I want to get the mean of a sequence of images by using Imagemagick. Therefore I use the following command:
convert *.png -evaluate-sequence mean MEAN.png
Each of my images does contain an alpha channel. What I want is: Combine all the images by ignoring the alpha channel.
When I combine the images, the alpha channel is considered in the "mean" method and my final image has transparency. That isn't what I want.
Result:
I tried to add the parameter -alpha off, but then Imagemagick converts the alpha channel to black.
convert *.png -alpha off -evaluate-sequence mean MEAN.png
Result:
Photoshop does it right. I load all images in a stack and create a smart object. When I use the "mean" method in Photoshop, the alpha channel is not considdered in the final result.
Result that I want with Imagemagick:
Does someone have an idea how to do that with Imagemagick?
What you need to do is to use the alpha channels as weighting images for each image. The total fraction of white values at each pixel from all the alpha channels would be the weight to use for the average. So something like this should do what you want or at least be close.
First, cd to your directory of images. Then run the following.
convert *.png -evaluate-sequence mean \
\( -clone 0 -alpha off \) \
\( -clone 0 -alpha extract \) \
-delete 0 +swap -compose divide -composite result.png
This will work if there is some image texture at each pixel coming from al least one image. That is at a given pixel all images are not totally black (transparent).
compare -metric rmse result.png mean_photoshop.png null:
125.167 (0.00190993)
So this shows that there is about 0.2% difference between my result and what you got from photoshop
Maybe this way of working will help you get there - or at least explain the problem:
convert xc:"rgba(255,0,0,1)" xc:"rgba(0,0,0,1)" xc:"rgba(0,0,0,0)" -depth 8 -evaluate-sequence mean txt:
Output
# ImageMagick pixel enumeration: 1,1,65535,srgba
0,0: (21845,0,0,43690) #550000AA srgba(85,0,0,0.666667)
Using IM 6.8.9.4 Q16 or IM 7.0.5.5 Q16 Mac OSX Sierra, this seems to work fine for me:
Make transparent image
convert logo: -transparent white logot.png
Get mean
convert logot.png logot.png logot.png -alpha off -evaluate-sequence mean result.png
magick logot.png logot.png logot.png -alpha off -evaluate-sequence mean result.png
This also seems to work:
convert logot.png logot.png logot.png -channel rgb -evaluate-sequence mean -alpha off result.png
So perhaps you need to upgrade your ImageMagick (and/or libpng?)
Can you post a zip file of some of your input images, so we can test with your images?
One problem that I see is that the PNG images that you provided have black under the transparent areas and not image texture. So when you disable alpha as in my commands above, you see black and the black gets averaged into the final result. Did you use these same PNG images in Photoshop or did you have Photoshop PSD images or some other images that you used and then exported to PNG, which may have put black under the transparent areas. Have you tried using the same PNG images in Photoshop to do the average?
In fact, you have 8-bit color (palette) images, which have one color (black) assigned to be the transparent color.
Related
I am converting many 3D textures with imagemagick for a video game. My source files are png, my target files are png, too. But I notice that whenever the alpha channel drops to 0.0 my color information are gone (and I need them). I just want to scale all channels as they are. I guess there is a small switch that fixes that problem, but the deadline is near and I cannot find anything about that.
Simple command to reproduce this:
convert source-with-alpha.png -scale 2014 target.png (I also tried -resize and it also didn't work).
Doing just convert source-with-alpha.png target.png works fine though (but has no scaledown).
Thank you for your help.
I guess ImageMagick is trying to optimise something but not sure what/why. Maybe the idea is that if something is transparent you can't see it, so we might as well make it black so it compresses well.
Anyway, try separating the channels so they are all just treated as independent channels, then resizing and recombining:
convert input.png -channel RGBA -separate -resize XxY -combine result.png
I am not sure I understand your problem. I have no issue resizing a transparent PNG image with ImageMagick 6.9.10.28 Q16 Mac OSX with libpng 1.6.36. Perhaps you need to upgrade one or both.
Image:
Make white into transparent:
convert logo.png -transparent white logot.png
Resize it:
convert logot.png -resize 25% logot_small.png
I tried Mark Setchell answer with two different versions of Windows imagemagick but I still have this issue.
