I want to know the difference between cloning a response object resolved by Fetch API using response.clone() and cloneDeep(response) (using cloneDeep method of lodash library)
The reason I ask this is because of this question raised by me earlier.
click here
I don't think lodash supports copying stream objects which Response has one for the response body. There also could be hidden properties that lodash can't see that the user agent manages behind the scenes.
Related
Hello I want to make a request to a xml file for a value I want on Code by Zapier, but I get the error XMLHttpRequest is not defined. I also tried var XMLHttpRequest = require("xmlhttprequest").XMLHttpRequest; but it says Error: Cannot find module 'xmlhttprequest'.
While the XMLHttpRequest is available in most browsers, it is not distributed in Node, which is what the Code action is using. Specifically, the Javascript code action is running a Node v10.x.x environment. You can see all of the commands and methods supported by that environment here:
https://node.green/
The JS environment does support the Fetch library for making requests. Perhaps you can look into making this work?
https://github.com/node-fetch/node-fetch
I am pulling a file from on premise TFS source control using the Rest API. I can't find on premise specific documentation, but it seems to be very close to version 4.1 of the Azure Get Item call. According to this documentaiton, it should return a TfvcItem object which has a lot of metadata including the version. However, when I make the call it only returns the file contents (the content field of the documentation's TfvcItem).
How do I get the current version of the file?
I need the version when I check itin with create changeset. I don't need it for any other reason, so if you know another way to check in an edited file that would help.
Instead of using Get Item API, some related REST APIs are not documented. For these REST APIs we can use tools such as Fiddler or directly press F12 - network in Chrome to track them.
You should use below API to fetch latest changeset version of a file:
post https://dev.azure.com/{organizationname}/{Projectname}/_api/_versioncontrol/history?__v=5
For body:
{"repositoryId":"","searchCriteria":"{\"itemPath\":\"$/MyFirstProject/Main/1.txt\",\"itemVersion\":\"T\",\"top\":50}"}
itemPath is your server path of the file.
From the response, you will get the version info such as "version": "139", instead of the file content.
Not sure your detail version of TFS, I was using Azure DevOps Service for an example. There maybe some difference for different TFS version. You could track the detail API on your own side.
More detail info kindly take a look at this question: VSTS Release API Documentation
Had the same issue. You can get item metadata by specifying "scopePath" URI parameter, instead of "path". Microsoft example in API documentation seems incorrect, as it indeed returns only item content: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/rest/api/azure/devops/tfvc/items/get?view=azure-devops-rest-6.0#get-item-metadata-and/or-content-for-a-single-item.
I try to use JavaScript library visjs.org in Dart. I prepared ‘adapter’ code according examples on Dart site pub.dartlang.org/packages/js and github.com/google/chartjs.dart/blob/master/lib/chartjs.dart.
Also according basic use case example from http://visjs.org I prepare client dart code.
While code compiles without any errors and warnings nothing happens in browser, expected to see graph-tree.
What I did wrong or miss to do?
https://gist.github.com/EdSv/e274a4d12ad3491c383fb4fe76ee671e
The attribute #anonymous is meant to be used when the object you're describing doesn't actually exist in the JS library you're binding, and is only used as a plain old data object. By adding it to all of your objects, my guess is that dart is never attempting to create anything from the visjs library.
Try removing the #anonymous from your Network class and see if that has an effect. You will likely also need to make these abstract classes as well.
I'm using ElFinder.NET connector in my MVC applications. In one application everything works fine, but the other application can't initialize Elfinder.
The code used to initialize Elfinder is the same in both applications. The problem is probably in Connector.Process(this.HttpContext.Request) call.
In the application, where ElFinder is working, Connector.Process returns JSON result with correct data, the other application returns a wierd result.
I can see in the browser, that the request was processed, but the response body contains string System.Web.Mvc.JsonDataContractResult instead of JSON data. If I step through the code in Visual Studio, I see that Connector.Process return a JsonDataContractResult but it's empty.
Well then :)
Possible situation is; outdated Json.Net(Newtonsotf.Json) package version. If you have an older version of this library please simply replace them with the ones in elfinder's package as i say on my comment..
I am trying to create a chrome extension that calls my rails app's api. currently the api returns json and it works fine, however when I try to build it into a chrome extension, it says :
Refused to load script from 'http://mysite.com/demo?q=hello?callback=jQuery16409466155741829425_1342489669670&_=1342489677171' because of Content-Security-Policy.
I looked up the document http://code.google.com/chrome/extensions/contentSecurityPolicy.html and it sounds like I can't do this unless I implement my site into a https version. (under "Relaxing the default policy" section) I am not sure if I understood correctly and it feels ridiculous to make such a big change just because of this. Am I misunderstood? Or is there a workaround to this? Thank you.
In a Chrome extension, cross-site XMLHttpRequests are allowed, provided that you define the source in the manifest file - see http://code.google.com/chrome/extensions/xhr.html.
A JSONP implementation loads an external script using the <script> tag, and inserts it in the document. Unless the source is whitelisted through the "content_security_policy" entry, JSONP cannot be used when manifest version 2 is active (do not use manifest v1 to overcome this, because it's deprecated, and a suitable alternative already exist).
When you're unable to receive a JSON response instead of JSONP, use an ordinary request to fetch the data, cut off the callback, then parse it. Eg:
// response is the response from the server
// Received through `XMLHttpRequest`, jQuery.ajax, or whatever you used
// cuts of jQuery....( and the trailing )
response = response.replace(/^[^(]*\(/, '').replace(/\);?$/, '');
By default browsers do not allow this because of the same origin policy.
However you can get around this by making a jsonp request.
As you using jquery this super easy with getJSON method