I want to create a new variable from two other variables.
The first is SEX (0=male, 1=female; there were no other genders selected by respondents though we had planned for that possibility) whereas the second is RACE9 (0=white, 1=racialized). The new variable is named SEXRACE9.
While the following code produces counts for white males, racialized males, white females and racialized females, the code fails to produce a count for total male or total female.
* Create combined sex and race categorical variable.
IF (sex=0 AND (race9=0 OR race9=1)) sexrace9=1. /*Total males - glitchy.
IF sex=0 AND race9=1 sexrace9=2. /*White males.
IF sex=0 AND race9=0 sexrace9=3. /*Racialized males.
IF (sex=1 AND (race9=0 OR race9=1)) sexrace9=4. /*Total females - glitchy.
IF sex=1 AND race9=1 sexrace9=5. /*White females.
IF sex=1 AND race9=0 sexrace9=6. /*Racialized females.
EXECUTE.
Am I missing something? Alternately, does anyone have a solution for how to insert a count for total males and total females using COMPUTE? Any help is greatly appreciated.
You are missing two key aspects:
Your sexracevariable is intended to define mutually exclusive groups (i.e. - each case will belong to one group, and no case could qualify for more than one group)
SPSS syntax is being run sequentially, line by line, so a syntax line can overwrite previous lines.
More to the point:
IF (sex=0 AND (race9=0 OR race9=1)) sexrace9=1.
is being partially overwritten by
IF sex=0 AND race9=1 sexrace9=2. /*White males.
because white males would qualify for both sexrace=1 and sexrace=2.
, and then by the line
IF sex=0 AND race9=0 sexrace9=3. /*Racialized males.
, because Racialized males qualify for both sexrace=1 and sexrace =3.
So I am guessing that no cases ghave sexrace=1 after running your syntax :)
Exactly the same logic goes for Females.
I am not sure what you want to achieve by your Total Males and Total Femalessyntax lines. You already have the sexvariable to differentiate between males and females.
Related
can someone help me figure out how to select cases containing number 1, for example I coded nausea as side effect as 1 and was then noting it with other side effects as 1234 and now i wan to select all combinations with 1 but i cant figure out how. Or at least how to properly name what I am trying to achieve, since I am fairly new to spss so I can try to further search online.
I have tried variable = 1 and variable = 1 and neither worked and a few random commands that did not work either. I have put the variable as string and did not change anything either.
Once you change the variable into text you can use text search commands to find "1" within the text, like this for example:
compute nausea=(char.index(YourVariable,"1")>0).
char.index command searches for "1" in YourVariable - if it is there, it will output it's position in the text. If it isn't there, the output is 0. So nausea will get a value of 1 in all cases that contain "1" and will gat a value of 0 in all cases that don't.
NOTE - if you get as high as 10 in your numbers, this method will fail, as "10" contains "1". In order for any method to work here, you'd need to add a delimiter between the numbers when you record them, e.g. "1,3,8,17,22".
I've got a SpatRaster of (150 x 150 x 1377) that shows temporal evolution of precipitations. Each layer is a given hour in a 2-month interval, but some hours are missing, and the dataset isn't continuous. The layers names are strings as "YYYYMMDDhhmm".
I need to find the mean value every three hours even on whole intervals or on missing-data intervals. On entire ones I want to average three data and on missing-data ones I would like to average two of them or, if two are missing, to select the unique value as the averaged one.
How can I use data names to select how to act?
I've already tried this code but I'm averaging on three continuous layers by index and not by hours. How can I convert names in DateTime form from "tidyverse" in order to use rollapply() to see if two steps back I find the DateTime I am expecting? Is there any other method to check this out?
