im new on the flutter and curious how class and async work.
for example, i have function.dart file and inside function.dart file, i create method that i can call in other dart file.
but i found a difficult. i created a class with async inside, detail code below :
class updateItem {
// do something
Future<List> _SelectTableNumber() async {
sql code
}
{
when i try call class updateItem on other dart file and found _SelectTableNumber not running and i double check the system said _SelectTableNumber() method isn't used.
how do i run the _SelectTableNumber() inside my class updateItem?
Your method name begins with an underscore _ and that means the method is declared as private. Private methods can only be called from inside the library, NOT from another library.
See this answer.
Also please read the basic docs about async.
Related
I have a class that extends another. The parent class is not intended to be used directly by the API rather it implements basic methods that are helpers for child classes.
When I use the child class in a program I can see all method from said class but also the one from the parent class that are not intended to be called directly, they exist to be called by the methods of the child class.
I tried to make parents method private. This would work I believe as long as parent and child are declared in the same library. But I have an issue with the "library" notion. I understand part/part of are somewhat depreciated, and I want the parent class to be in a specific file. I can't figure a way to do it with import/export.
Is there a way to either hide a public method from the parent class from all child classes usage or to make a private method from the parent class callable from all child classes ?
Best regards ;
Exemple:
myLib.dart
export mainClass.dart;
mainClass.dar
import baseClass.dart;
class MainClass extends BaseClass {
publicFunc() => ... //Can't call _hiddenFunc, can call wantToHideFunc()
}
In a second file (for code reusability purposes)
class MainClass extends BaseClass {
_hiddenFunc() => ...
wantToHideFunc() => ...
}
Using myLib public API
import myLib.dart
main() {
class = Class();
class.publicFunc(); //Intended
class.wantToHideFunc() //Wants to avoid...
}
Dart does not have protected access like Java or C#.
You can't hide a public member, you can't access a private member from a different library, and there is no third option.
It sounds like you want members of the superclass which can be invoked only from subclasses, not from outside of the object. That's what's called protected in, e.g., Java, and Dart does not have anything similar to that.
The only level of privacy in Dart is library-private, which is chosen by starting the name with a _.
The reason that Dart has this design is that it was originally a very dynamic language. You can preform "dynamic invocations" on a value with static type dynamic, say dynVal.foo(42) and it will call the method of that name.
To make a name unreachable, it needed to be safe from dynamic invocation as well. Because of that, Dart privacy does not care where the code doing the invocation is, it only cares whether you know the name - and library private names are considered different names depending on which library they're from.
Using part is not discouraged for situations where it actually serves a purpose. If you can put the part into a library of its own, that's better because it allows it to have its own privacy and imports, but if you need the classes to share privacy, using part files to split up a large file is perfectly reasonable. It's a tool, there is nothing wrong with using it when it's the right tool for the job. A library is often a better tool for modularity, but not always.
Now, there is a hack you can use:
// Declare the base and provide extensions for "protected" members:
abstract class Base {
int get _someHiddenStuff => 42;
int get somePublicStuff => 37;
}
extension ProtectedBase on Base {
int get someHiddenStuff => _someHiddenStuff;
}
Then import that in another library and do:
import "base.dart";
export "base.dart" hide ProtectedBase;
class SubClass extends Base {
int doSomething => someHiddenStuff + somePublicStuff;
}
Then anyone importing "subclass.dart" will also get a version of Base, but they won't get the ProtectedBase extensions. Hiding the extensions from your package's public API will allow yourself to use it, but prevent your package's users from seeing the helper extensions.
(This is likely highly over-engineered, but it's an option. It's the evolution of the hack of having static/top-level helper functions that you don't export.)
I am trying out the new Dart FFI in making wrappers for libsodium. Libsodium needs to be initialized with calling init(). But I don't think the user should be burdened to remember this and I also wouldn't like to check some global state variable.
I know that Go has package init() functions which run when a package gets included. Is there something similar in Dart?
Of course I could just wrap everything up into a class and run init() in the constructor but there isn't much sense in instatiating a class which basically only exposes static methods. Besides, I would like to preserve the procedural style of libsodium.
Of course I could just wrap everything up into a class and run init() in the constructor but there isn't much sense in instatiating a class which basically only exposes static methods. Besides, I would like to preserve the procedural style of libsodium.
You could have a singleton instance and expose library functions as methods on the instance, and you could provide a public getter function that automatically does initialization.
