There was a crash and I have this issue now where it says docker swarm status is pending and the node status is UNKNOWN. This is my docker info result
swarm#swarm-manager-1:~$ docker info
Containers: 270
Running: 0
Paused: 0
Stopped: 270
Images: 160
Server Version: 1.12.2
Storage Driver: aufs
Root Dir: /var/lib/docker/aufs
Backing Filesystem: extfs
Dirs: 1211
Dirperm1 Supported: true
Logging Driver: json-file
Cgroup Driver: cgroupfs
Plugins:
Volume: local
Network: host bridge null overlay
Swarm: pending
NodeID: d9hq8wzz6skh9pzrxzhbckm97
Is Manager: true
ClusterID: 5zgab5w50qgvvep35eqcbote2
Managers: 1
Nodes: 2
Orchestration:
Task History Retention Limit: 5
Raft:
Snapshot Interval: 10000
Heartbeat Tick: 1
Election Tick: 3
Dispatcher:
Heartbeat Period: 5 seconds
CA Configuration:
Expiry Duration: 3 months
Node Address: HIDDEN
Runtimes: runc
Default Runtime: runc
Security Options: apparmor seccomp
Kernel Version: 4.4.0-91-generic
Operating System: Ubuntu 16.04.1 LTS
OSType: linux
Architecture: x86_64
CPUs: 2
Total Memory: 6.804 GiB
Name: swarm-manager-1
ID: AXPO:VFSV:TDT3:6X7Y:QNAO:OZJN:U23R:V5S2:FU33:WUNI:CRPK:2E2C
Docker Root Dir: /var/lib/docker
Debug Mode (client): false
Debug Mode (server): false
Registry: https://index.docker.io/v1/
WARNING: No swap limit support
Insecure Registries:
127.0.0.0/8
This is my docker node ls result:
ID HOSTNAME STATUS AVAILABILITY MANAGER STATUS
9tlo3rg7tuc23xzc3am28lak1 swarm-worker-1 Unknown Active
d9hq8wzz6skh9pzrxzhbckm97 * swarm-manager-1 Unknown Active Leader
I've tried restarting docker engine and the VM but doesn't help in any way. The system is actually running as when I say docker ps in the worker it shows all the containers but on the manager there is nothing on docker ps.
Any idea?
In my experience with Swarm the only solution to similar trouble was to destroy the swarm. And when you do this you should probably also do a docker system prune (only if theres nothing valuable that could be deleted) and service docker restart. And then set up a new swarm.
It sucks. I know
Instead of just rebuilding the whole swarm all at once, you can attempt to remove and re-add each node one at a time - the advantage of this is that the swarm state is not destroyed and, on larger swarms, services can continue while you fix it. This process is considerably more complicated when you don't have a quorum of managers, though.
First, note the node IDs (I'll refer to here as $WORKER_ID and $MANAGER_ID).
On manager node:
docker node update --availability drain $WORKER_ID
^ This is optional, but it's a good habit when working with live services on a swarm.
docker swarm join-token manager
^ This command will give you the join command to run on each node after it's removed. I'll refer to it as $JOIN_COMMAND below. We will demote the worker once the manager re-joins.
On worker:
docker swarm leave
$JOIN_COMMAND
This node is now re-joined as a manager, but I'll continue calling it the 'worker' to avoid confusion.
On manager:
docker node rm $WORKER_ID
docker node update --availability drain $MANAGER_ID
docker swarm leave -f
$JOIN_COMMAND
docker node rm $MANAGER_ID
docker node ls
Find the worker's new id (pay attention to the hostname, not the role) -> $NEW_WORKER_ID
docker node demote $NEW_WORKER_ID
Your swarm should be refreshed - if there were more nodes, the services running on each would have migrated across the swarm when you drained each node.
If it still doesn't work (and regardless), you really should consider upgrading to docker v17.06 or newer. Swarm networking was very unstable before that, causing a lot of issues stemming from race conditions.
Related
I've set up Docker in rootless mode under Ubuntu 20.04 and Debian 11 (in my case, using Ansible and this role). I want to deploy a simple Docker stack to the node via Docker Swarm. No other hosts are involved, just one Swarm node from the same machine, acting as a manager.
