In my unit test, the App is started (which creates a connection with a user, say User1) and my unit test then creates a separate connection with User2 but it seems like this disconnects the first user connection.
Basically, I want to test the messaging using an OpenChannel.
Related
I'm trying to set up a Firebase A/B test with a conversion event logged from my server, in combination with events fired from my mobile application.
From the diagram below (retrieved here), I would expect that if I properly pass along my App Instance Id and Event Data to my server, and then pass that data along when logging to GA4, the event should be properly attributable to a Firebase A/B test, but that has yet to work.
I have confirmed that A/B tests with events fired from the mobile app directly work as expected, and confirmed that App Instance Id is being passed to my server before being forwarded to GA4 (which is where Firebase is getting my mobile app data).
The reason I am attempting to do this from my server is this event can be logged from either my Apple Watch app, or the iOS app, and has a heavy amount of processing that occurs on the server before being "complete" - I am therefore looking to log that conversion at the end of that server processing, but this processing is hidden from my mobile clients (I just send a 200 back shortly after receiving the payload and spawn child processes to handle the rest of the work on the server).
Is this simply a limitation of the Firebase A/B testing framework?
Thanks!
If I want to make sure that a device receives a message, over the network, for an app used by sellers in a shop for example.
I heard push notifications are not 100% reliable, sometimes some of the notifications don't arrive, or not on time.
The app could be in a shop, where the staff communicate with one another, and there could be 10 devices connected. (ipad, iphones)
edit 1: I heard about sockets, is it the right direction to go?
EDIT 2:
I am not sure why a socket should be used, rather than a webserver for example, I found these 2 sentences (source raywenderlich) :
You can send connected clients data whenever you want, rather than requiring the clients to poll.
You can write socket servers without a dependency of a web server, and can write in the language of your choice : don't understand what the "dependency" is?
Does it also mean :
Sockets let 2 (or more) specific devices to connect one another in a private connection, compared to webservers where everybody could connect if there is no login/password?
EDIT 3 : Maybe a bluetooth solution with MultiPeerConnectivity would be better...
Sockets, and push notifications in general, are only as reliable as the network the user is connected to. If your looking to circumvent network reliability where a 100% success rate is guaranteed, in a Shop environment where users are in close proximity, you can look into GKSession as part of the GameKit.framework
Or you could look into Bonjour or client/service discovery protocols that makes the process of "knowing" peers in a network
I see you tagged Parse.com, again, the reliability of Push Notifications is highly dependent on the reachability, however, most issues that arise with Parse is dev-end related, not product related.
EDIT I forgot to mention MultiPeerConnectivity
If you use TCP sockets, you are guaranteed the message will be delivered, and very quickly too.
However, the application would have to be open (and most likely in the foreground) to receive the messages. You can always have the server wait till the client connects to send the message.
I would suggest using a combination of both TCP sockets and push notifications (for when the app is closed).
I'm just starting to get into app development and have just been learning the uses of Xcode and Objective-C language. Just wondering how an app like snapchat or any other app can send data from one user to another. General answers would suffice just to better my understanding.
How do they test this functionality?
How can they connect peer to peer and send data from one phone to another? Is it all accessed in one database that the app connects to everytime that it pulls down?
When you sign up for an app like this with a registered account is that information stored on the iphone?
Well there are two ways data can be sent to a device. One is the device polls the main server periodically. This can be seen in a pull to refresh scenario. The other is the server can send a push notification to the specific phone and app which causes the data to be received by the device and displayed however the programmer wants. So device to device is essentially one person sending something through a web service call to your server. Your server them packages that information into a Json payload and sends a push notification to the recipient. It seems like its device to device because its so quick, but it requires that you have a server in the middle and of course your server is really sending the push notification to Apple's push server, so there really are two servers involved.
How do they test this functionality?
I would try to do this with real devices, and/or using a network sniffer tool to inspect the send packets.
How can they connect peer to peer and send data from one phone to another? Is it all accessed in one database that the app connects to everytime that it pulls down?
Someones sends you a snap
your app will ask the database every ...min or when you reload if there's something new to load, and gets it from the database if there is something new
When you sign up for an app like this with a registered account is that information stored on the iphone?
Connect to snapchat
get a snap from someone and wait till you can view it
start airplane mode and see if it loads, if it does there are files (temporarily) stored on your iPhone.
i'm writing an app that manage a sqlite database, and i have write a web server, i want the user register in my web server with username and password, i already know how make a request from ios app to server and receive the response, but i want enable also the synchronization of the sqlite database to other device, i now that with core data i can use iCloud synchronization, but for now i prefer use sqlite, and find a way to synchronize it, for example i want create this:
make a change in the sqlite in the iPhone app;
the app send this change to the server for that user;
then the server have to send this update to other device connected at that user;
and now i can't go over, how the server can send this change to the other device? the device has to be always listen to the server? or there is a way to send this update directly to some device and handle it? like an apple push notification?
