My problem is exactly what it says in the title. If I want to interact with users using MicrosoftGraph, I have a few options:
graphClient.Users.Request.GetAsync()
graphClient.Users.Request.AddAsync()
I would like to see:
graphClient.Users.Request.UpdateAsync()
Unfortunately, my problem is that I don't see it. Where is it? I see UpdateAsync on a few other objects... why is it not on users? Did I miss some crucial piece of documentation?
It is on User. You're missing a few things. You haven't identified the user, use the indexer. Also, Request is a method, not a property.
var betterMe = new User()
{
GivenName = "Super Man"
};
// Update the user to Super Man
await graphClient.Users[myId].Request().UpdateAsync(betterMe);
Related
With the latest update Firebase let you sign in with AppleAuthProvider without using the sign_in_with_apple package. This is really useful but how can I get the full name and email of the user?
I know that I can add scopes with the function .addScope() but then how can I retrieve them?
Just to make an example now we can retrieve those data with the following procedure:
final AuthorizationCredentialAppleID credential =
await SignInWithApple.getAppleIDCredential(
scopes: <AppleIDAuthorizationScopes>[
AppleIDAuthorizationScopes.email,
AppleIDAuthorizationScopes.fullName,
],
nonce: nonce,
);
final String name = credential.givenName + credential.familyName;
final String email = credential.email;
But now I'd like to something like this
final AppleAuthProvider appleAuth = AppleAuthProvider();
appleAuth.addScope('email');
appleAuth.addScope('name');
final UserCredential authResult = await FirebaseAuth.instance
.signInWithAuthProvider(appleAuth);
final String name = ... //What should I put here?
It Looks like it is a bug
Github issue reported
Hope they fix it as soon as possible
EDIT**********
I found out that this could happen because the first time you used this method, you didn't use scope.
The solution is to go to Settings> iCloud> Password and security> Apps that use the Apple ID.
And delete your app, since Apple only the first time you use the method, is when it brings the information you request
I'm trying to post to a Facebook page AS the page using the Unity Facebook SDK running on iOS. As I understand, to do that, I need the pages access token with manage_pages and publish_pages. I know that I can get it from /me/accounts?fields=access_token, but how do I tell AccessToken.CurrentAccessToken to use my pages access token instead?
Right now i'm using the following:
var wwwForm = new WWWForm();
//wwwForm.AddField ("access_token", "A-T I NEED");
wwwForm.AddBinaryData("image", screenshot, "InteractiveConsole.png");
wwwForm.AddField("message", "herp derp. I did a thing! Did I do this right?");
FB.API("/PAGE-ID/photos", HttpMethod.POST, HandleResult, wwwForm);
I tried putting the access token manually, but that didn't work (so I commented it out).
With this as it is I'm getting an error, telling me that I need publish_actions, wich is not correct since I'm not trying to post as the user. If I also get publish_actions the Post goes online, but is posted to the page as the user speaking. (User is also Admin)
Any Ideas ? Thanks!
So, I filed a bug report to facebook and as it turns out: "… at this time this functionality is not supported." Wich simply means there is now way to use the Page Access Token you acquired via the FB.API within the FB.API. And they are not going to tell you abot it in the documentation.
As a workaround I simply use a UnityWebRequest like this:
IEnumerator UploadToPage(byte[] screenshot) {
var wwwForm = new WWWForm();
wwwForm.AddField("message", "herp derp. I did a thing! Did I do this right?");
wwwForm.AddBinaryData("image", screenshot, "Test.png");
string url = "https" + "://graph.facebook.com/"+ PageID + "/photos";
url += "?access_token=" + PageAccessToken;
using (UnityWebRequest www = UnityWebRequest.Post(url, wwwForm))
{
yield return www.Send();
if (www.isError)
{
Debug.Log(www.error);
}
else
{
Debug.Log("Form upload complete!");
}
}
Debug.Log(url);
}
In my main page I have a list of users and i'd like to choose and open a channel to chat with one of them.
I am thinking if use the id is the best way and control an access of a channel like USERID1-USERID2.
But of course, user 2 can open the same channel too, so I'd like to find something more easy to control.
Please, if you want to help me, give me an example in javascript using a firebase url/array.
Thank you!
A common way to handle such 1:1 chat rooms is to generate the room URL based on the user ids. As you already mention, a problem with this is that either user can initiate the chat and in both cases they should end up in the same room.
