We are developing a medical device which shall be connected to a Patient Data Management Systems (PDMS). The idea is to use HL7 messages to push measured data directly to the PDMS.
The device itself is too small to fit a convenient user interface to input the patient id. Is it possible in HL7 to transmit just the device serial number instead of the PID and let the PDMS make the connection between the device and the patient?
The device serial number should be in the PRT-10 field, not the PID segment.
Related
I'm trying to implement the Apple Notification Center Service using an Adafruit Feather 32u4 Bluefruit LE to be able to receive notifications from my iPhone to the Feather board, sending them to my PC over Serial connection and dealing with them with some software that I wrote.
I set up the ANCS service and characteristics using the AT+GATTADDSERVICE and AT+GATTADDCHAR commands but when I try to make the device discoverable and to advertise the use of the ANCS service the device won't become discoverable.
This is the command that I use:
AT+GAPSETADVDATA=02-01-06-11-06-79-05-F4-31-B5-CE-4E-99-A4-0F-4B-1E-12-2D-00-D0
Where:
0x02: is the byte length of the first message in the payload
0x01: is the 'Data Type Value' and indicates that this is a 'Flag'
0x06: indicates the flag LE General Discoverable Mode without BR/EDR support
0x11: is the byte length of the second message (0x11 is 17 bytes in decimal, 1 for the type of "message "Incomplete List of 128-bit Service Class UUIDs", 16 bytes for the UUID of ANCS)
0x06: is the 'Data Type Value' for "Incomplete List of 128-bit Service Class UUIDs"
0x7905F431B5CE4E99A40F4B1E122D00D0: is the UUID for ANCS.
When I use the above command though, the device won't become discoverable. Do you know why?
While trying to troubleshoot the problem I noticed that if I try to advertise different services like an heart rate service and a device information service the device does become visible from other devices. This is the command that I used:
# Advertise as Discoverable and BLE only with 16-bit UUIDs 0x180D and 0x180A
AT+GAPSETADVDATA=02-01-06-05-02-0d-18-0a-18
Do you know why the device won't become visible when trying to advertise the ANCS service?
Thank you!
P.S. I'm new to the bluetooth protocol, sorry.
Have a look at the specification of the ANCS you provided. It states:
Only one instance of the ANCS may be present on an NP. Due to the nature of iOS, the ANCS is not guaranteed to always be present. As a result, the NC should look for and subscribe to the Service Changed characteristic of the GATT service in order to monitor for the potential publishing and unpublishing of the ANCS at any time.
Further down you find figures that show that your iPhone is the NP and it is the one that might implement the ANCS.
Your Feather board would be the Central and is supposed to look for the service and connect to it. As #Paulw stated in the comments you have it the wrong way around.
I have two BLE devices with the same UUID. Is there any way to connect to both of them so that they are both connected at the same time?
Right now I'm not able to even see both devices simultaneously using a bluetooth explorer, so I assume for the system they appear as just one device. Is it still somehow possible?
I assume that with UUID you mean the MAC-Address (Bluetooth address) of the device. UUIDs are typically used for services and characteristics.
All connection procedures work with the Bluetooth address as the main parameter. So two devices with the same address will be treated as the same device. (In fact, it is a common requirement that MAC-Addresses of Bluetooth devices should be unique, exactly for this reason.)
So it is not possible to connect to two devices with the same address at the same time. (*)
You can find more information about how connection is done in the Bluetooth Core Spec, Vol. 3, Part C, chapter 9.3.5 - 9.3.8.
(*) This is meant in the common way of having a connection to two different devices. Since incoming messages are not distinguishable on Link Layer level between the two devices with identical address (your control will always think there is only one device with the given address out there), you could mess around with this fact, especially in non-encrypted connections (since encryption is negotiated on a device-to-device basis, another device could not join in an encrypted connection, even if it has the same Bluetooth address). But it is definitely not recommended to do so.
If two devices are having the same UUID , then I think they would be consider as a single device. What I would suggest , send a trigger notification to the UUID and check which device will respond first . Secondly , try to send notification to devices put them far apart . The nearer to your smartphone/bluetooth explorer , will get notify first . Bluetooth works on the distance basis, the device which is near to the source will get the notification than the other one.I tried the same with Beacons but end up like you.
Description - How I can get the number of BLE connection in iOS.
I want to restrict a user to add more BLE sensor after a particular number of BLE connection. I want to get the number of a BLE connection a device can handle.