EDIT: if it's possible use an apple push notification to do this, i doesn't want alert with text sound and badge the user, but send a "silent notification" it's possible?
As a high-level there are a few different ways to approach this, all of which have pros and cons. Two name two examples you can do a polling method, active push or a hybrid approach.
Polling: at some pre-determined interval the app tries to "phone home" and send the delta db changes up to the server. Here you know that your server will be expecting X number of responses in any given interval so you can appropriately gauge your load.
Active Push: The user decides when they want those changes to be transmitted to the server by hitting a "Sync" button. This allows the user to only push data back up to the server when they know there's a change but an over zealous user may make a change, upload, make a change, upload, etc instead of queueing up a bunch of changes and sending them all at once. This may create frequently unneeded server calls.
Hybrid: You setup a polling schedule within the app AND give the user the ability to Sync at-will in the event there is a critical change that needs to be made ASAP.
Regarding the listener side of the equation you face a similar challenge conceptually. If the original user makes 20 changes and presses Sync 20 times do you bombard the second user's device 20 times as well or do you queue those changes up and send them down every 5 minutes (as an example)? Unless you have both devices paired to each other or are connected to the same network AND visible to each other via your app you're going to need to leverage that back-end server. Push notifications can be very useful in this manner but there is extra development and setup overhead to take into account to properly implement them.
To boil this all down I would recommend laying out what YOU want your syncing model to look like before you start marching down a path.
I have to add e-mail notifications to a client server application.
Notifications happen as the user do some particular action on the client UI.
If I had a middle tier or a service running at server I can imagine how to do it:
1) I simply create a DB tables with "pending notifications"
2) as a user does an action that generates a notification I add a record to the table
3) serverside I would continuously try to send those mails and removing them from the table once sending is succesful
Now I cannot do this now, I have a plan to add a service later on, but for now I must go the quick and dirty way.
So somehow what I was thinking to is to implement something like this:
1) as a notify-worth event occurs at client, the same client (my exe) tries to send the notification, upon failure it will log the notification in the "pending notifications" table (failure can be becuase lack of internet connection or any other problem)
2) I add a Timer that will work from any client machine to check for pending notifications. If there are any the client will try to send the e-mail (using a transaction: I will mark a field as "TryngToSendFromClientX" and in case of failure I will reset that field to NULL)
I think this approach would work, it has obvious limitations (if after failure no one logs into the system, no notification will be sent - same would be if service goes "down"). But can you comment on this approach and suggest a better one?
Additional notes (to better understand the scenario):
a) Note: all notifications are sent from the same e-mail account.
b) I don't need to keep track of who sent the e-mail.
c) the problem of creating the service now is that it will basically complicate significantly deployment and I need to create tools for monitoring the status of the service. Something that I will do in future but not now, in future I have plan to add more functionality (not only sending notifications) to the service, so in that case it makes more sense to create it.
d) I will send e-mails by using Indy components and SMTP server.
If you are not willing to create the service now, I think you are stuck with the scenario you describe. There are some things though you could do to circumvent the problem of no user firing up the client anymore while there are still pending messages.
You could add a commandline utility (or commandline parameter as bepe4711 suggested) that will only check for pending messages and try to send them.
Add this commandline utility to the StartUp folder or Run key in the registry. This way messages will at least get sent when the computer restarts, even if the user does not fire up the your app.
Add a scheduled task to run this utility at least once every day. The scheduled task can be added by code or by your installer.
If you do both, you will only have to worry about pending messages of users that never start their computer again.
Perhaps you can add a parameter to your client which causes it to just look at the pending notifications and send them. After this it can terminate itself. It will just act like some kind of service.
Then you install the client on the server and start it every x minutes.
I do something very similar to the approach you describe. Instead of sending emails I need to call a web service. My application is installed on several laptops and they are commonly not connected to any network.
When my application raises an exception I collect various bits of information including user comments and screen shots. Then I attempt to send this to our web service. If by chance the web service is not available. (i.e. not connected to the internet or web service is down) I write the results to an XML file on disk in the User Profile (App_Data) directory.
The one major difference is I don't poll to check to see if the server is up. I attempt to send them again on the startup of the application.
If both Systems are running on Windows, have a look at MS Message Queue. It is designed to send notifications to systems, which are not allways online. I did it in .Net, there are already easy to use classes implemented. Not sure about Delphi.
Latest version of Windows uses much more the Windows Task Scheduler, and now task can be fired on event (i.e. when a network card gets connected...). You could write a separate utility that tries to send pending notification, even if noone is logged in.