We had given task as
Read an angle in degrees, and print the tan, cosec, sec, and cot values of that angle in the same order. To use via the rad() function, convert the angle from degrees to radians for the standard library functions.
For which we written code as
x = io.read()
radianVal = math.rad (x)
io.write(string.format("%.1f ", math.tan(radianVal)),"\n")
io.write(string.format("%.1f ", math.cosh(radianVal)),"\n")
io.write(string.format("%.1f ", math.sinh(radianVal)),"\n")
io.write(string.format("%.1f ", math.cos(radianVal)),"\n")
But output is not as expect, not sure where we went wrong
Run as Custom Input
30
Your Output (stdout)
0.6
1.1
0.5
0.9
Expected Output
0.57735026918963
2.0
1.1547005383793
1.7320508075689
Correct code which is working perfectly is
x = io.read()
function cot(radAngle)
return 1 / math.tan(radAngle)
end
function cosec(radAngle)
return 1 / math.sin(radAngle)
end
function sec(radAngle)
return 1 / math.cos(radAngle)
end
local radAngle = math.rad(x)
print(math.tan(radAngle))
print(cosec(math.rad(x)))
print(sec(math.rad(x)))
print(cot(math.rad(x)))
How can you expect to get the correct result if you calculate cosh(x) instead of csc(x)? You're using the hyperbolic cosine to calcuate the cosecant. I think it is obvious why your results are not accepted.
You use sinh(x) to calculate sec(x) and cos(x) to calculate cot(x).
You're confusing mathematical functions. That's not a Lua programming problem.
I suggest you spend a few hours on researching trigonometric functions.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trigonometric_functions
Such values are calcuated using the correct formula or function. Not by using any function of the math library that has a similar name.
cosh is deprecated since Lua 5.3 btw.
You can use math.tan to calculate the tangens of your angle.
For secant, cosecant and cotangens you'll have to implement your own functions.
Also note that the number of decimals might cause issue in result validation. Make sure it is ok to round to 1 decimal.
Example:
There is no function to calculate the cotangent of an angle. So we define one.
function cot(radAngle)
return 1 / math.tan(radAngle)
end
local radAngle = math.rad(30)
print("tan(30°):", math.tan(radAngle))
print("cot(30°):", cot(math.rad(30)))
->
tan(30°): 0.57735026918963
cot(30°): 1.7320508075689
I am using lua 5.3.2 and the following piece of code gives me an error:
string.format("%d", 1.16 * 100)
whereas the following line works fine
string.format("%d", 1.25 * 100)
This is probably related to this question but the failure depends on the floating point value. Given that, in my case, a local variable (v) holds the float value, and is generated by an expresson that produces a value between 0 and 2 rounded to 2 decimal places.
How can I modify the code to ensure this doesn't fail for any possible value of v ?
You can use math.floor to convert to integer and add +0.5 if you need to round it: math.floor(1.16 * 100 + 0.5). Alternatively, "%.0f" should have the desired effect as well.
Which is the best efficient way to round up a number and then truncate it (remove decimal places after rounding up)?
for example if decimal is above 0.5 (that is, 0.6, 0.7, and so on), I want to round up and then truncate (case 1). Otherwise, I would like to truncate (case 2)
for example:
232.98266601563 => after rounding and truncate = 233 (case 1)
232.49445450000 => after rounding and truncate = 232 (case 2)
232.50000000000 => after rounding and truncate = 232 (case 2)
There is no build-in math.round() function in Lua, but you can do the following:
print(math.floor(a+0.5)).
A trick that is useful for rounding at decimal digits other than whole integers is to pass the value through formatted ASCII text, and use the %f format string to specify the rounding desired. For example
mils = tonumber(string.format("%.3f", exact))
will round the arbitrary value in exact to a multiple of 0.001.
A similar result can be had with scaling before and after using one of math.floor() or math.ceil(), but getting the details right according to your expectations surrounding the treatment of edge cases can be tricky. Not that this isn't an issue with string.format(), but a lot of work has gone into making it produce "expected" results.
Rounding to a multiple of something other than a power of ten will still require scaling, and still has all the tricky edge cases. One approach that is simple to express and has stable behavior is to write
function round(exact, quantum)
local quant,frac = math.modf(exact/quantum)
return quantum * (quant + (frac > 0.5 and 1 or 0))
end
and tweak the exact condition on frac (and possibly the sign of exact) to get the edge cases you wanted.
To also support negative numbers, use this:
function round(x)
return x>=0 and math.floor(x+0.5) or math.ceil(x-0.5)
end
If your Lua uses double precision IEC-559 (aka IEEE-754) floats, as most do, and your numbers are relatively small (the method is guaranteed to work for inputs between -251 and 251), the following efficient code will perform rounding using your FPU's current rounding mode, which is usually round to nearest, ties to even:
local function round(num)
return num + (2^52 + 2^51) - (2^52 + 2^51)
end
(Note that the numbers in parentheses are calculated at compilation time; they don't affect runtime).
