I want to run some test against local container which is Garden like, I want to use docker which should fits our requirement,
is there some docker image /prototype which build as CF garden container ?
with the FS like home/vcap/app/..... I just want to simulate E2E tests locally without deployment ...
It's hard to tell exactly what you're asking about here, so if this doesn't answer your question please expand your question. That said, if you're looking for the filesystem or "stack" that's used on CloudFoundry when you cf push an app that is currently called cflinuxfs and it's based off of Ubuntu 14.04 Trusty.
The image itself is maintained as a docker image here -> https://hub.docker.com/r/cloudfoundry/cflinuxfs2/.
If you want manually enter the container and work, maybe to run some tests or compile software locally, you can docker pull cloudfoundry/cflinuxfs2 and docker run cloudfoundry/cflinuxfs2 /bin/bash and run your tests in the resulting container. This will give you more control than using cflocal, as it will let you spin up a raw docker container with the same file system as an app running on CF and run whatever you want in that container.
If your intent is to run buildpacks inside this container, then you should use the cflocal plugin because it will do basically what I said above but also handle running the buildpack in docker container that is created so it's way more convenient.
Hope that helps!
You can try CF Local, it should suit your needs for local testing.
https://github.com/sclevine/cflocal
Related
I'm new to docker.Most of the tutorials on docker cover the same thing.I'm afraid I'm just ending up with piles of questions,and no answers really. I've come here after my fair share of Googling, kindly help me out with these basic questions.
When we install a docker,where it gets installed? Is it in our computer in local or does it happen in cloud?
Where does containers get pulled into?I there a way I can see what is inside the container?(I'm using Ubuntu 18.04)
When we pull an image.Docker image or clone a repository from
Git.where does this data get is stored?
Looks like you are confused after reading to many documents. Let me try to put this in simple words. Hope this will help.
When we install a docker,where it gets installed? Is it in our
computer in local or does it happen in cloud?
We install the docker on VM be it you on-prem VM or cloud. You can install the docker on your laptop as well.
Where does containers get pulled into?I there a way I can see what is
inside the container?(I'm using Ubuntu 18.04)
This question can be treated as lack of terminology awareness. We don't pull the container. We pull the image and run the container using that.
Quick terminology summary
Container-> Containers allow you to easily package an application's code, configurations, and dependencies into a template called an image.
Dockerfile-> Here you mention your commands or infrastructure blueprint.
Image -> Image gets derived from Dockerfile. You use image to create and run the container.
Yes, you can log inside the container. Use below command
docker exec -it <container-id> /bin/bash
When we pull an image.Docker image or clone a repository from
Git.where does this data get is stored?
You can pull the opensource image from Docker-hub
When you clone the git project which is docerized, you can look for Dockerfile in that project and create the your own image by build it.
docker build -t <youimagenae:tag> .
When you build or pull the image it get store in to your local.
user docker images command
Refer the below cheat-sheet for more commands to play with docker.
The docker daemon gets installed on your local machine and everything you do with the docker cli gets executed on your local machine and containers.
(not sure about the 1st part of your question). You can easily access your docker containers by docker exec -it <container name> /bin/bash for that you will need to have the container running. Check running containers with docker ps
(again I do not entirely understand your question) The images that you pull get stored on your local machine as well. You can see all the images present on your machine with docker images
Let me know if it was helpful and if you need any futher information.
I use Docker to execute a website I make.
When a release have to be delivered, I have to build a new Docker image and start a new Container from it.
The problem is that images et containers are accumulating and taking huge space.
Besides the delivery, I need to stop the running container and delete it and the source image too.
I don't need Docker command lines but a checklist or a process to not forget anything.
For instance:
-Stop running container
-Delete stopped container
-Delete old image
-Build new image
-Start new container
Am I missing something?
I'm not used to Docker, maybe there are best practices to this pretty classical use case?
The local workflow that works for me is:
Do core development locally, without Docker. Things like interactive debuggers and live reloading work just fine in a non-Docker environment without weird hacks or root access, and installing the tools I need usually involves a single brew or apt-get step. Make all of my pytest/junit/rspec/jest/... tests pass.
docker build a new image.
docker stop && docker rm the old container.
docker run a new container.
When the number of old images starts to bother me, docker system prune.
If you're using Docker Compose, you might be able to replace the middle set of steps with docker-compose up --build.
In a production environment, the sequence is slightly different:
When your CI system sees a new commit, after running the repository's local tests, it docker build && docker push a new image. The image has a unique tag, which could be a timestamp or source control commit ID or version tag.
Your deployment system (could be the CI system or a separate CD system) tells whatever cluster manager you're using (Kubernetes, a Compose file with Docker Swarm, Nomad, an Ansible playbook, ...) about the new version tag. The deployment system takes care of stopping, starting, and removing containers.
If your cluster manager doesn't handle this already, run a cron job to docker system prune.
You should use:
docker system df
to investigate the space used by docker.
After that you can use
docker system prune -a --volumes
to remove unused components. Containers you should stop them yourself before doing this, but this way you are sure to cover everything.
