I have app with two screens, and I want to make push from 1st to second screen by pressing button.
Screen 1
import 'package:flutter/material.dart';
import './view/second_page.dart';
void main() => runApp(new MyApp());
class MyApp extends StatefulWidget {
#override
State<StatefulWidget> createState() {
return new MainScreen();
}
}
class MainScreen extends State<MyApp> {
#override
void initState() {
super.initState();
}
#override
Widget build(BuildContext context) {
return new MaterialApp(
home: new Scaffold(
appBar: new AppBar(
title: new Text("Title")
),
body: new Center(
child: new FlatButton(child: new Text("Second page"),
onPressed: () {
Navigator.push(context,
new MaterialPageRoute(
builder: (context) => new SecondPage()))
}
)
)
)
);
}
}
Screen 2
import 'package:flutter/material.dart';
class SecondPage extends StatefulWidget {
#override
State<StatefulWidget> createState() {
return new SecondPageState();
}
}
class SecondPageState extends State<SecondPage> {
#override
void initState() {
super.initState();
}
#override
Widget build(BuildContext context) {
return new Scaffold(
appBar: new AppBar(
title: new Text("Title"),
),
body: new Center(
child: new Text("Some text"),
),
);
}
}
Push not happening and I got this
The following assertion was thrown while handling a gesture: Navigator
operation requested with a context that does not include a Navigator.
The context used to push or pop routes from the Navigator must be that
of a widget that is a descendant of a Navigator widget.
Another exception was thrown: Navigator operation requested with a
context that does not include a Navigator.
What is wrong?
Think of the widgets in Flutter as a tree, with the context pointing to whichever node is being built with the build function. In your case, you have
MainScreen <------ context
--> MaterialApp
(--> Navigator built within MaterialApp)
--> Scaffold
--> App Bar
--> ...
--> Center
--> FlatButton
So when you're using the context to find the Navigator, you're using a context for the MainScreen which isn't under the navigator.
You can either make a new Stateless or Stateful Widget subclass to contain your Center + FlatButton, as the build function within those will point at that level instead, or you can use a Builder and define the builder callback (which has a context pointing at the Builder) to return the Center + FlatButton.
Just make the MaterialApp class in main method as this example
void main() => runApp(MaterialApp(home: FooClass(),));
it works fine for me,
I hope it will work with you
There are two main reasons why the route cannot be found.
1) The Route is defined below the context passed to Navigator.of(context) - scenario which #rmtmackenzie has explained
2) The Route is defined on the sibling branch e.g.
Root
-> Content (Routes e.g. Home/Profile/Basket/Search)
-> Navigation (we want to dispatch from here)
If we want to dispatch a route from the Navigation widget, we have to know the reference to the NavigatorState. Having a global reference is expensive, especially when you intend to move widget around the tree. https://docs.flutter.io/flutter/widgets/GlobalKey-class.html. Use it only where there is no way to get it from Navigator.of(context).
To use a GlobalKey inside the MaterialApp define navigatorKey
final navigatorKey = GlobalKey<NavigatorState>();
Widget build(BuildContext context) => MaterialApp {
navigatorKey: navigatorKey
onGenerateRoute : .....
};
Now anywhere in the app where you pass the navigatorKey you can now invoke
navigatorKey.currentState.push(....);
Just posted about it https://medium.com/#swav.kulinski/flutter-navigating-off-the-charts-e118562a36a5
There is an another very different work around about this issue, If you are using Alarm Manager (Android), and open back to your Application. If you haven't turned on the screen before navigation, the navigator will never work. Although this is a rare usage, I think It should be a worth to know.
Make sure the route table mentioned in the same context:
#override
Widget build(BuildContext context) {
return MaterialApp(
home: FutureBuilder(
future: _isUserLoggedIn(),
builder: (ctx, loginSnapshot) =>
loginSnapshot.connectionState == ConnectionState.waiting ?
SplashScreen() : loginSnapshot.data == true ? AppLandingScreen(): SignUpScreen()
),
routes: {
AppLandingScreen.routeName: (ctx) => AppLandingScreen(),
},
);
}
I faced this issue because I defined the route table in different build method.
Am a newbie and have spent two days trying to get over the Navigtor objet linking to a black a screen.
