I'm able to get synonyms working in my custom analyzer, but it only appears to behave correctly if the phrase entered matches the input "key". I'd like to be able to match any synonym in a list of 2+ with any other synonym in that same list.
var map = new SynonymMap.Builder(true);
var synonyms = string.Join("\0", new string[] { "broken", "break", "malfunction" });
map.Add(new CharsRef("broke"), new CharsRef(synonyms), true);
stream = new SynonymFilter(stream, map.Build(), true);
Am I supposed to add a map for each synonym?
var synonyms2 = string.Join("\0", new string[] { "broke", "break", "malfunction" });
map.Add(new CharsRef("broken"), new CharsRef(synonyms2), true);
var synonyms3 = string.Join("\0", new string[] { "broken", "break", "broke" });
map.Add(new CharsRef("malfunction"), new CharsRef(synonyms3), true);
I can clean it up so it loops through a list and adds a map for each one, I just wanted to keep the issue clear.
If I have a database that manages synonyms for hundreds or thousands of words... is it expected to simply add tens of thousands of maps for every possible combination?
Related
I'm currently working on a JavaFX project.I'm using Autcomplete TextField of ControlFx .Each time i add new rows in database table, it should to update Autocomplete ,i did this but my problem is showing double Context-Menu ,we can say double autocompletes because i call method that create autocomplete each adding of new elements in table.
When i click a tab editBill i call this method :
public void showEditBill() {
if (!BillPane.getTabs().contains(EditBillTab)) {
BillPane.getTabs().add(EditBillTab);
}
SingleSelectionModel<Tab> selectionModel = BillPane.getSelectionModel();
selectionModel.select(EditBillTab);
/*it should remove the old autocomplete from textfield*/
pushBills(); //Call for cheking new items
}
pushBills method () :
public void pushBills() {
ArrayList list = new ArrayList<>();
bills = new BillHeaderDao().FindAll();
for (int i = 0; i < bills.size(); i++) {
list.add(bills.get(i).getIdClient());
}
//How can i remove the old bind before bind again
autoCompletionBinding = TextFields.bindAutoCompletion(SearchBill, SuggestionProvider.create(list));
}
How i can remove the old autocomplete and bind new automplete?
Just in any case if you need to keep instance of AutoCompletionTextFieldBinding object, thus avoiding use of:
autoCompleteBinding = TextFields.bindingAutoCompletion(TextField,List);
, which will change the instance, we could go a little bit deeper and use this:
// let's suppose initially we have this possible values:
Set<String> autoCompletions = new HashSet<>(Arrays.asList("A", "B", "C"));
SuggestionProvider<String> provider = SuggestionProvider.create(autoCompletions);
new AutoCompletionTextFieldBinding<>(textField, provider);
// and after some times, possible autoCompletions values has changed and now we have:
Set<String> filteredAutoCompletions = new HashSet<>(Arrays.asList("A", "B"));
provider.clearSuggestions();
provider.addPossibleSuggestions(filteredAutoCompletions);
So, through SuggestionProvider, we have "updated" auto completion values.
To avoid doubling of suggestions menu, don't use again (for the 2nd time):
TextFields.bindAutoCompletion(..)
In order to provide updates to the auto-complete suggestion list, retain a reference to the SuggestionProvider and update the suggestion provider instead:
TextField textField = new TextField();
SuggestionProvider suggestionProvider = SuggestionProvider.create(new ArrayList());
new AutoCompletionTextFieldBinding<>(textField, suggestionProvider);
When you want to update the suggestion list:
List<String> newSuggestions = new ArrayList();
//(add entries to list)
suggestionProvider.clearSuggestions();
suggestionProvider.addPossibleSuggestions(newSuggestions);
This will do the trick:
Instead of: TextFields.bindAutoCompletion(textField, list);
, try this:
List<String> strings = new ArrayList<>();
Then create binding between your textField with the list through:
new AutoCompletionTextFieldBinding<>(textField, SuggestionProvider.create(strings));
So any changes, including removing, from the list, will be reflected in the autoCompletion of the textField;
And you will have dynamic filtering of suggestions, showed in pop-up, when user enter some text in textField;
I had the same problem some time ago I try to do as #MaxKing mentions, but it didnt work. I managed to give it a solución even though I don't think it's the right way.
