Summary
So I'm trying to figure out a way to use docker to be able to spin up testing environments for customers rather easily. Basically, I've got a customized piece of software that want to install to a Windows docker container (microsoft/windowsservercore), and I need to be able to access the program folder for that software (C:\Program Files\SOFTWARE_NAME) as it has some logs, imports/exports, and other miscellaneous configuration files. The installation part was easy, and I figured that after a few hours of messing around with docker and learning how it works, but transferring files in a simple manner is proving far more difficult than I would expect. I'm well aware of the docker cp command, but I'd like something that allows for the files to be viewed in a file browser to allow testers to quickly/easily view log/configuration files from the container.
Background (what I've tried):
I've spent 20+ hours monkeying around with running an SSH server on the docker container, so I could just ssh in and move files back and forth, but I've had no luck. I've spent most of my time trying to configure OpenSSH, and I can get it installed, but there appears to be something wrong with the default configuration file provided with my installation, as I can't get it up and running unless I start it manually via command line by running sshd -d. Strangely, this runs just fine, but it isn't really a viable solution as it is running in debug mode and shuts down as soon as the connection is closed. I can provide more detail on what I've tested with this, but it seems like it might be a dead end (even though I feel like this should be extremely simple). I've followed every guide I can find (though half are specific to linux containers), and haven't gotten any of them to work, and half the posts I've found just say "why would you want to use ssh when you can just use the built in docker commands". I want to use ssh because it's simpler from an end user's perspective, and I'd rather tell a tester to ssh to a particular IP than make them interact with docker via the command line.
EDIT: Using OpenSSH
Starting server using net start sshd, which reports it starting successfully, however, the service stops immediately if I haven't generated at least an RSA or DSA key using:
ssh-keygen.exe -f "C:\\Program Files\\OpenSSH-Win64/./ssh_host_rsa_key" -t rsa
And modifying the permissions using:
icacls "C:\Program Files\OpenSSH-Win64/" /grant sshd:(OI)(CI)F /T
and
icacls "C:\Program Files\OpenSSH-Win64/" /grant ContainerAdministrator:(OI)(CI)F /T
Again, I'm using the default supplied sshd_config file, but I've tried just about every adjustment of those settings I can find and none of them help.
I also attempted to setup Volumes to do this, but because the installation of our software is done at compile time in docker, the folder that I want to map as a volume is already populated with files, which seems to make docker fail when I try to start the container with the volume attached. This section of documentation seems to say this should be possible, but I can't get it to work. Keep getting errors when I try to start the container saying "the directory is not empty".
EDIT: Command used:
docker run -it -d -p 9999:9092 --mount source=my_volume,destination=C:/temp my_container
Running this on a ProxMox VM.
At this point, I'm running out of ideas, and something that I feel like should be incredibly simple is taking me far too many hours to figure out. It particularly frustrates me that I see so many blog posts saying "Just use the built in docker cp command!" when that is honestly a pretty bad solution when you're going to be browsing lots of files and viewing/editing them. I really need a method that allows the files to be viewed in a file browser/notepad++.
Is there something obvious here that I'm missing? How is this so difficult? Any help is appreciated.
So after a fair bit more troubleshooting, I was unable to get the docker volume to initialize on an already populated folder, even though the documentation suggests it should be possible.
So, I instead decided to try to start the container with the volume linked to an empty folder, and then start the installation script for the program after the container is running, so the folder populates after the volume is already linked. This worked perfectly! There's a bit of weirdness if you leave the files in the volume and then try to restart the container, as it will overwrite most of the files, but things like logs and files not created by the installer will remain, so we'll have to figure out some process for managing that, but it works just like I need it to, and then I can use windows sharing to access that volume folder from anywhere on the network.
Here's how I got it working, it's actually very simple.
So in my dockerfile, I added a batch script that unzips the installation DVD that is copied to the container, and runs the installer after extracting. I then used the CMD option to run this on container start:
Dockerfile
FROM microsoft/windowsservercore
ADD DVD.zip C:\\resources\\DVD.zip
ADD config.bat C:\\resources\\config.bat
CMD "C:\resources\config.bat" && cmd
Then I build the container without anything special:
docker build -t my_container:latest .
