Does anyone know if the feature to tag agents has dissapeared?
I could not find anything related to over the internet.
My idea is to have certain builds use a specific agent. On TFS 2013 I would use tagging, but i no longer see that option.
On the other hand, I see that it is possible to connect a build definition to a certain agent queue.
There is no more agent tags for TFS 2015 or later version. If you want to use a particular build definition and a specific build Agent which used to run the build.
You could add a user Capability to that specific build agent then in the build definition you put that capability as a demand (General tab).
Another way is directly using Agent.Name or Agent.ComputerName demands in build def or when queuing a build. Take a look at this blog: How to send TFS build to a specific agent or server, which also support on TFS2015.
Oren: Is this feature works in TFS15 SP3?
Reply Eric Parvin: Yes, this should work on TFS 2015 to the newest version.
Use demands and capabilities for this. Add a custom capability to the build agent, and then add a matching demand to the build definition.
Demands and capabilities would work, and you could also create a specific queue, with a single available agent in it, and set the queue to your desired build, so you would achieve the same behavior as desired one.
Related
I have two BuildAgents in my Default queue. Both checkboxes for active are set, both are online and running and also shown as online and running. When I start a build on that queue, it is only sent to one Agent, never to the other. If I stop this one Agent, I get the error message, that there is no agent available. But there is!
Has anyone an idea, whats going on here?
Specs: I have an On-premise-TFS-2017 (it was upgraded from 2012). Build Agents where installed the way, that TFS-2017 describes it on the interface.
You get the message means that the build agent Capabilities don't meet the conditions which set in build definition (Demands settings) or build requirements.
Please try below things to narrow down the issue:
Check the Demands in your build definition, make sure the demands
you added are existing on build agent Capabilities. If not existing
there, just try to Add Capability for the agent manually.
Somethings the agent cannot automatically identify some components as
the system Capabilities. In this case you can try comparing the
Capabilities between the two build agents to identify the
differents. Add the missed Capability for the failed agent manually.
Then try it again.
Deploy a new agent to check that.
Reference this article : TFS/VSTS Build – System Capabilities and Demands
I'd like to be able to trigger a build in TFS Build when a developer tags in Subversion. I'd also like to use the tag number as part of the build and release name. Is this possible in TFS right now?
There is no this built-in trigger for building a repository type of subversion in TFS.
You could first get the event (a developer create a tag in svn) from SVN. Not sure how to do this in SVN, should be something like the service hooks in TFS. Then trigger a build in TFS 2017 using REST API. How to do this please refer: How to trigger a build in TFS 2015 using REST API
As for how to use the tag number as part of the build and release name, see below:
Create custom build number during build
With Team Build you can update the build number at any time during the
build by outputing "##vso[build.updatebuildnumber]1.2.3.4" to the log
during the build.
You can see the full list of logging commands here https://github.com/Microsoft/vso-agent-tasks/blob/master/docs/authoring/commands.md
This will update the build number & name.
The down side that you have run into is that you can no longer use the
auto-incrementing number that you have been trying to use. You need to
come up with the version number yourself, and then pass it back using
the output above.
Source
Add two more related blogs:
vNext Build Awesomeness – Managing Version Numbers
Generate custom build numbers in TFS Build vNext
We have upgraded from TFS 2013 to TFS 2017, One feature we are trying to implement that we had in 2013 was the ability to have a custom build number. the previous method we had a file called BuildVersion.XML which during the first build step would read the major,minor, and revision and name the build with that build number + 1 on the revision. It would then change then checkout and update the revison number and check in the new version. I know that there are steps where people update the AssemblyInfo. The issue is that not all our code is .net apps. we also now have SSIS Packages, Cordova iOS/android apps, angular sites, aws Lambda functions with node.js which do not have the concept of AssemblyInfo. is there an easy way to implement this?
You can do exactly the same thing in Team Build in TFS 2017.
You can update the build number from any task by calling:
Write-Verbose -Verbose "##vso[build.updatebuildnumber]1.2.3.4"
Add a PowerShell task and add an inline script to read from your file and update the build number with the above.
You can then have additional scripts that use the build number any way you need to version your application.