// Dispose the old binding and recreate a new binding
autoCompleteBinding.dispose();
autoCompleteBinding = TextFields.bindingAutoCompletion(TextField,List);
try this:
public void pushBills() {
ArrayList list = new ArrayList<>();
bills = new BillHeaderDao().FindAll();
for (int i = 0; i < bills.size(); i++) {
list.add(bills.get(i).getIdClient());
}
autoCompletionBinding.dispose();
autoCompletionBinding = TextFields.bindAutoCompletion(SearchBill, SuggestionProvider.create(list));
}
I have a comments type structure where users are able to post replies to an Article. (One article can have many discussion replies). When a user adds a reply, I want the parent articles last updated date to also change so that the article is placed at the top of the list when viewed from the frontend indicating that it has had recent activity. To achieve this, the comment is added through a custom controller and then I have used the ContentService Published event to update the parent though am finding my event to be a bit of a bottle neck and taking up to six seconds to run
public void OnApplicationStarted(UmbracoApplicationBase umbracoApplication, ApplicationContext applicationContext)
{
ContentService.Published += ContentServicePublished;
}
private void ContentServicePublished(IPublishingStrategy sender, PublishEventArgs<IContent> e)
{
foreach (var node in e.PublishedEntities)
{
//Handle updating the parent nodes last edited date to address ordering
if (node.ContentType.Alias == "DiscussionReply")
{
var contentService = new Umbraco.Core.Services.ContentService();
var parentNode = contentService.GetById(node.ParentId);
int intSiblings = parentNode.Children().Count() + 1;
if(parentNode.HasProperty("siblings"))
{
parentNode.SetValue("siblings", intSiblings);
contentService.SaveAndPublishWithStatus(parentNode, 0, false);
}
}
}
}
Is there anything obvious with this code that may be causing the performance issue?
Many thanks,
You should be using the Services Singleton for accessing the various services including ContentService.
One way to do so is to access the Services on ApplicationContext.Current like so:
var contentService = ApplicationContext.Current.Services.ContentService;
However, your bottleneck is going to be in retrieving the parent node and it's properties which requires multiple calls to the database. On top of that, you're retrieving the parent's children here:
int intSiblings = parentNode.Children().Count() + 1;
The better solution is to use the PublishedContent cache which doesn't hit the database at all and provides significantly superior performance.
If you're using a SurfaceController use it's Umbraco property (and you also have access to Services as well):
// After you've published the comment node:
var commentNode = Umbraco.TypedContent(commentNodeId);
// We already know this is a DiscussionReply node, no need to check.
int intSiblings = commentNode.Parent.Children.Count() + 1;
if (commentNode.Parent.HasProperty("siblings"))
{
// It's only now that we really need to grab the parent node from the ContentService so we can update it.
var parentNode = Services.ContentService.GetById(commentNode.ParentId);
parentNode.SetValue("siblings", intSiblings);
contentService.SaveAndPublishWithStatus(parentNode, 0, false);
}
If you're implementing a WebApi based on UmbracoApiController then the same Umbraco and Services properties are available to you there as well.
I'm using Umbraco 7.3.4 and here's my solution:
// Create a list of objects to be created or updated.
var newContentList = new List<MyCustomModel>() {
new MyCustomModel {Id: 1, Name: "Document 1", Attribute1: ...},
new MyCustomModel {Id: 2, Name: "Document 2", Attribute1: ...},
new MyCustomModel {Id: 3, Name: "Document 3", Attribute1: ...}
};
// Get old content from cache
var oldContentAsIPublishedContentList = (new UmbracoHelper(UmbracoContext.Current)).TypedContent(ParentId).Descendants("YourContentType").ToList();
// Get only modified content items
var modifiedItemIds = from x in oldContentAsIPublishedContentList
from y in newContentList
where x.Id == y.Id
&& (x.Name != y.Name || x.Attribute1 != y.Attribute1)
select x.Id;
// Get modified items as an IContent list.
var oldContentAsIContentList = ApplicationContext.Services.ContentService.GetByIds(modifiedItemIds).ToList();
// Create final content list.
var finalContentList= new List<IContent>();
// Update or insert items
foreach(var item in newContentList) {
// For each new content item, find an old IContent by the ID
// If the old IContent is found and the values are modified, add it to the finalContentList
// Otherwise, create a new instance using the API.
IContent content = oldContentAsIContentList.FirstOrDefault(x => x.Id == item.Id) ?? ApplicationContext.Services.ContentService.CreateContent(item.Name, ParentId, "YourContentType");
// Update content
content.Name = item.Name;
content.SetValue("Attribute1", item.Attribute1);
finalContentList.Add(content);
// The following code is required
content.ChangePublishedState(PublishedState.Published);
content.SortOrder = 1;
}
// if the finalContentList has some items, call the Sort method to commit and publish the changes
ApplicationContext.Services.ContentService.Sort(finalContentList);
I am binding all the columns of a table except one which is drop down. The table is tied to a model(ODataModel) and the contents of the drop downs in the last columns are all the coming from different model because user shall be selecting one item from the drop down later which is submitted on the click of a button 'Save' I have provided in the bottom.