I can run this project with Docker and Docker Compose just fine, also in rootless mode. All that changes for the rootless setup is that DOCKER_HOST is overwritten in .bashrc:
export XDG_RUNTIME_DIR="/run/user/1000"
export DOCKER_HOST="unix:///run/user/1000/docker.sock"
When I deploy the stack though, none of the services can start (here is an excerpt of the status):
$ docker stack deploy -c docker-stack.yml demo-stack
$ docker stack ps demo-stack --no-trunc
jig6zyewkem2g225509x91nt5 demo-stack_db.1 registry.example.com/db:v1.20.2 bullseye Shutdown Rejected 15 seconds ago "mkdir /var/lib/docker: permission denied"
ox6x5w7du9o5ew2v70g5mfg9e demo-stack_redis.1 registry.example.com/redis:v1.20.2 bullseye Shutdown Rejected 15 seconds ago "mkdir /var/lib/docker: permission denied"
ipme447wrrsjc8jw6cpfak4hq demo-stack_web.1 registry.example.com/web:v1.20.2 bullseye Shutdown Rejected 14 seconds ago "mkdir /var/lib/docker: permission denied"
The services all error with mkdir /var/lib/docker: permission denied. I suppose that it tries to start them as if the system was using rootful Docker, but it's a rootless installation.
I guess the question is: how do I get the Swarm node (which is the very same machine) to use the correct Docker rootless configuration for launching the services? That would include using the correct DOCKER_HOST configuration.
I am unsure if this is even supposed to work. I hear that overlay networks are not supported, but I am only on one machine, so I don't really need this. I do need Swarm for its usable implementation of secrets (compared to the mock implementation from Docker Compose).
Note that I have the same setup with Docker running in (normal) rootful mode, and there, all services can be started. It's therefore not an issue with the Docker stack file itself.
More details with docker info:
Client:
Context: default
Debug Mode: false
Server:
Containers: 0
Running: 0
Paused: 0
Stopped: 0
Images: 12
Server Version: 20.10.13
Storage Driver: fuse-overlayfs
Logging Driver: json-file
Cgroup Driver: systemd
Cgroup Version: 2
Plugins:
Volume: local
Network: bridge host ipvlan macvlan null overlay
Log: awslogs fluentd gcplogs gelf journald json-file local logentries splunk syslog
Swarm: active
NodeID: hpzsmez48acse9yo1frnx37fo
Is Manager: true
ClusterID: zkv7wsoun193kyvbxe1k3hdph
Managers: 1
Nodes: 1
Default Address Pool: 10.0.0.0/8
SubnetSize: 24
Data Path Port: 4789
Orchestration:
Task History Retention Limit: 5
Raft:
Snapshot Interval: 10000
Number of Old Snapshots to Retain: 0
Heartbeat Tick: 1
Election Tick: 10
Dispatcher:
Heartbeat Period: 5 seconds
CA Configuration:
Expiry Duration: 3 months
Force Rotate: 0
Autolock Managers: false
Root Rotation In Progress: false
Node Address: 127.0.0.1
Manager Addresses:
127.0.0.1:2377
Runtimes: io.containerd.runc.v2 io.containerd.runtime.v1.linux runc
Default Runtime: runc
Init Binary: docker-init
containerd version: 2a1d4dbdb2a1030dc5b01e96fb110a9d9f150ecc
runc version: v1.0.3-0-gf46b6ba2
init version: de40ad0
Security Options:
seccomp
Profile: default
rootless
cgroupns
Kernel Version: 5.10.0-13-amd64
Operating System: Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)
OSType: linux
Architecture: x86_64
CPUs: 2
Total Memory: 1.936GiB
Name: bullseye
ID: 3R5P:2UV6:FIP4:UIJV:TDNQ:35DT:DEDI:SMGN:FDUY:JSWO:FRU6:O2HF
Docker Root Dir: /home/vagrant/.local/share/docker
Debug Mode: false
Registry: https://index.docker.io/v1/
Labels:
Experimental: false
Insecure Registries:
127.0.0.0/8
Live Restore Enabled: false
Product License: Community Engine
WARNING: No cpu cfs quota support
WARNING: No cpu cfs period support
WARNING: No cpu shares support
WARNING: No cpuset support
WARNING: No io.weight support
WARNING: No io.weight (per device) support
WARNING: No io.max (rbps) support
WARNING: No io.max (wbps) support
WARNING: No io.max (riops) support
WARNING: No io.max (wiops) support
WARNING: bridge-nf-call-iptables is disabled
WARNING: bridge-nf-call-ip6tables is disabled
The solution is simple: Docker Rootless does not work with Docker Swarm. You can have either, but not both.
