We have a project where there are integration tests for the web-services implemented in the mobile projects. Would it be possible, for instance, to build and run a test target in the iOS repo every time the back-end is deployed? If so how would one go about this?
This is not supported out of the box.
You could however use the trigger a build feature during a build on the backend repository, so a build on the frontend repository is started.
See https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/triggering-builds/ for the required building blocks.
Downside is that you will not see a build error in the right place.
Alternative is to clone the frontend repository in a separate job on the backend repository, and run the tests there. This means that breaking changes in the backend will be visible in the GitHub UI.
Related
I have been searching far and wide to see if I can find information on Jenkins incremental pipeline builds that does not involve Maven.
The general idea is that I want to build a generic project and run specific steps of the pipeline if the underlying code has changed. If the code did not change, I want to re-use the results from a previous build.
The reason why I want to do this, is to drastically reduce build times for huge projects.
Imagine that you only need to fix 1 line in a SCSS file, but the whole project needs to be rebuild, repackaged, etc because of this. In the meantime, the site is live and broken and waiting 15 mins to be fixed.
Can someone give a basic example of how such a build can be created or where I can find more information on incremental building?
The only thing I have been able to find is incremental building for Maven projects, but this is not applicable for me.
The standard solution is to create modules that depends on each others.
Publish the built artifact of your modules to a binary repository like Sonatype Nexus (you can easily create private npm repo as well as proxy npm repo).
During the build download the dependencies, instead of building them.
If this solution is not the one you want to take, you will have a hard time hacking a solution. To persist the state of your steps, an easy solution is to create files in the job workspace and read them at next build
I want to setup a CI and CD processes for a React App for the company I'm working for, the following technologies are used:
React for frontend
Flask for backend
Docker
GitHub for source control management
currently we are using a script to build the app and than deploy it manually to AWS S3 bucket, I've read some article and watched tutorials and almost all of them cover Java based project and use Maven as a build tool to package the project before deploying.
appreciate if you could help.
I agree that the question is a bit broad but here but generally speaking you should ave a different CI pipeline for your frontend and backend application.
The implications of this are many since this will allow you to:
To use different release cycles for your backend/frontend application
Reduced build time
You might however at some point run an integration step to make sure everything holds together. Generally speaking your pipeline should look like (this should run on every commit):
Also make sure you choose a CI/CD tool that doesn't get in your way and that's flexible enough (i.e: GitLab, Jenkins).
Build docker image
Linter (to ensure a minimum code formatting and quality)
Unit Testing
Code coverage (Code coverage perse it's a bit useless but combined with how it evolves and enforcing a minimum % might help with quality)
Functional testing (this makes more sense for your backend stack if it uses a database for instance ...)
If everything passes then push to DockerHub
Deploy the recently built image to the corresponding environment. Example merging to develop implies deployment to your staging environment
I'm wondering if there is an easy way to "publish" p2 update sites in Jenkins (built with Tycho) so that they can easily be accessed in downstreams jobs? Currently I'm doing it semi-manually using Jenkins support for copying artifacts between jobs, and then specifying a repository-mirror element in a job-specific settings.xml which refers to the artifacts copied into the job, but this is all a little tricky and requires configuring jobs and build settings in a number of different places.
Is there any nicer way short of using an external solution such as Artifactory?
The only solution involving a repository manager that I am aware of is to use a Nexus and the Unzip Plug-in. (Disclaimer: The Unzip Plug-in is provided by the Tycho project, of which I am a committer.)
With such a setup, you could have one job deploy an update site to Nexus, and the next job use the update site via the unzip URL of the deployed site. Example: If the site was deployed under the GAV project.abc:site:1.0.0-SNAPSHOT, you could then access it via http://<nexus>/content/repositories/<unzip-repo-name>/project/abc/site/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/site-1.0.0-SNAPSHOT-unzip/.
Note that you are slightly less flexible with such a setup that with what you have set up now: You need to have a version number for what your upstream project is building, so this may become tricky if you have multiple feature branches developing towards the same release version.