RGB becomes 0 if alpha is 0 when resizing.
A workaround was to add alpha a little bit so it becomes non-zero:
magic.exe input.tga -channel a -evaluate add 0.2% -channel RGBA -separate -filter Quadratic -resize -resize XxY! -combine result.tga
or also (same result)
magick.exe ( input.tga -alpha off -filter Quadratic -resize XxY! ) ( input.tga -filter Quadratic -resize XxY! -alpha extract -evaluate add 0.2% ) -compose Copy_Alpha -composite result.tga
("-filter Quadratic" is optional)
Post one of your tga files so we can test with it. What is your ImageMagick version? There should be no need for any switch. This works fine for me on IM 6.9.10.65 Q16 Mac OSX.
Make a transparent TGA:
convert logo: -transparent white logo.tga
transparent tga image
Resize by 50%
convert logo.tga -resize 50% logo2.tga
resized transparent tga image
I've got 2 versions of 1 image
Is it possible to get a transparent png file representing this watermark? Can ImageMagick do this?
SilverMonkey has the basic solution using Imagemagick. But the request was for a transparent PNG. So I will add a little bit more to his code to make it transparent by adding -alpha copy.
convert kitty2.jpg kitty1.jpg -compose minus -composite -auto-level -alpha copy watermark1.png
Here is another approach that makes a binary mask for the watermark by thresholding. But it leaves a lot of noise. So I use some morphology open to remove the noise and then some morpholgy close to try to fill in where the text is broken up. Then I add -alpha copy to make the image transparent. But the text is white and the original watermark was light gray. So I turn alpha off, multiply by 0.75 to reduce the brightness of the white letters to gray without affecting the alpha channel. Then turn the alpha channel back on.
convert kitty2.jpg kitty1.jpg -compose minus -composite -threshold 0.6% -morphology open diamond:1 -morphology close octagon:1 -alpha copy -alpha off -evaluate multiply 0.75 -alpha on watermark2.png
For more on morphology, see https://imagemagick.org/Usage/morphology/
You can achieve your goal by calculating the difference between both images (subtract the pixels of both images and calculate the absolute value). This will result in:
ImageMagick seems to be capable of image subtraction, look here:
The code:
convert image2 image1 -compose minus -composite result
In ImageMagick convert, I can select a specific color with e.g. -opaque blue. How can I select all grayscale colors (e.g. #000000, #707070, #ffffff)?
Not sure what you are trying to do, but this may help. The greyscale pixels will have a saturation of zero, so that is probably the easiest way to identify them.
First, make a funky sample image:
convert -size 400x100 gradient:black-white -bordercolor red -border 80 image.png
Now make all grey areas (those with very low saturation) transparent:
convert image.png -alpha on -channel A -fx "saturation<0.01?0:1" result.png
Note
Note that the -fx operator is extremely powerful but notoriously slow because it is actually interpolated for each and every pixel. If your images are large, the following technique may be more appropriate.
Basically, I clone the image and convert the whole thing to HSL colorspace and separate the channels. Then I discard the Hue and Lightness channels so I am left with just the Saturation. I then threshold that and copy that back to the original image as the alpha channel. On a 2000x2000 pixel image, this method will run in under a second whereas the -fx method will require 5-6 seconds.
convert image.png \( +clone -colorspace hsl -separate -delete 0,2 -threshold 1% \) -compose copy-opacity -composite result.png
Given a jpeg, what is the formula to change the exposure of that jpeg by +/-1 stop or as known as 1 EV? I want to simulate this exposure change. Is there a formula/ method to do so?
I can demonstrate that using ImageMagick, which is included in most Linux distros and available for OSX and Windows from here.
First, at the Terminal command line create an image:
convert -size 512x512 gradient:black-yellow gradient.png
Now, the way to effect +1 stop exposure increase is to composite the image with itself using the Screen blending mode - it is available in Photoshop and ImageMagick and is described here.