I am trying build the nodemcu firmware with a docker on a windows 10 system.
When I try to build the nodemcu firmware, I have this error:
(...)
PRUNE libmain.a libc.a
/opt:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/opt/nodemcu-firmware/tools/toolchains/esp8266-linux-x86_64-20190731.0/bin
xtensa-lx106-elf-ar: /opt/nodemcu-firmware/sdk/esp_iot_sdk_v3.0-e4434aa/lib/libc.a: No space left on device
Makefile:334: recipe for target '/opt/nodemcu-firmware/sdk/.pruned-3.0-e4434aa' failed
make: *** [/opt/nodemcu-firmware/sdk/.pruned-3.0-e4434aa] Error 1
make: Leaving directory '/opt/nodemcu-firmware'
I tried docker system prune but this error persists.
I tried execute docker info but doesn't help me:
Client:
Debug Mode: false
Server:
Containers: 1
Running: 0
Paused: 0
Stopped: 1
Images: 12
Server Version: 19.03.1
Storage Driver: overlay2
Backing Filesystem: extfs
Supports d_type: true
Native Overlay Diff: true
Logging Driver: json-file
Cgroup Driver: cgroupfs
Plugins:
Volume: local
Network: bridge host ipvlan macvlan null overlay
Log: awslogs fluentd gcplogs gelf journald json-file local logentries splunk syslog
Swarm: inactive
Runtimes: runc
Default Runtime: runc
Init Binary: docker-init
containerd version: 894b81a4b802e4eb2a91d1ce216b8817763c29fb
runc version: 425e105d5a03fabd737a126ad93d62a9eeede87f
init version: fec3683
Security Options:
seccomp
Profile: default
Kernel Version: 4.14.131-linuxkit
Operating System: Docker Desktop
OSType: linux
Architecture: x86_64
CPUs: 2
Total Memory: 3.419GiB
Name: docker-desktop
ID: RCEX:VYON:IG6T:AXCF:CSLX:3NVK:V453:DTSP:HW4Y:EKBY:PCVW:2UOJ
Docker Root Dir: /var/lib/docker
Debug Mode: true
File Descriptors: 28
Goroutines: 44
System Time: 2020-12-21T02:04:22.387341144Z
EventsListeners: 1
Registry: https://index.docker.io/v1/
Labels:
Experimental: true
Insecure Registries:
127.0.0.0/8
Live Restore Enabled: false
Product License: Community Engine
When I execute docker system df, I have this result:
TYPE TOTAL ACTIVE SIZE RECLAIMABLE
Images 4 1 673.8MB 209.8MB (31%)
Containers 1 0 0B 0B
Local Volumes 10 0 0B 0B
Build Cache 0 0 0B 0B
I am new in docker and I don't know what do to from here. Can anyone help me?
Docker tends to need cleanup after you work with it sometimes. There may be previous resources that were created in the past that are no longer in use, this is especially true if you are making use of volumes.
Sometimes, images are not fully created and end up becoming untagged dangling images which for the most part are undesirable. So you have to remove these undesirables that consume space.
docker image prune
docker image prune removes all dangling images.
2. docker volume prune
docker volume prune removes all 'volumes' which are not attached to any containers. These should always be ran before pruning containers otherwise all containers will get deleted this is because pruning containers removes all containers which are not running at the time the command is ran. For the most part in my experience volumes is often what consumes the most amount of resources in terms of space.