I am making use of Paginator as Navigation mode. The problem is dropdown shows the contents of first page when user switches between the pages which is eventual as it is not tied to any of the fields in the model of the table. I want to show the respective changes to be reflected in the column of drop down though user switches between the pages.
Any suggestion over this? I know there is something called RowRepeater using which complex controls can be repeated but still what would be the way if I want to make use of sap.ui.table.Table?
Please find my code below:
createAssignResourcesTable: function(){
var model = new sap.ui.model.odata.ODataModel("/sap/opu/odata/sap/ZSECENTRAL_SRV", true);
var substituteRMCombo = sap.ui.getCore().byId("substituteRM");
var selectedRM = substituteRMCombo.getSelectedKey();
var jsonModel = new sap.ui.model.json.JSONModel();
var resourceData = null;
var readSuccess = function(responseData){
resourceData = responseData;
jsonModel.setData(resourceData);
};
var readError = function(){
//console.log('some error occurred while reading data');
sap.ui.commons.MessageBox.show("Some Error occurred while reading data",
sap.ui.commons.MessageBox.Icon.ERROR,"Error!",[sap.ui.commons.MessageBox.Action.OK],
function(){
//console.log('End Date should be grater than Start aDte!!!');
return;
});
};
model.read("/RMResourceSet",null, null, true,readSuccess,readError);
var template = new sap.ui.core.ListItem();
//console.log(template);
template.bindProperty("text","ChildbpName");
template.bindProperty("key","Childbp");
//console.log(template);
var that = this;
var table = new sap.ui.table.Table("assignResourcesTable",{
visibleRowCount: 6,
navigationMode: sap.ui.table.NavigationMode.Paginator,
columns:[
new sap.ui.table.Column("",{
label: new sap.ui.commons.Label({text:"Work Item"}),
template: new sap.ui.commons.Label().bindProperty("text", "DemoId"),
sortProperty: "DemoId",
filterProperty: "DemoId",
width: "auto"
}), new sap.ui.table.Column("",{
label: new sap.ui.commons.Label({text:"Requierd Date"}),
template: new sap.ui.commons.TextView().bindProperty("text", "ReqDate"),
sortProperty: "ReqDate",
filterProperty: "ReqDate",
width: "auto"
}),
new sap.ui.table.Column({
label: new sap.ui.commons.Label("",{
text: "Estimated Hours"
}),
template: new sap.ui.commons.TextField("",{
change:[{"name" : "DurEst"},that.onChangeAssignResourcesTable,that],
value: "00015"
}).bindProperty("value","DurEst")
}),
new sap.ui.table.Column({
label: new sap.ui.commons.Label({text:"Demo Engineer"}),
template: new sap.ui.commons.ComboBox("",{
change:[{"name" : "Childbp"},that.onChangeAssignResourcesTable,that]
}).setModel(jsonModel).bindItems("/results",template),
width: "auto"
})
]
});
table.setBusyIndicatorDelay(1);
var oModel = new sap.ui.model.odata.ODataModel("/sap/opu/odata/sap/ZSECENTRAL_SRV",true);
oModel.attachRequestSent(function (oEvent) {
//console.log('request sent');
table.setBusy(true);
});
oModel.attachRequestCompleted(function () {
//console.log('request completed');
table.setBusy(false);
});
oModel.attachRequestFailed(function () {
table.setBusy(false);
});
table.setModel(oModel);
var FilterOperator = sap.ui.model.FilterOperator;
var filter = new sap.ui.model.Filter("RmUser", FilterOperator.EQ, selectedRM);
table.bindRows("/RMNONSTAFFEDDBRSet",null,null,[filter]);
//table.bindRows("/RMNONSTAFFEDDBRSet",true);
return table;
}
Thanks in Advance!
Your ComboBox statically binds against jsonModel>results. Given the above code I would assume your ComboBox turns out to always contain the very same items.
I understood from your question that these items should be dynamic for each row or at least each page. Since the rows of a table can only be bound to one collection you have the following possibilities to tweak this:
Create a new JSONModel joining the data from your ODataModel with the data used for the ComboBox creation and bind your table against this new model.
Option 1 certainly has some weaknesses so here's another one: Bind your ComboBox column against any property of the ODataModel and use a formatter function to dynamically create the ComboBox items and return them from the formatter.