The issue causing this was dublicated dummy data. Find Bellow the two dummny data blocks:
**Problematic data **- duplicate assets/image:
_buildFoodItem('assets/plate1.png', 'Salmon bowl', '\$24'),
_buildFoodItem('assets/plate2.png', 'Spring bowl', '\$13'),
_buildFoodItem('assets/plate1.png', 'Salmon bowl', '\$24'),
_buildFoodItem('assets/plate5.png', 'Berry bowl', '\$34'),
**Solution **- after eliminating duplicated image argument:
_buildFoodItem('assets/plate1.png', 'Salmon bowl', '\$24'),
_buildFoodItem('assets/plate2.png', 'Spring bowl', '\$13'),
_buildFoodItem('assets/plate6.png', 'Avocado bowl', '\$34'),
I hope this helps someone,,,,,,,
If the navigator is not working, it can be due to many reasons but the major one is that the navigator not finds the context.
So, to solve this issue try to wrap your widget inside Builder because the builder has its own context...
Related
I'm new to Flutter and confused about how InheritedWidget works with routes. I'm using an SQLite database with the sqflite library. Basically, what I'm trying to achieve is, when my app is launched, I want all widgets that don't require the database to show right away. For instance, the bottomNavigationBar of my Scaffold doesn't need the database but the body does. So I want the bottomNavigationBar to show right away, and a CircularProgressIndicator to be shown in the body. Once the database is open, I want the body to show content loaded from the database.
So, in my attempt to achieve this, I use FutureBuilder before my Scaffold to open the database. While the Future is not completed, I pass null for the drawer and a CircularProgressBar for the body, and the bottomNavigationBar as normal. When the Future completes, I wrap the drawer and body (called HomePage) both with their own InheritedWidget (called DataAccessor). This seems to work, as I can access the DataAccessor in my HomePage widget. But, when I use the Navigator in my drawer to navigate to my SettingsScreen, my DataAccessor is not accessible and returns null.
Here's some example code, not using a database but just a 5 second delayed Future:
import 'package:flutter/material.dart';
void main() => runApp(App());
class App extends StatelessWidget {
#override
Widget build(BuildContext context) {
return MaterialApp(
home: FutureBuilder(
future: Future.delayed(Duration(seconds: 5)),
builder: (context, snapshot) {
Widget drawer;
Widget body;
if (snapshot.connectionState == ConnectionState.done) {
drawer = DataAccessor(
child: Drawer(
child: ListView(
children: <Widget>[
ListTile(
title: Text("Settings"),
onTap: () => Navigator.push(context, MaterialPageRoute(builder: (context) => SettingsScreen()))
)
]
)
)
);
body = DataAccessor(child: HomePage());
}
else {
drawer = null;
body = Center(child: CircularProgressIndicator());
}
return Scaffold(
drawer: drawer,
body: body,
bottomNavigationBar: BottomNavigationBar(
items: <BottomNavigationBarItem>[
BottomNavigationBarItem(icon: Container(), title: Text("One")),
BottomNavigationBarItem(icon: Container(), title: Text("Two"))
]
)
);
}
)
);
}
}
class HomePage extends StatelessWidget {
#override
Widget build(BuildContext context) {
DataAccessor dataAccessor = DataAccessor.of(context); //dataAccessor IS NOT null here
print("HomePage: ${dataAccessor == null}");
return Text("HomePage");
}
}
class SettingsScreen extends StatelessWidget {
#override
Widget build(BuildContext context) {
DataAccessor dataAccessor = DataAccessor.of(context); //dataAccessor IS null here
print("SettingsScreen: ${dataAccessor == null}");
return Text("SettingsScreen");
}
}
class DataAccessor extends InheritedWidget {
DataAccessor({Key key, Widget child}) : super(key: key, child: child);
#override
bool updateShouldNotify(InheritedWidget oldWidget) => false;
static DataAccessor of(BuildContext context) => context.inheritFromWidgetOfExactType(DataAccessor);
}
It's possible I'm doing things wrong. Not sure how good of practice storing widgets in variables is. Or using the same InheritedWidget twice? I've also tried wrapping the entire Scaffold with my DataAccessor (and having the database as null while it is loading), but the issue still remains where I can't get my DataAccessor in my SettingsScreen.
I've read that a possible solution is to put my InheritedWidget before the MaterialApp but I don't want to resort to this. I don't want a whole new screen to show while my database is opening, I want my widgets that don't need the database to be shown. This should be possible somehow.
Thanks!
The solution in the last paragraph is what you need. The MaterialApp contains the Navigator which manages the routes, so for all of your routes to have access to the same InheritedWidget that has to be above the Navigator, i.e. above the MaterialApp.