You can solve this by ordering the user ids lexicographically in the compound key. For example with user names, instead of ids:
var user1 = "Frank"; // UID of user 1
var user2 = "Eusthace"; // UID of user 2
var roomName = 'chat_'+(user1<user2 ? user1+'_'+user2 : user2+'_'+user1);
console.log(user1+', '+user2+' => '+ roomName);
user1 = "Eusthace";
user2 = "Frank";
var roomName = 'chat_'+(user1<user2 ? user1+'_'+user2 : user2+'_'+user1);
console.log(user1+', '+user2+' => '+ roomName);
<script src="https://getfirebug.com/firebug-lite-debug.js"></script>
A common follow-up questions seems to be how to show a list of chat rooms for the current user. The above code does not address that. As is common in NoSQL databases, you need to augment your data model to allow this use-case. If you want to show a list of chat rooms for the current user, you should model your data to allow that. The easiest way to do this is to add a list of chat rooms for each user to the data model:
"userChatrooms" : {
"Frank" : {
"Eusthace_Frank": true
},
"Eusthace" : {
"Eusthace_Frank": true
}
}
If you're worried about the length of the keys, you can consider using a hash codes of the combined UIDs instead of the full UIDs.
This last JSON structure above then also helps to secure access to the room, as you can write your security rules to only allow users access for whom the room is listed under their userChatrooms node:
{
"rules": {
"chatrooms": {
"$chatroomid": {
".read": "
root.child('userChatrooms').child(auth.uid).child(chatroomid).exists()
"
}
}
}
}
In a typical database schema each Channel / ChatGroup has its own node with unique $key (created by Firebase). It shouldn't matter which user opened the channel first but once the node (& corresponding $key) is created, you can just use that as channel id.
Hashing / MD5 strategy of course is other way to do it but then you also have to store that "route" info as well as $key on the same node - which is duplication IMO (unless Im missing something).
We decided on hashing users uid's, which means you can look up any existing conversation,if you know the other persons uid.
Each conversation also stores a list of the uids for their security rules, so even if you can guess the hash, you are protected.
Hashing with js-sha256 module worked for me with directions of Frank van Puffelen and Eduard.
import SHA256 from 'crypto-js/sha256'
let agentId = 312
let userId = 567
let chatHash = SHA256('agent:' + agentId + '_user:' + userId)
I'm writing an API for my Website. For Auth. i use ZfcUser. Is it possible to check the Login Data?. Like my API get per Post username/email and the password. Now i want to check if the username/email and password are correct. Also i want create a User in Code. But my problem is that the same password in ZfcUser has different hashs. I know that ZfcUser use Bycrypt but i don't know how the Cost is. In ZfcUser i found this Line:
$bcrypt->setCost($this->getOptions()->getPasswordCost());
ZfcUser: https://github.com/ZF-Commons/ZfcUser
mfg ternes3
I have found the solution by my self :D. The default Cost is 10. And it's possible to verify the Password with Bcrypt.
$bycrypt->verify($pass, $passhash);
You get a boolean with this method ;D
The second solution is:
$newUser = new User();
$newUser->user_id = '';
$newUser->email = '';
$password = ''
$bcrypt = new Bcrypt();
$bcrypt->setCost(10);
$newUser->password = $bcrypt->create($password);
$userT->saveUser($newUser);
mfg ternes3
I am trying to access a tweet conversation history using TweetSharp.
The requirement is like, if I use id of one tweet item it should
return me the whole thread that followed before that tweet item.
But could not find such method exposed through TwittertService, where
I can pass the current Tweet _id and get the conversation details.
I followed the following approach to get the collection (list) ie,
List<TwitterStatus> list = new List<TwitterStatus>();
private void GetReplied(TwitterStatus twitter, TwitterResponse twitterResponse)
{
if (twitter.InReplyToStatusId != null)
{
long statusID = (long)twitter.InReplyToStatusId;
this.ts.GetTweet(statusID, (twitterRecursive,
twitterResponseRecursive) =>
{
list.Add(twitterRecursive);
if (twitter.InReplyToStatusId != null)
{
this.GetReplied(twitterRecursive,
twitterResponseRecursive);
}
});
}
else
{
Debug.WriteLine(list.Count);
foreach (TwitterStatus status in list)
{
Debug.WriteLine(status.Text);
}
}
}
this.ts.GetTweet(<tweet Id>, twitterResponse) =>
{
list.Add(twitter);
this.GetReplied(twitter, twitterResponse);
});
Just wanted to have your advice, on that. Do we have any such method
with TweetSharp or any alternative approach can be implemented?
Really appreciate your help.
Yep, that's how you'll have to do it: start with a tweet and walk its in_reply_to_status_id chain.
One thing I do, although it may not be applicable to you, is check a local cache of tweets before fetching from Twitter to see if I already fetched the tweet being replied to.
As for libraries that make this easier, I don't know of any. Regardless of whether they expose a more streamlined method, under the covers they'll still have to perform the process that you implemented in your code.
To see how another library approached this task, take a look at this Twitterizer sample.