HSAF=rast(c((paste0(resfolder, "HSAF_final1_5.tif")),(paste0(resfolder, "HSAF_final6_10.tif")),(paste0(resfolder, "HSAF_final11_15.tif")),
(paste0(resfolder, "HSAF_final16_20.tif")),(paste0(resfolder, "HSAF_final21_25.tif")),(paste0(resfolder, "HSAF_final26_30.tif")),
(paste0(resfolder, "HSAF_final31_N04.tif")),(paste0(resfolder, "HSAF_finalN05_N08.tif")),(paste0(resfolder, "HSAF_finalN09_N13.tif")),
(paste0(resfolder, "HSAF_finalN14_N18.tif")),(paste0(resfolder, "HSAF_finalN19_N23.tif")),(paste0(resfolder, "HSAF_finalN24_N28.tif")),
(paste0(resfolder, "HSAF_finalN29_N30.tif"))))
index=names(HSAF)
j=2
for (i in seq(1,3, by=3))
{third_el<- HSAF[index[i+j]]
second_el <- HSAF[index[i+j-1]]
first_el<- HSAF[index[i+j-2]]
newraster<- c(first_el, second_el, third_el)
newraster<- mean(newraster, filename=paste0(tempfile(), ".tif"))
names(newraster)<- paste0(index[i+j-2],index[i+j-1],index[i+j])
}
for (i in seq(4,1374 , by=3))
{ third_el<- HSAF[index[i+j]]
second_el <- HSAF[index[i+j-1]]
first_el<- HSAF[index[i+j-2]]
subraster<- c(first_el, second_el, third_el)
subraster<- mean(subraster, filename=paste0(tempfile(), ".tif"))
names(subraster)<- paste0(index[i+j-2],index[i+j-1],index[i+j])
add(newraster)<- subraster
}
I'm working in Google Sheets and trying to create a FILTER function that returns only the results from a second table where a pair of values exists in the first table. Here's a simplified example:
SpellsInitial (Table 1)
Level
Name
1
Heal
2
Flaming Sphere
3
Fireball
SpellsHeightened (Table 2)
Level
Name
1
Heal
2
Flaming Sphere
2
Heal
3
Fireball
3
Flaming Sphere
3
Heal
And I want to filter SpellsHeightened to return only the results that are in SpellsInitial—essentially "(Level=Level)*(Name=Name)=1".
I have a FILTER function taking a level value as input to print a list of names, but I can't seem to get the ArrayFormula part to work.
=TRANSPOSE(FILTER(SpellsHeightened_Name, A30=SpellsHeightened_Level, (SpellsHeightened_Name=SpellsInitial_Name)*(A30=SpellsInitial_Level)))
I know what I actually need on the last line is "the value on a given line in SpellsHeightened_Name" because otherwise it's the whole array, but I guess I'm struggling to identify and pass in that value using only a level value as input. I tried nesting one FILTER (to get the list of names from Heightened) inside a second FILTER (to match the names up with Initial) but could get that figured out either.
Here's the actual thing in practice.
Perhaps:
=FILTER( SpellsHeightened,
ISNUMBER( MATCH( SpellsHeightened_Level&SpellsHeightened_Name,
SpellsInitial_Level&SpellsInitial_Name, 0 ) ) )
I can query using Cypher in Neo4j from the Panama database the countries of three types of identity holders (I define that term) namely Entities (companies), officers (shareholders) and Intermediaries (middle companies) as three attributes/columns. Each column has single or double entries separated by colon (eg: British Virgin Islands;Russia). We want to concatenate the countries in these columns into a unique set of countries and hence obtain the count of the number of countries as new attribute.
For this, I tried the following code from my understanding of Cypher:
MATCH (BEZ2:Officer)-[:SHAREHOLDER_OF]->(BEZ1:Entity),(BEZ3:Intermediary)-[:INTERMEDIARY_OF]->(BEZ1:Entity)
WHERE BEZ1.address CONTAINS "Belize" AND
NOT ((BEZ1.countries="Belize" AND BEZ2.countries="Belize" AND BEZ3.countries="Belize") OR
(BEZ1.status IN ["Inactivated", "Dissolved shelf company", "Dissolved", "Discontinued", "Struck / Defunct / Deregistered", "Dead"]))
SET BEZ4.countries= (BEZ1.countries+","+BEZ2.countries+","+BEZ3.countries)
RETURN BEZ3.countries AS IntermediaryCountries, BEZ3.name AS
Intermediaryname, BEZ2.countries AS OfficerCountries , BEZ2.name AS
Officername, BEZ1.countries as EntityCountries, BEZ1.name AS Companyname,
BEZ1.address AS CompanyAddress,DISTINCT count(BEZ4.countries) AS NoofConnections
The relevant part is the SET statement in the 7th line and the DISTINCT count in the last line. The code shows error which makes no sense to me: Invalid input 'u': expected 'n/N'. I guess it means to use COLLECT probably but we tried that as well and it shows the error vice-versa'd between 'u' and 'n'. Please help us obtain the output that we want, it makes our job hell lot easy. Thanks in advance!
EDIT: Considering I didn't define variable as suggested by #Cybersam, I tried the command CREATE as following but it shows the error "Invalid input 'R':" for the command RETURN. This is unfathomable for me. Help really needed, thank you.
