So I'm plan to create a safe init function for NSDictionary like someone else did, but as I'm a SDK developer:
I want add a switch for it, the user can decide if he want open it or not;
I don't want to use Category to implement it.
So I create a totally new class named "ALDictionarySafeFunction.h", it has two functions, the first one is the switch function, like this:
+(void)enableSafeFunction{
[ALSwizzlingHelper swizzleSelector:#selector(initWithObjects:forKeys:count:)
ofClass:NSClassFromString(#"__NSPlaceholderDictionary")
withSwizzledSelector:#selector(safeInitWithObjects:forKeys:count:)
ofClass:[ALDictionarySafeFunction class]];
}
The ALSwizzlingHelper can help me to swizzle two functions.
The second is the safe init function, like this:
-(instancetype)safeInitWithObjects:(const id _Nonnull __unsafe_unretained *)objects forKeys:(const id _Nonnull __unsafe_unretained *)keys count:(NSUInteger)cnt {
BOOL containNilObject = NO;
for (NSUInteger i = 0; i < cnt; i++) {
if (objects[i] == nil) {
containNilObject = YES;
NSLog(#"There is a nil object(key: %#)", keys[i]);
}
}
if (containNilObject) {
//Do something to make sure that it won't cause a crash even it has some nil value
}
//There is the problem, next line
[self safeInitWithObjects:objects forKeys:keys count:cnt];
}
For the normal situation(Write the swizzled method in the Category), I need to do like I wrote to invoke the original method.
But the problem is I cannot do it here, because that the "self" object is the instance of “__NSPlaceholderDictionary”, and the "__NSPlaceholderDictionary" class doesn't have the instance method "safeInitWithObjects:forKeys:count:".
So what should I do?
Is there a way to make it?
Any advice will be appreciated.
Related
In my app I have the Restaurant class that you can see below. I'd like to attach a KVOController to it. But I'm having no luck. When I attach it with the code below, it crashes.
FBKVOController *KVOController = [FBKVOController controllerWithObserver:self];
self.KVOController = KVOController;
[self.KVOController observe:self keyPath:#"[Restaurant current].name.asString" options:NSKeyValueObservingOptionInitial|NSKeyValueObservingOptionNew block:^(id observer, id object, NSDictionary *change) {
DDLogDebug(#"Restaurant changed");
}];
What's the best way to add KVO to a class like this?
#implementation Restaurant
static Restaurant *current = nil;
+ (Restaurant *)current {
#synchronized(self) {
if (current == nil) {
current = [[Restaurant alloc] initWithId:0];
}
}
return current;
}
- (id)initWithId:(NSInteger)number {
self = [super init];
if (self)
{
...
}
return self;
}
#end
The problem is not #synchronized. There are several issues with your code:
Do you want to observe when the current restaurant changes? Or when the current restaurant's name changes (without +[Restaurant current] pointing to a different restaurant instance). Or any kind of name change, whether triggered by a change of current or a change of name?
Depending on the answer, you'll either want to observe observe:[Restaurant class] or observe:[Restaurant instance], but definitely not observe:self (unless you're setting this up inside the Restaurant class implementation, in which case [self class] would be an alternative to [Restaurant class]).
For any change to be observable, you must ensure that the class is implemented in a KVO-compliant way. This goes both for changes to +[Restaurant current] as well as for changes to -[Restaurant name], depending on what you want to be able to observe.
[Restaurant current].name.asString is not a valid key path. Valid key paths may only contain property names (ASCII, begin with a lowercase letter, no whitespace) and dots to separate them (see Key-value coding for details). Once you're telling the KVOController to observe:[Restaurant class], all that remains for the key path is current.name.asString.
What is name if not a string? Do you really need to convert it to a string for observing it? If your intention is to watch for name changes, observing current.name is probably sufficient.
You'll likely end up with one of the following two options:
FBKVOController *kvoController = [FBKVOController controllerWithObserver:self];
[kvoController observe:[Restaurant class] keyPath:#"current.name" ...];`
// or
[kvoController observe:[Restaurant current] keyPath:#"name" ...];`
And again, for any changes to be observable, they need to be KVO-compliant.
I love blocks and it makes me sad when I can't use them. In particular, this happens mostly every time I use delegates (e.g.: with UIKit classes, mostly pre-block functionality).
So I wonder... Is it possible -using the crazy power of ObjC-, to do something like this?
