Is there any way to globally search review comments, given by other user. I tried message:"some word to search" in the gerrit search engine, however this is not the right way to find. I need to search using some common known string, like "remove this extra line", it should show all the matching review comments given by any user and should populate all such stories.
You should search using comment:text instead of message:text
message:'MESSAGE'
Changes that match 'MESSAGE' arbitrary string in the commit message body.
comment:'TEXT'
Changes that match 'TEXT' string in any comment left by a reviewer.
Related
I would like to have an input-field on my webpage, which allows users to interact with models and perform specific searches within specified models. The system should support various actions, primarily add (+), delete (!) and search (?).
To add a new Todoitem to a todolist, the syntax would be like this:
+todoitem Some text here #todolistname
To delete a post, the syntax would be like this:
!post nameofpost
To search for a post, the syntax would be:
?post nameofpost
The previous examples adds and removes items from the current signed in user. I would also like the command line to support groups (identified by .groupname)
A valid syntax to add a todoitem to todolist with name important
ingroup school would be: +todoitem Some todo text #important.school
Searching for all posts in a group would be: ?post .group
Spaces and order should not matter, except for actual content to be added to model (like the todo text of a todo item). That means +todoitem.school#important Some todo text should give the same result as the input in #1.
Could anyone help me with a way of implementing this effectively in rails? That is how you could effectively search the input-string, decide what the user is trying to do (based on the prefix identificators), and then parsing the input into actual queries ?
Edit:
To clarify the last paragraph, as I might have misused the word 'parsing', I was thinking of going through the input-string letter by letter, and then branching/dividing the information so that it can be easily used by pre-defined functions (which perform the queries).
While commenting on JIRA tickets, #username can be used to tag a team member. The thing that bugs me is that when I try to tag any team member, there is a special encoded text appear (something like this [~gbuc13]) for every person you tag in.
Now its very difficult to find which member you tagged in your comment by seeing this code. Is there any way that this strange encoded name could be replaced with a proper, meaningful names so that when a user is being tagged, [mike] is appeared instead of [~gbuc13]? I know this change will have to be adopted by every team member to define their aliases, but I am wondering where this (alias?) could be set.
The change you describe is is the difference between the saved view and the edited view and can't be changed:
at edit time you see the alias
once saved you see the full user name (which links to the Jira profile page showing all their activity)
I am working on "Advanced integration" of a forms from Wufoo to Asana. SO far I have followed the Asana guide - https://asana.com/guide/help/api/wufoo
Guide is excellent and everything within the guide work as it says, but I need to go a bit further.
I notice that there is a bit of symbols that asana recognize from the forms( like quotes"" , equal ==, question mark ?), example of multiple choice menu:
"Chose person" == "asana tag" ? 1559453678421
"Chose person" == "asana person" ? blablabla#something.org
So in the following example I can have a multi choice menu that can assign task to a person and/or put a tag.
If I add a second person, that person become a follower, which is great.
My goal:
I want to make the form filler to add its email address, and that email address to be add as follower of the task.
What I know:
I have so far talked with Wufoo support and they told me that the text from the form goes in a straight text form to Asana, and asana actually recognize the form and create the specific tasks, for example:
<strong>This become BOLD text in asana</strong>
I keep on looking for the rest of the recognized symbols, but without success so far. If you have any kind of information regarding the "Advanced integration" I would love to know.
(I work at Asana.) Right now we only support routing through fields that are hidden (have the "hide" classname) with our Wufoo integration, but your use-case is very interesting. I'll take a look and see if we can enable this.
I have found a 2 workarounds to make this work for me.
Workaround 1
So far I have discover that asana recognize "hide" CSS Layout and the field labels : project,tag,assignee,follower . If these values are true then to make this editable I add a Wufoo form Rule that can show/hide fields. for example :
If "Email" contains "#" show "assignee"
And that rule does not change the CSS Layout Keyword "hide" so the form is send the same way with the only difference that the "hide" field is actually visible and that make it easily editable.
Workaround 2
By keeping the fields hide you can still edit them with "URL Modifications ". So basically have 2 forms linked together, so the first form fill up information that is send to the second form within the URL, so the fields remain hidden but being filled up by the URL. - I have not played with that much but Wufoo support briefly explain to me that its possible
URL Modification reference - http://help.wufoo.com/articles/en_US/SurveyMonkeyArticleType/URL-Modifications
I need to get all issues by version id. My query is like:
http://archwork:2990/jira/rest/api/2/search\?jql\=project\=GP+and+fixVersion\=10001
working fine, but I want to get issues by VERSION
Link like:
http://archwork:2990/jira/rest/api/2/search\?jql\=project\=GP+and+version\=10001
returned "Field 'version' does not exist or you do not have permission to view it."
The two built-in version fields in JIRA can be accessed in JQL as fixVersion and affectedVersion. I suspect that you want the latter.
If you have another custom field (which is a version-type field) that you want to query, the error message suggests that you may not be using the correct name for it. The best way to check this is to type your JQL into JIRA's Issue Navigator manually (in the advanced search) and to take advantage of the dropdown box with field name suggestions to get the correct field name.
One way to bypass the problem of determining the correct JQL field name (which sometimes requires quoting, which gets slightly more messy if you are also URL-encoding the result) is to simply refer to a field by the custom field ID instead.
You can find the CF ID of a field by going to Admin->Issues->Custom Fields, finding the appropriate custom field, mousing over the "Configure" link, and then looking at the URL query parameter for customFieldId, and then use the syntax cf[xxxxxx] in your JQL instead of the field name, where xxxxxx is the custom field number.
Greetings!
Situation:
We have a CRM system that generates unique customer IDs. Now we added a field "customer match code" to our Fogbugz cases, using the Custom Fields Plugin.
In the CRM we have a button "Add case to customer" that launches a VB script to open a URL, ie. Fogbugz.
Obviously, it would be nice to pre-fill the custom field "customer match code" with the ID. Normal fields are easy to pre-fill:
http://devserver/fogbugz/default.asp?command=new&pg=pgEditBug&sTitle=MyTitle
Since the field is a custom field, I found it not in the table "Bug", but in "Plugin_6_CustomBugData", where it is called "customerxmatchxcodeX62".
Neither accessing "customerxmatchxcodeX62", nor "customer match code", nor "Customer Match Code" worked.
Does anyone know of a way to access custom fields like this?
Note: I am aware of the XML API. I'm trying to avoid it in this case, because all I want to do is open a browser with Fogbugz "new case" page and fill this one field.
Thank you for any helpful responses!
Best regards,
Robin
http://fogbugz.stackexchange.com/ Try this site instead =)