CODE 2:
MATCH (BEZ2:Officer)-[:SHAREHOLDER_OF]->(BEZ1:Entity),(BEZ3:Intermediary)-
[:INTERMEDIARY_OF]->(BEZ1:Entity)
WHERE BEZ1.address CONTAINS "Belize" AND
NOT ((BEZ1.countries="Belize" AND BEZ2.countries="Belize" AND
BEZ3.countries="Belize") OR
(BEZ1.status IN ["Inactivated", "Dissolved shelf company", "Dissolved",
"Discontinued", "Struck / Defunct / Deregistered", "Dead"]))
CREATE (p:Connections{countries:
split((BEZ1.countries+";"+BEZ2.countries+";"+BEZ3.countries),";")
RETURN BEZ3.countries AS IntermediaryCountries, BEZ3.name AS
Intermediaryname, BEZ2.countries AS OfficerCountries , BEZ2.name AS
Officername, BEZ1.countries as EntityCountries, BEZ1.name AS Companyname,
BEZ1.address AS CompanyAddress, AS TOTAL, collect (DISTINCT
COUNT(p.countries)) AS NumberofConnections
Lines 8 and 9 are the ones new and to be in examination.
First Query
You never defined the identifier BEZ4, so you cannot set a property on it.
Second Query (which should have been posted in a separate question):
You have several typos and a syntax error.
This query should not get an error (but you will have to determine if it does what you want):
MATCH (BEZ2:Officer)-[:SHAREHOLDER_OF]->(BEZ1:Entity),(BEZ3:Intermediary)- [:INTERMEDIARY_OF]->(BEZ1:Entity)
WHERE BEZ1.address CONTAINS "Belize" AND NOT ((BEZ1.countries="Belize" AND BEZ2.countries="Belize" AND BEZ3.countries="Belize") OR (BEZ1.status IN ["Inactivated", "Dissolved shelf company", "Dissolved", "Discontinued", "Struck / Defunct / Deregistered", "Dead"]))
CREATE (p:Connections {countries: split((BEZ1.countries+";"+BEZ2.countries+";"+BEZ3.countries), ";")})
RETURN BEZ3.countries AS IntermediaryCountries,
BEZ3.name AS Intermediaryname,
BEZ2.countries AS OfficerCountries ,
BEZ2.name AS Officername,
BEZ1.countries as EntityCountries,
BEZ1.name AS Companyname,
BEZ1.address AS CompanyAddress,
SIZE(p.countries) AS NumberofConnections;
Problems with the original:
The CREATE clause was missing a closing } and also a closing ).
The RETURN clause had a dangling AS TOTAL term.
collect (DISTINCT COUNT(p.countries)) was attempting to perform nested aggregation, which is not supported. In any case, even if it had worked, it probably would not have returned what you wanted. I suspect that you actually wanted the size of the p.countries collection, so that is what I used in my query.
I am using Neo4J to represent texts; in the simplest case a text is a sequence of words joined by the relationship LEMMA_TEXT.
I am trying to find the Nth word after a known word, with a query that looks something like this.
MATCH (anchor)-[:LEMMA_TEXT*32]->(word)
WHERE id(anchor) = 3275
RETURN word
In one particular case, if I increase the path length to 33, I get this error:
Neo.DatabaseError.Statement.ExecutionFailure: There is no spoon.
And yet the following query returns the correct result.
MATCH (anchor)-[:LEMMA_TEXT*32]->(word)-[:LEMMA_TEXT]->(next)
WHERE id(anchor) = 3275
RETURN next
which demonstrates that the node I want exists and is reachable.
Where is the section of the manual that tells me how to bend the spoon with my mind? More importantly, what does this actually mean?!
If anything breaks at number like 33, it means that there was a restriction upto 32, why 32? 2^5.
It's not trivial that most of the restrictions are in a factor of 2, MongoDB document size cannot be more than 16 MB, on a collection there could be maximum index, no more than 64. etc.
why it works as 32 and then next, because till 32 it can achieve in one operation and for last one it can see the next one as another operation. But it cannot go for 33 in one operation.
Most of these restrictions are basically sanity check though and not really technical boundary.
As for why it is almost always a factor of 2, I want someone else to answer or in other words I don't know.
Have you tried splitting the landing and the search statements in 2?
Plus you should add the label for the text word (forormance)
Example:
MATCH (anchor)
WHERE id(anchor) = 3275
WITH anchor
MATCH (anchor)-[:LEMMA_TEXT*32]->(word)
RETURN word
You get the same error?