docker and reading their chapter "Manage data in containers". In the "Mount a host directory as a data volume". They mentioned the following paragraph:
In addition to creating a volume using the -v flag you can also mount a directory from your Docker engine’s host into a container.
$ docker run -d -P --name web -v /src/webapp:/opt/webapp training/webapp python app.py
This command mounts the host directory, /src/webapp, into the container at /opt/webapp. If the path /opt/webapp already exists inside the container’s image, the /src/webapp mount overlays but does not remove the pre-existing content. Once the mount is removed, the content is accessible again. This is consistent with the expected behavior of the mount command.
Experiment 1
Then when I tried to run this command and try to inspect the container, I found that that actually container doesn't even run. Then I use docker logs web and find this error:
can't open file 'app.py': [Errno 2] No such file or directory
I assume that the /src/webapp mount overlays on the /opt/webapp, which there is no content.
Question 1
How can I remove this mount and check if the content is still there as the quote said?
Experiment 2
When I tried to run
$ docker run -d -P --name web2 -v newvolume:/opt/webapp training/webapp python app.py
I found that the container ran correctly. Then I use docker exec -it web2 /bin/bash and find that all of the existing content are still inside the /opt/webapp. I can also add more files inside here. So in this case, it looks like that the volume is not overlay but combined. If I use docker inspect web and check Mounts, then I'll see that the volume is created under /var/lib/docker/volumes/newvolume/_data
Question 2
If I give a name instead of a host-dir absolute path, then the volume will not overlay the container-dir /opt/webapp but connect the two dir together?
An alternative solution is to commit the container (or export it) using docker cli and re-create it without doing the mapping.
Question 1 How can I remove this mount and check if the content is still there as the quote said?
You would create a new container without the volume mount. E.g.
$ docker run -d -P --name web training/webapp python app.py
(Theoretically it's possible to perform some privileged operations to remove the mount on a running container, but inside the container you will not normally have this permission, and it's a good practice to get into the habit of treating containers as ephemeral.)
Question 2 If I give a name instead of a host-dir absolute path, then the volume will not overlay the container-dir /opt/webapp but connect the two dir together?
Almost. What's happening with named volumes is that docker provides an initialization step when the volume is empty and the container is created with that volume mount. The initialization step copies the contents of the image at that directory into the volume, including all files and directories recursively, ownership, and permissions. This is very useful to running containers as a non-root user with a volume directory that the user inside the container needs to be able to write into. After that initialization has happened, future containers with the same named volume will skip the initialization, even if the image content has changed, e.g. if you add new content into the image.
Assume that i have an application with this simple Dockerfile:
//...
RUN configure.sh --logmyfiles /var/lib/myapp
ENTRYPOINT ["starter.sh"]
CMD ["run"]
EXPOSE 8080
VOLUME ["/var/lib/myapp"]
And I run a container from that:
sudo docker run -d --name myapp -p 8080:8080 myapp:latest
So it works properly and stores some logs in /var/lib/myapp of docker container.
My question
I need these log files to automatically saved in host too, So how can i mount the /var/lib/myapp from the container to the /var/lib/myapp in host server (without removing current container) ?
Edit
I also see Docker - Mount Directory From Container to Host, but it doesn't solve my problem i need a way to backup my files from docker to host.
First, a little information about Docker volumes. Volume mounts occur only at container creation time. That means you cannot change volume mounts after you've started the container. Also, volume mounts are one-way only: From the host to the container, and not vice-versa. When you specify a host directory mounted as a volume in your container (for example something like: docker run -d --name="foo" -v "/path/on/host:/path/on/container" ubuntu), it is a "regular ole" linux mount --bind, which means that the host directory will temporarily "override" the container directory. Nothing is actually deleted or overwritten on the destination directory, but because of the nature of containers, that effectively means it will be overridden for the lifetime of the container.
So, you're left with two options (maybe three). You could mount a host directory into your container and then copy those files in your startup script (or if you bring cron into your container, you could use a cron to periodically copy those files to that host directory volume mount).
You could also use docker cp to move files from your container to your host. Now that is kinda hacky and definitely not something you should use in your infrastructure automation. But it does work very well for that exact purpose. One-off or debugging is a great situation for that.
You could also possibly set up a network transfer, but that's pretty involved for what you're doing. However, if you want to do this regularly for your log files (or whatever), you could look into using something like rsyslog to move those files off your container.
So how can i mount the /var/lib/myapp from the container to the /var/lib/myapp in host server
That is the opposite: you can mount an host folder to your container on docker run.
(without removing current container)
I don't think so.
Right now, you can check docker inspect <containername> and see if you see your log in the /var/lib/docker/volumes/... associated to the volume from your container.
Or you can redirect the result of docker logs <containername> to an host file.
For more example, see this gist.
The alternative would be to mount a host directory as the log folder and then access the log files directly on the host.
me#host~$ docker run -d -p 80:80 -v <sites-enabled-dir>:/etc/nginx/sites-enabled -v <certs-dir>:/etc/nginx/certs -v <log-dir>:/var/log/nginx dockerfile/nginx
me#host~$ ls <log-dir>
(again, that apply to a container that you start, not an existing running one)