// id _delegate; // Most likely declared as class variable or it will be released
_delegate = [DelegateFactory delegateOfProtocol:#protocol(SomeProtocol)];
_delegate performBlock:^{
// Do something
} onSelector:#selector(someProtocolMethod)]; // would execute the given block when the given selector is called on the dynamic delegate object.
theObject.delegate = (id<SomeProtocol>)_delegate;
// Profit!
performBlock:onSelector:
If YES, how? And is there a reason why we shouldn't be doing this as much as possible?
Edit
Looks like it IS possible. Current answers focus on the first part of the question, which is how. But it'd be nice to have some discussion on the "should we do it" part.
Okay, I finally got around to putting WoolDelegate up on GitHub. Now it should only take me another month to write a proper README (although I guess this is a good start).
The delegate class itself is pretty straightforward. It simply maintains a dictionary mapping SELs to Block. When an instance recieves a message to which it doesn't respond, it ends up in forwardInvocation: and looks in the dictionary for the selector:
- (void)forwardInvocation:(NSInvocation *)anInvocation {
SEL sel = [anInvocation selector];
GenericBlock handler = [self handlerForSelector:sel];
If it's found, the Block's invocation function pointer is pulled out and passed along to the juicy bits:
IMP handlerIMP = BlockIMP(handler);
[anInvocation Wool_invokeUsingIMP:handlerIMP];
}
(The BlockIMP() function, along with other Block-probing code, is thanks to Mike Ash. Actually, a lot of this project is built on stuff I learned from his Friday Q&A's. If you haven't read those essays, you're missing out.)
I should note that this goes through the full method resolution machinery every time a particular message is sent; there's a speed hit there. The alternative is the path that Erik H. and EMKPantry each took, which is creating a new clas for each delegate object that you need, and using class_addMethod(). Since every instance of WoolDelegate has its own dictionary of handlers, we don't need to do that, but on the other hand there's no way to "cache" the lookup or the invocation. A method can only be added to a class, not to an instance.
I did it this way for two reasons: this was an excercise to see if I could work out the part that's coming next -- the hand-off from NSInvocation to Block invocation -- and the creation of a new class for every needed instance simply seemed inelegant to me. Whether it's less elegant than my solution, I will leave to each reader's judgement.
Moving on, the meat of this procedure is actually in the NSInvocation category that's found in the project. This utilizes libffi to call a function that's unknown until runtime -- the Block's invocation -- with arguments that are also unknown until runtime (which are accessible via the NSInvocation). Normally, this is not possible, for the same reason that a va_list cannot be passed on: the compiler has to know how many arguments there are and how big they are. libffi contains assembler for each platform that knows/is based on those platforms' calling conventions.
There's three steps here: libffi needs a list of the types of the arguments to the function that's being called; it needs the argument values themselves put into a particular format; then the function (the Block's invocation pointer) needs to be invoked via libffi and the return value put back into the NSInvocation.
The real work for the first part is handled largely by a function which is again written by Mike Ash, called from Wool_buildFFIArgTypeList. libffi has internal structs that it uses to describe the types of function arguments. When preparing a call to a function, the library needs a list of pointers to these structures. The NSMethodSignature for the NSInvocation allows access of each argument's encoding string; translating from there to the correct ffi_type is handled by a set of if/else lookups:
arg_types[i] = libffi_type_for_objc_encoding([sig getArgumentTypeAtIndex:actual_arg_idx]);
...
if(str[0] == #encode(type)[0]) \
{ \
if(sizeof(type) == 1) \
return &ffi_type_sint8; \
else if(sizeof(type) == 2) \
return &ffi_type_sint16; \
Next, libffi wants pointers to the argument values themselves. This is done in Wool_buildArgValList: get the size of each argument, again from the NSMethodSignature, and allocate a chunk of memory that size, then return the list:
NSUInteger arg_size;
NSGetSizeAndAlignment([sig getArgumentTypeAtIndex:actual_arg_idx],
&arg_size,
NULL);
/* Get a piece of memory that size and put its address in the list. */
arg_list[i] = [self Wool_allocate:arg_size];
/* Put the value into the allocated spot. */
[self getArgument:arg_list[i] atIndex:actual_arg_idx];
(An aside: there's several notes in the code about skipping over the SEL, which is the (hidden) second passed argument to any method invocation. The Block's invocation pointer doesn't have a slot to hold the SEL; it just has itself as the first argument, and the rest are the "normal" arguments. Since the Block, as written in client code, could never access that argument anyways (it doesn't exist at the time), I decided to ignore it.)
libffi now needs to do some "prep"; as long as that succeeds (and space for the return value can be allocated), the invocation function pointer can now be "called", and the return value can be set:
ffi_call(&inv_cif, (genericfunc)theIMP, ret_val, arg_vals);
if( ret_val ){
[self setReturnValue:ret_val];
free(ret_val);
}
There's some demonstrations of the functionality in main.m in the project.