For example, when the FPU is set to round to nearest or even, this unit test prints "All tests passed":
local function testnum(num, expected)
if round(num) ~= expected then
error(("Failure rounding %.17g, expected %.17g, actual %.17g")
:format(num+0, expected+0, round(num)+0))
end
end
local function test(num, expected)
testnum(num, expected)
testnum(-num, -expected)
end
test(0, 0)
test(0.2, 0)
test(0.4, 0)
-- Most rounding algorithms you find on the net, including Ola M's answer,
-- fail this one:
test(0.49999999999999994, 0)
-- Ties are rounded to the nearest even number, rather than always up:
test(0.5, 0)
test(0.5000000000000001, 1)
test(1.4999999999999998, 1)
test(1.5, 2)
test(2.5, 2)
test(3.5, 4)
test(2^51-0.5, 2^51)
test(2^51-0.75, 2^51-1)
test(2^51-1.25, 2^51-1)
test(2^51-1.5, 2^51-2)
print("All tests passed")
Here's another (less efficient, of course) algorithm that performs the same FPU rounding but works for all numbers:
local function round(num)
local ofs = 2^52
if math.abs(num) > ofs then
return num
end
return num < 0 and num - ofs + ofs or num + ofs - ofs
end
Here's one to round to an arbitrary number of digits (0 if not defined):
function round(x, n)
n = math.pow(10, n or 0)
x = x * n
if x >= 0 then x = math.floor(x + 0.5) else x = math.ceil(x - 0.5) end
return x / n
end
For bad rounding (cutting the end off):
function round(number)
return number - (number % 1)
end
Well, if you want, you can expand this for good rounding.
function round(number)
if (number - (number % 0.1)) - (number - (number % 1)) < 0.5 then
number = number - (number % 1)
else
number = (number - (number % 1)) + 1
end
return number
end
print(round(3.1))
print(round(math.pi))
print(round(42))
print(round(4.5))
print(round(4.6))
Expected results:
3, 3, 42, 5, 5
I like the response above by RBerteig: mils = tonumber(string.format("%.3f", exact)).
Expanded it to a function call and added a precision value.
function round(number, precision)
local fmtStr = string.format('%%0.%sf',precision)
number = string.format(fmtStr,number)
return number
end
Should be math.ceil(a-0.5) to correctly handle half-integer numbers
Here is a flexible function to round to different number of places. I tested it with negative numbers, big numbers, small numbers, and all manner of edge cases, and it is useful and reliable:
function Round(num, dp)
--[[
round a number to so-many decimal of places, which can be negative,
e.g. -1 places rounds to 10's,
examples
173.2562 rounded to 0 dps is 173.0
173.2562 rounded to 2 dps is 173.26
173.2562 rounded to -1 dps is 170.0
]]--
local mult = 10^(dp or 0)
return math.floor(num * mult + 0.5)/mult
end
For rounding to a given amount of decimals (which can also be negative), I'd suggest the following solution that is combined from the findings already presented as answers, especially the inspiring one given by Pedro Gimeno. I tested a few corner cases I'm interested in but cannot claim that this makes this function 100% reliable:
function round(number, decimals)
local scale = 10^decimals
local c = 2^52 + 2^51
return ((number * scale + c ) - c) / scale
end
These cases illustrate the round-halfway-to-even property (which should be the default on most machines):
assert(round(0.5, 0) == 0)
assert(round(-0.5, 0) == 0)
assert(round(1.5, 0) == 2)
assert(round(-1.5, 0) == -2)
assert(round(0.05, 1) == 0)
assert(round(-0.05, 1) == 0)
assert(round(0.15, 1) == 0.2)
assert(round(-0.15, 1) == -0.2)
I'm aware that my answer doesn't handle the third case of the actual question, but in favor of being IEEE-754 compliant, my approach makes sense. So I'd expect that the results depend on the current rounding mode set in the FPU with FE_TONEAREST being the default. And that's why it seems high likely that after setting FE_TOWARDZERO (however you can do that in Lua) this solution would return exactly the results that were asked for in the question.
Try using math.ceil(number + 0.5) This is according to this Wikipedia page. If I'm correct, this is only rounding positive integers. you need to do math.floor(number - 0.5) for negatives.
If it's useful to anyone, i've hash-ed out a generic version of LUA's logic, but this time for truncate() :
**emphasized text pre-apologize for not knowing lua-syntax, so this is in AWK/lua mixture, but hopefully it should be intuitive enough
-- due to lua-magic alrdy in 2^(52-to-53) zone,
-- has to use a more coarse-grained delta than
-- true IEEE754 double machineepsilon of 2^-52
function trunc_lua(x,s) {
return \
((x*(s=(-1)^(x<-x)) \
- 2^-1 + 2^-50 \ -- can also be written as
\ -- 2^-50-5^0/2
- _LUAMAGIC \ -- if u like symmetric
\ -- code for fun
+ _LUAMAGIC \
) *(s) };
It's essentially the same concept as rounding, but force-processing all inputs in positive-value zone, with a -1*(0.5-delta) offset. The smallest delta i could attain is 2^-52 ~ 2.222e-16.
