I have and object rides and ride belongs_to company.
I get a list of rides
#rides = Ride.where(...)
What I need now is to store all companies of those ride in #companies where I want to have every company only once, even if two rides have the same company.
You can get all unique companies of all rides as below:
#rides = Ride.includes(:company).where(...)
#companies = #rides.map(&:company).uniq
Note: includes will load all companies in single query which are associated to resulting rides (prevents N+1 query problem).
PostgresQL is very efficient at doing that kind of work, much more so than Ruby.
You could write:
#rides = Ride.includes(:company).where(foo: "bar")
#companies = #rides.distinct.pluck('companies.name')
Which will result in the SQL query:
SELECT DISTINCT companies.name FROM "rides" LEFT OUTER JOIN "companies" ON "companies"."id" = "rides"."company_id" WHERE (rides.foo IS "bar")
Related
In the following book club example with associations:
class User
has_and_belongs_to_many :clubs
has_and_belongs_to_many :books
end
class Club
has_and_belongs_to_many :users
has_and_belongs_to_many :books
end
class Book
has_and_belongs_to_many :users
has_and_belongs_to_many :clubs
end
given a specific club record:
club = Club.find(params[:id])
how can I find all the users in the club who have all books in array of books?
club.users.where_has_all_books(books)
In PostgreSQL it can be done with a single query. (Maybe in MySQL too, I'm just not sure.)
So, some basic assumptions first. 3 tables: clubs, users and books, every table has id as a primary key. 3 join tables, books_clubs, books_users, clubs_users, each table contains pairs of ids (for books_clubs it will be [book_id, club_id]), and those pairs are unique within that table. Quite reasonable conditions IMO.
Building a query:
First, let's get ids of books from given club:
SELECT book_id
FROM books_clubs
WHERE club_id = 1
ORDER BY book_id
Then get users from given club, and group them by user.id:
SELECT CU.user_id
FROM clubs_users CU
JOIN users U ON U.id = CU.user_id
JOIN books_users BU ON BU.user_id = CU.user_id
WHERE CU.club_id = 1
GROUP BY CU.user_id
Join these two queries by adding having to 2nd query:
HAVING array_agg(BU.book_id ORDER BY BU.book_id) #> ARRAY(##1##)
where ##1## is the 1st query.
What's going on here: Function array_agg from the left part creates a sorted list (of array type) of book_ids. These are books of user. ARRAY(##1##) from the right part returns the sorted list of books of the club. And operator #> checks if 1st array contains all elements of the 2nd (ie if user has all books of the club).
Since 1st query needs to be performed only once, it can be moved to WITH clause.
Your complete query:
WITH club_book_ids AS (
SELECT book_id
FROM books_clubs
WHERE club_id = :club_id
ORDER BY book_id
)
SELECT CU.user_id
FROM clubs_users CU
JOIN users U ON U.id = CU.user_id
JOIN books_users BU ON BU.user_id = CU.user_id
WHERE CU.club_id = :club_id
GROUP BY CU.user_id
HAVING array_agg(BU.book_id ORDER BY BU.book_id) #> ARRAY(SELECT * FROM club_book_ids);
It can be verified in this sandbox: https://www.db-fiddle.com/f/cdPtRfT2uSGp4DSDywST92/5
Wrap it to find_by_sql and that's it.
Some notes:
ordering by book_id is not necessary; #> operator works with unordered arrays too. I just have a suspicion that comparison of ordered array is faster.
JOIN users U ON U.id = CU.user_id in 2nd query is only necessary for fetching user properties; in case of fetching user ids only it can be removed
It appears to work by grouping and counting.
club.users.joins(:books).where(books: { id: club.books.pluck(:id) }).group('users.id').having('count(*) = ?', club.books.count)
If anyone knows how to run the query without intermediate queries that would be great and I will accept the answer.
This looks like a situation where you'd make two queries, one to get all the ids you need, the other select perform a WHERE IN.
I have two tables users and posts and they have association of has_many. I want to fetch details of both users and posts in a single query. I'm able to manage the sql query but I don't want to use the raw query in the code (using execute method) as i think it is kind of simple thing and can be written using active record.
Here is the sql query
SELECT a.id, a.name, a.timestamp, b.id, b.user_id, b.title
FROM users a
INNER JOIN (SELECT id, user_id, title, from, to FROM posts) b on b.user_id = a.id
where id IN ( 1, 2, 3);
I think includes does not help here because i'm dealing with large data.
Can any one help me ?
If you just want those specific columns and nothing else then this will work
User.joins(:post)
.where(id: [1,2,3])
.select("users.id, users.name, users.timestamp,
posts.id as post_id, posts.user_id as post_user_id,
posts.title as post_title")
This will return an ActiveRecord::Relation of User objects with virtual attributes for post_id, post_user_id (Not sure why you need this one since you already selected users.id), and post_title.
