I am using throttle concurrent build to run job in parallel. But I am not able to run the job in parallel. Only single build is triggered.
In Job configuration : selected Throttle Concurrent Builds and specified Maximum Total (ex:4)and/or Maximum Per Node(Ex:2)
selected “Execute concurrent build if possible” option also
I have one Master(2 Executors) and one Agent(2 Executors) in Jenkins.
Kindly help me to resolve this problem.
From the Throttle Concurrent Builds Plugin
It should be noted that Jenkins, by default, never executes the same
Job in parallel, so you do not need to actually throttle anything if
you go with the default. However, there is the option Execute
concurrent builds if necessary, which allows for running the same Job
multiple time in parallel, and of course if you use the categories
below, you will also be able to restrict multiple Jobs.)
So you need to check the box, which I think might be in the advance settings
Related
I want to run one job multiple times (each build with different parameters) on 2 executors.
I want to execute them based on their build priority value.
Unfortunately Priority Sorter plugin doesn't help in my case, it doesn't sort it correctly - my builds are being executed based on the timestamp they were added to the queue instead of priority.*
I believe this priority mechanism should be implemented before, on a queue level.
How to achieve that?
*-I tested it on the newest Jenkins version and the newest Priority Sorter plugin version
I think what you should try is Accelerated Build Now plugin. This plugin allows the Jenkins users to launch a build right there, even if the queue is long. It prioritises human launched jobs and brings them to the top.
The Priority Sorter I am using (v3.6.0 and Jenkins v.2.73.3) will not see a job unless you have enabled the Execute Concurrent builds if necessary.
So, allow parallel builds for that job and maybe decrease the number of cores to 1. See if that works. If not, you can try Throttle Concurrent Builds Plugin. This allows you to assign as many cores as you want in the specific job.
Here is a patch for Priority Queue plugin. For your case it could be this patch.
In my newly installed Jenkins, I have four jobs. I can only run two concurrently. If I trigger the build of a third job, it is set in the queue and triggered once one of the first two finishes.
I know my server can handle more than two concurrent jobs at a time. How can I increase this default threshold of two?
If it means anything, these are not build-a-deployable package kind of jobs but environment prep jobs that instantiate various DBs. So the jobs simply invoke a python script on the Jenkins server, which is the same script across multiple jobs but each job invokes it with different input params. The jobs are 100% independent of one another and do not share any resource except the script.
You go to Manage Jenkins --> Configure System, then change # of executors:
I want to use a lock in a workflow job in order to prevent jobs from running at the same time on the same node.
I want to use the functionality of the lock and latches plugin to control the parallel execution of jobs: When a Job A starts building on a specific node, Job B should wait until A is done, and then B can run.
How can I achieve that ? or is there another solution (in case locks are not supported in workflow jobs) ?
Thank you.
What exactly are you trying to prevent? The easiest way would be to set each node as having only 1 executor... If you do this, then the node will only ever run one job at a time. Note that some fly-weight tasks may run but generally these are non-significant and involve polling the remote SCM repository and such.
If you just mean within the same workflow, you can use various mix of the parallel step to split parallel sections and then combine the results.
This is not just another question about concurrent job execution in Jenkins. The problem I have is that there are several jobs that run independently from one another. When they finish it should be possible to run a manual job. The condition though is that all those automated jobs should be in successful state. Otherwise it should not be possible to run this manual job. It should also not be possible to run or even schedule run of this manual job if those other jobs are running.
I searched for the answer everywhere and checked every possible plugin that serves synchronization. But I did not figure it out how to solve the above problem.
IMHO the delivery pipeline plugin (see https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Delivery+Pipeline+Plugin for the download and http://www.infoq.com/articles/orch-pipelines-jenkins for a thorough description) could do what you want.
You can run a lot of jobs (in parallel or not), and when (and only when) they succeed another job (or more). You even can add manual steps (needing a button click when your pipeline may continue).
Everything is configurable - and quite stable at this moment.
No-one should be able to manually (or otherwise) start a job that is in "waiting state" for other jobs to finish.
Regarding this question:
Otherwise it should not be possible to run this manual job. It should also not be possible to run or even schedule run of this manual job if those other jobs are running.
You can use the Throttle Concurrent Builds Plugin and create a category which will include your automated jobs and the manual jobs.
If one automated job is running, it will be impossible to launch the manual jobs.
Regarding your first question, did you have a look to the Join plugin?
Cheers
https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Promoted+Builds+Plugin can also be option. Setup promotions in that way that manual approval is needed and build will not fail only if automated jobs are done.
We have designed our test jobs to some sort of "abstract" test jobs, that run according to a set of parameters. These jobs are triggered use "runner" jobs that simply trigger them with the correct parameters (mostly generated by matrix jobs).
When we run multiple "runners", that all they do is simply trigger the abstract jobs, they occupy much needed workers (especially when it is a matrix job, that creates multiple temporary "runner" jobs).
Is there a way to tell jenkins to not spend a worker on a job that only trigger other jobs, or trigger jobs within the same worker?
It depends on what you use to trigger the jobs
If you use Trigger/call builds on other projects action, it has an option to Block until the triggered projects finish their builds. If that is checked, the triggering parent job will remain running and waiting for the triggered job to finish (thus occupying at least 2 executors). However, if you keep that unchecked, it will launch the triggered job, and the triggering job will end soon after.
I want my builds to wait until triggered jobs are completed, for reporting purposes and such (I don't want that logic in the triggered jobs due to their abstract nature).
What I decided to do, since the triggering jobs are very lightweight, I restricted them all to the master. I allocated a large number of workers to the master, since they won't do much work and they will simply manage the triggering of other jobs.