I created a test case, added few test steps, and now, am populating test step results in Test Step Details tab after a test is run.
I am able to see the test step details tab with each test case details like description, expected result, passes/failed etc. But only if, it is a manual test case.
This tab doesn't appear for automated test case.
I referred to below link for achieving this -
https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/aseemb/2012/08/06/code-snippets-on-test-management-apis/
The test case steps are designed for manual test. In manual test, you need to run test according to steps and set the result manually.
But for automatic tests, it doesn't need to run test step by step, it runs automatically and the result is generated automatically. So there no step concept in automatic tests because your test method are the "steps" for this test case. That's why you can't see the test step results details in MTM.
Related
When Exporting Test plan , i get plenty of Test Suites with 0 Test cases .
Though Every one of those Test Suites have multiple Child Test Suites with Multiple Test cases each .
How am i able to include the Test cases from the Child Test Suite in the Exported Report ?
It works well in my side, the test case is located under corresponding test suite.
When you do the export through right click the test plan, please make sure you have selected selected suite+children and check the test cases with step option.
Update:
Simply select the test plan you want to export, and right click the test plan, select Export.
I have a TFS build definition setup to run the task "Visual Studio Test" using the Nunit3 Test Adapter. This runs successfully and publishes test results. However, neither the TestFixture name or the Test's Fully Qualified Name are available in the test reuslts. This makes it difficult to determine what exactly what test failed without using lengthy test names.
Is there a way to include the Test Fixture names in the published test results from the build?
Please refer to the Tests summary tab of your build. It shows the detail information of test results of your Nunit3 tests.
You could use the Filter to find out those Failed or Succeeded tests.
You could also click the link in the picture below to check detail data for this test run.
We recently added Coded UI Tests to our solution. The tests complete successfully when ran through Test Explorer but when the code is checked in and a build is triggered, all the CUIT's fail (error message is below).
I have gone to each of the links in the error message. The first one details how to set up a test agent to run the tests. We don't really need tests on all our environments as we are setting up a lab environment to run them and adding the test agent would require me submitting a ticket which would probably take months to get a response back, not to mention walking the person through what needs to be done.
The second link is dead and I'm pretty sure I don't want to change the build to be interactive.
I am hoping there is an easy way to change the build definition (which I have access to) so that it can ignore all Coded UI Tests but still run the Unit Tests. Is this possible? Is there an easier way of going about this? Each set of tests have their own project file, all Coded UI Tests in one project and all Unit Tests in another project.
Thanks in advance.
Here is the error that is on all of the coded UI tests:
Microsoft.VisualStudio.TestTools.UITest.Extension.UITestException: Microsoft.VisualStudio.TestTools.UITest.Extension.UITestException: To run tests that interact with the desktop, you must set up the test agent to run as an interactive process. For more information, see "How to: Set Up Your Test Agent to Run Tests That Interact with the Desktop" (http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=255012)
If you are running the tests as part of your team build, you must also set up the build agent to run as an interactive process. For more information, see "How to: Configure and Run Scheduled Tests After Building Your Application" (http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=254735).
One thing you can do is to group all the coded UI tests into a particular test category and exclude running those in the build. We do this with our "integration" tests and only choose to run our true unit tests for speed reasons.
See below link for how to use test categories:
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd286683.aspx
Also see the below for how to edit your build definition to only run the tests you want:
Excluding tests from tfs build
You can use use some naming patterns and combine that with the Test case Filter option in the execute test step:
https://jessehouwing.net/xaml-build-staged-execution-of-unit-tests/
Something like:
FullyQualifiedName ~ .Ui.
This would require the Ui tests to have .Ui in the namespace
When creating a test suite in selenium ide it is possible to let all test cases in a test suite run in a continuous manner and see results when finished. I'm looking into creating test suites in Microsoft test manager and possibly automating with the code with cuit, my question is, is it possible to run the tests one after another with no manual interaction, as from what I've seen so far, it seems you have to manually verify the test results in each step for MTM tests and manually verify the pass or fail status at the end of the test?
You can create a test case and tie an automated test case (Selenium/CUIT) to it in Visual Studio. This flips a flag in the test case work item to "automated", and allows you to automatically execute those test cases on test agents.
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd380741.aspx
I think I'm missing a link somewhere in how microsoft expect TFS and automated testing to work together. TFS allows us to create test cases that have test steps. These can be merged into a variety of test plans. I have this all setup and working as I would expect for manual testing.
I've now moved into automating some of these tests. I have created a new visual studio project, which relates to my test plan. I have created a test class that relates to the test case and planned to create a test method for each test step within the test class, using the ordertest to ensure that the methids are executed in the same order as the test steps.
I'd hoped that I could then link this automation up to the test case so that it could be executed as part of the test plan.
This is when it all goes wrong, It is my understanding that the association panel appears to only hook a test case up to a particular test method, not a test step?
Is my understanding correct?
Have MS missed a trick here and made things a litte too complicated or have I missed something? If I hook things upto a whole test case to a method I lose granulaity of what each is doing.
If each test step was hooked into a test method it would be possible for the assert of the test method to register a pass or fail of the overall test case.
Any help or direction so that I can improve my understanding would be appreciated.
The link is not obvious. In Visual Studio Team Explorer create and run a query to find the test case(s). Open the relevant test case and view the test automation section. On the right hand side of the test automation line there should be an ellipsis, click it and link to the test case.
I view this as pushing an automated test from Visual Studio. Confusingly you cannot pull an automated test into MTM.
You can link only one method to a test case. That one method should cover all the steps written in its associated test case including verification(assertions).
If it is getting impossible to cover all steps in one test method or if your have too many verifications is your test case, then the test case needs to be broken down to smaller test cases and each of the test cases will have one automated method associate with it.
Automation test should work like this. (Not a hard rule though..)
Start -> Do some action -> Verify (Assert) -> Finish
You can write as many assertions as possible, but if first assert fails then test won't proceed further to do other assertions. This is how manual testing also works, ie Test fails even if 1 step out of 100 fails.
For the sake of automation test maintainability it is advisable to add minimum asserts in automation test and easiest way to achieve this is by splitting the test case. Microsoft or other test automation provider works this way only and we don't write test methods for each and every steps. This would make things very complicated.
But yes, you can write reusable methods(not test methods) in your test framework for each steps and call them in your test methods. For example you don't have to write code for a test case step say "Application Login" again and again. You can write your method separately and call that in your test method which is linked to the test case.