I am trying to create nodes of a specific type with properties which can be dynamic .
For Example : I can create a Person node with name,age,address properties. But these need not be the only properties when I create another Person node. This node can have name,age,address and an additional property salary. Using spring data or query DSL needs me to create Java POJO class Person with fixed number of instance variables name,age and address .
#NodeEntity
public class Person {
#GraphId private Long id;
private String name;
private String age;
private String address;
}
I cannot add a dynamic property for salary for another Person node. Is there a way I can achieve this ?
Dynamic properties are not supported in Neo4j-OGM at the moment (see https://jira.spring.io/browse/DATAGRAPH-555)
If you only interact with your graph via the OGM and do not have to query on individual dynamic properties, you could try a Map of properties with a custom Converter, that converts this Map to a String (like json). The OGM will then use this converter to serialize the map to and from the graph.
Note that because the values are squashed into a String, it is now not trivial to query on an individual dynamic property.
To create a custom converter you need to implement org.neo4j.ogm.typeconversion.AttributeConverter and provide the implementation to convert from a Map to String.
Then, annotate your map property in your domain entity like this:
#Convert(MoneyConverter.class)
Edit:
As pointed out by Michael, if the salary is the only extra optional property, then it makes sense to have this property but set it only when it has a value. Dynamic properties are overkill in this case. You may want to use dynamic properties when you have an unknown and arbitrary set of properties to be persisted with the node
You can workaround the limitations by creating a CompositeAttributeConverter saving each dynamic property in the graph (not only as JSON-String wich cannot be queried well - as mentioned by luanne in the accepted answer)
import java.lang.reflect.Field;
import java.util.*;
import org.neo4j.ogm.typeconversion.CompositeAttributeConverter;
public abstract class DynamicPropertiesConverter implements CompositeAttributeConverter<Map<String, ?>> {
private Set<String> blacklist;
public DynamicPropertiesConverter(Class<?> clazz) {
blacklist = new HashSet<>();
addAllFields(clazz);
}
public DynamicPropertiesConverter(Set<String> blacklist) {
this.blacklist = blacklist;
}
public void addAllFields(Class<?> type) {
for (Field field : type.getDeclaredFields()) {
blacklist.add(field.getName());
}
if (type.getSuperclass() != null) {
addAllFields(type.getSuperclass());
}
}
#Override
public Map<String, ?> toGraphProperties(Map<String, ?> value) {
Map<String, ?> result = new HashMap<>(value);
result.keySet().removeAll(blacklist);
return result;
}
#Override
public Map<String, ?> toEntityAttribute(Map<String, ?> value) {
return toGraphProperties(value);
}
}
Now you can create a special version of this converter:
public class DynamicNodePropertiesConverter extends DynamicPropertiesConverter {
public DynamicNodePropertiesConverter() {
super(Node.class);
}
}
And use it like this:
import java.util.Map;
import DynamicNodePropertiesConverter;
import org.neo4j.ogm.annotation.NodeEntity;
import org.neo4j.ogm.annotation.Relationship;
import org.neo4j.ogm.annotation.typeconversion.Convert;
#NodeEntity
public class Node {
#Convert(DynamicNodePropertiesConverter.class)
private Map<String, Object> data;
/* getter and setter */
}
Related
I am using Spring Data Neo4j RX. And I have a query like this:
#Query("MATCH (a:Repo)-[:REPO_DEPEND_ON]->(b:Repo) WHERE a.name= $name RETURN a.name, b.name")
String[] getSingleRepoDependencyTo(String name);
I know the return type is wrong here, as it cannot be a String array. But how can I get the result properly, which contains two fields?
I have searched online for a long time but cannot find an answer. The "#QueryResult" annotation is not supported in this RX version yet.
Thanks for your help.
Assuming that you have a mapped #Node Repo with its relationships like
#Node
public class Repo {
// other things
String name;
#Relationship("REPO_DEPEND_ON") Repo repo;
}
and defining this method in a ...extends Neo4jRepository<Repo,...>,
you could use Projections.
public interface RepoProjection {
String getName();
DependingRepo getRepo();
/**
* nested projection
*/
interface DependingRepo {
String getName();
}
}
Important to keep in mind that the returned values should be the nodes and relationship to make it work this way.
You could also remove the custom query and do something like:
RepoProjection findByName(String name)
if you do not have the need for a findByName in this repository for the entity itself.
Take a look here: https://neo4j.github.io/sdn-rx/current/#projections.interfaces
It seems to list exactly what you want. From those docs:
interface NamesOnly {
String getFirstName();
String getLastName();
}
interface PersonRepository extends Neo4jRepository<Person, Long> {
List<NamesOnly> findByFirstName(String firstName);
}
There are some other variations too.
You can use annotation #QueryResult on your expected model. For instance you can do that in this way.
