How can I use Ant to verify that the current working directory is located (arbitrarily deeply nested) under a certain path? For example, I want to execute a target only if the current directory is part of /some/dir/, for example if Ant is executed in directory /some/dir/to/my/project/.
The best I could come up with is a String contains condition:
<if>
<contains string="${basedir}" substring="/some/dir/"/>
<then>
<echo>Execute!</echo>
</then>
<else>
<echo>Skip.</echo>
</else>
</if>
This works for my current purpose but I'm afraid it might break some time in the future... for example when a build is executed in path /not/some/dir/ which is also contains the specified directory string.
Are there any more robust solutions like a startsWith comparison or even better a file system based check...?
There is no specific startswith condition in native Ant, but there is a matches condition that takes regular expressions.
As a side note, ant-contrib is rarely necessary for most build scripts, and will often lead to unreliable code. I would strongly recommend avoiding it.
Here's a sample script to illustrate how you can use the matches condition with native Ant. The test target is, of course, just for demonstration.
<property name="pattern" value="^/some/dir" />
<target name="init">
<condition property="basedir.starts.with">
<matches pattern="${pattern}" string="${basedir}" />
</condition>
</target>
<target name="execute" depends="init" if="basedir.starts.with">
<echo message="Executing" />
</target>
<target name="test">
<condition property="dir1.starts.with">
<matches pattern="${pattern}" string="/some/dir/" />
</condition>
<condition property="dir2.starts.with">
<matches pattern="${pattern}" string="/some/dir/to/my/project/" />
</condition>
<condition property="dir3.starts.with">
<matches pattern="${pattern}" string="/not/some/dir/" />
</condition>
<echo message="${dir1.starts.with}" />
<echo message="${dir2.starts.with}" />
<echo message="${dir3.starts.with}" />
</target>
Related
I'm new to Ant/Apache. When I tried to use <condition> tag in XML it's throwing an error. condition doesn't support the nested "then" element. Here is my code
<target name="determine-ae-build">
<condition property="ApplicationName">
<equals arg1="${ApplicationName}" arg2="new"/>
<then>
<echo>3.9 Robots Config Copied</echo>
</then>
<else>
<condition property="ApplicationName">
<equals arg1="${ApplicationName}" arg2="old"/>
<then>
<echo>3.8 Robots Config Copied</echo>
</then>
<else>
<echo>3.9 Robots Config Copied</echo>
</else>
</condition>
</else>
</condition>
</target>
I've tried with IF also but since my Ant version is not supporting to do this. Can someone help to resolve this issue. Thanks! in advance
The condition task simply sets a property; it doesn't contain nested build logic. The property that it sets can later be used to control which targets are executed.
While you can use antcontrib's extra if, then, and else tasks to accomplish something like what you showed in your example, I'd recommend sticking to the native Ant approach, which relies on target dependencies and uses separate targets to control build logic:
<project name="build" basedir="." default="build">
<target name="build" depends="copy-3.8,copy-3.9" />
<target name="copy-3.8" depends="determine-ae-build" if="copy.old">
<echo>3.8 Robots Config Copied</echo>
</target>
<target name="copy-3.9" depends="determine-ae-build" unless="copy.old">
<echo>3.9 Robots Config Copied</echo>
</target>
<target name="determine-ae-build">
<condition property="copy.old">
<equals arg1="${ApplicationName}" arg2="old"/>
</condition>
</target>
</project>
With the above script, you would run ant build (possibly with -DApplicationName=old). The build target depends on both copy targets, both of which depend on determine-ae-build. The determine-ae-build target will therefore run first. If ApplicationName is set to "old" (either from a properties file that has been loaded, or from being provided in command line with -DApplicationName=old) then the property copy.old will be set to true. Otherwise it will remain unset.
Then copy-3.8 and copy-3.9 will be called. If copy.old is is true, copy-3.8 will run. Otherwise, it will be skipped. copy-3.9 has no condition so it will run no matter what.
Lastly, the build target will execute because it was the original target called from the command line, but it contains no actual steps so the build will finish.