Finally, as for your question of "should this be done?", I think the answer is "yes, as long as it makes you more productive". WoolDelegate is completely generic, and an instance can act like any fully written-out class. My intention for it, though, was to make simple, one-off delegates -- that only need one or two methods, and don't need to live past their delegators -- less work than writing a whole new class, and more legible/maintainable than sticking some delegate methods into a view controller because it's the easiest place to put them. Taking advantage of the runtime and the language's dynamism like this hopefully can increase your code's readability, in the same way, e.g., Block-based NSNotification handlers do.
I just put together a little project that lets you do just this...
#interface EJHDelegateObject : NSObject
+ (id)delegateObjectForProtocol:(Protocol*) protocol;
#property (nonatomic, strong) Protocol *protocol;
- (void)addImplementation:(id)blockImplementation forSelector:(SEL)selector;
#end
#implementation EJHDelegateObject
static NSInteger counter;
+ (id)delegateObjectForProtocol:(Protocol *)protocol
{
NSString *className = [NSString stringWithFormat:#"%s%#%i",protocol_getName(protocol),#"_EJH_implementation_", counter++];
Class protocolClass = objc_allocateClassPair([EJHDelegateObject class], [className cStringUsingEncoding:NSUTF8StringEncoding], 0);
class_addProtocol(protocolClass, protocol);
objc_registerClassPair(protocolClass);
EJHDelegateObject *object = [[protocolClass alloc] init];
object.protocol = protocol;
return object;
}
- (void)addImplementation:(id)blockImplementation forSelector:(SEL)selector
{
unsigned int outCount;
struct objc_method_description *methodDescriptions = protocol_copyMethodDescriptionList(self.protocol, NO, YES, &outCount);
struct objc_method_description description;
BOOL descriptionFound = NO;
for (int i = 0; i < outCount; i++){
description = methodDescriptions[i];
if (description.name == selector){
descriptionFound = YES;
break;
}
}
if (descriptionFound){
class_addMethod([self class], selector, imp_implementationWithBlock(blockImplementation), description.types);
}
}
#end
And using an EJHDelegateObject:
self.alertViewDelegate = [EJHDelegateObject delegateObjectForProtocol:#protocol(UIAlertViewDelegate)];
[self.alertViewDelegate addImplementation:^(id _self, UIAlertView* alertView, NSInteger buttonIndex){
NSLog(#"%# dismissed with index %i", alertView, buttonIndex);
} forSelector:#selector(alertView:didDismissWithButtonIndex:)];
UIAlertView *alertView = [[UIAlertView alloc] initWithTitle:#"Example" message:#"My delegate is an EJHDelegateObject" delegate:self.alertViewDelegate cancelButtonTitle:#"Cancel" otherButtonTitles:#"OK", nil];
[alertView show];
Edit: This is what I've come up after having understood your requirement. This is just a quick hack, an idea to get you started, it's not properly implemented, nor is it tested. It is supposed to work for delegate methods that take the sender as their only argument. It works It is supposed to work with normal and struct-returning delegate methods.
