In the past I have used environment modules extensively in Unix based systems. The tool proved very usefull since we had many different projects each of them using a potentially different set of tools.
I am now however stuck with a windows machine and need to make the most of it. Does anybody know of a good alternative to environment modules for windows? I am basically looking for a tool that let's me manipulate the PATH (or $env:PATH in windows powershell) environment variable without having to touch it directly.
You can install environment modules on windows as well. The instructions are in the repository https://github.com/cea-hpc/modules/blob/master/INSTALL-win.txt
Basically you have to install active state tcl and copy the source files.
I use this and it works quite well.
Related
New to Emacs and recently been trying to get used to it. loving it so far!
One thing I cannot seem to figure out by myself nor find any proper examples of how to figure out to following workflow:
Since I work on multiple projects with different languages and like to keep my work and private projects separated as much as possible in my OS, ive been working with development containers using docker and VScode for the past years.
This allowed me to keep both my project dependencies and the development tools in one container, where i just attached my VScode instance to a project and used extensions such as Language servers / linting / debugging from within that container.
Currently I can open my projects in emacs as the code is local and mounted to the containers, but im looking for a way to either:
Allow my local emacs to use the language/linting/debugging services installed in the container.
Install emacs in the dev containers and mount my configs to keep this synchronized.
Or better alternatives?
Most valuable would be to get language servers working again.
In case it matters, i'm working in DOOM Emacs on Arch. Mostly Python, PHP and NodeJS projects.
... use the language/linting/debugging services installed in the container
By design this is difficult to do with Docker: by design the host system can't directly access files or binaries installed in a container. Without a lot of tricks around bind mounts and user IDs and paths and permissions it's very difficult to run a program in a container in a way that looks like it's on the host system. A couple of tools have those tricks built in, but it's not at all universal. (Jenkins for example generates about 5 lines' worth of docker run command options if you ask it to run a step inside a container.)
My Emacs experience has generally been much better using a host-based per-language version manager and per-project packaging tool (a per-project node_modules directory, rbenv plus Ruby gem sets, pipenv for Python programs, ...).
In short: Emacs can't use language servers, language interpreters, or other tools from Docker images instead of the host system (without writing a lot of Lisp (and if you do consider publishing it to MELPA (and also to GitHub))).
Most valuable would be to get language servers working again.
M-x lsp-install-server will download one of the language servers lsp-mode knows about and save it in your $HOME/.emacs directory. If you activate lsp-mode and it doesn't already have a language server for the current major mode, it will offer to download it for you. There's not much to "get working" usually.
I was wondering If any one could help me to understand the difference of python virtual environment and docker container.
So I would like to have environment for each tools isolating from each other to avoid dependency conflict for example: use of different version of same dependency causing error in one of the tool because one tool need older version and other one requires newer version.
I’m tested out python venv but not sure if it’s the right one I should use for the issue I just explained or docker is something I should be using for my situation?.
Particularly for day-to-day development, prefer a virtual environment if it's practical.
Virtual environment
Docker
Works with native tools; can just run python myscript.py
Requires Docker-specific setup
Every IDE and editor works fine with it
Requires Docker-specific IDE support
Can just open() data files with no special setup
Can't access data files without Docker-specific mount setup
Immediately re-run code after editing it
Re docker build image or use Docker-specific mount setup
Uses Python installation from host
Use any single specific version of Python
Isolated Python library tree
Isolated Python library tree
Uses host version of C library dependencies
Isolated C library dependencies
A virtual environment acts like a normal Python installation in an alternate path. You don't need to do special things to make your local code or data files available; you can just run your script directly or via your IDE. The one downside is that you're limited to what your host OS's package manager makes available for Python versions and C library dependencies.
A Docker container contains the filesystem of a complete OS, including a completely isolated Python installation. It can be a good match if you need a very specific version of Python or if you need host OS dependencies that are tricky to install. It can also be a good match if you're looking for a production-oriented deployment setup that doesn't specifically depend on installing things on to the target system. But, Docker by design makes it hard to access your host files; it is not a great match for a live development environment or especially for one-off scripts that read and write host files.
The other consideration here is, if you use the standard Python packaging tools, it's straightforward to run your program in a virtual environment, and converting that to a Docker image is almost boilerplate. Starting from Docker can make it tricky to go back the other way, and I see some setups around SO that can only be run via Docker; if they were restructured to use a standard setup.cfg/requirements.txt installation setup they would not require Docker but could still be used with it.
Our requirement is to create a container for legacy apps over docker.
We don't have the operating system support/application server support available, nor do we have knowledge to build them from scratch.
But we have a physical instance of the legacy app running in our farm.
We could get an ISO image from our server team if required, our question is if we get this ISO image can we export this as a docker image?
if yes, please let me know if there is any specific procedure or steps associated with it.
if no, please tell me why? and the possible workarounds for the same.
if we get this ISO image can we export this as a docker image?
I don't think there is an easy way (like push-the-export-button) to do this. Explanation follows...
You are describing a procedure taking place in the Virtual Machine world. You take a snapshot of a server, move the .iso file somewhere else and create a new VM that will run on a Hypervisor.
Containers are not VMs. They "contain" all the bytes that a service needs to run but not a whole operating system. They are supposed to run as processes on the host.
Workarounds:
You will have to get your hands dirty. This means that you will have to find out what the legacy app uses (for example Apache + PHP + MySql + app code) and build it from scratch with Docker.
