My question is, how should my Erlang app reliably find a binary in the priv directory, not just in production; when installed properly, but during common test?
I realised today when I added a travis-ci configuration to an old Erlang app and pushed it to git-hub, that the process by which it works locally for me, is a little more fragile than I thought. The travis-ci build failed because it, not unreasonably, checked out my repo into a directory named after the repo, which is of the form erlang-APP. Locally my app is in a directory called APP-VSN though.
The result of this is that a call to code:lib_dir(APP) returns a correct result during the common test run locally, but if I rename my current directory to erlang-APP instead of APP-VSN (or just APP works too) my local build fails, just like it does for travis-ci, because code:lib_dir(APP) returns {error,bad_name}. The behaviour as though .. is added to the library path for rebar ct.
Renaming my github repo from erlang-APP to APP resolves the travis-ci build failure... but knowing the build tests only pass depending on the name of the directory the repo is checked out into doesn't sit right with me.
One way could be to use a soft link (either in the repo under version control, or created when initializing the tests), and make your Erlang code path go via the link. E.g., "./APP" -> ".", or "./lib/APP" -> "..".
Related
For years I've been running a Docker container on my local machine and using it as a remote Python interpreter via SSH in PyCharm. This works great (though 2022.2.1 brought a lot of new bugs that have been slowly being ironed out) for running my code! I'm now on 2022.2.3.
However, I'm having issues running unit tests. In the past (i.e. before version 2022.2.1), I could simply right click my tests directory (a direct child of my main project directory) and click Run Python tests in test... and it would all work as expected.
Now, though, when I click this, I receive an error message about "No such file or directory."
I've tried everything I can think of- I've setup my path mappings in the Python test run config to exactly match those shown in my Python run config, and have tried every version of directory and subdirectory in the mappings and working directory, but I always receive an error about either having an empty test suite (no tests found), or that the directory "must be in the project."
It seems like no matter what I do, PyCharm is trying to create a temp directory somewhere, or is trying to read from some temp directory that I never specified, because I see errors this like:
AssertionError: /tmp/pycharm_project_405/docker/tests: No such file or directory
Yet I never created, specified, or requested a temp directory of any sort, let alone one named /tmp/pycharm_project_405/; this is a mystery to me.
PyCharm with an SSH interpreter is rapidly becoming unusable for me and my team because we cannot figure out how to set this up. Can anybody please offer some guidance on what we need to do?
Thank you all so very much!
I tried:
Changing run config for Python tests to match the working directory and path mapping of Python run configs (which work)
Directly specifying the path to the tests from the container's perspective
Setting up run config templates
Specifying one directory up/down from the actual tests
Expected:
Unit tests to be found and run as they were in previous versions of PyCharm
Answer
Create a run config for testing
In the testing run config, set Target: to Custom
Set the correct remote interpreter
Set Working directory to the test folder
Set TWO path mappings: 1) Map the code directory (in my case, the parent directory of the tests folder) and 2) Map the test directory itself
Voila!!!
We want to have the same VSCode settings for the whole crew of developers. Also it would be fine to have a oneline command to tear VSCode down and restart it from scratch with predefined settings and plugins so that you do not have to worry about trying out plugins and getting beck to the known state. Kind of Config-as-Code for VSCode.
I already found:
https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/editor/extension-gallery#_command-line-extension-management
https://github.com/microsoft/vscode-dev-containers
https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=Shan.code-settings-sync&ssr=false#qna
https://github.com/gantsign/ansible-role-visual-studio-code-extensions
https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/remote/containers
https://github.com/gantsign/ansible-role-visual-studio-code
But non of these provides a good solution to me
We are using Mac and Windows machines and develop most of the time locally (not remotely in the cloud or the like).
I imagine like having a script like
.... projectname up
or
.... projectname reset
(or
.... projectname down)
to receive/reset the configured settings and newest plugins that have been configured for the project.
Have any ideas or use a similar solution already?
After doing a lot of research, playing with Docker, Ansible and so on... it seems that although I excluded it at first the plugin Settings Sync Plugin from Shan Khan is the way to go. It has round about 1 million installs!
Only dependency - you need a GitHub account to host your configs. That is what held me back at first - but it should be not that much of a problem to get one for everyone in the team and connect it to like a company-github-account.
Copy the files settings.json and keybindings.json to your target machine(s) to copy the settings. You can find those files here:
Win: ~\AppData\Roaming\Code\User
Mac: ~/Library/Application Support/Code/User/
Linux: ~/.config/Code/User
You can copy extentions from ~/.vscode/extensions or C:\Users\username\.vscode\extensions from linux/mac or windows respectively.
FalcoGer's answer should explain how to copy the files in a way VS Code will pick them up. If you only need to copy the config files once, this solution would be fine.
If you need to "sync" these config files on a regular basis, I would advise to create a Git repository where all config files will be stored.
When cloning the repo to local machines, you can symlink the files to the config destinations (see FalcoGer's anwser). Then when you need to "sync", you only have to run git pull and restart VS Code to apply the changes.
For your other script-related question, you could create a CLI for this. Python would be the most friendly way to do this. You can find an example here.