<target name="prepare-copy" description="copy file based on condition" depends="determine-ae-build, prepare-copy-old, prepare-copy-new, prepare-copy-default">
<sleep seconds="10"/> --To read the results
</target>
<target name="prepare-copy-old" description="copy file based on condition" if="copy.old">
<echo>Old File Copied </echo>
</target>
<target name="prepare-copy-new" description="copy file based on condition" if="copy.new">
<echo>New File Copied</echo>
</target>
<target name="prepare-copy-default" description="copy file based on false condition" if="copy.default">
<echo>Default File Coping</echo>
</target>
<target name="determine-ae-build">
<condition property="copy.old">
<equals arg1="${ApplicationName}" arg2="old"/>
</condition>
<condition property="copy.new">
<equals arg1="${ApplicationName}" arg2="new"/>
</condition>
<condition property="copy.default">
<not>
<or>
<equals arg1="${ApplicationName}" arg2="new"/>
<equals arg1="${ApplicationName}" arg2="old"/>
</or>
</not>
</condition>
</target>
Explanation: Calling way "ant -Dcopy.old = true prepare-copy". Here we are passing to copy old file hence, "Old File Copied" will copied. If you call it like "ant prepare-copy" it'll call "Default File Coping".
Kindly Accept my answer if it is answered your question.Thankyou!
Currently I have this code in ant script:
<target name="-pre-compile" if="${log.disabled}">
<antcall target="remove-logs"/>
</target>
It's pretty self explanatory: if log.disable=true in properties file, then my remove-logs target will be called. Now I need to make minor changes to if/else. Pseudo-code:
<target name="-pre-compile">
if("${log.disabled}")
<antcall target="remove-logs"/>
else if("${log.disabled.level}" != "")
<antcall target="remove-logs-levels"/>
</target>
how can I write that in ant?
Also, note that all these if/them ant-contrib do not work for me:
<target name="test-xxx">
<echo level="info">testing</echo>
<if>
<equals arg1="${log.disabled}" arg2="true" />
<then>
<echo message="true" />
</then>
<else>
<echo message="false" />
</else>
</if>
</target>
get's me this output:
custom_rules.xml:73: if doesn't support the nested "equals" element.
PS. Once again, I ended up writing javascript instead of wasting time with ant itself. What a crappy make replacement...
Ant provide conditionals. Frankly using ant-contrib is easier. It provides an if task. See a more detailed answer in ant-contrib - if/then/else task
i have a small peice of code which prints if platform is unix or windowsas
<if>
<equals=${arg1} value="linux-86"/>
<then>
<echo message="linux"
<then>
<elseif>
<equals=${arg1} value="linux-64"/>
<then>
<echo message="linux"/>
</then>
</elseif>
<else>
<echo message="Windows">
</else>
</if>
Here we can see we are unnecessarily checking first two conditions for same message,is there any OR operator in ant like we have in c ||,so that we can write arg1=linux-64||linux-86....if there is please tell me how should i use this will save up lot of time here
<condition property="WinPlatform.Check">
<or>
<equals arg1="${param1}" arg2="win-x86"/>
<equals arg1="${param1}" arg2="win-x86-client"/>
<equals arg1="${param1}" arg2="win-x64"/>
</or>
</condition>
<target name="Mytarget" if="WinPlatform.Check">
<echo message="executing windows family build:::${param1}"/>
</target>
now call Mytarget with your parameter,it will work
The if task is part of ant-contrib. It is not available in core Ant.
Various conditions are available in core Ant and can be used, for example, to make target execution conditional.
Before 1.8, if/unless conditions evaluate "is the property set?"
<target name="test" if="foo" unless="bar"/>
From 1.8, if/unless conditions can evaluate "is the property true/false":
<target name="test" if="${foo}" unless="${bar}"/>
Why don't you have a look in the ant manual? http://ant.apache.org/manual/Tasks/conditions.html
Or google for "ant if task".
I m trying to do this with Ant:
<property name="test" value="123"/>
<target name="helloworld" depends="${test}"/>
But I'm getting error "Target ${test} does not exist in this project."
So I m guessing I can do this?
You can use the AntCall Task to call a Task inside another Task.
<project>
<target name="asdf">
<property name="prop" value="qwer" />
<antcall target="${prop}" />
</target>
<target name="qwer">
<echo message="in qwer" />
</target>
</project>
To make one depend on the other, you can set a parameter in the dependent task and check it in your calling task.
Rather than depends, you can check a property using the if attribute. See the manual for more details.
For example:
<target name="helloworld" if="test"/>
Note this only checks if the property is set (you can use unless to check if it is unset).
An alternative, more complex but powerful, approach is to use a nested condition on a depended target:
<target name="helloworld" depends="myTarget.check" if="myTarget.run">
...
