UrlSet has a ShortnedUrl and ShortenedUrl can be part of a UrlSet
Not able to come up with a search query that finds me the expected recipe.
public class ShortenedUrl
{
public string Raw { get; set; }
public string Short { get; set; }
public UrlSet Set { get; set; }
}
public class UrlSet
{
public string Name { get; set; }
public string Description { get; set; }
public ShortenedUrl Short { get; set; }
public string Key { get; set; }
}
at Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Design.OperationExecutor.OperationBase.Execute(Action action)
The child/dependent side could not be determined for the one-to-one relationship between 'ShortenedUrl.Set' and 'UrlSet.Short'. To identify the child/dependent side of the relationship, configure the foreign key property. If these navigations should not be part of the same relationship configure them without specifying the inverse. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=724062 for more details.
I would still be very curious on how to do it the way i originally "brain farted" but in my case what I was doing was wrong, but I don't think that will always be the case...
Correct implementation:
public class ShortenedUrl
{
public Guid Id { get; set; }
public string Raw { get; set; }
public string Short { get; set; }
}
public class UrlSet
{
public Guid Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public string Description { get; set; }
public ShortenedUrl Short { get; set; }
public string Key { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<ShortenedUrl> Urls { get; set; }
}
Related
public class BClass
{
public class RClass
{
public string stjCd { get; set; }
public string lgnm { get; set; }
public string stj { get; set; }
public string dty { get; set; }
public List<object> adadr { get; set; }
public string cxdt { get; set; }
public string gstin { get; set; }
public List<string> nba { get; set; }
public string lstupdt { get; set; }
public string rgdt { get; set; }
public string ctb { get; set; }
public Pradr pradr { get; set; }
public string tradeNam { get; set; }
public string sts { get; set; }
public string ctjCd { get; set; }
public string ctj { get; set; }
}
public class AClass
{
public string id { get; set; }
public string consent { get; set; }
public string consent_text { get; set; }
public int env { get; set; }
public string response_code { get; set; }
public string response_msg { get; set; }
public int transaction_status { get; set; }
public string request_timestamp { get; set; }
public string response_timestamp { get; set; }
public RClass result { get; set; }
}
}
//COntroller
BClass.AClass btr = new BClass.AClass();
var lst = JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<BClass.AClass>(strresult);
btr.response_code = lst.response_code;
btr.response_msg = lst.response_msg;
btr.result.lgnm = lst.result.lgnm;
The property btr.result.lgnm = lst.result.lgnm; Gives null value error object reference not set to instance of an object. but the lst variable has a value in the response received.Please provide suggesion
You can solve this by adding one line into your code.
btr.result = new BClass.RClass(); //This one. You need to initialize instance before assigning anything to it.
btr.result.lgnm = lst.result.lgnm;
or else, you can also create default constructor for class A.
public AClass()
{
result = new RClass();
}
I would suggest you to please have a look at below web resources for naming conventions widely used for c# language.
Properties naming conventions: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/standard/design-guidelines/names-of-type-members
class naming conventions: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/standard/design-guidelines/names-of-classes-structs-and-interfaces
Assigning this way does not give null reference exception
RClass rclass=new RClass();
rclass.lgnm=lst.result.lgnm
I am using ValueInjecter to map domain classes to my view models. My domain classes are complex. To borrow an example from this question:
public class Person
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string FirstName { get; set; }
public string LastName { get; set; }
public Address Address { get; set; }
}
public class Address
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string City { get; set; }
public string State { get; set; }
public string Zip { get; set; }
}
// VIEW MODEL
public class PersonViewModel
{
public string FirstName { get; set; }
public string LastName { get; set; }
public int PersonId { get; set; }
public int AddressId { get; set; }
public string City { get; set; }
public string State { get; set; }
public string Zip { get; set; }
}
I have looked at FlatLoopInjection, but it expects the view model classes to be prefixed with nested domain model type like so:
public class PersonViewModel
{
public string FirstName { get; set; }
public string LastName { get; set; }
public int Id { get; set; }
public int AddressId { get; set; }
public string AddressCity { get; set; }
public string AddressState { get; set; }
public string AddressZip { get; set; }
}
The OP in the linked question altered his view models to match the convention expected by FlatLoopInjection. I don't want to do that.
How can I map my domain model to the original unprefixed view model? I suspect that I need to override FlatLoopInjection to remove the prefix, but I am not sure where to do this. I have looked at the source for FlatLoopInjection but I am unsure if I need to alter the Match method or the SetValue method.
you don't need flattening, add the map first:
Mapper.AddMap<Person, PersonViewModel>(src =>
{
var res = new PersonViewModel();
res.InjectFrom(src); // maps properties with same name and type
res.InjectFrom(src.Address);
return res;
});
and after that you can call:
var vm = Mapper.Map<PersonViewModel>(person);
I have asked question in a different post, but seems that was not the right question, so going to reword here:
I have three classes:
public class StateLog : BaseModel
{
public Guid StateLogId { get; set; }
public Guid LookupMasterId { get; set; }
public Guid EntityId { get; set; }
public string Discriminator { get; set; }
public bool IsActive { get; set; }
public virtual LookupMaster State { get; set; }
}
Second class:
public class ApplicationState : StateLog
{
[Column("EntityId")]
public Guid ApplicationId { get; set; }
}
There is another Class DocumentStates which inherits from StateLog.