docker container prune
For the most part this is optional and you can choose to do this or not
Now even after deleting dangling images there might still be other images that do not get deleted but you no longer need, like for example if you had older versions of the redis image and later download the most recent version of it, you may need to remove the older one if you no longer use it. You will have to delete this manually. Use the following commands:
docker image ls
docker rmi <image id>
The first command gives you a list of all the images you have downloaded, and the second command deletes it. sometimes you may have to use the -f flag on the delete command to force the deletion of an image:
docker rmi -f <image id>
I use windows container and try to create docker swarm ,I create three virtual machine use hyper-v , and each OS is windows server 2016.There machines ip is :
windocker211 192.168.1.211
windocker212 192.168.1.212
windocker219 192.168.1.219
The docker swarm node is :
PS C:\ConsoleZ> docker node ls
ID HOSTNAME STATUS AVAILABILITY MANAGER STATUS
4c0g0o0uognheugw4do1a1h7y windocker212 Ready Active
bbxot0c8zijq7xw4lm86svgwp * windocker219 Ready Active Leader
wftwpiqpqpbqfdvgenn787psj windocker211 Ready Active
I create use command:
docker service create --name=demo5 -p 5005:5005 --replicas 6 192.168.1.245/cqgis/wintestcore:0.6
The docker image is asp.net core app , the Dockerfile is:
FROM 192.168.1.245/win/aspnetcore-runtime:1.1.2
COPY . /app
WORKDIR /app
ENV ASPNETCORE_URLS http://*:5005
EXPOSE 5005/tcp
ENTRYPOINT ["dotnet", "dotnetcore.dll"]
then it create success:
PS C:\ConsoleZ> docker service ls
ID NAME MODE REPLICAS IMAGE PORTS
omhu7e0vo96s demo5 replicated 6/6 192.168.1.245/cqgis/wintestcore:0.6 *:5005->5005/tcp
PS C:\ConsoleZ> docker service ps demo5
ID NAME IMAGE NODE DESIRED STATE CURRENT STATE ERROR PORTS
8pihnak9a2ei demo5.1 192.168.1.245/cqgis/wintestcore:0.6 windocker212 Running Running 59 seconds ago
ut3f3b9giu4w demo5.2 192.168.1.245/cqgis/wintestcore:0.6 windocker219 Running Running 47 seconds ago
iy1xjevt67yl demo5.3 192.168.1.245/cqgis/wintestcore:0.6 windocker211 Running Running about a minute ago
q7f1gnbwslr3 demo5.4 192.168.1.245/cqgis/wintestcore:0.6 windocker212 Running Running about a minute ago
8zewaktcu32h demo5.5 192.168.1.245/cqgis/wintestcore:0.6 windocker219 Running Running about a minute ago
xq820kqwf3v9 demo5.6 192.168.1.245/cqgis/wintestcore:0.6 windocker211 Running Running 55 seconds ago
but my question is I cann't accessing The Site each by
http://192.168.1.219:5005/
http://192.168.1.219:5005/
http://192.168.1.219:5005/
When I use command
docker run -it -p 5010:5005 192.168.1.245/cqgis/wintestcore:0.6
I can use http://192.168.1.219:5010/ get the right result
my docker info is
PS C:\ConsoleZ> docker info
Containers: 4
Running: 3
Paused: 0
Stopped: 1
Images: 5
Server Version: 17.06.0-ce-rc1
Storage Driver: windowsfilter
Windows:
Logging Driver: json-file
Plugins:
Volume: local
Network: l2bridge l2tunnel nat null overlay transparent
Log: awslogs etwlogs fluentd json-file logentries splunk syslog
Swarm: active
NodeID: bbxot0c8zijq7xw4lm86svgwp
Is Manager: true
ClusterID: 32vsgwrbn6ihvpevly71gkgxk
Managers: 1
Nodes: 3
Orchestration:
Task History Retention Limit: 5
Raft:
Snapshot Interval: 10000
Number of Old Snapshots to Retain: 0
Heartbeat Tick: 1
Election Tick: 3
Dispatcher:
Heartbeat Period: 5 seconds
CA Configuration:
Expiry Duration: 3 months
Force Rotate: 0
Root Rotation In Progress: false
Node Address: 192.168.1.219
Manager Addresses:
192.168.1.219:2377
Default Isolation: process
Kernel Version: 10.0 14393 (14393.1198.amd64fre.rs1_release_sec.170427-1353)
Operating System: Windows Server 2016 Datacenter
OSType: windows
Architecture: x86_64
CPUs: 8
Total Memory: 2.89GiB
Name: windock219
ID: 7AOY:OT6V:BTJV:NCHA:3OF5:5WR5:K2YR:CFG3:VXLD:QTMD:GA3D:ZFJ2
Docker Root Dir: C:\ProgramData\docker
Debug Mode (client): false
Debug Mode (server): true
File Descriptors: -1
Goroutines: 297
System Time: 2017-06-04T19:58:20.7582294+08:00
EventsListeners: 2
Registry: https://index.docker.io/v1/
Experimental: true
Insecure Registries:
192.168.1.245
127.0.0.0/8
Live Restore Enabled: false
I beleive you need to publish port in "host" mode (learn.microsoft.com/en-us/virtualization/windowscontainers/…). Also it will be one to one port mapping between running container and host and hence you will not be able to run several containers on the same port. Routing mesh is not working on Windows yet.
