In my model subject.rb i have the following defined
has_many :tutors, through: :profiles
def self.search(param)
where("name like ?", "%#{param}%")
end
So something like Subject.search("English") works perfectly fine in rails console.
What i would like to know is that if i do subject = Subject.first and i can do stuff like subject.id and it returns the subject ID to me.
Whereas when i do subject = Subject.search("English") i am unable to do something like subject.id
Because i'm trying to link the search function to my tutor.rb model with the following code.
def self.subject_search(s)
#tutor = Tutor.all
#tutor.each do |x|
y = x.subjects.search(s)
unless y.empty?
return x
end
end
end
Which works but only returns one Tutor and not all Tutors that have the subject.
I also tried this instead
def self.subject_search(s)
#subject = Subject.search(s)
if #subject
#subject.tutors
end
end
But thats when i realised #subject.tutors doesn't work, as explained above, if i do subject = Subject.search("English") i can't manipulate subject with any methods.
What am i doing wrongly?
Using a #where returns an array of objects meeting the criteria.
Subject.search('Math') => ['Math1', 'Math2', 'Math3'] # Objects of course
In your case, you should be doing Subject.find_by_name('English') which returns the first object satisfying your query. Then you can call #tutors on your Subject model assuming you have the method defined.
If you do have to use the like operator no matter what (which I do not recommend), here's what will happen.
s = Subject.search('En') # => ['English', 'Environmental Science', ..]
s.tutors # => Undefined method tutors for Array class
Here, s is an array of Subject models rather than a singular Subject which is the reason why its not working. You either need something to narrow it down more or loop through it which is probably not what you want anyway.
Related
I have a model in ruby on rails with the below code, which uses a singelton class definition. Also, som metaprogramming logic. But, I don't understand when this code will invoke.Is it when an attribute below specified is editing?
class Product < ApplicationRecord
class << self
['cat_no', 'effort', 'impact', 'effect', 'feedback'].each do |attr|
define_method "update_#{attr}" do |pr, count, user_id|
pr.order=pr.cat_no
pr.idea=pr.description
pr.update("#{attr}"=>count,:last_modified_by=>user_id)
end
end
end
end
Please help.
Thanks
This code generates five methods, one for each attribute name in the list. All these generated methods take three arguments and will basically look like this (I use the impact attribute name as an example):
def self.update_impact(pr, count, user_id)
pr.order = pr.cat_no
pr.idea = pr.description
pr.update("impact" => count, :last_modified_by => user_id)
end
That means there are five methods generated that update the passed in pr with some data from itself and with a count and a user_id.
Note that this method only deals with a specific pr therefore it is certainly better to use an instance instead of a class method as Stefan already suggested in his comment. And IMO there is not really a benefit in meta-programming here. I would change the logic to
def update_count(type, count, user_id) # or any another name that makes sense in the domain
if type.in?(%i[cat_no effort impact effect feedback])
update(
:order => cat_no,
:idea => description,
:last_modified_by => user_id,
type => count
)
else
raise ArgumentError, "unsupported type '#type'"
end
end
and call it instead of
Model.update_impact(pr, count, user_id)
like this
pr.update_count(:impact, count, user_id)
message and user. my message belongs_to user and user has_many messages.
in one of my views, i call something like
current_user.home_messages?
and in my user model, i have...
def home_messages?
Message.any_messages_for
end
and lastly in my message model, i have
scope :any_messages_for
def self.any_messages_for
Message.where("to_id = ?", self.id).exists?
end
ive been trying to get the current_users id in my message model. i could pass in current_user as a parameter from my view on top but since im doing
current_user.home_messages?
i thought it would be better if i used self. but how do i go about referring to it correctly?
thank you.