I'm to deploy .war file using docker.
and I'm very new to docker.
and there's something little bit confusing when I'm trying that.
I'm confused about the approach I'm creating the Dockerfile.
I don't know that the product owner must installing the tomcat and java jdk in his server manually or I should handle that automatically in my Docker image?
what is common and what is the best practice of that?
No, the product owner doesn't need to install anything that's the beauty of containers approach. The approach is there to solve the problem that it runs on my machine and not on others. So, once you built an image all the product owner need is to install docker on his machine and then it is done. Because the container itself is a virtual machine in which everything required to run the project is installed and taken care of. So, short answer no, product owner doesn't need anything except docker itself.
Glad that you opted to use Docker for this, though few things to take note of :-
You will be needing to create a Dockerfile. Refer [https://stackoverflow.com/a/45870319/2519351][1]
Build a Docker image using the Dockerfile docker build -t <image_name>:<tag>
Install Docker service on your product owner's server
Deploying the Docker Image to your product owner is a bit tricky. As it will require you to transfer the Docker Image built on your machine to the Product owner's server
One option is to push the Docker Image to Docker Hub. Don't opt for this option if you don't want to make your app public.
Another option is to set up a private registry, though this would be an overkill if there is no scale of your deployment. But it is the correct approach.
Another crude option is to take remote control of the Docker daemon running on your product owner's server. This way you can start a docker container on remote server from your local machine. Refer - [https://success.docker.com/article/how-do-i-enable-the-remote-api-for-dockerd][1]
Finally run the Docker container docker -H <remote_server>:<port> run -d <image>:<tag>
Im facing the same problem since months now and i dont have an adequate solution.
Im running several Containers based on different images. Some of them were started using portainer with some arguments and volumes. Some of them were started using the CLI and docker start with some arguments and parameters.
Now all these settings are stored somewhere. Because if i stop and retart such a container, everything works well again. but, if i do a commit, backup it with tar and load it on a different system and do a docker start, it has lost all of its settings.
The procedure as described here: https://linuxconfig.org/docker-container-backup-and-recovery does not work in my case.
Now im thinking about to write an own web application which will create me some docker compose files based on my setting rather than to just do a docker start with the correct params. This web application should also take care of the volumes (just folders) and do a incremental backup of them with borg to a remote server.
But actually this is only an idea. Is there a way to "extract" a docker compose file of a running containter? So that i can redeploy a container 1:1 to an other server and just have to run docker run mycontainer and it will have the same settings?
Or do i have to write my web app? Or have i missed some page on google and there is already such a solution?
Thank you!
To see the current configuration of a container, you can use:
docker container inspect $container_id
You can then use those configurations to run your container on another machine. There is no easy import/export of these settings to start another container that I'm aware of.
Most people use a docker-compose.yml to define how they want a container run. They also build images with a Dockerfile and transfer them with a registry server rather than a save/load.
The docker-compose.yml can be used with docker-compose or docker stack deploy and allows the configuration of the container to be documented as a configuration file that is tracked in version control, rather than error prone user entered settings. Running containers by hand or starting them with a GUI is useful for a quick test or debugging, but not for reproducibility.
You would like to backup the instance but the commands you're providing are to backup the image. I'd suggest to update your Dockerfile to solve the issue. In case you really want to go down the saving the instance current status, you should use the docker export and docker import commands.
Reference:
https://docs.docker.com/engine/reference/commandline/import/
https://docs.docker.com/engine/reference/commandline/export/
NOTE: the docker export does not export the content of the volumes anyway, I suggest you to should refer to https://docs.docker.com/engine/admin/volumes/volumes/
My goal is to use Docker to create a mail setup running postfix + dovecot, fully configured and ready to go (on Ubuntu 14.04), so I could easily deploy on several servers. As far as I understand Docker, the process to do this is:
Spin up a new container (docker run -it ubuntu bash).
Install and configure postfix and dovecot.
If I need to shut down and take a break, I can exit the shell and return to the container via docker start <id> followed by docker attach <id>.
(here's where things get fuzzy for me)
At this point, is it better to export the image to a file, import on another server, and run it? How do I make sure the container will automatically start postfix, dovecot, and other services upon running it? I also don't quite understand the difference between using a Dockerfile to automate installations vs just installing it manually and exporting the image.
Configure multiple docker images using Dockerfiles
Each docker container should run only one service. So one container for postfix, one for another service etc. You can have your running containers communicate with each other
Build those images
Push those images to a registry so that you can easily pull them on different servers and have the same setup.
Pull those images on your different servers.
You can pass ENV variables when you start a container to configure it.
You should not install something directly inside a running container.
This defeat the pupose of having a reproducible setup with Docker.
Your step #2 should be a RUN entry inside a Dockerfile, that is then used to run docker build to create an image.
This image could then be used to start and stop running containers as needed.
See the Dockerfile RUN entry documentation. This is usually used with apt-get install to install needed components.
The ENTRYPOINT in the Dockerfile should be set to start your services.
In general it is recommended to have just one process in each image.