I am trying to create a list of all my firebase users in node.js. I am following the description as offered on https://firebase.google.com/docs/auth/admin/manage-users
When running the below code, I throws an error saying
TypeError: admin.auth(...).listUsers is not a function
I have a suspicion that the firebase documentation uses 'admin' in different ways in different places and that the 'admin' I use below from initialisation is not the one I should be using to list the users, but I can't quite work out how to correct it. The documentation is not very clear.
Please note that for the .initializeApp({...}) code I added some '...' where otherwise I have the correct text.
var admin = require('firebase-admin');
var serviceAccount = require('../serviceAccountKey');
admin.initializeApp({
credential: admin.credential.cert(serviceAccount),
databaseURL: 'https://...',
databaseAuthVariableOverride: {
uid: ' ... ',
},
});
const db = admin.database();
const refUsersServer = db.ref('usersServer');
function listAllUsers(nextPageToken) {
// List batch of users, 1000 at a time.
// admin.auth().listUsers(1000, nextPageToken)
admin.auth().listUsers(1000, nextPageToken)
.then(function(listUsersResult) {
listUsersResult.users.forEach(function(userRecord) {
console.log("user", userRecord.toJSON());
});
// List next batch of users.
if (listUsersResult.pageToken) {
listAllUsers(listUsersResult.pageToken)
}
})
.catch(function(error) {
console.log("Error listing users:", error);
});
}
// Start listing users from the beginning, 1000 at a time.
listAllUsers();
The code works fine but only in the latest firebase-admin version. In the earlier versions, the listUsers function didn't exit.
My mistake was that I didn't run the latest firebase-admin version which thanks to David 'G' I realised. Thanks.
Related
I'm trying to implement the #auth directive in GraphQL for use with Neo4j as documented here:
https://neo4j.com/docs/graphql-manual/current/auth/auth-directive/
With a jwt token that is taken from firebase, and should have all of the necessary fields, including admin roles
The problem is that whenever I try to use one of the generated queries with the admin bearer token it says "forbidden" when the auth directive is attached to it.
The full discussion of this issue between me and ChatGPT, which includes extensive trial and error that was done before writing this question, logs, code snippets etc, can be found here for reference:
https://firebasestorage.googleapis.com/v0/b/awtsmoos.appspot.com/o/ai%2FBH_1674546675630.html?alt=media&token=17b653c4-5db2-4bca-8bc1-3cc3625e5a6c
Just to summarize some key code parts, I'm trying to follow the setup example like this essentially:
const neoSch = new graphqlNeo.Neo4jGraphQL({
typeDefs: typeDefs,
driver:dr,
resolvers:rez,
plugins: {
auth: new neoGraphQLAuth
.Neo4jGraphQLAuthJWTPlugin({
secret:
secret.private_key.toString()
})
}
})
Here's the schema that it suggested after I gave it some samples, doesn't work:
type Homework {
id: ID #id
title: String!
steps: [Step!]! #relationship(
type: "HAS",
direction: OUT
)
}
extend type Homework #auth(
rules:[
{
allow: CREATE,
roles:[
"ADMIN"
]
}
]
)
extend type Homework #auth(
rules:[
{
allow: READ,
}
]
)
The token itself is getting properly passed in, as discussed at length in the ChatGPT session, I'm not sure what else it is?
Where the secret property is my JSON of a service account taken from firebase, then in my Apollo context I've tried lots of trial and error with no success, in this matter, but here was one implantation I tried:
app.use(
"/etsem",
cors(),
bodyp.json(),
exp4.expressMiddleware(
serv, {
context: async info => {
var rz = {
req:info.req,
headers:info.req.headers
}
return rz;
}
}
)
)
But still I got the forbidden error
I'm trying to implement the code example in this repo:
https://github.com/autodesk-platform-services/aps-simple-viewer-dotnet
While launching in debugging mode, I get an error in the AuthController.cs says:
Could not list models. See the console for more details
I didn't make any significant changes to the original code, I only changed the env vars (client id, secret etc..)