I am trying to deploying my website on Netlify from my GitHub.
However I am stuck to the following error:
11:37:19 AM: failed during stage 'deploying site': Invalid filename 'node_modules/es5-ext/date/#/format.js'. Deployed filenames cannot contain # or ? characters
I tried to delete and upgrade the module es5-ext but the error persists.
I don't know if i'm too late to this but I just ran into this issues
here's what I did which fixed my issues
base directory : yourApps
build command : CI= npm run build
publish directory : yourApps/build
I used craco in my react apps because I needed it to work with Tailwind css , I don't know if this will work for you , but that solution worked for me
My first answer is a question: Why are you deploying your node_modules folder? That is generally not needed on static websites: they're used to build the site, but then not needed at runtime, since, well, "runtime" is just "send this file" not "run this code" on the Netlify CDN server. Perhaps you've set your "publish directory" wrong in the site's build & deploy settings and are deploying your source code too, rather than just the finished build?
In case you do for some reason need to deploy node_modules for some reason, you can in general do so. The message is quite clear - don't send filenames with # or ? in them. Those are not valid filenames per the HTTP spec - # is for designating anchors, and everything after the # is used client-side and thus won't map correctly to your file. ? is for denoting query string parameters and similarly won't work as you're intending to read the file whose name contains ? but rather cutting off the filename that the server will (attempt to) serve, before the ? character.
Up until now I've been using Xcode with Subversion for my code repositories with no problem. Now I'm working on a project that uses a Git repository stored at GitHub, so I figured I'd go clone that repository to my local machine and get started.
In Xcode, I add the repository then tell it to Clone -- The machine chews on this for a while, and if I use the Finder I can see the files being placed in the target directory (which is a newly-created, empty directory on my system). After a while though, I get an error message:
fatal: destination path '/Users/myname/Documents/ProjectName' already exists and is not an empty directory.
I have tried this three times now, each time starting with an empty target directory, and it gives the same error message each time, so I know it has to be something I am doing wrong, or have not set up properly.
Thinking that perhaps something was going wrong and the system was trying to do a second clone operation (to a now non-empty directory) I tried canceling and trying a build, but some files are missing from the project -- so not all of it made it down to my system.
My searches on this issue turn up several hits for people doing the clone via command line and showing this error message, but not through the Xcode interface.
Does anyone have any suggestions about what might be going wrong?
I'd like to know if there is any way to develop continuously with Trigger.io and avoid the forge build step with every file change I want to test in my browser or simulator.
I was faced with the same problem and I've got a working solution that uses watchr and watch to automatically rebuild each time I make a change to a source file. If you are running a "web" version of your app you can make a change to a source file and go directly to your browser and see the effect of your changes fairly quickly depending on how long the build takes.
Prerequisites: Ruby, watchr, Unix 'watch', and a terminal.
gem install watchr.
create a new ruby file for watchr to know what files to monitor and what to do when it sees a change. I named my file 'my_watch.rb': https://gist.github.com/3153167
open two terminals. Terminal 1 will run watchr and Terminal two will run 'forge build ...'.
In terminal 1 run 'watchr my_watch.rb' making sure the path to my_watch.rb is correct and make sure you've edited my_watch.rb according to your setup so that the path inside watch(...) reflects the files to be watched. My example watches all files in the same directory (and beneath) as the my_watch.rb script. You can place my_watch.rb in the 'src' folder of your Trigger.io app if you want to match my example and run watchr my_watch.rb directly from the src folder. Also not the shell command and path in the block need to be updated to reflect your environment. Again, in my example 'my_watch.rb' is inside 'src/' so when a change is detected we go up one directory and call 'forge build'.
I tend to develop actively with the 'web' version of my app so I can just open terminal 2 to my forge project directory and 'forge run web'. When I am testing in simulators and on devices, yes I have to run forge build every time I want to see a change. However, I typically don't have to wait for forge build to finish because watchr kicked off the build as soon as I made a change and it happens pretty quickly.
I know this is not an ideal solution but so far developing new features in the 'web' version first and then implementing in mobile versions has been very smooth for me. I've never needed to kill the 'web' version after a build but I maybe just lucky. As for running build each time you want to test the mobile versions if you are good with your keyboard shortcuts it really isn't bad at all. XCode makes you build and run after changes are made to source code when creating native iOS apps so I don't think Trigger is unique in requiring this build step.
I hope this helps and that my answer isn't too specific to me and my setup.
The build phase makes some changes to your source to enable the forge.* APIs - therefore, trying to just use the raw files in your src directory won't work.
You may be tempted to change files directly in the development directory, but this is a pretty bad idea: we delete those files with impunity when we need to!
We have plans on our medium-term roadmap to add a file-system watcher to start builds automatically when changes have occurred.
In the meantime, I just use forge build && forge run PLATFORM which tends to only take a few seconds...
while not perfect... this works for me.
go into development/web
rm src
link to your root src, ie ln -s ../../src src
copy the all.js from the web/forge and add to your index.html
ie
start nodemon web.js
open in browser.
note you will need to comment out the all.js script tag for non web builds.