</target>
<target name="myTarget.check">
<condition property="test">
<and>
<available file="foo.txt"/>
<available file="bar.txt"/>
</and>
</condition>
I am attempting to remove all lines that begin with log if a macrodef attribute is set to prod (example below). I plan on using replaceregexp to remove all lines beginning with log. However, I am not sure how to test if an attribute is set to a specific value, besides using the if task. I would like to not introduce any non-core Ant tasks to perform this, but I can't come up with any other solutions. Do I have any other options besides using the if-task?
Thanks
<macrodef name="setBuildstamp">
<attribute name="platform" />
<sequential>
<if>
<equals arg1="platform" arg2="prod" />
<then>
<replaceregexp match="^log\(.*" value="" />
</then>
</if>
</sequential>
</macrodef>
You should use a reference to a parameter, like this #{platform}.
Also, your replaceregexp task is missing a few parameters.
I think that in your particular case it is better to use linecontainsregexp filter reader. Here is modified code (note negate argument to linecontainsregexp).
<macrodef name="setBuildstamp">
<attribute name="platform" />
<sequential>
<if>
<equals arg1="#{platform}" arg2="prod" />
<then>
<copy todir="dest-dir">
<fileset dir="src-dir"/>
<filterchain>
<linecontainsregexp
regexp="^log\(.*"
negate="true"
/>
</filterchain>
</copy>
</then>
</if>
</sequential>
</macrodef>
They may be a couple of ways to solve this, but none are as straightforward as using the ant-contrib element. I'm not sure if this will get you what you need for your application, but you could try the following:
Using conditional targets. If you can replace your macrodef with a target to call, this may work for you. Note that this will set the property globally, so it might not work for your application.
<target name="default">
<condition property="platformIsProd">
<equals arg1="${platform}" arg2="prod" />
</condition>
<antcall target="do-buildstamp" />
</target>
<target name="do-buildstamp" if="platformIsProd">
<echo>doing prod stuff...</echo>
</target>
Handle the 'else' case. If you need to handle an alternate case, you'll need to provide a few targets...
<target name="default">
<property name="platform" value="prod" />
<antcall target="do-buildstamp" />
</target>
<target name="do-buildstamp">
<condition property="platformIsProd">
<equals arg1="${platform}" arg2="prod" />
</condition>
<antcall target="do-buildstamp-prod" />
<antcall target="do-buildstamp-other" />
</target>
<target name="do-buildstamp-prod" if="platformIsProd">
<echo>doing internal prod stuff...</echo>
</target>
<target name="do-buildstamp-other" unless="platformIsProd">
<echo>doing internal non-prod stuff...</echo>
</target>
Using an external build file. If you need to make multiple calls with different values for your property, you could isolate this in another build file within the same project. This creates a bit of a performance hit, but you would not need the additional library.
in build.xml:
<target name="default">
<ant antfile="buildstamp.xml" target="do-buildstamp" />
<ant antfile="buildstamp.xml" target="do-buildstamp">
<property name="platform" value="prod" />
</ant>
<ant antfile="buildstamp.xml" target="do-buildstamp">
<property name="platform" value="nonprod" />
</ant>
</target>
in buildstamp.xml:
<condition property="platformIsProd">
<equals arg1="${platform}" arg2="prod" />
</condition>
<target name="do-buildstamp">
<antcall target="do-buildstamp-prod" />
<antcall target="do-buildstamp-other" />
</target>
<target name="do-buildstamp-prod" if="platformIsProd">
<echo>doing external prod stuff...</echo>
</target>
<target name="do-buildstamp-other" unless="platformIsProd">
<echo>doing external non-prod stuff...</echo>
</target>
Add ant-contrib to your project. Of course, if you can add a file to your project, the easiest thing would be to just add the ant-contrib.jar file. You could put it under a "tools" folder and pull it in using a taskdef:
<taskdef resource="net/sf/antcontrib/antlib.xml" classpath="${basedir}/tools/ant-contrib.jar" />
It looks like when you are building your project specifically for your Production environment - you are stripping out code you don't want to run in Production. Thus you are creating a different binary than what will run in your Dev or Testing environment.
How about using an environment variable or property file at run-time instead of build-time which determines whether or not logging happens? This way when you're having trouble in Production and you want to use the same exact binary (instead of determining the revision, checking out the code, rebuilding with a different environment flag) you just re-deploy it to your Dev or Test environment and turn on debugging in a properties file or environment variable?