So, the formula to composite image A with image B is:
1-stop brighter image = 1-(1-A)(1-B)
but as we are compositing the image with itself, A and B are the same, so we effectively have
1-(1-A)(1-A)
ImageMagick refers to the pixels of an image using p rather than A, so we can do a 1-stop increase like this:
convert gradient.png -colorspace RGB -fx "(1-(1-p)(1-p))" result.png
Note that the Wikipedia article, and ImageMagick's -fx both assume your pixel intensities vary between 0 and 1.0. If you are using 8-bit images, you should calculate with 255 in place of 1, namely
+1 stop brighter image = 255-(255-A)(255-A)
or if using 16-bit values
+1 stop brighter image = 65535-(65535-A)(65535-A)
The above fx-based method is however, very slow because the -fx is interpreted rather than compiled, so a faster way to do it is:
convert gradient.png gradient.png -colorspace RGB -compose screen -composite screen.png
Just for fun, another way of looking at that is that we take the inverse of A, that is 1-A, and square it, and then take the inverse, so it can be done like this:
convert gradient.png -colorspace RGB -negate -evaluate pow 2 -negate result.png
The equivalent of -1 stop exposure decrease is to composite the image with itself using the Multiply blend mode, the formula being
1-stop darker image = A x B
which you would do faster with
convert gradient.png gradient.png -colorspace RGB -compose multiply -composite result.png
or even faster, by using memory-to-memory cloning rather than reading from disk twice, with
convert gradient.png -colorspace RGB +clone -compose multiply -composite result.png
but could do equally with
convert gradient.png -colorspace RGB -evaluate pow 2 result.png
I have two images. One is background with no alpha. The other is a white cloud. The alpha of the cloud image is premultiplied with black. When I composite them the white cloud has black in it, so it looks grey instead of white like it should. I'm doing:
convert -gravity Center bg.tga whitecloud.tga -composite comp.tga
Is there a way to composite premultiplied images in ImageMagick, or does the image have to be non-premultiplied? Can I make a premultiplied image non-premultiplied using ImageMagick?
Update:
Ok, here are the images as TGA for download:
http://acatysmoof.com/posting/problems/imagemagick/premultiplication/bg.tga
http://acatysmoof.com/posting/problems/imagemagick/premultiplication/whitecloud.tga
http://acatysmoof.com/posting/problems/imagemagick/premultiplication/aftereffects.tga
http://acatysmoof.com/posting/problems/imagemagick/premultiplication/imagemagick.tga
and in the same order as jpgs to view in your browser:
I tried all the modes provided, but none of them create the same result as After Effects.
It would be easier if you showed your images, but try adding -compose lighten before -composite in your command, like this:
convert a.tga b.tga -compose lighten -composite out.tga
Basically that will make ImageMagick choose the lighter pixel of the two images at every point.
If that doesn't work, try other blending modes
for b in $(identify -list compose); do
convert -label "$b" bg.tga whitecloud.tga -compose $b -composite miff:-
done | montage - -tile 5x out.png
I am kind of thinking Atop, Dissolve, SrcAtop and SrcOver might be your friends but have a look full-size and see what floats your boat. That would be
convert a.tga b.tga -compose Atop -composite out.tga
Here is an Imagemagick command that does what you want:
convert -gravity Center whitecloud.tga -fx "u/max(u.a, 1/255)" bg.tga +swap -composite -fx "u*u.a" comp.tga
What's happening here?
-fx command #1: Convert whitecloud.tga from premultiplied alpha to "normal". The max() operator is a special case to avoid dividing by zero.
+swap command: Make bg.tga the first image and the revised whitecloud.tga the second.
-composite these two regular, non-premultiplied images.
-fx command #2: take the result, and return to a premultiplied alpha format.
This gives exactly the same result as After Effects.
Note that, as I wrote it, it only works for an opaque bg.tga. You'd need to do some extra work to handle a transparent background image.
If you want to duplicate the After Effects result, then I believe what you want to do in ImageMagick is the following -- composite the background image with a white image using the cloud as a mask:
convert bg.tga \( -clone 0 -fill white -colorize 100 \) whitecloud.tga -compose over -composite cloud_blue.tga
I have posted a JPG result, but my .tga result is the same.