I'm having a problem accessing the nifi API from a web app I'm building. This is the error I get:
Cross-Origin Request Blocked: The Same Origin Policy disallows reading the remote resource at ...
I know I need to enable CORS on the jetty server nifi runs on, and I've changed the web.xml in an attempt to do this. But every time I rebuild the image and stand up a container, all of my changes are overwritten. Is there an easier way to accomplish enabling CORS so that I can access the nifi api with my webapp? Or is there any insight on how to make my changes persist in the web.xml files on the docker container startup?
Related
I am currently running latest versions Nifi and Postgresql via docker compose.
as of 1.14 version update of Nifi, when you accesss the UI on web it connects via https, thus asking you for ID and Password every time you log in. Its too cumbersome to go to nifi-app.log file and look for credentials every time I access the UI. I know that you can change the setting where it keeps https as the default method but I am not sure how to do that in a docker container. Can anyone help me with this?
You could use some env like AUTH in the documentation
You can find the full explanations here
I'm using Swagger UI using its docker version. The Try it out button is not working as expected from the Web UI because there's a problem with cors. I'm running the UI from localhost and doing requests to another domain. I have read this other question How to avoid CORS errors ("Failed to fetch" or "Server not found or an error occurred") when making requests from Swagger Editor? but I cannot do any of the solutions it says.
I'm not sure if it's posible to setup a proxy on the docker container as SwaggerHub does, like, instead of the Try it out request be resolved on the browser, resolve it on the docker container.
Do you know if that is posible?
I have found a strange behavior in Keycloak when deployed in Kubernetes, that I can't wrap my head around.
Use-case:
login as admin:admin (created by default)
click on Manage account
(manage account dialog screenshot)
I have compared how the (same) image (quay.io/keycloak/keycloak:17.0.0) behaves if it runs on Docker or in Kubernetes (K3S).
If I run it from Docker, the account console loads. In other terms, I get a success (204) for the request
GET /realms/master/protocol/openid-connect/login-status-iframe.html/init?client_id=account-console
From the same image deployed in Kubernetes, the same request fails with error 403. However, on this same application, I get a success (204) for the request
GET /realms/master/protocol/openid-connect/login-status-iframe.html/init?client_id=security-admin-console
Since I can call security-admin-console, this does not look like an issue with the Kubernetes Ingress gateway nor with anything related to routing.
I've then thought about a Keycloak access-control configuration issue, but in both cases I use the default image without any change. I cross-checked to be sure, it appears that the admin user and the account-console client are configured exactly in the same way in both the docker and k8s applications.
I have no more idea about what could be the problem, do you have any suggestion?
Try to set ssl_required = NONE in realm table in Keycloak database to your realm (master)
So we found that it was the nginx ingress controller causing a lot of issues. While we were able to get it working with nginx, via X-Forwarded-Proto etc., but it was a bit complicated and convoluted. Moving to haproxy instead resolved this problem. As well, make sure you are interfacing with the ingress controller over https or that may cause issues with keycloak.
annotations:
kubernetes.io/ingress.class: haproxy
...
I am in the process of evaluating moving a very large Azure Cloud Service (Web Role) microservice architecture to AKS and have been working through the necessary code and build changes to support it.
In order to replicate the production environment locally for the developers, we run nginx on the host with SSL offloading and DNS (hosted in Azure) A records pointing to 127.0.0.1. When running in the Azure Emulator, the net affect is the ability for both the developer to visit the various web front ends in their browser (i.e. https://myapp.mydomain.dev) as well as hit the various API's in the solution (Web API 2) in Postman/cURL, etc.
Additionally due to how the networking of the Azure Emulator works, the apps themselves can resolve each other through nginx on the host (i.e. MVC app at https://myapp.mydomain.dev can obtain a token from the IdP web API at https://identity.mydomain.dev and then use that token at the API at https://api.mydomain.dev). This is the critical piece and the source of my question.
All attempts at getting the containers themselves to resolve each other the same way the host OS can (browser/Postman, SSL offloading via nginx) have failed. Many of the instructions out there are understandably for linux containers but having adapted the various networking docker-compose settings for the windows container equivalent have not yet yielded an success. In order to keep the development environments aligned with the real work systems, which are tenantized and make sure of the default mapping in nginx to catch all incoming traffic and route it to a specific user facing app/container, it is not as simple as determining a "static" method of addressing these on startup and why the effort was put in to produce the development environments we have today.
Right now when one service (container) attempts to communication with another, it ultimately results in a resolution error as all requests resolve to https://127.0.0.1 due to the DNS A records hosted in Azure for the domain. Since this migration will be a longer term project, the environments need to co-exist so changing the way that DNS is resolved (real DNS A records pointing to 127.0.0.1), host running nginx and handling SSL offloading to the various webroles normally running in the Azure Emulator is not an option.
Is there a way (with Windows containers) to either:
Allow the container to utilize nginx on the host OS transparently (app must still call the API at https://api.mydomain.dev), which will cause the traffic to be routed properly to the correct container/port defined in the docker-compose file?
OR
Run nginx on each container, allowing each container to then resolve and route appropriately without knowing the IP of the other container, possibly through an alias which could be added to the containers nginx.conf before the service starts?
The platform utilizes OAuth2/OIDC and it is critical to maintain the full URL to the other services from the applications perspective. Beyond mirroring production and sandbox environments, this URL's are utilized for redirect URL and post logout redirect URL validation among other things so using "https://myContainerNameForOtherContainerAlias" is not a workable solution.
Will I have the same problem when setting up the AKS environment as well?
I am currently trying to setup wso2 api manager on openshift. The problem i am running into is that when i try to browse the url created by the openshift route, the application redirects me to the internally created IP address of the publisher app. However when i launch the container without openshift, the application directs me to it's intended API login page which is the Mgt console url.
I suspect this has to do with how the HAProxy embedded load balancer is behaving. I was able to hack around the configurations by changing the default ports to 443 however that created a new set of issues because changing the ports also required me hard coding container hostnames in the carbon.xml. Hardcoding settings in the configuration files prevents me from being able to scale up the containers.
Any assistance on this will be much appreciated.