You could use a lambda. In your Message model:
scope :any_messages_for, lambda {|user| where('user_id = ?', user.id)}
This would work like so:
Message.any_messages_for(current_user)
And you could add a method to your user model to return true if any messages are found. In this case you use an instance method and pass in the instance as self:
def home_messages?
return true if Message.any_messages_for(self)
end
But really, I'd just do something like this in the User model without having to write any of the above. This uses a Rails method that is created when declaring :has_many and :belongs_to associations:
def home_messages?
return true if self.messages.any?
end
You can do either of the following
def self.any_messages_for(id) #This is a class method
Message.where("to_id = ?", id).exists?
end
to call above method you have to do
User.any_messages_for(current_user.id) #I am assuming any_messages_for is in `User` Model
OR
def any_messages_for #This is a instance method
Message.where("to_id = ?", self.id).exists?
end
to call above method you have to do
current_user.any_messages_for
This stuff in your Message class doesn't make a lot of sense:
scope :any_messages_for
def self.any_messages_for
Message.where("to_id = ?", self.id).exists?
end
The scope macro defines a class method on its own and there should be another argument to it as well; also, scopes are meant to define, more or less, a canned set of query parameters so your any_messages_for method isn't very scopeish; I think you should get rid of scope :any_messages_for.
In your any_messages_for class method, self will be the class itself so self.id won't be a user ID and so it won't be useful as a placeholder value in your where.
You should have something more like this in Message:
def self.any_messages_for(user)
where('to_id = ?', user.id).exists?
# or exists?(:to_id => user.id)
end
And then in User:
def home_messages?
Message.any_messages_for(self)
end
Once all that's sorted out, you can say current_user.home_messages?.
I'm new to Ruby and I'm trying to create a model where collections are assembled if they do not exist.
I already overloaded individual attributes like so:
class My_class < ActiveRecord::Base
def an_attribute
tmp = super
if tmp
tmp
else
#calculate this and some similar, associated attributes, for example:
self.an_attribute = "default" #{This does work as it is calling an_attribute=() }
self.an_attribute
end
end
end
test = My_class.new
p test.an_attribute # => "default"
This works great and basically gives me ||= functionality.
So, without thinking, I went and wrote myself a pretty big function to do the same with a collection (i.e. if there are no objects in the collection, then go and work out what they should be)
class My_class < ActiveRecord::Base
def things
thngs = super
if thngs.empty? #we've got to assemble the this collection!
self.other_things.each do |other_thing| #loop through the other things
#analysis of the other_things and creation and addition of things
self.things << a_thing_i_want
end
else #just return them
thngs
end
end
end
test = My_class.new
test.other_things << other_thing1
test.other_things << other_thing2
p test.things # => METHOD ERROR ON THE 'super' ARGH FAIL :(
This fails unfortunately. Any ideas for solutions? I don't think extensions are the right solution here
Attempted so far:
super --> 'method_missing': super: no superclass method
self[:things] --> test.things.each generates a nilClass error
Potential solution:
Would be rename the table column and has_many association from things to priv_things. This would allow me to simply create the things method and use self.priv_things instead of super
I have a table with data that needs to be updated at run-time by additional data from an external service. What I'd like to do is something like this:
MyModel.some_custom_scope.some_other_scope.enhance_with_external_data.each do |object|
puts object.some_attribute_from_external_data_source
end
Even if I can't use this exact syntax, I would like the end result to respect any scopes I may use. I've tried this:
def self.enhance_with_external_data
external_data = get_external_data
Enumerator.new do |yielder|
# mimick some stuff I saw in ActiveRecord and don't quite understand:
relation.to_a.each do |obj|
update_obj_with_external_data(obj)
yielder.yield(obj)
end
end
end
This mostly works, except it doesn't respect any previous scopes that were applied, so if I do this:
MyModel.some_custom_scope.some_other_scope.enhance_with_external_data
It gives back ALL MyModels, not just the ones scoped by some_custom_scope and some_other_scope.
Hopefully what I'm trying to do makes sense. Anyone know how to do it, or am I trying to put a square peg in a round hole?