Application:
public class Application : BaseModel
{
public Guid ApplicationId { get; set; }
public Guid UserId { get; set; }
public virtual User User { get; set; }
[Required]
public Guid ApplicationTypeId { get; set; }
public bool? AuthorizedToWork { get; set; } = false;
public string Token { get; set; }
public string ApplicationTitle { get; set; }
public string WorkStartDate { get; set; }
public Nullable<DateTime> SignedAt { get; set; } = DateTime.Now;
public bool? Signed { get; set; }
public string Notes { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<ApplicationSelfDeclaration> ApplicationSelfDeclarations { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<ApplicationState> ApplicationStates { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<StateLog> StateLogs { get; set; }
}
I am trying to save statelogs for both application and documents in same table and based on Discriminator, fetch data.
E.g.
_context.Applications.include(a => a.ApplicationState)
This is not not working. ApplicationState should Alias EntityId column as ApplicationId. But it is not working.
Any idea what my options are at this point?
Thanks in advance.
I have 2 classes:
public class Retete
{
public Retete() { }
public int ID { get; set; }
public string Nume { get; set; }
public string Categorie { get; set; }
public string Grupa { get; set; }
public string Descriere { get; set; }
public string Ingrediente { get; set; }
public string Preparare { get; set; }
//Configure 1 to many relationship
//Foreign Key
[ForeignKey("GrupaIndivizi")]
public int GrupaID { get; set; }
[ForeignKey("GrupaID")]
public virtual GrupaIndivizi GrupaIndivizi { get; set; }
}
and
public class GrupaIndivizi
{
public GrupaIndivizi(){}
[Key]
public int GrupaID { get; set; }
public string NumeGrupa { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<Retete> Retetes { get; set; }
}
and the table that are created
My question is how to make GrupaID from Retetes table to be a foreign Key?
One way to make a foreign key in entity framework is: beside the Id of the key you need to have an object of that type. Check if this works.
[Table("Retete")]
public class Retete
{
public Retete() { }
public int ID { get; set; }
public string Nume { get; set; }
public string Categorie { get; set; }
public string Grupa { get; set; }
public string Descriere { get; set; }
public string Ingrediente { get; set; }
public string Preparare { get; set; }
//Configure 1 to many relationship
//Foreign Key
[ForeignKey("GrupaIndivizis")]
public int GrupaIndiviziID { get; set; }
public GrupaIndivizi GrupaIndivizi { get; set; }
}
I would also recommed to get the tables some more suitable names and don't let EF generate the names. This can be done by the Table attribute.
Your FK didn't generate corectly because he was trying to bind to a GrupaIndivizi table but you have GrupaIndivizis.
ASP .NET MVC4
Class #1:
public class F61BPROD
{
public int WPDOCO { get; set; }
public string WPDCTO { get; set; }
public string WPMCU { get; set; }
public string WPLOCN { get; set; }
public string WPDCT { get; set; }
public int WPTRDJ { get; set; }
public string WPKYPR { get; set; }
public string WPLITM { get; set; }
public decimal WPTRQT { get; set; }
public string WPKYFN { get; set; }
public string WPLOTN { get; set; }
public string WPLRP1 { get; set; }
public string WPLRP2 { get; set; }
public string WPLRP3 { get; set; }
public string WPLRP4 { get; set; }
public string WPLRP5 { get; set; }
public string WPLRP6 { get; set; }
public string WPLRP7 { get; set; }
public string WPLRP8 { get; set; }
public string WPLRP9 { get; set; }
public string WPLRP0 { get; set; }
public string WPFLAG { get; set; }
public string WPLOT1 { get; set; }
public string WPLOT2 { get; set; }
}
For one of the properties of Class #1 i need to fetch one of Class #2:
public class JDEItemBasic
{
public int itm { get; set; }
public string litm { get; set; }
public string dsc { get; set; }
public string dsce { get; set; }
public string ean14 { get; set; }
public string cc { get; set; }
public string uom1 { get; set; }
public string uom2 { get; set; }
public int uom1ea { get; set; }
public int bxuom1 { get; set; }
public int uom1gr { get; set; }
}
There is a DAL that gets the above classes. I need to combine these classes a new class that will have most of the properties of the above classes.
Should i create a third class and do the job in BLL?
or should i do it in UI using LINQ to Entities after i fetch them?
Should i create a third class and do the job in BLL?
or should i do it in UI using LINQ to Entities after i fetch them?
That would depend on where you need this class. If it is for displaying purposes then it should live in the UI. This class even has a name in this case: it's called a view model and is what your controller action could pass to the view after querying your DAL layer and projecting the various results to this view model.