I have configured a multi-branch pipeline for my Bitbucket repository. My configuration is the staging branch gets automatically triggered and deploy to staging environment.
Now I want to implement a use case where I should be able to select one build from ‘Build history’ and deploy that build to production. Can any one give a suggestion on how to solve it?
Related
When I check in my gitlab code from dev, it triggers Jenkins to build this dev branch and deploy the application on the staging server 1. I have selenium automated testing to run against this deployed application (eg Test UI & API etc).
Question:
If the test all passes, Jenkins should deploy a production code on server 2. Can and should Jenkins make a merge request from dev to master in order to do the build?
Theese are possible.
1.You need conditional steps in jenkins.
2.You need conditional steps again and you must use git commands.(git commit,git push etc.)
I currenly have an Azure DevOps release pipeline containing Test, Acceptance and Production stage, that are triggered in that order. The Test is triggered when there is a new build available to deploy.
The problem I have with this is that all stages currently deploy the exact same artifact. But this is wrong, since they are deploying to different environments that need to have their own version of the Web.config.
How do I change my setup in such a way that all environments get the right package? Should I change my build setup in such a way that it builds for multiple different configs or should I have separate builds for each environment? And how do I select what artifact each stage of the release pipeline should deploy?
This is what my release pipeline looks like now:
Each environment can have its own variables defined. Simply click on the variables tab and make sure you scope any of those variables to the proper environment.
Then using the Azure App Service Deploy (if targeting Azure) or IIS Web app deploy tasks, you can update your configuration files with the values of your variables, here is the documentation on how to do so.
Im creating Jenkins pipeline for building and deploying our app.
I want to have the same build for the staging and production environment(buld-once-deploy-many approach).
Merging feature branch into staging branch would build an app for both staging and production, but it will deploy it only to staging bucket.
After testing, it would be good that developers merge the staging branch into master which will take the previous staging build and deploy it to production.
Alternative would be to have one branch, and devs would manually trigger another job on Jenkins that would deploy the build to production.
I want to avoid devs going into jenkins and triggering build, since most of them find it intimidating, there are also some nasty vpn configuration steps they need to go through to have access to Jenkins etc.
Would this be a bad practice? Do you have any suggestions how to achieve something like this?
Thanks
This is more of a devops question than a Jenkins question, but here is my take...
I can't decide if you are saying that you would re-build from the master branch, or only use the commit to the master branch to trigger a deployment of the original staging artifact. So I'll address both.
For this situation:
If you build an artifact in a staging branch, and test it. Everything looks green on the tests. So you merge those changes to another branch, re-build, and deploy to production.
The problem: Can you be 100% sure that there was nothing else in the master branch that is not different than what was built AND tested in staging?
You are risking the jello view anti-pattern because unknown and untested changes could sneak into your production artifact. It becomes terribly difficult to troubleshoot why it worked fine it staging, but now fails in production.
For the second situation:
If you are saying that you wouldn't rebuild from the master branch, then merging back to master doesn't buy you anything except a trigger to kick off a new build, because you are never generating an artifact from Master.
If you are going to to it this way, I think you could commit to a single branch, and then tag a release that is meant to go to production, then trigger off of the tag.
Either way, this seems like a strange pattern, and would be difficult to accomplish in an automated fashion in Jenkins. Somehow the newly triggered build would have to find the previously built artifact and deploy that to production.
Possible solution:
There are a few ways to solve this, but one of the easiest is to build once and deploy the same artifact all the way down the line, as you mentioned as an alternative option. But this would likely require some approvals or additional triggering in Jenkins.
If you don't want developers to have to touch Jenkins, then the more likely solution is to build and run your unit tests and smoke tests on the staging environment. Then when a developer wants to promote a build to production, they commit it to the master branch, where the same build is kicked off, and testing is all performed again, in addition to more advanced integration, functional, and acceptance testing. If it doesn't pass, it doesn't go to production.
Your initial tests in staging give the developer quick feedback, but don't serve as the official tests, which only run on the production build.
With a pipeline script, you could easily accomplish this with a single Jenkinsfile and single multibranch pipeline job with stages that are only run when the branch pattern matches.
stage ("Acceptance Testing" ) {
when { branch "master" }
echo "Do testing here"
}
I'm setting up a development environment where I have Jenkins as CI server (using pipelines), and the last build step in Jenkinsfile is a deployment to staging. The idea is to have a staging environment for each branch that is pushed.
Whenever someone deletes a branch (sometimes after merging), Jenkins automatically removes its respective job.
I wonder if there is a way to run a custom script before the automatic job removal, then I would be able to connect to the staging server and stop or remove all services that are running for the job that is going to be deleted.
The plugin multibranch-action-triggers-plugin might be worth a look.
This plugin enables building/triggering other jobs when a Pipeline job is created or deleted, or when a Run (also known as Build) is deleted by a Multi Branch Pipeline Job.
We are searching for a CI and CD Solution for our WebApp based on NodeJS/Meteor.
Our Process should be:
On each Push to Master/ Pull Request/ Merge to Master do the following:
Checkout
Run Code Style Checks (coffeelint, scsslinter, etc.)
Build Code
Run Tests
Generate Tarball-Archive
Deploy archive to Developmet (Quality Management) Server, extract and run
next step would be manual testing of the app on our dev server.
when we think it is deployable, I want have a button in jenkins like "Deploy these Artifacts NOW to Live-Instance". How can I achive this? Also Nice would be something like deploy these artifacts at 2am to the live instances.
From Checkout to deploy to dev-server is already implemented in jenkins. What we need now is a button "deploy this artifact to live"
You need another job to get this working. The other job takes the artifact from the build job and deploy it wherever you want.
There is no possibility to include such behavior in the same job.