A connection represents state, not traffic. The count of connections will be bound by either memory or the data structures used by the Bluetooth stack to manage them, both unknown. My answer is, "As many as it can and no more."
Packets represent traffic and each is handled one at a time. From this perspective, my answer is, "One."
However, if a packet cannot be processed out of the critical paths in the chip and protocol stack fast enough to begin processing the next packet, packets can be dropped. Experience has shown these critical paths in iOS are dependent on the traffic's packet size and rate. Additionally, other devices in the area not connected to your BLE stack may be flooding the radio spectrum and causing packet collisions outside the stack. I have seen BLE traffic go to hell with an excess of 20 connections and as few as one. From this perspective my answer is, "It depends."
Is it possible to send only 1 iBeacon packet? I have tried using CBPeripheralManager,but since there are only 2 method to start and stop advertising, so I can't control how many packet is being broadcast.
What I want to try to do is use an iBeacon packet as a command, instead of just a broadcasting some ID. So I could send 1 iBeacon packet, and if the receiver got the message, it can send back Acknowledgement with another iBeacon packet. The intention is to avoid the pairing of bluetooth to send very simple data. The information will be linked to UUID, major, and minor of the packet.
Or are there better ways to do this than using iBeacon.
Yes, you can use iBeacon technology to send information back and forth between two iOS devices without pairing. If you have two devices, Device A and Device B, you set both of them up to range for beacons with a common ProximityUUID, say, E2C56DB5-DFFB-48D2-B060-D0F5A71096E0. And then you can exchange information in the two byte major and minor fields.
What you can't do is control the transmitter enough to send only a single iBeacon advertisement. The transmitter in iOS sends out 10 advertisement packets per second, so the best you could do is start the transmitter then stop it on a timer about 100ms later. (You probably shouldn't do this, because there is no guarantee that a single iBeacon advertising packet will be received successfully by the other device -- it may be lost due to a CRC error in the radio noise. You are probably better off letting the packet continue to transmit until you can confirm from a response from the other device that it was received.)
You can see an example of starting and stopping a transmitter on a timer in my answer here.
Of course, there may be easier and more robust ways of accomplishing what you want with built-in Bluetooth data exchange mechanisms. But that doesn't change the fact that what you propose is certainly possible.
No you can't since iBeacon is uni-direction device
We need in our project to detect the proximity of an iPhone that is running a custom APP that is using Bluetooth LE.
The detector (Scanner, Central...) will be implemented using a BLE Integrated Circuit (from Texas or Nordic). I mean that the scanner is not another IOS device... running Core Bluetooth as a Central..
For the detector to guess the proximity, the idea is very simple, just advertise a service with an UUID proprietary.
While in foreground all works OK, and the UUID and a Local name are advertised (The UUID in the main advertise packet, and the Local Name in the SCAN Response packet....), and our scanner is able to decide if this iOS device is running our App.
The problem arises when going to background .....
The iOS stops broadcasting UUID and Local Name. (As the documentation of Core Bluetooth Explains... I Know...)
At this moment (Background), IOS begin to broadcast a SPECIAL MANUFACTURER DATA in the main advertise packet, and nothing in the SCAN Response packet)
The data packet we see using a Bluetooth Sniffer is :
0x14 (length of packet not including this byte).
0xFF (Manufacturer specific data AD Type).
And then :
0x4C, 0x00 (this data is the manufacturer identifier, if the packet is compliant with BLE 4.0 specification).
0x01, 0x00,0x00, 0x00, 0x00,0x00,0x80, and ten 0x00 more....
I know Apple says that while in background ONLY ANOTHER IOS DEVICE SEARCHING FOR A SPECIFIC SERVICE CAN DISCOVER IT. (Really I do not know how they can achieve that, unless they connect to the peripheral and retrieve the services, or if the peripheral knows about other IOS device is scanning because of it´s Address in the SCAN REQUEST and then changes the advertisement data in background).
The main questions are :
Is there any documentation or knowledge of what this manufacturer data means....Perhaps it would be possible to the scanner to know based on this info that this is an iOS device advertising in background and then connect to look if the custom service is there. (Not a quick and clean solution...but I do not see any other workaround....)
Does anybody worked with this scenario...and found a clean solution .....
I have heard from people that forces the application not to go to background.
This limitation, will stop a lot of possible projects.