I get the following Java exception when I run my application from within docker.
Exception in thread "AWT-EventQueue-0" java.awt.HeadlessException:
No X11 DISPLAY variable was set, but this program performed an operation which requires it.
at java.awt.GraphicsEnvironment.checkHeadless(GraphicsEnvironment.java:204)
at java.awt.Window.<init>(Window.java:536)
at java.awt.Frame.<init>(Frame.java:420)
at java.awt.Frame.<init>(Frame.java:385)
at javax.swing.JFrame.<init>(JFrame.java:189)
at mantra.mfs100.test.MFS100Test.<init>(MFS100Test.java:67)
at mantra.mfs100.test.MFS100Test$8.run(MFS100Test.java:450)
at java.awt.event.InvocationEvent.dispatch(InvocationEvent.java:311)
at java.awt.EventQueue.dispatchEventImpl(EventQueue.java:756)
at java.awt.EventQueue.access$500(EventQueue.java:97)
at java.awt.EventQueue$3.run(EventQueue.java:709)
at java.awt.EventQueue$3.run(EventQueue.java:703)
at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
at java.security.ProtectionDomain$JavaSecurityAccessImpl.doIntersectionPrivilege(ProtectionDomain.java:80)
at java.awt.EventQueue.dispatchEvent(EventQueue.java:726)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpOneEventForFilters(EventDispatchThread.java:201)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEventsForFilter(EventDispatchThread.java:116)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEventsForHierarchy(EventDispatchThread.java:105)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(EventDispatchThread.java:101)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(EventDispatchThread.java:93)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.run(EventDispatchThread.java:82)
My docker file looks like this...
# cat Dockerfile
FROM openjdk:8
COPY . /usr/src/myapp
WORKDIR "x64/mfs100_9.0.2.2_x86_redist/"
RUN "./install.sh"
WORKDIR /usr/src/myapp
CMD ["java", "-jar", "/usr/src/myapp/dist/myap.jar"]
I am using Ubuntu Desktop provided by Amazon for testing. If I install the Java Application on Ubuntu desktop (without docker) it works as expected. Is this docker problem or the way I access Amazon cloud ubuntu?
you should set up headless mode, passing java.awt.headless=true, using something like this:
CMD ["java", "-Djava.awt.headless=true", "-jar", "/usr/src/myapp/dist/myap.jar"]
There are multiple ways to do it. The most common way is to share your host X11 display to the docker container
docker run -d \
-v /tmp/.X11-unix:/tmp/.X11-unix \
-v /etc/localtime:/etc/localtime \
-e DISPLAY=unix$DISPLAY \
<yourcontainer>
Next as #SimonlucaLandi, suggested you can run a headless version
CMD ["java", "-Djava.awt.headless=true", "-jar", "/usr/src/myapp/dist/myap.jar"]
Below are some more related references that you can refer if you need to go the X11 display version
How to view GUI apps from inside a docker container
X11 forwarding of GUI app in Docker container
https://medium.com/#dimitris.kapanidis/running-gui-apps-in-docker-containers-3bd25efa862a
Related
I've been trying to figure this out in the last hours but I'm stuck.
I have a very simple Dockerfile which looks like this:
FROM alpine:3.6
COPY gempbotgo /
COPY configs /configs
CMD ["/gempbotgo"]
EXPOSE 8025
gempbotgo is just an go binary which runs a webserver and some other stuff.
The webserver is running on 8025 and should answer with an hello world.
My issue is with exposing ports. I ran my container like this (after building it)
docker run --rm -it -p 8025:8025 asd
Everything seems fine but when I try to open 127.0.0.1:8025 in the browser or try a wget i just get an empty response.
Chrome: ERR_EMPTY_RESPONSE
The port is used and not restricted by the firewall on my Windows 10 system.
Running the go binary without container just on my "Bash on Ubuntu on Windows" terminal and then browsing to 127.0.0.1:8025 works without a hitch.
Other addresses returned a "ERR_CONNECTION_REFUSED" like 127.0.0.1:8030 so there definetly is something active on the port.
I then went into the conatiner with
docker exec -it e1cc6daae4cf /bin/sh
and checked in there with a wget what happens. Also there no issues. index.html file gets downloaded with a "Hello World"
Any ideas why docker is not sending any data? I've also ran my container with docker-compose but no difference there.
