I know that Docker and Kubernetes aren’t direct competitors. Docker is the container platform and containers are coordinated and scheduled by Kubernetes, which is a tool.
What does it really mean and how can I deploy my app on Docker for Azure ?
Short answer:
Docker (and containers in general) solve the problem of packaging an application and its dependencies. This makes it easy to ship and run everywhere.
Kubernetes is one layer of abstraction above containers. It is a distributed system that controls/manages containers.
My advice: because the landscape is huge... start learning and putting the pieces of the puzzle together by following a course. Below I have added some information from the:
Introduction to Kubernetes, free online course from The Linux Foundation.
Why do we need Kubernetes (and other orchestrators) above containers?
In the quality assurance (QA) environments, we can get away with running containers on a single host to develop and test applications. However, when we go to production, we do not have the same liberty, as we need to ensure that our applications:
Are fault-tolerant
Can scale, and do this on-demand
Use resources optimally
Can discover other applications automatically, and communicate with each other
Are accessible from the external world
Can update/rollback without any downtime.
Container orchestrators are the tools which group hosts together to form a cluster, and help us fulfill the requirements mentioned above.
Nowadays, there are many container orchestrators available, such as:
Docker Swarm: Docker Swarm is a container orchestrator provided by Docker, Inc. It is part of Docker Engine.
Kubernetes: Kubernetes was started by Google, but now, it is a part of the Cloud Native Computing Foundation project.
Mesos Marathon: Marathon is one of the frameworks to run containers at scale on Apache Mesos.
Amazon ECS: Amazon EC2 Container Service (ECS) is a hosted service provided by AWS to run Docker containers at scale on its infrastructrue.
Hashicorp Nomad: Nomad is the container orchestrator provided by HashiCorp.
Kubernetes is built on Docker technology. It is an orchestration tool for Docker container whereas Docker is a technology to create and deploy containers.
Docker, starting with a platform-as-a-service (PaaS) provider named dotCloud.
All in all, Kubernetes is related to the Docker container, allowing you to implement application portability and extensibility in container orchestration.
DOCKER
Easy and fast to install and configure
Functionality is provided and limited by the Docker API
Quick container deployment and scaling even in very large clusters
Automated internal load balancing through any node in the cluster
Simple shared local volumes
Kubernetes
Require some work to get up and running
Client, API and YAML definitions are unique to Kubernetes
Provides strong guarantees to cluster states at the expense of speed
To Enable load balancing requires manual service configuration
Volumes shared within pods
This is just a basic idea which at least explains the difference.If you want to go in depth see my posts
http://www.thecreativedev.com/an-introduction-to-kubernetes/
http://www.thecreativedev.com/learn-docker-works/
Docker and Kubernetes are complementary. Docker provides an open standard for packaging and distributing containerized applications, while Kubernetes provides for the orchestration and management of distributed, containerized applications created with Docker. In other words, Kubernetes provides the infrastructure needed to deploy and run applications built with Docker.
Related
I have a project to containerize several applications (Gitlab, Jenkins, Wordpress, Python Flask app...). Currently each application runs on a Compute Engine VM each at GCP. My goal would be to move everything to a cluster (Swarm or Kubernetes).
However I have different questions about Docker Swarm on Google Cloud Platform:
How can I expose my Python application on the outside (HTTP load balancer) as well as the other applications only available in my private VPC ?
From what I've seen on the internet, I have the impression that docker swarm is very little used. Should I go for a kubernetes cluster instead ? (I have good knowledge of Docker/Kubernetes)
It is difficult to find information about Docker Swarm in cloud providers. What would be an architecture with Docker Swarm on GCP?
Thanks for your help.
I'd create a template and from that an instance group for all VM, which shall host the Docker swarm. And a separate instance or instance group for said internal purposes - so that there is a strict separation, which can then be used to route the internal & external traffic accordingly (this would apply in any case). Google Kubernetes Engine is about the same as such an instance group, but Google managed infrastructure. See the tutorial, there's not much difference - except that it better integrates with gcloud & kubectl. While there is no requirement to want or need to maintain the underlying infrastructure, GKE is probably less effort.
What you are basically asking is:
Kubernetes vs. Docker Swarm: What’s the Difference?
Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes: A Helpful Guide for Picking One
Kubernetes vs. Docker: What Does it Really Mean?
Docker Swarm vs. Kubernetes: A Comparison
Kubernetes vs Docker Swarm
I am new to cluster container management, and this question is the basis for all the freshers over here.