I figured out a way to do this. Kind of ugly, but seems to work:
def self.merge_with_extra_info
the_scope = scoped
class << the_scope
alias :base_to_a :to_a
def to_a
MyModel.enhance(base_to_a)
end
end
the_scope
end
def self.enhance(items)
items.each do |item|
item = add_extra_item_info(item)
end
items
end
What this does is add a class method to my model - which for reasons unknown to me seems to also make it available to ActiveRecord::Relation instances. It overrides, just for the current scope object, the to_a method that gets called to get the records. That lets me add extra info to each record before returning. So now I get all the chainability and everything like:
MyModel.where(:some_attribute => some_value).merge_with_extra_info.limit(10).all
I'd have liked to be able to get at it as it enumerates versus after it's put into an array like here, but couldn't figure out how to get that deep into AR/Arel.
I achieved something similar to this by extending the relation:
class EnhancedModel < DelegateClass(Model)
def initialize(model, extra_data)
super(model)
#extra_data = extra_data
end
def use_extra_data
#extra_data.whatever
end
end
module EnhanceResults
def to_a
extra_data = get_data_from_external_source(...)
super.to_a.map do |model_obj|
EnhancedModel.new(model_obj, extra_data)
end
end
end
models = Model.where('condition')
models.extend(EnhanceResults)
models.each do |enhanced_model|
enhanced_model.use_extra_data
end
I understand my question is a bit vague but I don't know how else to describe it. I've asked in numerous places and no one seems to understand why I want to do this. But please bear with me, and I'll explain why I want something like this.
I'm using Liquid Templates to allow users to make some dynamic pages on my site. And for those that don't know, Liquid uses a class of theirs called LiquidDrop to expose certain items to the user. Any method in the drop can be called by the Liquid template.
class PageDrop < Liquid::Drop
def initialize(page)
#page = page
end
def name
#page.name
end
def children
PagesDrop.new(#page.children)
end
end
class PagesDrop < Liquid::Drop
def initialize(pages)
#pages = pages
end
def group_by
GroupByDrop.new(#pages)
end
def all
#pages.all
end
def size
#pages.size
end
end
For example, I want to be able to do this:
#page_drop = PageDrop.new(#page)
#page_drop.children # to get an array of children
instead of
#page_drop.children.all
Why do I have a pages drop?
Because I want to be able to cleanly split up the methods I can do to an array of pages, and methods I can do to a single page. This allows me to group pages like so:
#page_drop.children.group_by.some_method_here_that_the_group_drop_contains
To make it simpler for my users, I don't want them to have to think about adding "all" or not to a drop instance to get the "default" object/s that it contains. To reiterate:
#pages_drop = PagesDrop.new(Page.all)
#pages_drop == #pages_drop.pages #I want this to be true, as well as
#pages_drop == #pages_drop.all
Where did I get this idea?
In Rails, a scope (association object) (#person.friends) seems to return the array when you do certain things to it: #person.friends.each, for person in #person.friends
This isn't really possible. When you write #instance you aren't really calling an instance as you describe, you're getting a reference to the object that #instance refers to.
The reason it seems to work with the collections for Rails' associations is that the the association objects are instances of Array that have had some of their methods overridden.
I would consider removing PagesDrop and using the group_by(&:method) syntax if you want a concise way to express groupings. If you do want to keep it then you can get some way towards what you want by implementing each and [] on PagesDrop and having them delegate to #pages. That will let you use #page_drop.children in for loops, for instance.
It looks like you want to implement has_many outside of rails. Will the following work?
class PageDrop < Liquid::Drop
attr_accessor :children
def initialize(page)
#page = page
#children = []
end
def name
#page.name
end
end
This allows you to do the following:
#page_drop = PageDrop.new(#page)
#page_drop.children.size # => 0
#page_drop.children # => []
This also gives you all the standard array functions (group_by, size, each, etc). If you want to add your own methods, create a class that inherits from Array and add your methods there.
class PageArray < Array
def my_method
self.each{|a| puts a}
end
end
class PageDrop < Liquid::Drop
attr_accessor :children
def initialize(page)
#page = page
#children = PageArray.new
end
[...]
end
#page_drop = PageDrop.new(#page)
#page_drop.children.size # => 0
#page_drop.children # => []
#page_drop.children.my_method # Prints all the children
Then any functions you don't define in PageArray fall through to the Ruby Array methods.