You can see the full list of logging commands here
https://github.com/Microsoft/vso-agent-tasks/blob/master/docs/authoring/commands.md
You can use my VSTS TFVC tasks to interact with source control, though I do not recommend it. I built these tasks for clients of mine who were doing exactly what you are doing.
Instead of relying on a file in source control it would be a much better solution to pass the BuildNumber from the Build Definition along to the build, have one of your first steps update the files on disk with the correct version number then run your build.
If you manipulate files during the build and check them in you run the risk of inconsistent numbering when you scale up to multiple build agents, it's hard to use in combination with parallel builds and build variable multiplexing and it becomes notoriously hard to do Gated Checkins and Shelveset builds. Plus, it limits your options to move to Git in the future.
We are using TFS and the TFS Build Service. We are considering to migrate the Build service to Jenkins but we came across some issues. According to this site, there are some things that do not work very well with the TFS and Jenkins plugins. All of them we use a lot:
Associated Change sets – Team Build automatically associates a list of change sets that are included in the build
Associated Work Items – Team Build analysis the relationships and also associates Work Items with a build. Indeed it walks the work item tree (parent) and maintains that association in the chain.
Is this still true? We have this scenario:
A developer checks in a code that fix a bug or resolve a User Story. It does that by associating his check in with the work item ID.
His check in triggers a build that will associate the work item with his changeset. For bugs, the build will update the "Integrated in Build" field with the build number. We use this field to know in witch version the bug was fixed.
Is there any way to make Jenkins behave and do what TFS build service does?
Another option is to mix the two using dummy builds on the TFS side that set the records straight and kick-off the Jenkins' builds. Some hints
How to trigger Jenkins builds remotely and to pass parameters and “Fake” a TFS Build.
This approach requires a bit of effort but has many advantages:
No big-bang, use Jenkins opportunistically
Can continue using existing builds
Having a build identifier in TFS allows you an overall monitoring and to use the Test features
I have a VSTS build definition for one of our projects that requires jenkins to build, but we still have all our other products using VSTS natively. To maintain consistency, this build definition triggers a jenkins build. We configured the build definition to not sync code as jenkins will download it (save time) and not to publish the artifacts back to the agent (i have another script for that found here). This allows developers to continue to use git as normal, and the build/release process is consistent with our other products. Along with task tracking and such.
In 2009, there was a SO question on the same topic.
I'm wondering if later versions of Team Foundation Server are better at longer build pipelines. Refer features of Jenkins, TeamCity, ThoughtWorks' Go (my employer).
The visualizations of the build pipelines are important to me, as well as the notification about individual stages passing or failing. That and the eminent clone-ability of say a 'trunk' pipeline into one for a release branch as that branch leaps into being.
Secondly, a personal holy-grail is the CI server storing its config in the SCM that's holding the buildable thing itself, and even picking up on the creation of branches silently to provision new pipelines; Can TFS be configured to store the CI definitions/scripts in its SCM side rather than its accompanying SqlServer?
TFS build consists of three components:
The build definition - stored on the SQL server data tier.
The build workflow - a XAML file stored in the source control.
The supporting MSBuild scripts - usually contains user defined actions, also stored in the source control.
As the build progresses, you can see visualization of the build steps and you also get a different log for the main build and the MSBuild output.
The build definition in TFS is merely a collection of build settings, similar to CC.Net's config file and TeamCity's build configuration tab which both stored on the file system as well. Assuming there's a backup plan on the database you don't really need to store the build defintions on the source control, but if you must it's possible by exporting the tbl_BuildDefinition table.
The TFS Power Tools adds cloning functionality for build definitions.
There's no OOTB support for provisioning build definitions from a new branch though it's fairly feasible using the TFS-API.
Bit late to the party, but just don't bother with TFS if you want advanced build pipeline automation. It simply doesn't cut it.
I have used Jenkins and TFS both extensively. Tfs is just. pure. crap. Here's why.
No down/up stream build.
No piepline/orchestraion build. (like jenkins)
Obscure ways of adding build steps and falls back to using MsBuild.
Slow and still polls the source control.
Ties you to MsTest.
And please don't point me to "Oh look you can do everything if you write a custom activity". I'm not wasting time doing development for a closed source, sub-par platform. If I am going to contribute something, it's to a FREE. OPEN SOURCE platform.