There are some differences in the network between Docker for windows container and Docker for Linux. Windows Containers uses the HyperV Network technologies to provide the virtual networking features that docker uses. From there are some restrictions that are not work like you would expect or maybe found in standard Docker Documentation.
First you cannot access the web side running inside your container by
using the lookback address (127.0.0.1) or the host address (192.168.1.xxx) You have to call it
always from a remote machine.
I saw you are using the expose command in your Dockerfile. It is not
so self-explaining but expose is to expose a port in any other
network then the host or ingress network. It’s not a problem if you
do that in a non swarm configuration but it does not work in a swarm.
I Suggest to remove the Expose command.
There are some unsolved problems with windows networking. Sometimes the port stays in use after the container gets restarted.
For example, after a reboot of the host system.
[https://github.com/moby/moby/issues/21558][1]
With this scrip you can remove the all virtual network settings:
Stop-Service docker
Get-ContainerNetwork | Remove-ContainerNetwork
Get-NetNat | Remove-NetNat
Get-VMSwitch | Remove-VMSwitch
Start-Service docker
You cannot reach a container's published port from the same machine because of a limitation of the WinNAT networking. But you can reach the required port using an external request.
In your example, from a machine other than 192.168.1.219, accessing using the url http://192.168.1.219:5005/ will succeed. The url's http://192.168.1.211:5005/ and http://192.168.1.212:5005/ will also succeed provided the requests originate from outside those machines.
Using the 'host' mode will succeed: however, you are not getting the advantage of the 'routing mesh' feature which allows the service to be reachable from any of the services' nodes - only from that one single node.
I create docker swarm use command:"docker swarm init ",but there is nothing output.
PS C:\ConsoleZ> docker swarm init
then I use command "docker node ls" in another termination , it output :
PS C:\ConsoleZ> docker node ls
ID HOSTNAME STATUS AVAILABILITY MANAGER STATUS
rttn874z4rpnuisrcse6869zu * Down Active Leader
PS C:\ConsoleZ> docker network ls
NETWORK ID NAME DRIVER SCOPE
w5d6snuid9pi ingress overlay swarm
8bc0801a3b5a nat nat local
285a0eacfb3f none null local
the manager node why is DOWN and no HOSTNAME?
And I reboot my computer, the swarm I create is lost, I must use the init command create another one.
Is somebody know why?
by the way , I use windows container with windows server 2016
PS C:\ConsoleZ> docker info
Containers: 1
Running: 0
Paused: 0
Stopped: 1
Images: 3
Server Version: 17.03.1-ee-3
Storage Driver: windowsfilter
Windows:
Logging Driver: json-file
Plugins:
Volume: local
Network: l2bridge l2tunnel nat null overlay transparent
Swarm: pending
NodeID: rttn874z4rpnuisrcse6869zu
Is Manager: true
ClusterID: 9bie63os8jzg0e8vvfx3lg3or
Managers: 1
Nodes: 1
Orchestration:
Task History Retention Limit: 5
Raft:
Snapshot Interval: 10000
Number of Old Snapshots to Retain: 0
Heartbeat Tick: 1
Election Tick: 3
Dispatcher:
Heartbeat Period: 5 seconds
CA Configuration:
Expiry Duration: 3 months
Node Address: 192.168.1.219
Manager Addresses:
0.0.0.0:2377
Default Isolation: process
Kernel Version: 10.0 14393 (14393.1198.amd64fre.rs1_release_sec.170427-1353)
Operating System: Windows Server 2016 Datacenter
OSType: windows
Architecture: x86_64
CPUs: 8
Total Memory: 1.999 GiB
Name: windock219
ID: 7AOY:OT6V:BTJV:NCHA:3OF5:5WR5:K2YR:CFG3:VXLD:QTMD:GA3D:ZFJ2
Docker Root Dir: C:\ProgramData\docker