And run it with the attachment to the volume:
docker run -it -d -p 9999:9092 --mount source=my_volume,destination="C:/Program Files (x86)/{PROGRAM NAME}" my_container
And that's it. Unfortunately, the container takes a little longer to start (it does build faster though, for what that's worth, as it isn't running the installer in the build), and the program isn't installed/running for another 5 minutes or so after the container does start, but it works!
I can provide more details if anyone needs them, but most of the rest is implementation specific and fairly straightforward.
Try this with Docker composer. Unfortunately, I cannot test it as I'm using a Mac it's not a "supported platform" (way to go Windows). See if that works, if not try volume line like this instead - ./my_volume:C:/tmp/
Dockerfile
FROM microsoft/windowsservercore
# need to ecape \
WORKDIR C:\\tmp\\
# Add the program from host machine to container
ADD ["<source>", "C:\tmp"]
# Normally used with web servers
# EXPOSE 80
# Running the program
CMD ["C:\tmp\program.exe", "any-parameter"]
Docker Composer
Should ideally be in the parent folder.
version: "3"
services:
windows:
build: ./folder-of-Dockerfile
volume:
- type: bind
source: ./my_volume
target: C:/tmp/
ports:
- 9999:9092
Folder structure
|---docker-composer.yml
|
|---folder-of-Dockerfile
|
|---Dockerfile
Just run docker-composer up to build and start the container. Use -d for detach mode, should only use once you know its working properly.
Useful link Manage Windows Dockerfile
Related
Can be closed, not sure how to do it.
I am to be quite frank lost right now, the user whom published his source on github somehow failed to update the installation instructions when he released a new branch. Now, I am not dense, just uneducated when it comes to docker. I would really appreciate a push in the right direction. If I am missing any information from this post, please allow me to provide it in the comments.
Current Setup
O/S - Debian 8 Minimal (Latest kernel)
Hardware - 1GB VPS (KVM)
Docker - Installed with Compose (# docker info)
I am attempting to setup this (https://github.com/pboehm/ddns/tree/docker_and_rework), first I should clone this git to my working directory? Lets say /home for example. I will run the following command;
git clone -b docker_and_rework https://github.com/pboehm/ddns.git
Which has successfully cloned the source files into /home/ddns/... (working dir)
Now I believe I am supposed to go ahead and build something*, so I go into the following directory;
/home/ddns/docker
Inside contains a docker-compose.yml file, I am not sure what this does but by looking at it, it appears to be sending a bunch of instructions which I can only presume is to do with actually deploying or building the whole container/image or magical thing right? From here I go ahead and do the following;
docker-compose build
As we can see, I believe its building the container or image or whatever its called, you get my point (here). After a short while, that completes and we can see the following (docker images running). Which is correct, I see all of the dependencies in there, but things like;
go version
It does not show as a command, so I presume I need to run it inside the container maybe? If so I dont have a clue how, I need to run 'ddns.go' which is inside /home/ddns, the execution command is;
ddns --soa_fqdn=dns.stealthy.pro --domain=d.stealthy.pro backend
I am also curious why the front end web page is not showing? There should be a page like this;
http://ddns.pboehm.org/
But again, I believe there is some more to do I just do not know what??
docker-compose build will only build the images.
You need to run this. It will build and run them.
docker-compose up -d
The -d option runs containers in the background
To check if it's running after docker-compose up
docker-compose ps
It will show what is running and what ports are exposed from the container.