The error is on the below function:
async function setupModelSelection(viewer, selectedUrn) {
const dropdown = document.getElementById('models');
dropdown.innerHTML = '';
try {
const resp = await fetch('/api/models');
if (!resp.ok) {
throw new Error(await resp.text());
}
const models = await resp.json();
dropdown.innerHTML = models.map(model => `<option value=${model.urn} ${model.urn === selectedUrn ? 'selected' : ''}>${model.name}</option>`).join('\n');
dropdown.onchange = () => onModelSelected(viewer, dropdown.value);
if (dropdown.value) {
onModelSelected(viewer, dropdown.value);
}
} catch (err) {
alert('Could not list models. See the console for more details.');
console.error(err);
}
}
I get an access token so my client id and secret are probably correct, I also added the app to the cloud hub, what could be the problem, why the app can't find the projects in the hub?
I can only repeat what AlexAR said - the given sample is not for accessing files from user hubs like ACC/BIM 360 Docs - for that follow this: https://tutorials.autodesk.io/tutorials/hubs-browser/
To address the specific error. One way I can reproduce that is if I set the APS_BUCKET variable to something simple that has likely been used by someone else already, e.g. "mybucket", and so I'll get an error when trying to access the files in it, since it's not my bucket. Bucket names need to be globally unique. If you don't want to come up with a unique name yourself, then just do not declare the APS_BUCKET environment variable and the sample will generate a bucket name for you based on the client id of your app.
I need to call Graph API from spfx webpart.
Previously we used the following method:
import { MSGraphClient } from '#microsoft/sp-client-preview';
But later we got to know that MSGraphClient is depreciated now in sp-client-preview.
I checked the following method which is mentioned in Microsoft docs also.
import { MSGraphClient } from '#microsoft/sp-http';
But it is giving an error as following:
Module '"d:/O365/upload-onedrive/node_modules/#microsoft/sp-http/dist/index-internal"' has no exported member 'MSGraphClient'
SPFx version we are using now is 1.6
Is there any way call Graph API from spfx now?
Of course we can use Graph in SPFx.
Graph+adal+SPFx steps:
Create an application in Azure portal. Click the manifest, then change "oauth2AllowImplicitFlow" value to true
Go to Settings->Required Permissions->ADD->Select an API->Microsoft Graph, select the permission and then Grant Permissions.
Build HelloWorld SPFx project : https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/sharepoint/dev/spfx/web-parts/get-started/build-a-hello-world-web-part
Add and IAdalConfig.ts and WebPartAuthenticationContext.js patch files
Tips: If you have no adal module in node_modules/#types folder, you'd better manually install the module using the command : npm install #types/adal#1.0.29
Add the following code to render()
// Make an AJAX request to the Graph API and print the response as JSON.
var getToken;
var getCurrentUser = function (access_token) {
var xhr = new XMLHttpRequest();
xhr.open('GET', 'https://graph.microsoft.com/v1.0/me', true);
xhr.setRequestHeader('Authorization', 'Bearer ' + access_token);
xhr.onreadystatechange = function () {
if (xhr.readyState === 4 && xhr.status === 200) {
// Do something with the response
getToken=JSON.stringify(JSON.parse(xhr.responseText), null, ' ');
console.log('get Graph APi information=='+getToken);
} else {
// TODO: Do something with the error (or non-200 responses)
// console.log(' error');
}
};
xhr.send();
There is actually no reason to create any applications in the Azure side, it's all automatic and taken care of by SharePoint. See following documentation for details. We did change the API structure slightly between preview and GA, but the basics have remained the same with MSGraphClient usage and no reason for any manual access token handling.
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/sharepoint/dev/spfx/use-msgraph
I am working on a angularfire project and I would like to know how can I create an user in Firebase 3 and once done, do not authenticate the specified user. In the previous Firebase version we had the method called createUser(email, password). Now we have the method createUserWithEmailAndPassword(email, password) only, it creates and authenticates the specified user.