typedef void *(^UBDCallback)(id);
typedef void(^UBDCallbackStret)(void *, id);
void *UBDDelegateMethod(UniversalBlockDelegate *self, SEL _cmd, id sender)
{
UBDCallback cb = [self blockForSelector:_cmd];
return cb(sender);
}
void UBDelegateMethodStret(void *retadrr, UniversalBlockDelegate *self, SEL _cmd, id sender)
{
UBDCallbackStret cb = [self blockForSelector:_cmd];
cb(retaddr, sender);
}
#interface UniversalBlockDelegate: NSObject
- (BOOL)addDelegateSelector:(SEL)sel isStret:(BOOL)stret methodSignature:(const char *)mSig block:(id)block;
#end
#implementation UniversalBlockDelegate {
SEL selectors[128];
id blocks[128];
int count;
}
- (id)blockForSelector:(SEL)sel
{
int idx = -1;
for (int i = 0; i < count; i++) {
if (selectors[i] == sel) {
return blocks[i];
}
}
return nil;
}
- (void)dealloc
{
for (int i = 0; i < count; i++) {
[blocks[i] release];
}
[super dealloc];
}
- (BOOL)addDelegateSelector:(SEL)sel isStret:(BOOL)stret methodSignature:(const char *)mSig block:(id)block
{
if (count >= 128) return NO;
selectors[count] = sel;
blocks[count++] = [block copy];
class_addMethod(self.class, sel, (IMP)(stret ? UBDDelegateMethodStret : UBDDelegateMethod), mSig);
return YES;
}
#end
Usage:
UIWebView *webView = [[UIWebView alloc] initWithFrame:CGRectZero];
UniversalBlockDelegate *d = [[UniversalBlockDelegate alloc] init];
webView.delegate = d;
[d addDelegateSelector:#selector(webViewDidFinishLoading:) isStret:NO methodSignature:"v#:#" block:^(id webView) {
NSLog(#"Web View '%#' finished loading!", webView);
}];
[webView loadRequest:[NSURLRequest requestWithURL:[NSURL URLWithString:#"http://google.com"]]];
I'm not really sure exactly how to describe what I want to do - the best I can do is provide some code as an example:
- (void) doStuffInLoopForDataArray:(NSArray *)arr forObjectsOfClass:(NSString *)class
{
for ([class class] *obj in arr)
{
// Do stuff
}
}
So I might call this like
NSArray *arr = [NSArray arrayWithObjects:#"foo",#"bar", nil];
[self doStuffInLoopForDataArray:arr forObjectsOfClass:#"NSString"];
and I would expect the code to be executed as if I had wrote
- (void) doStuffInLoopForDataArrayOfStrings:(NSArray *)arr
{
for (NSString *obj in arr)
{
// Do KVC stuff
}
}
Is there a way to get this kind of behavior?
I don't see much point in passing the class to the method. Run your loop as:
for (id obj in arr) {
and check the methods you want to call exist. Passing the class is only really useful if you want to check that the objects in the array are actually of that class, but you couldn't then do much with that information.
Another approach would be to create a single superclass that all the classes I'd like to use this method for inherit from. I can then loop using that superclass.
So if I want to be able to loop for MyObject1 and MyObject2, I could create a BigSuperClass, where MyObject1 and MyObject2 are both subclasses of BigSuperClass.
- (void) doStuffInLoopForDataArray:(NSArray *)arr
{
for (BigSuperClass *obj in arr)
{
// Do stuff
}
}
This loop should work for arrays of MyObject1 objects, arrays of MyObject2 objects, or arrays of BigSuperClass objects.
The more I've been thinking about this, the more I'm leaning towards this being the best approach. Since I can setup my BigSuperClass with all the #propertys and methods I'd be interested in as part of my // Do Stuff, which means I won't have to check respondsToSelector as with the other answers. This way just doesn't feel quite as fragile.
I came up with an idea while I was typing up this question, figured I might as well finish it. I just need to change how I'm doing my loop, and I don't really need to send in the class.
- (void) doStuffInLoopForDataArray:(NSArray *)arr
{
for (int i=0; i < [arr count]; i++)
{
// Do stuff
}
}
I should note that part of my // Do stuff is checking to make sure if ([[arr objectAtIndex:i] respondsToSelector:...]) before I actually try to do anything with it - and from what I understand that should prevent any nasty crashes.
I need to add additional behavior to methods I need to extend, i.e. implement method that looks like
- (void)extendMethod:(SEL)selector forClass:(Class)class withCompletionBlock:(void (^)(void))completionBlock;
So every time Class instance call a method with SEL selector in addition should be invoked my completion block.
I've tried method swizzling, but ran into some problems: I want original method implementation to be called.
What I need is very similar with subclassing, but this should be implemented without subclassing.
UPDATE:
For example I have subclass of UIViewController named MyViewController. MyViewController have - (void)viewDidLoad method. Somewhere in application I call method
[methodExtender extendMethod:#selector(viewDidLoad)
forClass:[MyViewController class]
withCompletionBlock:^{
NSLog(#"view did load called");
}];
So after viewDidLoad method of every instance of MyViewController my completion block invoked.