I read some documentation, but still, my understanding is not too clear, so any leads.. helping to understand?
Somewhere it is mentioned, Minikube is used to run Kubernetes locally. So if we want to maintain cluster management in my four-node Raspberry Pi, then Minikube is not the option?
Does Minikube support only a one-node system?
Docker Compose is set of instructions and a YAML file to configure and start multiple Docker containers. Can we use this to start containers of the different hosts? Then for simple orchestration where I need to call container of the second host, I don't need any cluster management, right?
What is the link between Docker Swarm and Kubernetes? Both are independent cluster management. Is it efficient to use Kubernetes on Raspberry Pi? Any issue, because I was told that Kubernetes in single node takes the complete memory and CPU usage? Is it true?
Is there other cluster management for Raspberry Pi?
I think this 4-5 set will help me better.
Presuming that your goal here is to run a set of containers over a number of different Raspberry Pi based nodes:
Minikube isn't really appropriate. This starts a single virtual machine on a Windows, MacOS or Linux and installs a Kubernetes cluster into it. It's generally used by developers to quickly start-up a cluster on their laptops or desktops for development and testing purposes.
Docker Compose is a system for managing sets of related containers. So for example if you had a web server and database that you wanted to manage together you could put them in a single Docker Compose file.
Docker Swarm is a system for managing sets of containers across multiple hosts. It's essentially an alternative to Kubernetes. It has fewer features than Kubernetes, but it is much simpler to set up.
If you want a really simple multi-node Container cluster, I'd say that Docker swarm is a reasonable choice. If you explicitly want to experiment with Kubernetes, I'd say that kubeadm is a good option here. Kubernetes in general has higher resource requirements than Docker Swarm, so it could be somewhat less suited to it, although I know people have successfully run Kubernetes clusters on Raspberry Pis.
Docker Compose
A utility to to start multiple docker containers on a single host using a single docker-compose up. This makes it easier to start multiple containers at once, rather than having do mutliple docker run commands.
Docker swarm
A native container orchestrator for Docker. Docker swarm allows you to create a cluster of docker containers running on multiple machines. It provides features such as replication, scaling, self-healing i.e. starting a new container when one dies ...
Kubernetes
Also a container orchestrator. Kubernetes and Docker swarm can be considered as alternatives to one another. They both try to handle managing containers starting in a cluster
Minikube
Creating a real kubernetes cluster requires having multiple machines either on premise or on a cloud platform. This is not always convenient if someone is just new to Kubernetes and trying to learn by playing around with Kubernetes. To solve that minikube allows you to start a very basic Kubernetes cluster that consists of a single VM on you machine, which you can use to play around with Kubernetes.
Minikube is not for a production or multi-node cluster. There are many tools that can be used to create a multi-node Kubernetes cluster such as kubeadm
Containers are the future of application deployment. Containers are smallest unit of deployment in docker. There are three components in docker as docker engine to run a single container, docker-compose to run a multi-container application on a single host and docker-swarm to run multi-container application across hosts which also an orchestration tool.
In kubernetes, the smallest unit of deployment is Pod(which is composed of multiple container). Minikube is a single node cluster where you can install it locally and try, test and feel the kubernetes features locally. But, you can't scale this to more than a single machine. Kubernetes is an orchestration tool like Docker Swarm but more prominent than Docker Swarm with respect to features, scaling, resiliency, and security.
You can do the analysis and think about which tool will be fit for your requirements. Each one having their own pros or cons like docker swarm is good and easy to manage small clusters whereas kubernetes is much better for larger once. There is another orchestration tool Mesos which is also popular and used in largest size clusters.
Check this out, Choose your own Adventure but, it's just a general analogy and only to understand because all the three technologies are evolving rapidly.
I get the impression you're mostly looking for confirmation and am happy to help with that if I can.
Yes, minikube is local-only
Yes, minikube is intended to be single-node
Docker-compose isn't really an orchestration system like swarm and Kubernetes are. It helps with running related containers on a single host, but it is not used for multi-host.
Kubernetes and Docker Swarm are both container orchestration systems. These systems are good at managing scaling up, but they have an overhead associated with them so they're better suited to multi-node.
I don't know the range of orchestration options for Raspberry Pi, but there are Kubernetes examples out there such as Build Your Own Cloud with Kubernetes and Some Raspberry Pi.
For Pi, you can use Docker Swarm Mode on one or more Pi's. You can even run ARM emulation for testing on Docker for Windows/Mac before trying to get it all working directly on a Pi. Same goes for Kubernetes, as it's built-in to Docker for Windows/Mac now (no minikube needed).