Usually you can access services from your localhost
If you want to have a look inside the container
docker-compose exec SERVICE /bin/bash
Where SERVICE is the name of the service in docker-compose.yml
The instructions it runs that you probably care about are in the Dockerfile, which for that repo is in the docker/ddns/ directory. What you're missing is that Dockerfile creates an image, which is a template to create an instance. Every time you docker run you'll create a new instance from the image. docker run docker_ddns go version will create a new instance of the image, run go version and output it, then die. Running long running processes like the docker_ddns-web image probably does will run the process until something kills that process. The reason you can't see the web page is probably because you haven't run docker-compose up yet, which will create linked instances of all of the docker images specified in the docker-compose.yml file. Hope this helps
I'm trying to create a Docker container based on CentOS 7 that will host R, shiny-server, and rstudio-server, but to I need to have systemd in order for the services to start. I can use the systemd enabled centos image as a basis, but then I need to run the container in privileged mode and allow access to /sys/fs/cgroup on the host. I might be able to tolerate the less secure situation, but then I'm not able to share the container with users running Docker on Windows or Mac.
I found this question but it is 2 years old and doesn't seem to have any resolution.
Any tips or alternatives are appreciated.
UPDATE: SUCCESS!
Here's what I found: For shiny-server, I only needed to execute shiny-server with the appropriate parameters from the command line. I captured the appropriate call into a script file and call that using the final CMD line in my Dockerfile.
rstudio-server was more tricky. First, I needed to install initscripts to get the dependencies in place so that some of the rstudio scripts would work. After this, executing rstudio-server start would essentially do nothing and provide no error. I traced the call through the various links and found myself in /usr/lib/rstudio-server/bin/rstudio-server. The daemonCmd() function tests cat /proc/1/comm to determine how to start the server. For some reason it was failing, but looking at the script, it seems clear that it needs to execute /etc/init.d/rstudio-server start. If I do that manually or in a Docker CMD line, it seems to work.
I've taken those two CMD line requirements and put them into an sh script that gets called from a CMD line in the Dockerfile.
A bit of a hack, but not bad. I'm happy to hear any other suggestions.
You don't necessarily need to use an init system like systemd.
Essentially, you need to start multiple services, there are existing patterns for this. Check out this page about how to use supervisord to achieve the same thing: https://docs.docker.com/engine/admin/using_supervisord/
I often find myself in need of re-creating container with minor modifications to arguments used to docker run container originally (things like changing published ports, network, memory amount).
Now I am making images and running them in place of old containers.
This works fine but I don't always have original params to docker run saved and sometimes (esp. when there are lot of things to define) it becomes pain to recover them.
Is there any way to recover docker run arguments from existing container?
Sorry for being a couple of years late, but I had a similar question and no satisfying answer yet, so I still needed to find my way out.
I've found two sources addressing the issue:
A gist
To run, save this to a file, e.g. run.tpl and do docker inspect --format "$(<run.tpl)" name_or_id_of_running_container
A docker image
Quick run:
$ docker run --rm -v /var/run/docker.sock:/var/run/docker.sock nexdrew/rekcod <container>
Both solutions are quite simple to use, but the second one failed to generate the command for an Nginx container because they did not manage to have it quoted like this "nginx" "-g" "daemon off;"
So, I focused on the first solution, which is a golang template intended to feed the --format parameter of docker inspect. I liked it because it was kind of simple, elegant, and no other tool needed.
I've made some improvements in my forked gist and notified the original author about it.
Couple of answers to this. Run your containers using docker-compose, then you can just run compose files and retain all your configuration. Obviously compose is designed for multi-container applications, but massively underrated for single-container, complex run argument use cases.
Second one is to put your run command into a LABEL on the image. Take a look at Label Schema's docker.cmd etc... Then you can easily retrieve from the image (or from your Dockerfile).
the best way to do this is not to type the commands manually. put them into a shell script... a .sh file on linux/mac, or a .cmd file on windows. then you just run the shell script to create your container and you never have to worry about re-typing the commands and options, you'll never get them wrong, etc.
personally, i write my scripts with "npm scripts" in my package.json file. but the same thing can be done with any tool that can run command-line program with arguments
i do this along with a few other tricks to make sure i never fail to build my images or run my containers. makes life with docker soooo much easier. :)
You can use docker inspect to get the container's configuration. Reconstructing the docker run command from that can be somewhat tedious though.
Another option is to search your shell history using either history | grep "docker run" or ctrl+r (if you use bash). That way, you don't need to go out of your way to save the commands but can still recover them quickly.