Use Remi's method and you end up with a widget tree like this:
MyApp (has the static .of() returning MyAppState)
MyAppState, whose build returns _MyInherited(child: MaterialApp(...)) and whose initState starts loading the database, calling setState when loaded.
When building your home page you have access to MyAppState via .of, so can ascertain whether the database has loaded or not. If it has not, just build the database independent widgets; if it has, build all the widgets.
The Flutter documentation for InheritedWidget says
Base class for widgets that efficiently propagate information down the tree.
To obtain the nearest instance of a particular type of inherited widget from > a build context, use BuildContext.inheritFromWidgetOfExactType.
Inherited widgets, when referenced in this way, will cause the consumer
to rebuild when the inherited widget itself changes state.
Given that widgets in Flutter are immutable, and in the example code..
class FrogColor extends InheritedWidget {
const FrogColor({
Key key,
#required this.color,
#required Widget child,
}) : assert(color != null),
assert(child != null),
super(key: key, child: child);
final Color color;
static FrogColor of(BuildContext context) {
return context.inheritFromWidgetOfExactType(FrogColor);
}
#override
bool updateShouldNotify(FrogColor old) => color != old.color;
}
the color property is final so cannot be reassigned. Assuming this widget is right at the top of the tree, as in most examples, when will this ever be useful. For the widget to be replaced, a new instance will have to be created.
Presumably where this is done, a new instance of whatever is passed as child will be created too, causing that child's descendants to also rebuild, creating new instances of its childresn etc..
Ending up with the whole tree rebuilt anyway. So the selective updating applied by using inheritFromWidgetOfExactType is pointless, when the data of an instance of InheritedWidget will never change for that instance?
Edit:
This is the simplest example of what I don't understand that I can put together.
In this example, the only way to "change" the InheritedWidget/FrogColor which is near the root of the application is to have its parent (MyApp) rebuild. This causes it to rebuild its children and create a new instance of FrogColor and which gets passed a new child instance. I don't see any other way that the InheritedWidget/FrogColor
would change its state as in the documentation
... will cause the consumer to rebuild when the inherited widget itself changes state.
import 'package:flutter/material.dart';
import 'dart:math';
void main() {
runApp(MyApp());
}
class FrogColor extends InheritedWidget {
const FrogColor({
Key key,
#required this.color,
#required Widget child,
}) : assert(color != null),
assert(child != null),
super(key: key, child: child);
final Color color;
static FrogColor of(BuildContext context) {
return context.inheritFromWidgetOfExactType(FrogColor);
}
#override
bool updateShouldNotify(FrogColor old) => color != old.color;
}
class MyApp extends StatefulWidget {
// This widget is the root of your application.
MyAppState createState() => MyAppState();
}
class MyAppState extends State<MyApp>
{
#override
Widget build(BuildContext context) {
var random = Random(DateTime.now().millisecondsSinceEpoch);
return FrogColor(
color : Color.fromARGB(255,random.nextInt(255),random.nextInt(255),random.nextInt(255)),
child:MaterialApp(
title: 'Flutter Demo',
home: Column (
children: <Widget>[
WidgetA(),
Widget1(),
FlatButton(
child:Text("set state",style:TextStyle(color:Colors.white)),
onPressed:() => this.setState((){})
)
]
)
)
);
}
}
class WidgetA extends StatelessWidget {
#override
Widget build(BuildContext context) {
print("Ran Build ${this.runtimeType.toString()}");
return WidgetB();
}
}
class WidgetB extends StatelessWidget {
#override
Widget build(BuildContext context) {
print("Ran Build ${this.runtimeType.toString()}");
return Text("SomeText",style:TextStyle(color:FrogColor.of(context).color));
}
}
class Widget1 extends StatelessWidget {
#override
Widget build(BuildContext context) {
print("Ran Build ${this.runtimeType.toString()}");
return Widget2();
}
}
class Widget2 extends StatelessWidget {
#override
Widget build(BuildContext context) {
print("Ran Build ${this.runtimeType.toString()}");
return Text("SomeText",style:TextStyle(color:FrogColor.of(context).color));
}
}
Further, the output of this is
I/flutter (24881): Ran Build WidgetA
I/flutter (24881): Ran Build WidgetB
I/flutter (24881): Ran Build Widget1
I/flutter (24881): Ran Build Widget2
So all the child widgets are always rebuilt. Making the registration done in inheritFromWidgetOfExactType pointless also.