Alex Ellis has a good blog on Pi and Docker and this post may help too.
I've been playing around with orchestrating Docker containers on a subnet of Raspberry Pis (3Bs).
I found Docker-swarm easiest to set up and work with, and adequate for my purposes. Guide: https://docs.docker.com/engine/swarm/swarm-tutorial/
For Kubernetes there are two main options; k3s and microk8s. Some guides:
k3s
https://bryanbende.com/development/2021/05/07/k3s-raspberry-pi-initial-setup
microk8s
https://ubuntu.com/tutorials/how-to-kubernetes-cluster-on-raspberry-pi#1-overview
Pretty basic question. We have an existing swarm and I want to start migrating to Kubernetes. Can I run both using the same docker hosts?
See the official documentation for Docker for Mac at https://docs.docker.com/docker-for-mac/kubernetes/ stating:
When Kubernetes support is enabled, you can deploy your workloads, in parallel, on Kubernetes, Swarm, and as standalone containers. Enabling or disabling the Kubernetes server does not affect your other workloads.
So: yes, both should be able to run in parallel.
If you're using Docker on Linux you won't have the convenient tools available like in Docker for Mac/Windows, but both orchestrators should still be able to run in parallel without further issues. On system level, details like e.g. ports on a network interface are still shared resources, so they cannot be bound by different orchestrators.
I thought a major benefit of Docker was the ability to deploy a single unit of work (a container) that is cheap, lightweight, and boots fast, instead of having to deploy a more expensive and heavy VM that boots slowly. But everywhere I look (eg AWS, Docker Cloud, IBM, Azure, Google Cloud, kubernetes), deploying single containers is not an option. Instead, a single customer must deploy entire VMs that will run instances of the docker engine which will then host clusters of containers.
Is there any CaaS that allows you to deploy only as few containers as you need? I thought many cloud provider companies would offer this service, coordinating the logistics of which containers submitted by which customers to group together and distribute among the companies' docker engines. I see this service is unnecessary for those customers that will be deploying enough containers that a full docker engine instance is necessary. But what about those customers that want the cheap option of only deploying a single container?
If this service is not available, I see Docker containers as no cheaper nor lighter in weight than full VMs. In both cases, you pay for a heavy VM. The only remaining benefit would be isolation of processes and the ability to quickly change them.
Again, is there any cloud service available to deploy only a single container?
As far as I see here, the problem is the point of view of your approach, not Docker.
Any machine that runs a GNU-Linux distro can run the docker daemon and therefore, run your docker containers.
There are solutions like Elastic Beanstalk that allow you to deploy docker containers with a high level of abstraction, making your "ops" part a little bit easier.
Nevertheless, I wonder, how do you actually try to deploy your application? what do you mean with:
"Instead, a single customer must deploy entire VMs that will run
instances of the docker engine which will then host clusters of
containers."
?
For example, kubernetes is a framework that allows you to deploy containers in other machines, so yes, you have to have a Framework for that or, instead, use a Framework as a service as Elastic Beankstalk is.
I hope my answer helps!
We are currently moving towards microservices with Docker from a monolith application running in JBoss. I want to know the platform/tools/frameworks to be used to test these Docker containers in developer environment. Also what tools should be used to deploy these containers to this developer test environment.
Is it a good option to use some thing like Kubernetes with chef/puppet/vagrant?
I think so. Make sure to get service discovery, logging and virtual networking right. For the former you can check out skydns. Docker now has a few logging plugins you can use for log management. For virtual networking you can look for Flannel and Weave.
You want service discovery because Kubernetes will schedule the containers the way it sees fit and you need some way of telling what IP/port your microservice will be at. Virtual networking make it so each container has it's own subnet thus preventing port clashes in case you have two containers with the same ports exposed in the same host (kubernetes won't let it clash, it will schedule containers to run until you have hosts with ports available, if you try to create more it just won't run).
Also, you can try the built-in cluster tools in Docker itself, like docker service, docker network commands and Docker Swarm.
Docker-machine helps in case you already have a VM infrastructure in place.
We have created and open-sourced a platform to develop and deploy docker based microservices.
It supports service discovery, clustering, load balancing, health checks, configuration management, diagnosing and mini-DNS.
We are using it in our local development environment and production environment on AWS. We have a Vagrant box with everything prepared so you can give it a try:
http://armada.sh
https://github.com/armadaplatform/armada