Some thoughts:
containers are supposed to be lightweight. For example one might use one container for the database, another one for the Apache etc... Your case looks like you are moving towards a fat container that has everything inside.
Depending on what the legacy technology is, you might hit a wall... For example, if we are talking about something working with old php, mysql you might find ready-to-use images on hub.docker.com. But if the legacy app is a financial system written in cobol, I don't know what your starting point might be...
You will need to reverse engineer the application dependencies from the artifacts that you have in access to. This means recovering the language specific dependencies (whether python, java, php, node, etc). And any operating system level packages/dependencies that are required.
Essentially you are rebuilding the contents of that ISO image inside your docker file using OS package installation tools like apt, language level tools like pip, PECL, PEAR, composer, or maven, and finally the files that make up the app code.
So, for example: a PHP application might be dependent on having build-essential and php-mysql installed in the OS. Then the app may be dependent on packages like twig and monolog loaded through composer. If you are using SASS you may need to install ruby as well.
Your job is to track all these down and create a docker file that reproduces the iso image. If you are using a common stack like a J2EE app in tomcat, or a php app fronted by apache or ngnix, there will be base docker images that will get you most of the way to where you need to go.
It does look like there are some tools that can do this for you automatically: Dependency Walker equivalent for Linux?. I can't vouch for any of them. But you can also use command line tools. For example this will give you a list of all the user installed packages on a fedora system:
sudo dnf history userinstalled
When an app is using a dependency manager like composer or pip, there is usually a file that lists all the language specific dependencies.
At the end of the process you'll have a portable legacy app that can be easily deployed anywhere with a minimal footprint.
As one of the comments rightly points out, creating a VM from the ISO image is another way forward that will be much easier to accomplish. The application dependencies won't be explicit, but maybe that's ok for your use case.
I have a private server that I've been slowly setting up for personal projects, but I've run into a bit of a roadblock. My server is running Arch linux [I like bleeding edge and minimalistic installs in situations like this] and I have Jenkins running on it so that I can have it automatically build projects. I have a project that I've been working on that is currently targeting the Win32/64 platform using MSVC, but I can't seem to find any info anywhere about setting up a job on Jenkins for this situation. I was hoping that I could maybe setup a Docker instance that would be able to provide the MSVC toolchain, especially since Visual Studio Code is available for Linux, and that I could use that as part of my Jenkins setup to generate Win binaries for me to test on my main machine. I mention this because naturally, Visual Studio is not a command line utility, and currently my server is a pure headless setup that only provides cli interaction, so if possible, I would like to avoid directly adding GUI packages to the server, but if it is the only way, I'd be willing to do so. Is there really no way to achieve what I'm going for with this?
Sorry if this lacks important details or is formatted poorly, this is my first time asking a question here as it's very rare for me to not be able to find the info I'm looking for in an already existing question.
After research, this is not currently possible as it stems from a misunderstanding of exactly what docker provides. Docker simply uses the underlying OS to provide everything and does not provide any virtualization of foreign OSs. Without a version of the MSVC toolchain that can run on linux, or possibly the use of WINE, there is not a way to achieve this short of a VM. Since WINE is not perfect, the most reliable solution as it appears to me is the VM, but YMMV. The other advantage to using a VM is that I can keep the server headless.
I can't answer this question completely, but this topic is interesting to me too.
Note: Visual Studio Code is open-source, but that's an Electron-based editor. Visual Studio IDE and MSVC are proprietary Windows-only apps.
The website https://blog.sixeyed.com/how-to-dockerize-windows-applications/ suggests it's possible to dockerize Windows apps, including Visual Studio.
Docker images for Windows apps need to be based on microsoft/nanoserver or microsoft/windowsservercore, or on another image based on one of those.
Once you get that working, I'd use Visual Studio command-line builds, like devenv /build file.sln [optionally /project file.vcxproj ]. (https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/visualstudio/ide/reference/devenv-command-line-switches?view=vs-2017 ).
Note that the VS2017 installer does not function on Wine. I recently filed a bug for this (https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45749 followed by https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45757 ).
I personally use Appveyor for auto-building MSVC apps. Appveyor is a Windows-based centralized cloud service, not a self-hosted CI system.
I am completely new to programming and am trying to install Ruby on Windows (64 bit). I get to the config.yml message and cannot set up a command to get past this to full set up.
I have been doing research online and find many people say ruby and Windows are not compatible.
Can anyone help advise/send a link that is a good workaround?
Thanks,
You can install Ruby on Windows. Probably the easiest way to get started with Ruby on Windows is to use Ruby Installer. They support up to Ruby 2.2.3 at the moment.
If you are looking for an alternative workflow, you might consider running a Vagrant machine on Windows. This workflow is described here.
The workflow involves using your native environment to launch a virtual machine that more closely matches the one typically used to deploy your code. You get the benefits of the windowing system tools (Sublime Text, RubyMine, Notepad++, etc) with the benefits of running specs and code in an environment closer to a production environment.
You can run Ruby on Windows, if you have the correct dependencies/libraries installed.
The best way to do this (if new) is to download a pre-compiled version of Ruby, from RubyInstaller:
EXE installer
ZIP file
Choose one of the above; they provide you the ability to put the Ruby.exe executable on your system, which (if installing with ZIP), needs to be added to your system PATH var.
--
I can explain more if required. If you want specific responses, you need to provide specific points (IE the full error message for config.yml etc)