I have the following Search class method that takes a bunch of params and then builds a request.
def self.search(agent, params)
RealPropertySale.where(id: available_ids)
.joins(:address)
.by_state(state)
.by_suburb(suburb)
.by_post_code(post_code)
.by_country(country)
.paginate(page: page)
end
def self.by_state(state)
where(addresses: {state: state})
end
def self.by_suburb(suburb)
where(addresses: {suburb: suburb})
end
def self.by_post_code(post_code)
where(addresses: {post_code: post_code})
end
def self.by_country(country)
where(addresses: {country: country})
end
What is the correct way of handling if one of my custom class methods e.g. self.by_country(country) returns nil so that the query continues with whatever param/s are present. I have tried returning self if one the params is blank but the query is lost and the class is returned resulting in errors.
I agree with #Michael Gaskill that you probably should only call the scopes that actually affect the final query (i.e. that have meaningful params).
However, if you insist on the scopes ignoring nil parameters, you may make them return current_scope instead (which is an undocumented but useful method):
def self.by_state(state)
return current_scope if state.nil?
where(addresses: {state: state})
end
We did something similar by breaking it down like so :
response = RealPropertySale.where(id: available_ids)
.joins(:address)
response = response.by_state(state) if state
response = response.by_suburb(suburb) if suburb
response = response.by_post_code(post_code) if post_code
response = response.by_country(country) if country
response = response.paginate(page: page) if page
I like the readibility. I try to break it down to as many pieces as needed, but this should be adapted to your business logic. Don't know if, for you, it makes sense to check if suburb is provided for example.
Related
I am trying to do a search with multiple attributes for Address at my Rails API.
I want to search by state, city and/or street. But user doesn't need to send all attributes, he can search only by city if he wants.
So I need something like this: if the condition exists search by condition or return all results of this condition.
Example:
search request: street = 'some street', city = '', state = ''
How can I use rails where method to return all if some condition is nil?
I was trying something like this, but I know that ||:all doesn't work, it's just to illustrate what I have in mind.:
def get_address
address = Adress.where(
state: params[:state] || :all,
city: params[:city] || :all,
street: params[:street] || :all)
end
It's possible to do something like that? Or maybe there is a better way to do it?
This is a more elegant solution using some simple hash manipulation:
def filter_addesses(scope = Adress.all)
# slice takes only the keys we want
# compact removes nil values
filters = params.permit(:state, :city, :street).to_h.compact
scope = scope.where(filters) if filters.any?
scope
end
Once you're passing a column to where, there isn't an option that means "on second thought don't filter by this". Instead, you can construct the relation progressively:
def get_address
addresses = Address.all
addresses = addresses.where(state: params[:state]) if params[:state]
addresses = addresses.where(city: params[:city]) if params[:city]
addresses = addresses.where(street: params[:street]) if params[:street]
addresses
end
I highly recommend using the Searchlight gem. It solves precisely the problem you're describing. Instead of cluttering up your controllers, pass your search params to a Searchlight class. This will DRY up your code and keep your controllers skinny too. You'll not only solve your problem, but you'll have more maintainable code too. Win-win!
So in your case, you'd make an AddressSearch class:
class AddressSearch < Searchlight::Search
# This is the starting point for any chaining we do, and it's what
# will be returned if no search options are passed.
# In this case, it's an ActiveRecord model.
def base_query
Address.all # or `.scoped` for ActiveRecord 3
end
# A search method.
def search_state
query.where(state: options[:state])
end
# Another search method.
def search_city
query.where(city: options[:city])
end
# Another search method.
def search_street
query.where(street: options[:street])
end
end
Then in your controller you just need to search by passing in your search params into the class above:
AddressSearch.new(params).results
One nice thing about this gem is that any extraneous parameters will be scrubbed automatically by Searchlight. Only the State, City, and Street params will be used.
In my app that I am building to learn Rails and Ruby, I have below iteration/loop which is not functioning as it should.
What am I trying to achieve?
I am trying to find the business partner (within only the active once (uses a scope)) where the value of the field business_partner.bank_account is contained in the field self_extracted_data and then set the business partner found as self.sender (self here is a Document).
So once a match is found, I want to end the loop. A case exists where no match is found and sender = nil so a user needs to set it manually.
What happens now, is that on which ever record of the object I save (it is called as a callback before_save), it uses the last identified business partner as sender and the method does not execute again.
Current code:
def set_sender
BusinessPartner.active.where.not(id: self.receiver_id).each do |business_partner|
bp_bank_account = business_partner.bank_account.gsub(/\s+/, '')
rgx = /(?<!\w)(#{Regexp.escape(bp_bank_account)})?(?!\w)/
if self.extracted_data.gsub(/\s+/, '') =~ rgx
self.sender = business_partner
else
self.sender = nil
end
end
end
Thanks for helping me understand how to do this kind of case.
p.s. have the pickaxe book here yet this is so much that some help / guidance would be great. The regex works.