The answer to the question is: you can't.
We have similar situation where we have 'admin' users that can create other users. With 2.x this was a snap. With 3.x it's a fail as that capability was completely removed.
If you create a user in 3.x you authenticate as that user, and unauthenticate the account that's logged in.
This goes deeper as you would then need to re-authenticate to create another user; so the admin either does that manually or (cringe) stores the authentication data locally so it could be an automated process (cringe cringe, please don't do this)
Firebase has publicly stressed that 2.x will continue to be supported so you may just want to avoid 3.x.
Update:
one of the Firebaser's actually came up with a workaround on this. Conceptually you had an admin user logged in. You then create a second connection to firebase and authenticate with another user, that connection then creates the new user. Rinse - repeat.
Update again
See this question and answer
Firebase kicks out current user
You can do this using cloud function and firebase admin SDK.
Create HTTP function like below.
const functions = require('firebase-functions');
const admin = require('firebase-admin');
admin.initializeApp(functions.config().firebase);
// Create and Deploy Your First Cloud Functions
// https://firebase.google.com/docs/functions/write-firebase-functions
exports.createUser = functions.https.onRequest((request, response) => {
if (request.method !== "POST") {
response.status(405).send("Method Not Allowed");
} else {
let body = request.body;
const email = body.email;
const password = body.password;
const displayName = body.displayName;
admin.auth().createUser({
email: email,
emailVerified: false,
password: password,
displayName: displayName,
disabled: false
})
.then((userRecord) => {
return response.status(200).send("Successfully created new user: " +userRecord.uid);
})
.catch((error) => {
return response.status(400).send("Failed to create user: " + error);
});
}
});
In your client app, call this function using Http request, for example using ajax
$.ajax({
url: "the url generated by cloud function",
type: "POST",
data: {
email: email,
password: password,
displayName: name
},
success: function(response) {
console.log(response);
},
error: function(xhr, status, error) {
let err = JSON.parse(xhr.responseText);
console.log(err.Message);
}
});
I just started learning MeteorJS and after completing the tutorial, I decided to play around with the Twitter API. Initially, I followed this tutorial
http://artsdigital.co/exploring-twitter-api-meteor-js/
Once completing that, what I wanted to do is scrape data from a tweet and display it on the client side.
N/A = proper authentication
Here's the code I've written:
if (Meteor.isClient) {
Session.setDefault('screen_name', 'John');
Template.hello.helpers({
screen_name: function () {
return Session.get('screen_name');
}
});
Template.hello.events({
'click button': function () {
T.get('search/tweets',
{
q: '#UCLA',
count: 1
},
function(err,data,response) {
var user_name = data.statuses[0].users.screen_name;
Session.set('screen_name', user_name);
}
)
}
});
}
if (Meteor.isServer) {
Meteor.startup(function () {
// code to run on server at startup
var Twit = Meteor.npmRequire('twit');
var T = new Twit({
consumer_key: 'N/A', // API key
consumer_secret: 'N/A', // API secret
access_token: 'N/A',
access_token_secret: 'N/A'
});
});
}
What I believe the problem is that, the 'click button' function, the 'T' is seen to be undefined so the compiler doesn't know what that is or where it came. That thought did spark a thought in my mind to move what I have written inside the
if (Meteor.isServer) to if (Meteor.isClient)
But to no avail. It didn't work. What my reasoning is that once Meteor starts, the server starts, so if the server declares the variable T, shouldn't we be able to access it on the client side too?
I'm not sure if my approach is correct/don't know the conventions of Meteor/Meteor NOOB..so if someone could please help me, that will be highly appreciated!
Thanks!
You put a "var" declaration in front of your "T" variable. This binds the scope to the server side context of the app. I bet if you got rid of the var and made "T" global, then you would be able to access it from the client side as well.