This is the scenario: I'm working with a listgrid that needs to be grouped, and also needs to have its records ordered within each group. I've already used the ListGrid.sort() and the ListGrid.sort(String, SortDirection) methods but none of them works properly.
This problem doesn't show up when the grid isn't grouped (it makes the sort perfectly); and when the sort (with the listgrid is grouped) is made by clicking the column header, works fine but I need to sort it by code (without user interaction) because the header sort option needs to be disabled (and context menu too).
I'm using SmartGWT 4.0
Here is the class I'm using:
public class Access extends ListGrid {
public Access() {
super();
setWidth("30%");
setHeight100();
// setShowHeaderContextMenu(false);
setCanResizeFields(false);
// setCanSort(false);
setAutoFitWidthApproach(AutoFitWidthApproach.BOTH);
setWrapCells(true);
setFixedRecordHeights(false);
setShowRecordComponents(true);
setShowRecordComponentsByCell(true);
ListGridField id = new ListGridField("id", "ID");
ListGridField user = new ListGridField("user", "User");
ListGridField access = new ListGridField("access", "Access");
id.setHidden(true);
user.setWidth("60%");
access.setWidth("40%");
access.setType(ListGridFieldType.BOOLEAN);
access.setCanEdit(true);
setFields(id, user, access);
groupBy("access");
access.setGroupTitleRenderer(new GroupTitleRenderer() {
public String getGroupTitle(Object groupValue, GroupNode groupNode, ListGridField field, String fieldName,
ListGrid grid) {
return (String) groupValue + " - " + groupNode.getGroupMembers().length;
}
});
getField("access").setGroupValueFunction(new GroupValueFunction() {
public Object getGroupValue(Object value, ListGridRecord record, ListGridField field, String fieldName,
ListGrid grid) {
Boolean access = (Boolean) value;
if (access)
return "With access";
else
return "Without access";
}
});
ListGridRecord lgr1 = new ListGridRecord();
lgr1.setAttribute("id", 1);
lgr1.setAttribute("user", "ewgzx");
lgr1.setAttribute("access", true);
ListGridRecord lgr2 = new ListGridRecord();
lgr2.setAttribute("id", 2);
lgr2.setAttribute("user", "Bgfths");
lgr2.setAttribute("access", false);
ListGridRecord lgr3 = new ListGridRecord();
lgr3.setAttribute("id", 3);
lgr3.setAttribute("user", "utcvs");
lgr3.setAttribute("access", true);
ListGridRecord lgr4 = new ListGridRecord();
lgr4.setAttribute("id", 4);
lgr4.setAttribute("user", "gfdjxc");
lgr4.setAttribute("access", false);
ListGridRecord lgr5 = new ListGridRecord();
lgr5.setAttribute("id", 5);
lgr5.setAttribute("user", "763");
lgr5.setAttribute("access", true);
ListGridRecord lgr6 = new ListGridRecord();
lgr6.setAttribute("id", 6);
lgr6.setAttribute("user", "2");
lgr6.setAttribute("access", false);
ListGridRecord lgr7 = new ListGridRecord();
lgr7.setAttribute("id", 7);
lgr7.setAttribute("user", "35");
lgr7.setAttribute("access", false);
ListGridRecord lgr8 = new ListGridRecord();
lgr8.setAttribute("id", 8);
lgr8.setAttribute("user", "123");
lgr8.setAttribute("access", true);
ListGridRecord lgr9 = new ListGridRecord();
lgr9.setAttribute("id", 9);
lgr9.setAttribute("user", "2342");
lgr9.setAttribute("access", true);
ListGridRecord lgr10 = new ListGridRecord();
lgr10.setAttribute("id", 10);
lgr10.setAttribute("user", "aqwc");
lgr10.setAttribute("access", false);
setRecords(new ListGridRecord[] { lgr1, lgr2, lgr3, lgr4, lgr5, lgr6, lgr7, lgr8, lgr9, lgr10 });
sort("user", SortDirection.ASCENDING);
}
}
I have been having a similar issue. Disclaimer: if the "grouping data" message is not appearing when you group then the following solution may not help.
In my case the sorting of a grouped column was screwed because of the "grouping data" pop up.
Let me clarify.
The "grouping data" pop up appears when trying to group a ListGrid that is displaying more than 50 records.
It appears because the ListGrid, internally, is doing the grouping operation asynchronously to avoid the "script running slowly" message from the browser.
What I did was to set the grouping async threshold to a higher value. The risk of doing this is getting the "script running slowly" browser message, even though this is likely to happen only with IE8/9.