Edit2:
In response to #RémiRousselet answer in the comments, modifying the above example, something like
class MyAppState extends State<MyApp>
{
Widget child;
MyAppState()
{
child = MaterialApp(
title: 'Flutter Demo',
home: Column (
children: <Widget>[
WidgetA(),
Widget1(),
FlatButton(
child:Text("set state",style:TextStyle(color:Colors.white)),
onPressed:() => this.setState((){})
)
]
)
);
}
#override
Widget build(BuildContext context) {
var random = Random(DateTime.now().millisecondsSinceEpoch);
return FrogColor(
color : Color.fromARGB(255,random.nextInt(255),random.nextInt(255),random.nextInt(255)),
child: child
);
}
}
works by storing the tree that shouldn't be modified outside of the build function so that the same child tree is passed to the InhertedWidget on each rebuild. This does work only causing the rebuild of the widgets that have registered with inheritFromWidgetOfExactType to get rebuilt, but not the others.
Although #RémiRousselet says it is incorrect to store the subtree as part of the state, I do not believe there is any reason that this is not ok, and infact they do this in some google tutorial videos. Here She has a subtree created and held as part of the state. In her case 2 StatelessColorfulTile() widgets.
Presumably where this is done, a new instance of whatever is passed as a child will be created too, causing that child's descendants to also rebuild, creating new instances of its children etc..
Ending up with the whole tree rebuilt anyway.
That's where your confusion comes from
A widget rebuilding doesn't force its descendants to rebuild.
When a parent rebuild, the framework internally check if newChild == oldChild, in which case the child is not rebuilt.
As such, if the instance of a widget didn't change, or if it overrides
operator== then it is possible for a widget to not rebuild when its parent is updated.
This is also one of the reasons why AnimatedBuilder offer a child property:
AnimatedBuilder(
animation: animation,
builder: (context, child) {
return Container(child: child,);
},
child: Text('Hello world'),
);
This ensures that when for the whole duration of the animation, child is preserved and therefore not rebuilt. Leading to a much more optimized UI.
I’m creating mobile application with Flutter.
This application has two forms (screens).
For example:
class MainScreen extends StatelessWidget {
#override
Widget build(BuildContext context) {
return Scaffold(
appBar: AdvertAppBar(context),
body: Container(…),
),
);
}
}
And
class ListScreen extends StatelessWidget {
// This widget is the root of your application.
#override
Widget build(BuildContext context) {
return Scaffold(
appBar: AdvertAppBar(context),
body: Container(…),
),
);
}
}
As you could see I’m using shared appBar which instantiates from external class (AdvertAppBar).
Is there any way to know from appBar class what the class of parent object (MainScreen or ListScreen)?
Navigator 2.0 should be able to cater this use case. I suggest using the pages argument in the Navigator constructor. This should help keeping a list of Page objects in tab and be able to update the Screen as needed. This blog post has a complete sample that you can try out.
In my flutter app, screen A has no AppBar.
So I call SystemChrome.setSystemUIOverlayStyle(SystemUiOverlayStyle.dark) in build.
After another screen B which has an AppBar was pushed and then popped,
screen A has light status bar.
I'd like the system UI to return to the original setting when the screen is popped.
The reason behind this is the fact that your new screen will have its own lifecycle and thus, might use another color for the status bar.
You can call SystemChrome.setSystemUIOverlayStyle(SystemUiOverlayStyle.dark) in your initState method but that won't trigger after a stacked screen is popped. There are two problems here, you can, however, call that back again after returning from a screen pop(). Simple enough right? Almost there.
When you press the back button on the AppBar widget, will return immediately from your Navigator.of(context).push(someroute), even if the navigation animation is still being rendered from the stacked screen.