If you don't need this, you have the benefit of getting a portable build of your downstream project, i.e. developers build the project in the same way as your Jenkins does.
Hi I am using TFS and want do deploy two web applications after build to a test server.
After the deployment I want to call a web page at one of the web applications to trigger some work like, delete all data and insert test data.
How can I accomplish this?
You could have a look at TFSDeployer. If you are comfortable with Powershell, you can write a deployment script that does whatever you want, and TFSDeployer will execute it when it detects changes to the build quality (i.e. you set build quality to "deploy to test" for example and it will run the script to deploy to the test environment). There's more information on the site, and this is what I use almost always for deployments.
You can MS Deploy to deploy your applications to the test environments: http://www.ewaldhofman.nl/post/2010/04/12/Auto-deployment-of-my-web-application-with-Team-Build-2010-to-add-Interactive-Testing.aspx.
To call a web application, you can either create a codedui that you run as part of your testing, or you add an activity to your build template that calls the web site: http://www.ewaldhofman.nl/?tag=/build+2010+customization
You can use DeployToAzure. It publishes specified cloud project to Azure as a part of your TFS build workflow. Publishing is executed after solution is built and unit tested are passed. You can include some steps (like call web page) after that.
And you don't need any Powershell programming for that.
Check here for additional information: Deploying Azure Project from TFS 2010 Build Server
I'm working on my first rails app and am struggling trying to find an efficient and clean solution for doing automated checkouts and deployments.
So far I've looked at both CruiseControl.rb (having been familiar with CruiseControl.NET) and Capistrano. Unfortunately, unless I'm missing something, each one of them only does about half of what I want (with each one doing a different half).
For what I've seen so far:
CruiseControl
Strengths
Automated builds on repository checkouts upon commit
Also runs unit/functional tests and reports back
Weaknesses
No built-in deployment mechanisms (best I can find so far is writing your own bash scripts)
Capistrano
Strengths
Built for deployments
Weaknesses
Has to be kicked off via a command (i.e. doesn't do automated checkouts upon commit)
I've found ways that I can string the two together -- i.e. have CruiseControl ping the repository for changes, do a checkout upon commit, run the tests, etc. and then make a call to Capistrano when finished to do the deployment (even though Capistrano is also going to do a repository checkout).
Basically, when all is said and done, I'd like to have three projects set up:
Dev: Checkout/Deployment is entirely no touch. When someone commits a file, something checks it out, runs the tests, deploys the changes, and reports back
Stage: Checkout/Deployment requires a button click
Prod: Button click does either a tagged check out or moves the files from stage
I have this working with a combination of CruiseControl.NET and MSBuild in the .NET world, and it was fairly straightforward. I would guess this is also a common pattern in the ruby deployment world, but I could easily be mistaken.
I would give Hudson a try (free and open source). I started off using CruiseControl but got sick of having to relearn the XML configuration every time I needed to change a setting or add a project. Then I started using Hudson and never looked back. Hudson is more or less completely configurable over the web. It was initially a continuous integration tool for Java but has plugins for other development stack such as .NET and Ruby on Rails. There's a Rake plugin. If that doesn't work, you can configure it to execute any arbitrary command line after running your Rake builds/tests.
I should also add it's extremely easy to get Hudson going:
java -jar hudson.war
Or you can drop the war in any servlet container.
I would use two system to build and deploy anyway. At least two reasons: you should be able to run it separately and you should have two config files one for deploy and one for build. But you can easily glue the two systems together.
Just create a simple capistrano task, that tests and reports back to you. You can use the "run" command to do anything you want.
If you don't want any command line tool there was webistrano 2 years ago.
To could use something like http://github.com/benschwarz/gitnotify/tree/master to trigger the build deploy if you use git as repository.
At least for development automated deployments, check out the hook scripts available in git:
http://git-scm.com/docs/githooks
I think you'll want to focus on the post-receive hook script, since this runs after a push to a remote server.
Also worth checking out Mislav's git-deploy on github. Makes managing deployments pretty clean.
http://github.com/mislav/git-deploy