I'm new to docker.Most of the tutorials on docker cover the same thing.I'm afraid I'm just ending up with piles of questions,and no answers really. I've come here after my fair share of Googling, kindly help me out with these basic questions.
When we install a docker,where it gets installed? Is it in our computer in local or does it happen in cloud?
Where does containers get pulled into?I there a way I can see what is inside the container?(I'm using Ubuntu 18.04)
When we pull an image.Docker image or clone a repository from
Git.where does this data get is stored?
Looks like you are confused after reading to many documents. Let me try to put this in simple words. Hope this will help.
When we install a docker,where it gets installed? Is it in our
computer in local or does it happen in cloud?
We install the docker on VM be it you on-prem VM or cloud. You can install the docker on your laptop as well.
Where does containers get pulled into?I there a way I can see what is
inside the container?(I'm using Ubuntu 18.04)
This question can be treated as lack of terminology awareness. We don't pull the container. We pull the image and run the container using that.
Quick terminology summary
Container-> Containers allow you to easily package an application's code, configurations, and dependencies into a template called an image.
Dockerfile-> Here you mention your commands or infrastructure blueprint.
Image -> Image gets derived from Dockerfile. You use image to create and run the container.
Yes, you can log inside the container. Use below command
docker exec -it <container-id> /bin/bash
When we pull an image.Docker image or clone a repository from
Git.where does this data get is stored?
You can pull the opensource image from Docker-hub
When you clone the git project which is docerized, you can look for Dockerfile in that project and create the your own image by build it.
docker build -t <youimagenae:tag> .
When you build or pull the image it get store in to your local.
user docker images command
Refer the below cheat-sheet for more commands to play with docker.
The docker daemon gets installed on your local machine and everything you do with the docker cli gets executed on your local machine and containers.
(not sure about the 1st part of your question). You can easily access your docker containers by docker exec -it <container name> /bin/bash for that you will need to have the container running. Check running containers with docker ps
(again I do not entirely understand your question) The images that you pull get stored on your local machine as well. You can see all the images present on your machine with docker images
Let me know if it was helpful and if you need any futher information.
Related
I'm pretty new to using Docker. I'm needing to deploy a NiFi instance through my employer, but the internal service we need to use requires a Dockerfile, not an image.
The service we're using requires the Dockerfile because each time the repository we're using is updated, the service is pointed to the Dockerfile and initiates the build process from it, then runs/operates the container.
I've already set up the NiFi flow to how it needs to operate, I'm just unsure of how to get a Dockerfile from an already existing container (or if that is even possible?)
I was looking into this myself, apparently there is no real way to do it, but you can inspect the docker container and pretty much get all the commands used to create the container except the OS used which is easy to find, you can spawn a bash into the container and do something like sudo uname -a, which you can just take and make your own docker image with. Usually you can find it on github, though.
docker inspect <image>
or you can do it through the docker desktop UI
You can use the Dockerfile that is in NiFi source code, see in this directory: https://github.com/apache/nifi/tree/main/nifi-docker/dockerhub
I'm learning about Docker Containers, so, I found this repo with a lot of images and references, can anyone help me in order to understand how can I use those images?
I know the docker run --rm command
With docker you first need a docker image. A docker image is a representation of an application that docker can understand and run.
The most common ways to get one is to use docker pull or to generate yours with docker build.
You can check the images you got with docker images
Once you got your image you can run it with docker run MyImage, this will create a container, a container is a running application.
I've moved my docker-compose container from the development machine to a server using docker save image-name > image-name.tar and cat image-name.tar | docker load. I can see that my image is loaded by running docker images. But when I want to start my server with docker-compose up, it says that there isn't any docker-compose.yml. And there isn't really any .yml file. So how to do with this?
UPDATE
When I've copied all my project files to the server (including docker-compose.yml), everything started to work. But is it normal approach and why I needed to save-load image first?
What you achieve with docker save image-name > image-name.tar and cat image-name.tar | docker load is that you put a Docker image into an archive and extract the image on another machine after that. You could check whether this worked correctly with docker run --rm image-name.
An image is just like a blueprint you can use for running containers. This has nothing to do with your docker-compose.yml, which is just a configuration file that has to live somewhere on your machine. You would have to copy this file manually to the remote machine you wish to run your image on, e.g. using scp docker-compose.yml remote_machine:/home/your_user/docker-compose.yml. You could then run docker-compose up from /home/your_user.