I'm not sure how you want to use selector, but you can try extend any class(even ones that you don't have implementation file) by using mechanism in Objective-C know as "Categories".
From Xcode click on File->New->File (command+n)
From Cocoa Touch choose Objective-C category
Type name of your category and choose class on which you want to make category (I choosed UIButton)
Then next and Create.
Xcode will create two files for example: UIButton+extendMethod.h
Declare your method in header file and implement it in *.m file.
Using
If you want to use in let's say your View Controller in *.h file import
#import "UIButton+extendMethod.h"
and then you can call your method like this:
UIButton *button = [[UIButton alloc] init];
[button extendMethod:#selector(yourMethod:)];
Swizzling does allow you to call the original implementation, though it is just a bit confusing. Because the implementations are swapped after swizzling, you call the original implementation using the selector of the swizzled method:
- (void)mySwizzledImplementation {
// do stuff
// now call original implementation (using swizzled selector!)
[self mySwizzledImplementation];
// do more stuff
}
See also http://cocoadev.com/wiki/MethodSwizzling
There is no way (anymore)to simulate inheritance without subclassing. There use to be Posing, method swizzling is all that is left (not as elegant as posing though). Here is one way to do method swizzling correctly while being able to call the original implementation.
int swizzle_instance_methods(Class class, SEL selector, IMP replacement, IMP *store) {
#synchronized(class) {
Method method = class_getInstanceMethod(class, selector);
IMP original_imp = NULL;
if (method != NULL) {
const char *type = method_getTypeEncoding(method);
IMP original_imp = class_replaceMethod(class, selector, replacement, type);
if (original_imp == NULL)
original_imp = method_getImplementation(method);
if (original_imp != NULL && store != NULL) {
*store = original_imp;
}
}
return (original_imp != NULL);
}
}
+ (void) load
{
static IMP originalMethodImpl = NULL;
IMP customMethodImpl = imp_implementationWithBlock(^(id self_) {
NSString *descr = ((NSString(*)(id,SEL))originalMethodImpl)(self_, #selector(description);
return [NSString stringWithFormat:#"<--- %# --->",descr];
});
swizzle_instance_methods([self class], #selector(description), customMethodImpl, &originalMethodImpl);
}
I might add that this is nice for debugging and I think that it can be greate for building excellent frameworks. Alas, Apple seems to think differently and using method swizzling can result in your app being excluded from the App store. If you are not aiming for the app store then all the power to you.
It is be possible with ObjC categories. For ex, you can extend hasPrefix method of NSString as follows,
-(BOOL)hasPrefixx:(NSString *)aString
{
NSLog(#"Checking has prefix");
return [self hasPrefix:aString];
}
If you import the category, you should be able to call this method. But his means you got change the method in your call.
By the way, Method swizzling should work. Bit of explanation here.
I love blocks and it makes me sad when I can't use them. In particular, this happens mostly every time I use delegates (e.g.: with UIKit classes, mostly pre-block functionality).
So I wonder... Is it possible -using the crazy power of ObjC-, to do something like this?
// id _delegate; // Most likely declared as class variable or it will be released
_delegate = [DelegateFactory delegateOfProtocol:#protocol(SomeProtocol)];
_delegate performBlock:^{
// Do something
} onSelector:#selector(someProtocolMethod)]; // would execute the given block when the given selector is called on the dynamic delegate object.
theObject.delegate = (id<SomeProtocol>)_delegate;
// Profit!
performBlock:onSelector:
If YES, how? And is there a reason why we shouldn't be doing this as much as possible?
Edit
Looks like it IS possible. Current answers focus on the first part of the question, which is how. But it'd be nice to have some discussion on the "should we do it" part.
Okay, I finally got around to putting WoolDelegate up on GitHub. Now it should only take me another month to write a proper README (although I guess this is a good start).
The delegate class itself is pretty straightforward. It simply maintains a dictionary mapping SELs to Block. When an instance recieves a message to which it doesn't respond, it ends up in forwardInvocation: and looks in the dictionary for the selector:
- (void)forwardInvocation:(NSInvocation *)anInvocation {
SEL sel = [anInvocation selector];
GenericBlock handler = [self handlerForSelector:sel];
If it's found, the Block's invocation function pointer is pulled out and passed along to the juicy bits:
IMP handlerIMP = BlockIMP(handler);
[anInvocation Wool_invokeUsingIMP:handlerIMP];
}
(The BlockIMP() function, along with other Block-probing code, is thanks to Mike Ash. Actually, a lot of this project is built on stuff I learned from his Friday Q&A's. If you haven't read those essays, you're missing out.)