I also ran the container on my VPS hosted externally. Same issue there... (Debian)
My code: (note the Makefile)
https://github.com/gempir/gempbotgo/tree/docker
Edit:
After getting some comments I changed my Dockerfile to a multi-stage build. This is my Dockerfile now:
FROM golang:latest
WORKDIR /go/src/github.com/gempir/gempbotgo
RUN go get github.com/gempir/go-twitch-irc \
&& go get github.com/stretchr/testify/assert \
&& go get github.com/labstack/echo \
&& go get github.com/op/go-logging
COPY . .
RUN CGO_ENABLED=0 GOOS=linux go build -a -installsuffix cgo -o app .
FROM alpine:latest
RUN apk --no-cache add ca-certificates
WORKDIR /root/
COPY configs ./configs
COPY --from=0 /go/src/github.com/gempir/gempbotgo/app .
CMD ["./app"]
EXPOSE 8025
Sadly this did not change anything, I kept everything as close as possbile to the guide here: https://docs.docker.com/engine/userguide/eng-image/multistage-build/#use-multi-stage-builds
I have also tried the minimalist Dockerfile from golang.org which looks like this:
FROM golang:onbuild
EXPOSE 8025
But no success either with that.
Your issue is that you are binding to the 127.0.0.1:8025 inside your code. This makes the code work from inside the container but not outside.
You need to bind to 0.0.0.0:8025 to bind to all interfaces inside the container. So traffic coming from outside of the container is also accepted by your Go app
Adding to the accepted answer: I had the same error message trying to run docker/getting-started.
The problem was that "getting-started" is using port 80 and this was
"occupied" (netsh http show urlacl) on my machine.
I had to use docker run -d -p 8888:80 docker/getting-started where
8888 was an unused port. And then open "http://localhost:8888/tutorial/".
I have the same problem using Dockerize GatsbyJS. As Tarun Lalwani's comment above, I resolved the problem by binding or using 0.0.0.0 as hostname
yarn develop -P 0.0.0.0 -p 8000
For me this was a problem with the docker swarm mode ingress network. I had to recreate it. https://docs.docker.com/network/overlay/#customize-the-default-ingress-network
Another possibility why you are getting that error is that the docker run command is run through a normal cmd prompt and not the admin command prompt. Make sure you run as an admin!
As it stands, my Dockerfile works as written below, but currently I have to run the two commented lines in order to pull, compile, and deploy my application to the server. I tried creating a shell script to run those commands using ADD and ENTRYPOINT, but when I run (using the docker commands below) the shell script runs and then the container exits.
What/How do I modify (I'm assuming, the docker run command) to fix this?
Is there an easier way to import libraries than the multiple URLS for RPM? I tried using YUM, but I wasn't sure how to set up my repo for installing anything.
Dockerfile
FROM registry.access.redhat.com/jboss-eap-7/eap71-openshift
USER root
RUN rpm -i [the URLS of the 40 libraries I need for SVN]
ADD subversion_installer_1.14.1.sh /home/svn_installer.sh
RUN yes | /home/svn_installer.sh
USER jboss
ARG REPO_USER
ARG REPO_PW
ARG REPO_URL
ENV REPO_USER=$REPO_USER
ENV REPO_PW=$REPO_PW
ENV REPO_URL=$REPO_URL
#RUN svn export --username="$REPO_USER" --password="$REPO_PW" "$REPO_URL" /usr/svn/myapp
#RUN /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.191.b12-1.el7_6.x86_64/bin/jar -cvf $JBOSS_HOME/standalone/deployments/myapp.war /usr/svn/myapp
Docker commands
docker build . -t myapp:latest
docker run -d -p 8080:8080 -p 9990:9990 --env-file=svnvars.cfg myapp:latest
Found out what I was doing wrong. I was trying to use
/opt/eap/bin/standalone.sh
as the last command in my entrypoint script.
I discovered this was wrong by calling
docker images inspect myapp:latest
where I found
"Cmd": [
"/opt/eap/bin/openshift-launch.sh"
],
I was calling the wrong command. So I fixed this by replacing the command in my shell script and changing my ENTRYPOINT to CMD.