In the end , in the grid constructor, just add (I used 500 as a threshold):
setInitialSort(new SortSpecifier[] {new SortSpecifier("user", SortDirection.ASCENDING)}));
setGroupByField("access");
setGroupByAsyncThreshold(500);
Also set the initial sort and the grouped column as shown above.
PROGRAMMATICALLY, FIRST SORT, THEN GROUP.
Hope this helps.
This is due to sort() being called before rendering the grid, and setRecords() complicates things further.
Initial rendering of the grid happens along with its parents when rootCanvas.draw() is called (in onModuleLoad or similar).
As setRecords() can be used to change data set in the grid anytime, it tries to redraw the grid regardless of whether its initial stage or not.
If in the real scenario, sort is triggered after UI initialization, it should work as given in following code sample.
Remove the sort() call at the end of the constructor.
final Access access = new Access();
Button button = new Button("Sort");
button.addClickHandler(new ClickHandler() {
public void onClick(ClickEvent event) {
// toggle sort direction, using two different ways to do it
SortSpecifier sortSpecifier = access.getSortSpecifier("user");
if (sortSpecifier == null || SortDirection.DESCENDING.equals(sortSpecifier.getSortDirection())) {
access.sort("user", SortDirection.ASCENDING);
} else {
access.setSort(new SortSpecifier[]{
new SortSpecifier("user", SortDirection.DESCENDING)
});
}
}
});
Check http://www.smartclient.com/smartgwt/showcase/#grid_multilevel_sort to see how to use listGrid.setInitialSort().
Having setRecords() in the constructor could lead to other initialization issues as well.
Update
To have the grid grouped by and sorted on load, set an initial sort and a group by field as indicated below.
// along with other configuration methods, can not use after grid is drawn
SortSpecifier sortSpecifier = new SortSpecifier("user", SortDirection.ASCENDING);
setInitialSort(new SortSpecifier[]{sortSpecifier});
// use following instead of groupBy(), which is used to group the grid programmatically
// groupBy() causes a redraw
setGroupByField("access");
An overloaded ListGrid.setGroupByField(String... field) method is available to group by multiple fields.
I'm trying to get my head around datasources and related models in sproutcore and am getting no where fast was wondering if anyone could maybe help me understand this all bit better.
Basically I have two related models Client and Brand, Clients can have many Brands and Brands can have a single Client, I have defined my models correctly and everything is pulling back as expected. The problem I'm having is working out how to create a new Brand and setup its relationship.
So on my Brand controller I have a createBrand method like so:
var brand = DBs.store.createRecord(DBs.Brand, {
title: this.get('title')
}, Math.floor(Math.random()*1000000));
brand.set('client', this.get('client'));
MyApp.store.commitRecords();
So as this is a new Brand I randomly generate a new ID for it (the second argument to createRecord). This is calling my createRecord in my datasource to create the new Brand, and then it also calls the updateRecord for the client.
The problem I'm having is that the clientUpdate is being passed the temporary (randomly generated id) in the relationship. How should I be structuring my creating of the new brand? Should I be waiting for the server to return the newly created brands ID and then updating the client relationship? If so how would I go about doing this?
Thanks
Mark
Right, after sitting in the sproutcore IRC channel and talking to mauritslamers he recommended creating a framework to handle all the server interactions for me manually.
So I setup a framework called CoreIo, which contains all my models, store and data source.
The data source is only used for fetching records from the server ie:
fetch: function(store, query) {
var recordType = query.get('recordType'),
url = recordType.url;
if (url) {
SC.Request.getUrl(CoreIo.baseUrl+url)
.header({ 'Accept': 'application/json'})
.json()
.notify(this, '_didFetch', store, query, recordType)
.send();
return YES;
}
return NO;
},
_didFetch: function (response, store, query, recordType) {
if (SC.ok(response)) {
store.loadRecords(recordType, response.get('body'));
store.dataSourceDidFetchQuery(query);
} else {
store.dataSourceDidErrorQuery(query, response);
}
},
Then the CoreIo framework has creation methods for my models ie:
CoreIo.createBrand = function (brand, client) {
var data = brand,
url = this.getModelUrl(CoreIo.Brand);
data.client_id = client.get('id');
SC.Request.postUrl(url)
.json()
.notify(this, this.brandDidCreate, client)
.send(data);
};
CoreIo.brandDidCreate = function (request, client) {
var json = request.get('body'),
id = json.id;
var ret = CoreIo.store.pushRetrieve(CoreIo.Brand, id, json);
var brand = CoreIo.store.find(CoreIo.Brand, id);
if (ret) {
client.get('brands').pushObject(brand);
}
};
I would then call into these 'actions' to create my new models which would setup the relationships as well.