For example, something like:
Libsodium? _instance;
Libsodium get libsodium => _instance ??= Libsodium._();
class Libsodium {
Libsodium._() {
// Do initialization.
}
void foo() {
// ...
}
void bar() {
// ...
}
}
and then callers would need to use it via:
import 'libsodium.dart';
libsodium.foo();
This would hide the class instantiation and wouldn't look any different to callers than if you were to use only top-level functions with a namespace (import 'libsodium.dart' as libsodium).
Dart does not have any way to implicitly run code. No code runs before main, and all code running after main does so because it was invoked directly or indirectly from the main method. So, no.
If you need something initialized, there is a number of options.
You can use a lazily initialized static variable:
var _initialState = _init();
int doSomething(arguments) {
_initialState;
do the something.
}
The reading of _initialState will ensure that init is invoked the first time
it's needed, and not after that. You can even store things in the state for
later use.
The singleton implementation object suggested by #jamesdlin. It basically does the
same thing, then puts the methods on the object instead of being static.
Another variant is to do exactly that, but with a private instance, and have the
public top-level functions forward to the singleton object. Then you get the
procedural API and still ensures that the state object is initialized.
(This may be better for testing, allowing you to have multiple state objects alive
at the same time).
Require people to call init.
I am a newbie to Grails and still learning the ropes! The application that i work on uses services.
My task is to add a new method in one of the services and have it get called from clients.
This new method is going to be pretty long and i don't want all the method body to be in the service class.
I would like to add another method in a place other than this service to do all the calculations for this new method.
Which is the best place to add a method like that? Should i add a new domain? Or just a controller class?
I don't want any of the information in the new method to be saved to database.
A sample code look like this:
class MyService {
String getDomainName(String ID) {
return domainNameGenerator(ID);
}
}
Now i want to put the domainNameGenerator method into another place.
Place your standalone code in src/groovy or src/java depending on the actual language of your code, but there's nothing wrong with putting code in the service class itself. If the new class and the service package is the same, you don't even have to add an import.
I have a very simple function which I define as follows:
def mySimpleFunction(Map myMap) {
// Function logic here...
}
However, when I try to compile this, I get a warning message and build exception which says that: The [mySimpleFunction] action accepts a parameter of type [java.util.Map] which has not been marked with Validateable.
How can I mark this function as Validateable? I imported the org.codehaus.groovy.grails.validation.Validateable
and have marked my class as #Validateable .
What should I be doing differently in order to get my application to build?
Thank you in advance!
If it is a helper method, make it private. In Grails 2.0+ public controller methods are assumed to be actions, and arguments are assumed to be bindable. That means they need to be number types, boolean, String, etc., or a command object class.
Command object classes are automatically made validateable if they're defined in the controller class file, and if they're defined elsewhere they need to be annotated as #Validateable.
Since this is a helper method and not an action, just make it private (especially since it can't be called from another class anyway):
private mySimpleFunction(Map myMap) {
// Function logic here...
}
How do I replace methods of an existing java class (GrailsDataBinder in my case).
I read that method calls for java classes doesnt go through invokeMethod, and hence it doesn't work, but I think there would be some solution.
I just tried this
GrailsDataBinder.metaClass.static.createBinder = {Object target, String objectName ->
throw new RuntimeException()
}
And this
GrailsDataBinder.class.metaClass.static.createBinder = {Object target, String
objectName -> throw new RuntimeException()
}
But that did not seem to have replaced the method, as my closure isn't being invoked, but instead the original method executes.
update
I just found that the closure is being executed if I call the createBinder from the test class itself - so it works and method is replaced
void testDataBinder() {
GrailsDataBinder.createBinder(null, null)
}
However When it is invoked from DataBindingUtils, it always executes original method (DataBindingUtils is also a java class)
Following is the code inside DataBindingUtils that invokes the method.
binder = GrailsDataBinder.createBinder(object, object.getClass().getName());
Note : There are some similar questions asked earlier, but none of them have worked for me.
This is disappointing once you see the power of Groovy. However, as you already know, many of the cool metaclass etc. features available in Groovy simply don't work as you would like on Java classes.
If you are trying to override, stub or mock stuff on a Java class for unit testing etc., I advise looking into Spock, because it uses 'magic' that actually works on Java classes also.
If you are try to override methods for some other reason, you should try extending the Java class with a Groovy class or 'wrapping' the Java class with a Groovy class to gain the metaclass features you want when external classes call you classes methods. Unfortunately this still won't allow you to intercept calls that the Java class makes to itself.