Here are the corrected files:
Dockerfile
FROM registry.access.redhat.com/jboss-eap-7/eap71-openshift
USER root
RUN rpm -i [too many libraries]
ADD subversion_installer_1.14.1.sh /home/svn_installer.sh
ADD svnvars.cfg /var/svn/svnvars.cfg
RUN yes | /home/svn_installer.sh
USER jboss
ARG REPO_USER
ARG REPO_PW
ARG REPO_URL
ENV REPO_USER=$REPO_USER
ENV REPO_PW=$REPO_PW
ENV REPO_URL=$REPO_URL
ADD entrypoint.sh /home/entrypoint.sh
CMD /home/entrypoint.sh
entrypoint.sh
#!/bin/bash
svn export --username="$REPO_USER" --password="$REPO_PW" "$REPO_URL" /usr/svn/myapp
cd /usr/svn/myapp
ant war
/opt/eap/bin/openshift-launch.sh
I am new to Docker and I am following their official tutorial - https://docs.docker.com/get-started/.
I am trying to start my container with this command - docker run -dp 3000:3000 getting-started.
However, when I am trying to open my browser to http://localhost:3000 I get
I already did try to run it on different port - docker run -dp 3000:80 getting-started, however it redirects me to docker tutrial page and thats not what I want.
I have created a file app/Dockerfile with this content:
# syntax=docker/dockerfile:1
FROM node:12-alpine
RUN apk add --no-cache python3 g++ make
WORKDIR /app
COPY . .
RUN yarn install --production
CMD ["node", "src/index.js"]
I can't find the problem and I will be grateful for help.
Not sure if you ever solved this but I had a similar issue as I missed this all important line located in this section:
"If you haven't already done so, open a terminal and go to the app directory with the Dockerfile"
Your Dockerfile, as did mine in my http://localhost/tutorial/our-application/ does not have the
EXPOSE 3000
line at the end, whereas this line indeed appears in the Dockerfile in https://docs.docker.com/get-started/02_our_app/#build-the-apps-container-image (link provided in pbay's answer).
Without that line, the produced container does not expose port 3000, and docker start -dp 3000:(whatever) is bound to fail. [Edit: that's my understanding as a near-absolute beginner, but other people seem to have run that container successfully without that line. Go figure why/how. I'm ready to be enlightened.] In "Docker Desktop" on Windows, you can see in the dashboard that the container exits as soon as it starts.
I added that EXPOSE 3000 line, rebuild and rerun the using the same commands as first time:
docker build -t getting-started .
docker -dp 3000:3000 getting-started
and it now works fine.
(Rant: "If you've created Dockerfiles before, you might see a few flaws in the Dockerfile below" they say. Well this is not a minor flaw -- this is a beginner-discouraging trap. How come ?)
I am having some issues deploying to Cloud Run lately. When I am trying to deploy the below Dockerfile to Cloud Run, it ends up with the error Failed to start and then listen on the port defined by the PORT environment variable.:
FROM phpmyadmin/phpmyadmin:latest
EXPOSE 8080
RUN sed -i 's/80/${PORT}/g' /etc/apache2/sites-available/000-default.conf /etc/apache2/ports.conf
ENTRYPOINT [ "/docker-entrypoint.sh" ]
CMD [ "apache2-foreground" ]
The ENTRYPOINT and CMD were added separately even though the phpmyadmin/phpmyadmin:latest uses this same ENTRYPOINT and CMD to see if that would solve it, though it is not required. The same Docker image when deployed using docker run runs properly and listens on port 8080. Is there something I am doing wrong?
This is the command I use to deploy:
gcloud run deploy phpmyadmin --memory=1Gi --platform=managed \
--allow-unauthenticated --add-cloudsql-instances project_id:us-central1:db-name \
--region=us-central1 --image gcr.io/project_id/phpmyadmin:1.3 \
--update-env-vars PMA_HOST=localhost,PMA_SOCKET="/cloudsql/project_id:us-central1:db-name",PMA_ABSOLUTE_URI=phpmyadmin.domain.com
This is all I can find in the logs. (Have redacted some data):
https://gist.github.com/shanukk27/9dd4b3076c55307bd6e853a76e7a34e0
Cloud Run runtime environment seems to be slightly different than Docker run command. You can't use ENTRYPOINT and CMD in the same time
ENTRYPOINT [ "/docker-entrypoint.sh" ]
CMD [ "apache2-foreground" ]
It works with Docker Run (Why? Docker issue? Docker feature?) and not on Cloud Run (missing feature? bug?).