I'm new to Docker and was wondering if it was possible (and a good idea) to develop within a docker container.
I mean create a container, execute bash, install and configure everything I need and start developping inside the container.
The container becomes then my main machine (for CLI related works).
When I'm on the go (or when I buy a new machine), I can just push the container, and pull it on my laptop.
This sort the problem of having to keep and synchronize your dotfile.
I haven't started using docker yet, so is it something realistic or to avoid (spacke disk problem and/or pull/push timing issue).
Yes. It is a good idea, with the correct set-up. You'll be running code as if it was a virtual machine.
The Dockerfile configurations to create a build system is not polished and will not expand shell variables, so pre-installing applications may be a bit tedious. On the other hand after building your own image to create new users and working environment, it won't be necessary to build it again, plus you can mount your own file system with the -v parameter of the run command, so you can have the files you are going to need both in your host and container machine. It's versatile.
> sudo docker run -t -i -v
/home/user_name/Workspace/project:/home/user_name/Workspace/myproject <container-ID>
I'll play the contrarian and say it's a bad idea. I've done work where I've tried to keep a container "long running" and have modified it, but then accidentally lost it or deleted it.
In my opinion containers aren't meant to be long running VMs. They are just meant to be instances of an image. Start it, stop it, kill it, start it again.
As Alex mentioned, it's certainly possible, but in my opinion goes against the "Docker" way.
I'd rather use VirtualBox and Vagrant to create VMs to develop in.
Docker container for development can be very handy. Depending on your stack and preferred IDE you might want to keep the editing part outside, at host, and mount the directory with the sources from host to the container instead, as per Alex's suggestion. If you do so, beware potential performance issue on macos x with boot2docker.
I would not expect much from the workflow with pushing the images to sync between dev environments. IMHO keeping Dockerfiles together with the code and synching by SCM means is more straightforward direction to start with. I also carry supporting Makefiles to build image(s) / run container(s) same place.
I started using Docker and I can say, it is a great concept.
Everything is going fine so far.
I installed docker on ubuntu (my host operating system) , played with images from repository and made new images.
Question:
I want to make an image of the current(Host) operating system. How shall I achieve this using docker itself ?
I am new to docker, so please ignore any silly things in my questions, if any.
I was doing maintenance on a server, the ones we pray not to crash, and I came across a situation where I had to replace sendmail with postfix.
I could not stop the server nor use the docker hub available image because I need to be clear sure I will not have problems. That's why I wanted to make an image of the server.
I got to this thread and from it found ways to reproduce the procedure.
Below is the description of it.
We start by building a tar file of the entire filesystem of the machine (excluding some non necessary and hardware dependent directory - Ok, it may not be as perfect as I intent, but it seams to be fine to me. You'll need to try whatever works for you) we want to clone (as pointed by #Thomasleveil in this thread).
$ sudo su -
# cd /
# tar -cpzf backup.tar.gz --exclude=/backup.tar.gz --exclude=/proc --exclude=/tmp --exclude=/mnt --exclude=/dev --exclude=/sys /
Then just download the file into your machine, import targz as an image into the docker and initialize the container. Note that in the example I put the date-month-day of image generation as image tag when importing the file.
$ scp user#server-uri:path_to_file/backup.tar.gz .
$ cat backup.tar.gz | docker import - imageName:20190825
$ docker run -t -i imageName:20190825 /bin/bash
IMPORTANT: This procedure generates a completely identical image, so it is of great importance if you will use the generated image to distribute between developers, testers and whateever that you remove from it or change any reference containing restricted passwords, keys or users to avoid security breaches.
I'm not sure to understand why you would want to do such a thing, but that is not the point of your question, so here's how to create a new Docker image from nothing:
If you can come up with a tar file of your current operating system, then you can create a new docker image of it with the docker import command.
cat my_host_filesystem.tar | docker import - myhost
where myhost is the docker image name you want and my_host_filesystem.tar the archive file of your OS file system.
Also take a look at Docker, start image from scratch from superuser and this answer from stackoverflow.
If you want to learn more about this, searching for docker "from scratch" is a good starting point.