EDIT: Additional info concerning the updated question:
UPDATE When I've copied all my project files to the server (including docker-compose.yml), everything started to work. But is it normal approach and why I needed to save-load image first?
Personally, I have never used this approach of transferring a Docker image (but it's cool, didn't know it). What you typically would do is pushing your image to a Docker registry (either the official DockerHub one, or a self-hosted registry) and then pulling it from there.
I have followed this guide from Google documentation in order to be able to push a custom Docker image to Google Container Registry and then be able to start a new GCE instance with this image. At first I wanted to try using an anaconda3 public image from docker hub without any modification (in order to test).
So here is the steps I have done so far after installing gcloud and docker:
gcloud auth configure-docker -> configured docker with my gcloud crendentials
docker pull continuumio/anaconda3 -> pulled the public image
docker tag continuumio/anaconda3 eu.gcr.io/my-project-id/anaconda3 -> tagged the local image with the registry name as specified in the doc
docker push eu.gcr.io/my-project-id/anaconda3 -> pushed the image to GCR
Good ! I am now able to see my image trough GCR interface, and also able to deploy it with GCE. I choose to deploy it with a f1-micro instance, Container-Optimized OS 67-10575.62.0 stable, 10 Go boot disk, Allow HTTP traffic, etc.
But when I connect with ssh to the freshly new created VM instance, I can't find anaconda3 librairies (which are supposed to be created in /opt/conda). Instead, I can see a /opt/google directory which makes me think that the image has not been deployed correctly and GCE is using a default image...
So I tried to check if the image was pushed correctly in GCR, so I decided to delete my local image and pull it once again from GCR:
docker rmi -f eu.gcr.io/my-project-id/anaconda3
docker pull eu.gcr.io/my-project-id/anaconda3:latest
I run the image
docker run -t -i eu.gcr.io/my-project-id/anaconda3
and I can see that everything is fine, I have anaconda3 installed correctly inside /opt/conda with all the toolts needed (Pandas, Numpy, Jupyter notebook, etc.)
I tried to find people with the same problem as me without any success... maybe I have done something wrong in my proccess ?
Thanks !
TL;DR My problem is that I have pushed an anaconda3 image on Google GCR, but when I launch a virtual instance with this image, I do not have anaconda on it
It's normal that you can't find anaconda libraries installed directly on the GCE instance.
Actually, when you choose to deploy a container image on a GCE VM instance, a Docker container is started from the image you provide (in your example, eu.gcr.io/my-project-id/anaconda3). The libraries are not installed on the host, but rather inside that container (run docker ps to see it, but normally it has the same name as your VM instance). If you run something like :
docker exec -it <docker_container_name> ls /opt/conda
Then you should see the anaconda libraries, only existing inside the container.
When you run docker run -t -i eu.gcr.io/my-project-id/anaconda3, you're actually starting the container and running an interactive bash session inside that container (see the CMD here). That's why you can find anaconda libraries : you are inside the container!
Containerization software (docker here) provides isolation between your host and your containers. I'll suggest you to read documentation about containerization, Docker and how to run containers on Container-Optimized OS.
I want to run some test against local container which is Garden like, I want to use docker which should fits our requirement,
is there some docker image /prototype which build as CF garden container ?
with the FS like home/vcap/app/..... I just want to simulate E2E tests locally without deployment ...
It's hard to tell exactly what you're asking about here, so if this doesn't answer your question please expand your question. That said, if you're looking for the filesystem or "stack" that's used on CloudFoundry when you cf push an app that is currently called cflinuxfs and it's based off of Ubuntu 14.04 Trusty.
The image itself is maintained as a docker image here -> https://hub.docker.com/r/cloudfoundry/cflinuxfs2/.
If you want manually enter the container and work, maybe to run some tests or compile software locally, you can docker pull cloudfoundry/cflinuxfs2 and docker run cloudfoundry/cflinuxfs2 /bin/bash and run your tests in the resulting container. This will give you more control than using cflocal, as it will let you spin up a raw docker container with the same file system as an app running on CF and run whatever you want in that container.
If your intent is to run buildpacks inside this container, then you should use the cflocal plugin because it will do basically what I said above but also handle running the buildpack in docker container that is created so it's way more convenient.
Hope that helps!
You can try CF Local, it should suit your needs for local testing.
https://github.com/sclevine/cflocal