The query produced will be
SELECT users.id,
users.name,
users.timestamp,
posts.id as post_id,
posts.user_id as post_user_id,
posts.title as post_title
FROM users
INNER JOIN posts on posts.user_id = users.id
where users.id IN ( 1, 2, 3);
Please note you may have multiple User objects, one for each Post, just as the SQL query does.
You can execute your exact query using the string version of joins e.g.
User.joins("INNER JOIN (SELECT id, user_id, title, from, to FROM posts) b on b.user_id = users.id")
.where(id: [1,2,3])
.select("users.id, users.name, users.timestamp,
b.id as post_id, b.user_id as post_user_id,
b.title as post_title")
Additionally to avoid some of the overhead you can use arel instead e.g.
users_table = User.arel_table
posts_table = Post.arel_table
query = users_table.project(Arel.star)
.join(posts_table)
.on(posts_table[:user_id].eq(users_table[:id]))
.where(users_table[:id].in([1,2,3]))
ActiveRecord::Base.connection.exec_query(query.to_sql)
This will return an ActiveRecord::Result with 2 useful methods columns (the columns selected) and rows. You can convert this to a Hash(#to_hash) but note that any columns with duplicate names (id for instance) will overwrite one another.
You could fix this by specifying the colums you want selected in the project portion. e.g. your current query would be:
query = users_table.project(
users_table[:id],
users_table[:name],
users_table[:timestamp],
posts_table[:id].as('post_id'),
posts_table[:user_id].as('post_user_id'),
posts_table[:title].as('post_title')
).join(posts_table)
.on(posts_table[:user_id].eq(users_table[:id]))
.where(users_table[:id].in([1,2,3]))
ActiveRecord::Base.connection.exec_query(query.to_sql).to_hash
Since none of the names collide now it can be structured into a nice Hash where the keys are the column names and the values or the row value for that record.
users = User.joins(:posts).includes(:posts).where(id: [1, 2, 3])
Will give you all the users with theirs posts.
then you can do whatever you want with them, but to access posts data for first retrieved user
first_user_posts = users.first.posts # this will not make additional DB queries as you used includes and data is already added
We use joins to have INNER JOIN statement in the SQL
We use includes to load all posts in the memory
I have two tables users and posts and they have association of
has_many. I want to fetch details of both users and posts in a single
query.
can be done with includes like
users = User.includes(:posts).where({posts: {user_id: [1,2,3]}})
other is eager_load and preload you can use as per your requirements, for more https://blog.arkency.com/2013/12/rails4-preloading/
This is a hard problem to describe but I have Rails query where I join another table and I want to exclude any results where the join table contain one of three conditions.
I have a Device model that relates to a CarUserRole model/record. In that CarUserRole record it will contain one of three :role - "owner", "monitor", "driver". I want to return any results where there is no related CarUserRole record where role: "owner". How would I do that?
This was my first attempt -
Device.joins(:car_user_roles).where('car_user_roles.role = ? OR car_user_roles.role = ? AND car_user_roles.role != ?', 'monitor', 'driver', 'owner')
Here is the sql -
"SELECT \"cars\".* FROM \"cars\" INNER JOIN \"car_user_roles\" ON \"car_user_roles\".\"car_id\" = \"cars\".\"id\" WHERE (car_user_roles.role = 'monitor' OR car_user_roles.role = 'driver' AND car_user_roles.role != 'owner')"
Update
I should mention that a device sometimes has multiple CarUserRole records. A device can have an "owner" and a "driver" CarUserRole. I should also note that they can only have one owner.
Anwser
I ended up going with #Reub's solution via our chat -
where(CarUserRole.where("car_user_roles.car_id = cars.id").where(role: 'owner').exists.not)
Since the car_user_roles table can have multiple records with the same car_id, an inner join can result in the join table having multiple rows for each row in the cars table. So, for a car that has 3 records in the car_user_roles table (monitor, owner and driver), there will be 3 records in the join table (each record having a different role). Your query will filter out the row where the role is owner, but it will match the other two, resulting in that car being returned as a result of your query even though it has a record with role as 'owner'.
Lets first try to form an sql query for the result that you want. We can then convert this into a Rails query.
SELECT * FROM cars WHERE NOT EXISTS (SELECT id FROM car_user_roles WHERE role='owner' AND car_id = cars.id);
The above is sufficient if you want devices which do not have any car_user_role with role as 'owner'. But this can also give you devices which have no corresponding record in car_user_roles. If you want to ensure that the device has at least one record in car_user_roles, you can add the following to the above query.