The lua-magic values must come after all those pre-processing steps, else precision-loss may occur. And finally, restore original sign of input.
The 2 "multiplies" are simply low-overhead sign-flipping. sign-flips 4 times for originally negative values (2 manual flips and round-trip to end of mantissa), while any x >= 0, including that of -0.0, only flips twice. All tertiary function calling, float division, and integer modulus is avoided, with only 1 conditional check for x<0.
usage notes :
(1) doesn't perform checks on input for invalid or malicious payload,
(2) doesn't use quickly check for zero,
(3) doesn't check for extreme inputs that may render this logic moot, and
(4) doesn't attempt to pretty format the value
if not exist math.round
function math.round(x, n)
return tonumber(string.format("%." .. n .. "f", x))
end
Even though Lua does not differentiate between floating point numbers and integers, there are some cases when you want to use integers. What is the best way to covert a number to an integer if you cannot do a C-like cast or without something like Python's int?
For example when calculating an index for an array in
idx = position / width
how can you ensure idx is a valid array index? I have come up with a solution that uses string.find, but maybe there is a method that uses arithmetic that would obviously be much faster. My solution:
function toint(n)
local s = tostring(n)
local i, j = s:find('%.')
if i then
return tonumber(s:sub(1, i-1))
else
return n
end
end
You could use math.floor(x)
From the Lua Reference Manual:
Returns the largest integer smaller than or equal to x.
Lua 5.3 introduced a new operator, called floor division and denoted by //
Example below:
Lua 5.3.1 Copyright (C) 1994-2015 Lua.org, PUC-Rio
>12//5
2
More info can be found in the lua manual
#Hofstad is correct with the math.floor(Number x) suggestion to eliminate the bits right of the decimal, you might want to round instead. There is no math.round, but it is as simple as math.floor(x + 0.5). The reason you want to round is because floats are usually approximate. For example, 1 could be 0.999999996
12.4 + 0.5 = 12.9, floored 12
12.5 + 0.5 = 13, floored 13
12.6 + 0.5 = 13.1, floored 13
local round = function(a, prec)
return math.floor(a + 0.5*prec) -- where prec is 10^n, starting at 0
end
why not just use math.floor()? it would make the indices valid so long as the numerator and denominator are non-negative and in valid ranges.
I need a base converter function for Lua. I need to convert from base 10 to base 2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11...36 how can i to this?
In the string to number direction, the function tonumber() takes an optional second argument that specifies the base to use, which may range from 2 to 36 with the obvious meaning for digits in bases greater than 10.
In the number to string direction, this can be done slightly more efficiently than Nikolaus's answer by something like this:
local floor,insert = math.floor, table.insert
function basen(n,b)
n = floor(n)
if not b or b == 10 then return tostring(n) end
local digits = "0123456789ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ"
local t = {}
local sign = ""
if n < 0 then
sign = "-"
n = -n
end
repeat
local d = (n % b) + 1
n = floor(n / b)
insert(t, 1, digits:sub(d,d))
until n == 0
return sign .. table.concat(t,"")
end
This creates fewer garbage strings to collect by using table.concat() instead of repeated calls to the string concatenation operator ... Although it makes little practical difference for strings this small, this idiom should be learned because otherwise building a buffer in a loop with the concatenation operator will actually tend to O(n2) performance while table.concat() has been designed to do substantially better.
There is an unanswered question as to whether it is more efficient to push the digits on a stack in the table t with calls to table.insert(t,1,digit), or to append them to the end with t[#t+1]=digit, followed by a call to string.reverse() to put the digits in the right order. I'll leave the benchmarking to the student. Note that although the code I pasted here does run and appears to get correct answers, there may other opportunities to tune it further.
For example, the common case of base 10 is culled off and handled with the built in tostring() function. But similar culls can be done for bases 8 and 16 which have conversion specifiers for string.format() ("%o" and "%x", respectively).
Also, neither Nikolaus's solution nor mine handle non-integers particularly well. I emphasize that here by forcing the value n to an integer with math.floor() at the beginning.
Correctly converting a general floating point value to any base (even base 10) is fraught with subtleties, which I leave as an exercise to the reader.
you can use a loop to convert an integer into a string containting the required base. for bases below 10 use the following code, if you need a base larger than that you need to add a line that mapps the result of x % base to a character (usign an array for example)
x = 1234
r = ""
base = 8
while x > 0 do
r = "" .. (x % base ) .. r
x = math.floor(x / base)
end
print( r );