DTO:
import org.springframework.data.neo4j.annotation.QueryResult;
#QueryResult
public class SomeDto {
private int someInt;
private SomeObject sobj;
private double sdouble;
private AnotherObject anObj;
//getters setters
}
Neo4jRepository:
public interface DomainObjectRepository extends Neo4jRepository<DomainObject, Long> {
#Query("MATCH(n:SomeTable) RETURN someInt, sobj, sdouble, anObj") //Return a few columns
Optional<SomeDto> getSomeDto();
}
I have a class (OmeletteMaker) that contains an injected field (Vegetable). I would like to write a producer that instantiates an injected object of this class. If I use 'new', the result will not use injection. If I try to use a WeldContainer, I get an exception, since OmeletteMaker is #Alternative. Is there a third way to achieve this?
Here is my code:
#Alternative
public class OmeletteMaker implements EggMaker {
#Inject
Vegetable vegetable;
#Override
public String toString() {
return "Omelette: " + vegetable;
}
}
a vegetable for injection:
public class Tomato implements Vegetable {
#Override
public String toString() {
return "Tomato";
}
}
main file
public class CafeteriaMainApp {
public static WeldContainer container = new Weld().initialize();
public static void main(String[] args) {
Restaurant restaurant = (Restaurant) container.instance().select(Restaurant.class).get();
System.out.println(restaurant);
}
#Produces
public EggMaker eggMakerGenerator() {
return new OmeletteMaker();
}
}
The result I get is "Restaurant: Omelette: null", While I'd like to get "Restaurant: Omelette: Tomato"
If you provide OmeletteMaker yourself, its fields will not be injected by the CDI container. To use #Alternative, don't forget specifying it in the beans.xml and let the container instantiate the EggMaker instance:
<alternatives>
<class>your.package.path.OmeletteMaker</class>
</alternatives>
If you only want to implement this with Producer method then my answer may be inappropriate. I don't think it is possible (with standard CDI). The docs says: Producer methods provide a way to inject objects that are not beans, objects whose values may vary at runtime, and objects that require custom initialization.
Thanks Kukeltje for pointing to the other CDI question in comment:
With CDI extensions like Deltaspike, it is possible to inject the fields into an object created with new, simply with BeanProvider#injectFileds. I tested this myself:
#Produces
public EggMaker eggMakerProducer() {
EggMaker eggMaker = new OmeletteMaker();
BeanProvider.injectFields(eggMaker);
return eggMaker;
}
I'm currently trying to create a GlobalExtension for my Geb-Spock framework. So far here is my extension:
class OnFailureListener extends AbstractRunListener {
private final String id
private final SauceREST sauceREST
public OnFailureListener(String id, String username, String accessKey) {
this.id = id
this.sauceREST = new SauceREST(username, accessKey)
}
def void error(ErrorInfo error) {
println error;
this.sauceREST.updateJobInfo(this.sessionIdProvider.getSessionId(), "failed")
}
}
class ResultExtension extends AbstractGlobalExtension {
protected final String username = System.getenv("SAUCE_USERNAME")
protected final String accesskey = System.getenv("SAUCE_ACCESS_KEY")
protected final String sessionId
#Override
void visitSpec(SpecInfo specInfo) {
specInfo.addListener(new OnFailureListener(sessionId, username, accesskey))
}
}
My issue is that the sesssionId value gets assigned in the GebSpec base class I'm using for other specs, and cannot be assigned directly in the extension class. Beyond using some gnarly reflection approaches, is there a way to access the sessionId value assigned in the base class in the extension? I'd also like to avoid using an AnnotationExtension since I'd like to apply this globally without modifying any spec code (similar to a JUnit TestWatcher pattern).
The easiest way for you would be to write the sessionId into a shared ThreadLocal that can be accessed by your listener and the spec, otherwise you'll have to implement an org.spockframework.runtime.extension.IMethodInterceptor so that you can gain access to the actual test instance to extract the field value.
I'm having a problem querying based on an Enum property of my NodeEntity.
The NodeEntity in question is defined:
#NodeEntity(label = "Entity")
public class MyEntity {
#GraphId
private Long internalId;
....
private State state;
#Transient
public enum State {
STATEONE, STATETWO, STATETHREE
}
....
It saves without a problem, the state Enum represented perfectly, and I can query using other properties (Strings) with no problem at all. However the problem is the following query in a repository:
#Query("MATCH (entity:Entity {state:{0}})" +
"RETURN entity")
List<MyEntity> findByState(MyEntity.State state)
i.e. find all entities with the given state.
There's no exception, however using this simply returns a List of 0 Entities.
I've tried all kinds of variations on this, using a WHERE clause for example, with no luck.
The Entities are persisted properly, using findAll() in the same test returns the expected List of Entities with their states exactly as I would expect.
Any thoughts?
Not quite sure what the value #Transient adds to the enum. It is anyway not persistable as a node or relationship in Neo4j. It is sufficient to define the field as one that should persist with
private State state;
and leave off the #Transient annotation from the enum.
With it, SDN ignores the field sent to the derived query.