Use only one of them, for example:
ENTRYPOINT /docker-entrypoint.sh && apache2-foreground
EDIT
A strange remark shared by Shanu is the 2 command works with Wordpress deployment, and doesn't work here.
FROM wordpress:5.3.2-php7.3-apache
EXPOSE 8080
# Copy custom entrypoint from repo
COPY cloud-run-entrypoint.sh /usr/local/bin/
# Change apache listening port and set permission for docker entrypoint
RUN sed -i 's/80/${PORT}/g' /etc/apache2/sites-available/000-default.conf /etc/apache2/ports.conf && \
chmod +x /usr/local/bin/cloud-run-entrypoint.sh
# Wordpress conf
COPY wordpress/. /var/www/html/
# Custom entrypoint
ENTRYPOINT ["cloud-run-entrypoint.sh","docker-entrypoint.sh"]
# Start apache when docker container starts
CMD ["apache2-foreground"]
The problem is solved here, but the reason is not clear
Note to Googler (Steren? Ahmet?): Can you share more details on this behavior?
I made a webapp in Java and I would like to test the site locally using Docker.
The war file I created works perfectly but to be read correctly it must be inserted inside this path:
/tomcat/webapps/ROOT/
For these reasons I decided to use this form:
https://hub.docker.com/_/tomcat
In particular I decided to use this Dockerfile:
https://github.com/docker-library/tomcat/blob/ec2d88f0a3b34292c1693e90bdf786e2545a157e/9.0/jre11-slim/Dockerfile
I added this code towards the end:
...
EXPOSE 8080
CMD ["cd /usr/local/tomcat/webapps/"]
CMD ["mv ROOT ROOT.old"]
CMD ["mkdir ROOT"]
COPY ./esercitazione.1.maven/ /usr/local/tomcat/webapps/ROOT/
CMD ["catalina.sh", "run"]
I used this code at the Windows 10 prompt:
D:
cd "D:\DATI\Docker-Tomcat-Win10"
docker build -t tomcat-9-java-11:v2.0 .
docker run -it --rm --name tomcat-9-java-11-container -p 8888:8080 tomcat-9-java-11:v2.0
When I enter this link on the browser:
http://192.168.99.103:8888/
I see this:
https://prnt.sc/n2vti1
I'm a beginner with both Docker and Tomcat and I need a little help.
Inside this path I put my unzipped .war file:
D:\DATI\Docker-Tomcat-Win10\esercitazione.1.maven
Thank you
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
#Shree Tiwari
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
First of all thank you for your help!
I deleted all the containers and all the images on Docker and used your Dockerfile (I only changed the name of the folder containing the .war files to be tested).
FROM tomcat:9-jre8
ENV JAVA_OPTS="-Xms512m -Xmx1024m -XX:MaxPermSize=256m -XX:MaxMetaspaceSize=128m"
WORKDIR /usr/local/tomcat/webapps/
RUN rm -rf /usr/local/tomcat/webapps/*
COPY ./webapps/*.war /usr/local/tomcat/webapps
EXPOSE 8080
CMD ["catalina.sh", "run"]
I placed the .war file at this address:
D:\DATI\Docker-Tomcat-Win10\webapps\esercitazione.1.maven.war
I opened the Windows prompt and I typed:
D:
cd "D:\DATI\Docker-Tomcat-Win10"
docker build -t tomcat:v1.0 .
docker run -it --rm --name tomcat-container -p 8888:8080 tomcat:v1.0
I entered this URL in the browser:
http://192.168.99.103:8888/esercitazione.1.maven/
then this other:
http://192.168.99.103:8888/
Unfortunately none of them went well.
The only mistake I encountered when creating the image is this:
"SECURITY WARNING: You are building to Docker image from Windows against a non-Windows Docker host. Files and directories added to build context will have '-rwxr-xr-x' permissions. It is recommended to double check and reset permissions for sensitive files and directories."
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
#Miq
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
First of all thank you for your help!
I also tested your code but it doesn't work.