To handle this, you can add a little "tweak" that will set the status bar color again after 500 milseconds, that should be enough for the animation to fully complete. So, you'll want something more or less like this:
class HomeScreen extends StatefulWidget {
_HomeScreenState createState() => _HomeScreenState();
}
class _HomeScreenState extends State<HomeScreen> {
#override
void initState() {
_updateAppbar();
super.initState();
}
void _updateAppbar() {
SystemChrome.setSystemUIOverlayStyle(SystemUiOverlayStyle.dark);
}
#override
Widget build(BuildContext context) {
return Container(
child: RaisedButton(
child: Text('Navigate to second screen'),
onPressed: () => Navigator.of(context)
.push(MaterialPageRoute(builder: (BuildContext context) => SecondScreen()))
.whenComplete(() => Future.delayed(Duration(milliseconds: 500)).then((_) => _updateAppbar()))));
}
}
class SecondScreen extends StatelessWidget {
#override
Widget build(BuildContext context) {
return Scaffold(
appBar: AppBar(),
);
}
}
Although this works, I'm still curious to know if someone knows a better way to handle this though and keep a status bar color binding to each screen.
maybe you can wrap the whole page widget with AnnotatedRegion like this:
AnnotatedRegion(
value: _currentStyle,
child: Center(
child: ElevatedButton(
child: const Text('Change Color'),
onPressed: _changeColor,
),
),
);
you can follow the full example here:
https://api.flutter.dev/flutter/services/SystemChrome/setSystemUIOverlayStyle.html
maybe that works
SystemChrome.setSystemUIOverlayStyle(SystemUiOverlayStyle.transparent)
Add this package to your project Need Resume and extends your screen state to ResumableState
import 'package:need_resume/need_resume.dart';
class WelcomeScreen extends StatefulWidget {
final String title;
const WelcomeScreen({Key key, this.title}) : super(key: key);
#override
_WelcomeScreenState createState() => _WelcomeScreenState();
}
class _WelcomeScreenState extends ResumableState<WelcomeScreen> {
#override
void onResume() {
SystemChrome.setSystemUIOverlayStyle(SystemUiOverlayStyle.dark);
super.onResume();
}
#override
Widget build(BuildContext context) {
return Scaffold(
body: Column(
children: [],
),
);
}
}
This solutions works as expected with very little changes in the code.
I'm trying to change the state from a different widget in Flutter. For example, in the following example I set the state after a few seconds.
Here is the code for that:
class _MyAppState extends State<MyApp> {
int number = 1;
#override
void initState() {
super.initState();
new Future.delayed(new Duration(seconds: 5)).then((_) {
this.setState(() => number = 2);
print("Changed");
});
}
#override
Widget build(BuildContext context) {
return new Scaffold(
body: new Center(
child: new FlatButton(
color: Colors.blue,
child: new Text("Next Page"),
onPressed: () {
Navigator.of(context).push(new MaterialPageRoute(
builder: (BuildContext context) => new StatefulBuilder(builder: (BuildContext context, setState) =>new MySecondPage(number))
));
},
),
),
);
}
}
I tried using an InheritedWidget, but that won't work unless I wrap it around my top level widget, which is not feasible for what I'm trying to do (the code above is a simplification of what I'm trying to achieve).
Any ideas on what the best way of achieving this is in Flutter?
Avoid this whenever possible. It makes these widgets depends on each others and can make things harder to maintain in the long term.
What you can do instead, is having both widgets share a common Listenable or something similar such as a Stream. Then widgets interact with each other by submitting events.
For easier writing, you can also combine Listenable/Stream with respectively ValueListenableBuilder and StreamBuilder which both do the listening/update part for you.
A quick example with Listenable.
class MyHomePage extends StatelessWidget {
final number = new ValueNotifier(0);
#override
Widget build(BuildContext context) {
return Scaffold(
body: ValueListenableBuilder<int>(
valueListenable: number,
builder: (context, value, child) {
return Center(
child: RaisedButton(
onPressed: () {
number.value++;
},
child: MyWidget(number),
),
);
},
),
);
}
}
class MyWidget extends StatelessWidget {
final ValueListenable<int> number;
MyWidget(this.number);
#override
Widget build(BuildContext context) {
return new Text(number.value.toString());
}
}
Notice here how we have our UI automatically updating when doing number.value++ without ever having to call setState.
Actually the most effective way to do this is using BLoC package in flutter and implement it from the top of the widget tree so all inheriting widgets can use the same bloc. If you have worked with Android before - it works like Android Architecture Components - you separate data and state management from the UI - so you do not setState in the UI, but instead use the block to manage state. So you can set and access the same data - from any widget that inherits from the top widget where the bloc is implemented, for more complex apps, it is very useful.
This is where you can find the package: https://pub.dev/packages/flutter_bloc#-readme-tab-
Write-up: https://www.didierboelens.com/2018/08/reactive-programming-streams-bloc/
And a great tutorial on youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hTExlt1nJZI&list=PLB6lc7nQ1n4jCBkrirvVGr5b8rC95VAQ5&index=7