I should note that this goes through the full method resolution machinery every time a particular message is sent; there's a speed hit there. The alternative is the path that Erik H. and EMKPantry each took, which is creating a new clas for each delegate object that you need, and using class_addMethod(). Since every instance of WoolDelegate has its own dictionary of handlers, we don't need to do that, but on the other hand there's no way to "cache" the lookup or the invocation. A method can only be added to a class, not to an instance.
I did it this way for two reasons: this was an excercise to see if I could work out the part that's coming next -- the hand-off from NSInvocation to Block invocation -- and the creation of a new class for every needed instance simply seemed inelegant to me. Whether it's less elegant than my solution, I will leave to each reader's judgement.
Moving on, the meat of this procedure is actually in the NSInvocation category that's found in the project. This utilizes libffi to call a function that's unknown until runtime -- the Block's invocation -- with arguments that are also unknown until runtime (which are accessible via the NSInvocation). Normally, this is not possible, for the same reason that a va_list cannot be passed on: the compiler has to know how many arguments there are and how big they are. libffi contains assembler for each platform that knows/is based on those platforms' calling conventions.
There's three steps here: libffi needs a list of the types of the arguments to the function that's being called; it needs the argument values themselves put into a particular format; then the function (the Block's invocation pointer) needs to be invoked via libffi and the return value put back into the NSInvocation.
The real work for the first part is handled largely by a function which is again written by Mike Ash, called from Wool_buildFFIArgTypeList. libffi has internal structs that it uses to describe the types of function arguments. When preparing a call to a function, the library needs a list of pointers to these structures. The NSMethodSignature for the NSInvocation allows access of each argument's encoding string; translating from there to the correct ffi_type is handled by a set of if/else lookups:
arg_types[i] = libffi_type_for_objc_encoding([sig getArgumentTypeAtIndex:actual_arg_idx]);
...
if(str[0] == #encode(type)[0]) \
{ \
if(sizeof(type) == 1) \
return &ffi_type_sint8; \
else if(sizeof(type) == 2) \
return &ffi_type_sint16; \
Next, libffi wants pointers to the argument values themselves. This is done in Wool_buildArgValList: get the size of each argument, again from the NSMethodSignature, and allocate a chunk of memory that size, then return the list:
NSUInteger arg_size;
NSGetSizeAndAlignment([sig getArgumentTypeAtIndex:actual_arg_idx],
&arg_size,
NULL);
/* Get a piece of memory that size and put its address in the list. */
arg_list[i] = [self Wool_allocate:arg_size];
/* Put the value into the allocated spot. */
[self getArgument:arg_list[i] atIndex:actual_arg_idx];
(An aside: there's several notes in the code about skipping over the SEL, which is the (hidden) second passed argument to any method invocation. The Block's invocation pointer doesn't have a slot to hold the SEL; it just has itself as the first argument, and the rest are the "normal" arguments. Since the Block, as written in client code, could never access that argument anyways (it doesn't exist at the time), I decided to ignore it.)
libffi now needs to do some "prep"; as long as that succeeds (and space for the return value can be allocated), the invocation function pointer can now be "called", and the return value can be set:
ffi_call(&inv_cif, (genericfunc)theIMP, ret_val, arg_vals);
if( ret_val ){
[self setReturnValue:ret_val];
free(ret_val);
}
There's some demonstrations of the functionality in main.m in the project.
Finally, as for your question of "should this be done?", I think the answer is "yes, as long as it makes you more productive". WoolDelegate is completely generic, and an instance can act like any fully written-out class. My intention for it, though, was to make simple, one-off delegates -- that only need one or two methods, and don't need to live past their delegators -- less work than writing a whole new class, and more legible/maintainable than sticking some delegate methods into a view controller because it's the easiest place to put them. Taking advantage of the runtime and the language's dynamism like this hopefully can increase your code's readability, in the same way, e.g., Block-based NSNotification handlers do.
I just put together a little project that lets you do just this...