Dockerfile:
FROM tomcat:9-jre11-slim
RUN mv webapps/ROOT webapps/ROOT.old && mkdir webapps/ROOT
COPY ./esercitazione.1.maven/ webapps/ROOT/
Code:
D:
cd "D:\DATI\Docker-Tomcat-Win10"
docker build -t tomcat:v2.0 .
docker run -it --rm --name tomcat-container tomcat:v2.0
Browser:
http://192.168.99.103:8080/
Other tests:
FROM tomcat:9-jre11-slim
ENV JAVA_OPTS="-Xms512m -Xmx1024m -XX:MaxPermSize=256m -XX:MaxMetaspaceSize=128m"
RUN mv webapps/ROOT webapps/ROOT.old && mkdir webapps/ROOT
WORKDIR /usr/local/tomcat/webapps/
RUN rm -rf /usr/local/tomcat/webapps/ROOT/*
COPY ./webapps/*.war /usr/local/tomcat/webapps/ROOT/
EXPOSE 8080
CMD ["catalina.sh", "run"]
docker ps -a
docker images
docker stop tomcat-container
docker rmi tomcat:v3.0
D:
cd "D:\DATI\Docker-Tomcat-Win10"
docker build -t tomcat:v3.0 .
docker run -d --name tomcat-container -p 8888:8080 tomcat:v3.0
http://192.168.99.103:8888/
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Other tests: (8 April 2019)
FROM tomcat:9.0.17-jre11-slim
LABEL Author="Nome Cognome"
EXPOSE 8080
RUN rm -fr /usr/local/tomcat/webapps/ROOT
COPY ./esercitazione.1.maven.war /usr/local/tomcat/webapps/ROOT.war
CMD ["catalina.sh", "run"]
>
docker build -t tomcat-eb:v.9.0.17 .
docker run -it --rm -p 8888:8080 tomcat-eb:v.9.0.17
>
I'm going here:
http://192.168.99.103:8888
and the browser sends me here:
https://192.168.99.103:8443
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Other tests: (I choose another image)
FROM tomee:8-jre-8.0.0-M2-webprofile
LABEL Author="Nome Cognome"
EXPOSE 8080
RUN rm -fr /usr/local/tomcat/webapps/ROOT
COPY ./esercitazione.1.maven.war /usr/local/tomcat/webapps/ROOT.war
CMD ["catalina.sh", "run"]
>
docker build -t tomcat-eb:v.9.0.17 .
docker run -it --rm -p 8888:8080 tomcat-eb:v.9.0.17
>
If I go here:
http://192.168.99.103:8888
I see Tomcat home, non my webapp.
Is this a problem without a solution?
The biggest problem I see here is that you use CMD instead RUN in your dockerfile. CMD is to define a command that will be run when container is ran. With the Dockerfile you have now, only the last one is executed when you start your container and all of those mkdirs, moves, etc. are never executed. As said, you need to use RUN keywords to indicate command that build process should execute and commit as image layer. You probably also do not need the catalina.sh CMD as it might come from the image you base on, but you need to check it on doc page for the base image or take a peek to it's Dockerfile or use docker history imagename To see the layers and commands used to create them.
I took a deeper look into this and the base image you use. In addition to the CMD's your problem is that you change the workdir by running cd commands. catalina.sh exists in $CATALINA_HOME dir, which then is marked as workdir in base image. When you change the active directory by executing cd it breaks the image runtime.
I'd suggest you try with following dockerfile:
FROM tomcat:9-jre11-slim
RUN mv webapps/ROOT webapps/ROOT.old && mkdir webapps/ROOT
COPY ./esercitazione.1.maven/ webapps/ROOT/
No need to use EXPOSE and CMD as they are defined in base image. also, base image defines WORKDIR to $CATALINA_HOME and that's where you will be when executing any following commands (treat WORKDIR as cd but in docker style).
Hope that helps.
First you need to compile your Code to a war file then you can use below Dockerfile
FROM tomcat:9-jre8
ENV JAVA_OPTS="-Xms512m -Xmx1024m -XX:MaxPermSize=256m -XX:MaxMetaspaceSize=128m"
WORKDIR /usr/local/tomcat/webapps/
RUN rm -rf /usr/local/tomcat/webapps/*
COPY ./esercitazione.1.maven/*.war /usr/local/tomcat/webapps
EXPOSE 8080
CMD ["catalina.sh", "run"]