AND EXISTS (SELECT id FROM car_user_roles WHERE role IN ('monitor', 'driver') AND car_id = cars.id);
Now, we need to convert this into a Rails query.
Device.where(
CarUserRole.where("car_user_roles.car_id = cars.id").where(role: 'owner').exists.not
).where(
CarUserRole.where("car_user_roles.car_id = cars.id").where(role: ['monitor', 'driver']).exists
).all
You could also try the following if your Rails version supports exists?:
Device.joins(:car_user_roles).exists?(role: ['monitor', 'driver']).exists?(role: 'owner').not.select('cars.*').distinct
Select the distinct cars
SELECT DISTINCT (cars.*) FROM cars
Use a LEFT JOIN to pull in the car_user_roles
LEFT JOIN car_user_roles ON cars.id = car_user_roles.car_id
Select only the cars that DO NOT contain an 'owner' car_user_role
WHERE NOT EXISTS(SELECT NULL FROM car_user_roles WHERE cars.id = car_user_roles.car_id AND car_user_roles.role = 'owner')
Select only the cars that DO contain either a 'driver' or 'monitor' car_user_role
AND (car_user_roles.role IN ('driver','monitor'))
Put it all together:
SELECT DISTINCT (cars.*) FROM cars LEFT JOIN car_user_roles ON cars.id = car_user_roles.car_id WHERE NOT EXISTS(SELECT NULL FROM car_user_roles WHERE cars.id = car_user_roles.car_id AND car_user_roles.role = 'owner') AND (car_user_roles.role IN ('driver','monitor'));
Edit:
Execute the query directly from Rails and return only the found object IDs
ActiveRecord::Base.connection.execute(sql).collect { |x| x['id'] }
In my app, users can create galleries that their work may or may not be in. Users have and belong to many Galleries, and each gallery has a 'creator' that is designated by the gallery's user_id field.
So to get the 5 latest galleries a user is in, I can do something like:
included_in = #user.galleries.order('created_at DESC').uniq.first(5)
# SELECT DISTINCT "galleries".* FROM "galleries" INNER JOIN "galleries_users" ON "galleries"."id" = "galleries_users"."gallery_id" WHERE "galleries_users"."user_id" = 10 ORDER BY created_at DESC LIMIT 5
and to get the 5 latest galleries they've created, I can do:
created = Gallery.where(user_id: id).order('created_at DESC').uniq.first(5)
# SELECT DISTINCT "galleries".* FROM "galleries" WHERE "galleries"."user_id" = 10 ORDER BY created_at DESC LIMIT 5
I want to display these two together, so that it's the 5 latest galleries that they've created OR they're in. Something like the equivalent of:
(included_in + created).order('created_at DESC').uniq.first(5)
Does anyone know how to construct an efficient query or post-query loop that does this?
order isn't available, but you can use sort - or sort_by as suggested by jvnill in this answer
As you've stated, you can use the following code:
(included_in + created).sort_by(&:created_at).uniq.first(5)
How about:
Gallery.joins("LEFT JOIN galleries_users ON galleries.id = galleries_users.gallery_id")
.where("galleries_users.user_id = :user_id OR galleries.user_id = :user_id", user_id: id)
.order("galleries.created_at DESC")
.limit(5)
I'm assuming the name of your HABTM join table is galleries_users (which is the default).
Union the two queries and select the order from the union.
I'm trying to optimize some of our queries. One particular challenge was trying to eager load a polymorphic model. In this case, UserView is polymorphic and has the following columns:
user_id, user_viewable_id, user_viewable_type
When I try to run this query.
#user_views = UserView.select('user_views.* AS user_views, songs.* AS songs, users.* AS users')
.joins('INNER JOIN users AS users ON user_views.user_id = users.id')
.joins('INNER JOIN songs AS songs ON user_views.user_viewable_id = songs.id')
.where(:user_viewable_type => 'Song').order('user_views.id DESC').limit(5)
It doesn't seem to eager load the query. I am using a gem called MiniProfiler, which indicates that it is actually running n+1 queries, instead of just one.
The following AR query returns this SQL:
SELECT user_views.* AS user_views, songs.* AS songs, users.* AS users FROM "user_views" INNER JOIN users AS users ON user_views.user_id = users.id INNER JOIN songs AS songs ON user_views.user_viewable_id = songs.id WHERE "user_views"."user_viewable_type" = 'Song' ORDER BY user_views.id DESC LIMIT 5
Which returns the records all in one query. Strange why this is not working as expected in AR.
Any ideas how to get this to work?
Rails documentation about eager loading says includes works with polymorphic associations. So you should just write:
#user_views = UserView.includes(:user_viewable).
where(:user_viewable_type => 'Song').order('id DESC').limit(5)