#interface EJHDelegateObject : NSObject
+ (id)delegateObjectForProtocol:(Protocol*) protocol;
#property (nonatomic, strong) Protocol *protocol;
- (void)addImplementation:(id)blockImplementation forSelector:(SEL)selector;
#end
#implementation EJHDelegateObject
static NSInteger counter;
+ (id)delegateObjectForProtocol:(Protocol *)protocol
{
NSString *className = [NSString stringWithFormat:#"%s%#%i",protocol_getName(protocol),#"_EJH_implementation_", counter++];
Class protocolClass = objc_allocateClassPair([EJHDelegateObject class], [className cStringUsingEncoding:NSUTF8StringEncoding], 0);
class_addProtocol(protocolClass, protocol);
objc_registerClassPair(protocolClass);
EJHDelegateObject *object = [[protocolClass alloc] init];
object.protocol = protocol;
return object;
}
- (void)addImplementation:(id)blockImplementation forSelector:(SEL)selector
{
unsigned int outCount;
struct objc_method_description *methodDescriptions = protocol_copyMethodDescriptionList(self.protocol, NO, YES, &outCount);
struct objc_method_description description;
BOOL descriptionFound = NO;
for (int i = 0; i < outCount; i++){
description = methodDescriptions[i];
if (description.name == selector){
descriptionFound = YES;
break;
}
}
if (descriptionFound){
class_addMethod([self class], selector, imp_implementationWithBlock(blockImplementation), description.types);
}
}
#end
And using an EJHDelegateObject:
self.alertViewDelegate = [EJHDelegateObject delegateObjectForProtocol:#protocol(UIAlertViewDelegate)];
[self.alertViewDelegate addImplementation:^(id _self, UIAlertView* alertView, NSInteger buttonIndex){
NSLog(#"%# dismissed with index %i", alertView, buttonIndex);
} forSelector:#selector(alertView:didDismissWithButtonIndex:)];
UIAlertView *alertView = [[UIAlertView alloc] initWithTitle:#"Example" message:#"My delegate is an EJHDelegateObject" delegate:self.alertViewDelegate cancelButtonTitle:#"Cancel" otherButtonTitles:#"OK", nil];
[alertView show];
Edit: This is what I've come up after having understood your requirement. This is just a quick hack, an idea to get you started, it's not properly implemented, nor is it tested. It is supposed to work for delegate methods that take the sender as their only argument. It works It is supposed to work with normal and struct-returning delegate methods.
typedef void *(^UBDCallback)(id);
typedef void(^UBDCallbackStret)(void *, id);
void *UBDDelegateMethod(UniversalBlockDelegate *self, SEL _cmd, id sender)
{
UBDCallback cb = [self blockForSelector:_cmd];
return cb(sender);
}
void UBDelegateMethodStret(void *retadrr, UniversalBlockDelegate *self, SEL _cmd, id sender)
{
UBDCallbackStret cb = [self blockForSelector:_cmd];
cb(retaddr, sender);
}
#interface UniversalBlockDelegate: NSObject
- (BOOL)addDelegateSelector:(SEL)sel isStret:(BOOL)stret methodSignature:(const char *)mSig block:(id)block;
#end
#implementation UniversalBlockDelegate {
SEL selectors[128];
id blocks[128];
int count;
}
- (id)blockForSelector:(SEL)sel
{
int idx = -1;
for (int i = 0; i < count; i++) {
if (selectors[i] == sel) {
return blocks[i];
}
}
return nil;
}
- (void)dealloc
{
for (int i = 0; i < count; i++) {
[blocks[i] release];
}
[super dealloc];
}
- (BOOL)addDelegateSelector:(SEL)sel isStret:(BOOL)stret methodSignature:(const char *)mSig block:(id)block
{
if (count >= 128) return NO;
selectors[count] = sel;
blocks[count++] = [block copy];
class_addMethod(self.class, sel, (IMP)(stret ? UBDDelegateMethodStret : UBDDelegateMethod), mSig);
return YES;
}
#end
Usage:
UIWebView *webView = [[UIWebView alloc] initWithFrame:CGRectZero];
UniversalBlockDelegate *d = [[UniversalBlockDelegate alloc] init];
webView.delegate = d;
[d addDelegateSelector:#selector(webViewDidFinishLoading:) isStret:NO methodSignature:"v#:#" block:^(id webView) {
NSLog(#"Web View '%#' finished loading!", webView);
}];
[webView loadRequest:[NSURLRequest requestWithURL:[NSURL URLWithString:#"http://google.com"]]];