However, if you have a good reason to mark the enum #Transient, please do share it and we'll re-visit this case.
There is a general problems using spring data rest interface to search on enum fields. Just using the enum-to-string converter cannot work for search where you want to find if the value is IN a collection of values:
public interface AppointmentRepository extends Neo4jRepository<Appointment, Long> {
Page<Appointment> findByDayOfWeekIn(#Param("days") List<DayOfWeek> days, Pageable pageable);
}
The above does not work out of the box because neo4j will try to convert a List to your property type: DayOfWeek
In order to work around this I needed a custom converter that handles both requests providing collection of values (the search) and single values (the normal read and write entity):
#SuppressWarnings({ "unchecked", "rawtypes" })
public abstract class SearchQueryEnumConverter<T extends Enum> {
private Class<T> enumType;
public SearchQueryEnumConverter() {
enumType = (Class<T>) ((ParameterizedType) this.getClass()).getActualTypeArguments();
}
public Object toGraphProperty(Object value) {
if (Collection.class.isAssignableFrom(value.getClass())) {
List<T> values = (List<T>) value;
return values.stream().map(Enum::name).collect(Collectors.toList());
}
return ((Enum) value).name();
}
public Object toEntityAttribute(Object value) {
if (Collection.class.isAssignableFrom(value.getClass())) {
List<String> values = (List<String>) value;
return values.stream().map(v -> (T) T.valueOf(enumType, v)).collect(Collectors.toList());
}
return (T) T.valueOf(enumType, value.toString());
}
}
The abstract converter can be reified by all enums, and used as parameter of the #Convert annotation:
public enum EnumType {
VALUE_A, VALUE_B;
public static class Converter extends SearchQueryEnumConverter<EnumType> implements AttributeConverter {
}
}
#NodeEntity
public Entity {
#Property
#Convert(EnumType.Converter.class)
EnumType type;
}
I'm new to Guice and here is a naive question. I learned that we could bind String to a particular value through:
bind(String.class)
.annotatedWith(Names.named("JDBC URL"))
.toInstance("jdbc:mysql://localhost/pizza");
But what if I want to bind String to any possible characters?
Or I think it could be described this way:
How can I replace "new SomeClass(String strParameter)" with Guice?
You first need to annotate the constructor for SomeClass:
class SomeClass {
#Inject
SomeClass(#Named("JDBC URL") String jdbcUrl) {
this.jdbcUrl = jdbcUrl;
}
}
I prefer to use custom annotations, like this:
class SomeClass {
#Inject
SomeClass(#JdbcUrl String jdbcUrl) {
this.jdbcUrl = jdbcUrl;
}
#Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
#Target({ElementType.FIELD, ElementType.PARAMETER})
#BindingAnnotation
public #interface JdbcUrl {}
}
Then you need to provide a binding in your Module:
public class SomeModule extends AbstractModule {
private final String jdbcUrl; // set in constructor
protected void configure() {
bindConstant().annotatedWith(SomeClass.JdbcUrl.class).to(jdbcUrl);
}
}
Then an time Guice creates SomeClass, it will inject the parameter. For instance, if SomeOtherClass depends on SomeClass:
class SomeOtherClass {
#Inject
SomeOtherClass(SomeClass someClass) {
this.someClass = someClass;
}
Often, when you think you want to inject a String, you want to inject an object. For instance, if the String is a URL, I often inject a URI with a binding annotation.
This all assumes there is some constant value you can define at module creation time for the String. If the value isn't available at module creation time, you can use AssistedInject.
This might be off-topic, but Guice makes configuration much easier than writing an explicit binding for every String you need. You can just have a config file for them:
Properties configProps = Properties.load(getClass().getClassLoader().getResourceAsStream("myconfig.properties");
Names.bindProperties(binder(), configProps);
and voilĂ all your config is ready for injection:
#Provides // use this to have nice creation methods in modules
public Connection getDBConnection(#Named("dbConnection") String connectionStr,
#Named("dbUser") String user,
#Named("dbPw") String pw,) {
return DriverManager.getConnection(connectionStr, user, pw);
}
Now just create your Java properties file myconfig.properties at the root of your classpath with
dbConnection = jdbc:mysql://localhost/test
dbUser = username
dbPw = password
or merge authorization information from some other source into the properties and you're set.
I was able to inject a string through Named annotation.
#Provides
#Named("stage")
String stage() {
return domain;
}
class SomeClass {
#Inject
#Named("stage")
String stageName;
}
I find a solution in the FAQ of Guice:
http://code.google.com/docreader/#p=google-guice&s=google-guice&t=FrequentlyAskedQuestions
In addition to define an annotation and a String attribute in MyModule, I need to write below line to get a instance of SomeClass:
SomeClass instance = Guice.createInjector(new MyModule("any string i like to use")).getInstance(SomeClass.class);
But I remembered that Injector.getInstance() should not be used except for the root object, so is there any better way to do this?