Debug Mode (client): false
Debug Mode (server): false
Registry: https://index.docker.io/v1/
Experimental: false
Insecure Registries:
192.168.1.245
127.0.0.0/8
Live Restore Enabled: false
I've started a docker master with:
docker swarm init --advertise-addr <MANAGER-IP>
so, im trying to have my shell point to swarm master via:
eval $(docker-machine env --swarm <MANAGER-IP>)
but it's giving me an error: Host does not exists
docker info:
-bash-4.2$ docker info
Containers: 18
Running: 1
Paused: 0
Stopped: 17
Images: 20
Server Version: 1.12.0
Storage Driver: devicemapper
Pool Name: docker-253:1-25646-pool
Pool Blocksize: 65.54 kB
Base Device Size: 10.74 GB
Backing Filesystem: xfs
Data file: /dev/loop0
Metadata file: /dev/loop1
Data Space Used: 3.124 GB
Data Space Total: 107.4 GB
Data Space Available: 13.4 GB
Metadata Space Used: 5.071 MB
Metadata Space Total: 2.147 GB
Metadata Space Available: 2.142 GB
Thin Pool Minimum Free Space: 10.74 GB
Udev Sync Supported: true
Deferred Removal Enabled: false
Deferred Deletion Enabled: false
Deferred Deleted Device Count: 0
Data loop file: /var/lib/docker/devicemapper/devicemapper/data
WARNING: Usage of loopback devices is strongly discouraged for production use. Use `--storage-opt dm.thinpooldev` to specify a custom block storage device.
Metadata loop file: /var/lib/docker/devicemapper/devicemapper/metadata
Library Version: 1.02.107-RHEL7 (2016-06-09)
Logging Driver: json-file
Cgroup Driver: cgroupfs
Plugins:
Volume: local
Network: host bridge null overlay
Swarm: active
NodeID: 05szzy2z96ypgl5k21swggoil
Is Manager: true
ClusterID: a2wrfuga2tu4cm4k0lxxorqtm
Managers: 1
Nodes: 3
Orchestration:
Task History Retention Limit: 5
Raft:
Snapshot interval: 10000
Heartbeat tick: 1
Election tick: 3
Dispatcher:
Heartbeat period: 5 seconds
CA configuration:
Expiry duration: 3 months
Node Address: 10.193.46.89
Runtimes: runc
Default Runtime: runc
Security Options: seccomp
Kernel Version: 3.10.0-327.28.2.el7.x86_64
Operating System: CentOS Linux 7 (Core)
OSType: linux
Architecture: x86_64
CPUs: 4
Total Memory: 15.51 GiB
Name: scsor0004331002.rtp.openenglab.netapp.com
ID: T52U:6MWQ:XEDM:2TGH:ITLQ:YD6B:R3MR:MWF5:CFBM:G6PX:W4LG:6SR7
Docker Root Dir: /var/lib/docker
Debug Mode (client): false
Debug Mode (server): false
Username: eugenepark3
Registry: https://index.docker.io/v1/
WARNING: bridge-nf-call-ip6tables is disabled
Insecure Registries:
127.0.0.0/8
Anyone know what i need to put for eval $(docker-machine env --swarm <MANAGER-IP>) so my compose can run on swarm cluster?
Im supposed to put master name but i dont know how to find it
-bash-4.2$ docker node ls
ID HOSTNAME STATUS AVAILABILITY MANAGER STATUS
05szzy2z96ypgl5k21swggoil * scsor0004331002.rtp.openenglab.netapp.com Ready Active Leader
59t110b0wjhitj1fr8erys600 scsor0004331003.rtp.openenglab.netapp.com Ready Active
dhm6utu2w3dw1to0zh3n71moq scsor0004331004.rtp.openenglab.netapp.com Ready Active
You're mixing up the container based swarm commands with the newer swarmkit based Swarm that's been embedded directly into the Docker CLI. With the new version of Swarm, docker-compose isn't directly supported, yet. Consider this a beta product that works well for a limited scope. You can try the experimental release of the docker engine which adds support for DAB files that are managed with the docker stack CLI. The DAB files are exported from docker-compose bundle and then imported into Docker. This feature is still very experimental and expected to change.
Without that, anything with docker-compose will only operate on a single docker engine since the swarm access is all done under a different docker service CLI interface.