Using feedback from #moveson, this code works:
def match_with_extracted_data?(rgx_to_match)
extracted_data.gsub(/\s+/, '') =~ rgx_to_match
end
def set_sender
self.sender_id = matching_business_partner.try(:id) #unless self.sender.id.present? # Returns nil if no matching_business_partner exists
end
def matching_business_partner
BusinessPartner.active.excluding_receiver(receiver_id).find { |business_partner| sender_matches?(business_partner) }
end
def sender_matches?(business_partner)
rgx_registrations = /(#{Regexp.escape(business_partner.bank_account.gsub(/\s+/, ''))})|(#{Regexp.escape(business_partner.registration.gsub(/\s+/, ''))})|(#{Regexp.escape(business_partner.vat_id.gsub(/\s+/, ''))})/
match_with_extracted_data?(rgx_registrations)
end
In Ruby you generally want to avoid loops and #each and long, procedural methods in favor of Enumerable iterators like #map, #find, and #select, and short, descriptive methods that each do a single job. Without knowing more about your project I can't be sure exactly what will work, but I think you want something like this:
# /models/document.rb
class Document < ActiveRecord::Base
def set_sender
self.sender = matching_business_partner.try(:id) || BusinessPartner.active.default.id
end
def matching_business_partners
other_business_partners.select { |business_partner| account_matches?(business_partner) }
end
def matching_business_partner
matching_business_partners.first
end
def other_business_partners
BusinessPartner.excluding_receiver_id(receiver_id)
end
def account_matches?(business_partner)
rgx = /(?<!\w)(#{Regexp.escape(business_partner.stripped_bank_account)})?(?!\w)/
data_matches_bank_account?(rgx)
end
def data_matches_bank_account?(rgx)
extracted_data.gsub(/\s+/, '') =~ rgx
end
end
# /models/business_partner.rb
class BusinessPartner < ActiveRecord::Base
scope :excluding_receiver_id, -> (receiver_id) { where.not(id: receiver_id) }
def stripped_bank_account
bank_account.gsub(/\s+/, '')
end
end
Note that I am assigning an integer id, rather than an ActiveRecord object, to self.sender. I think that's what you want.
I didn't try to mess with the database relations here, but it does seem like Document could include a belongs_to :business_partner, which would give you the benefit of Rails methods to help you find one from the other.
EDIT: Added Document#matching_business_partners method and changed Document#set_sender method to return nil if no matching_business_partner exists.
EDIT: Added BusinessPartner.active.default.id as the return value if no matching_business_partner exists.
I'm using Rails 4 and have an Article model that has answer, side_effects, and benefits as attributes.
I am trying to create a before_save method that automatically looks at the side effects and benefits and creates links corresponding to another article on the site.
Instead of writing two virtually identical methods, one for side effects and one for benefits, I would like to use the same method and check to assure the attribute does not equal answer.
So far I have something like this:
before_save :link_to_article
private
def link_to_article
self.attributes.each do |key, value|
unless key == "answer"
linked_attrs = []
self.key.split(';').each do |i|
a = Article.where('lower(specific) = ?', i.downcase.strip).first
if a && a.approved?
linked_attrs.push("<a href='/questions/#{a.slug}' target=_blank>#{i.strip}</a>")
else
linked_attrs.push(i.strip)
end
end
self.key = linked_attrs.join('; ')
end
end
end
but chaining on the key like that gives me an undefined method 'key'.
How can I go about interpolating in the attribute?
in this bit: self.key you are asking for it to literally call a method called key, but what you want, is to call the method-name that is stored in the variable key.
you can use: self.send(key) instead, but it can be a little dangerous.
If somebody hacks up a new form on their browser to send you the attribute called delete! you don't want it accidentally called using send, so it might be better to use read_attribute and write_attribute.
Example below:
def link_to_article
self.attributes.each do |key, value|
unless key == "answer"
linked_attrs = []
self.read_attribute(key).split(';').each do |i|
a = Article.where('lower(specific) = ?', i.downcase.strip).first
if a && a.approved?
linked_attrs.push("<a href='/questions/#{a.slug}' target=_blank>#{i.strip}</a>")
else
linked_attrs.push(i.strip)
end
end
self.write_attribute(key, linked_attrs.join('; '))
end
end
end
I'd also recommend using strong attributes in the controller to make sure you're only permitting the allowed set of attributes.
OLD (before I knew this was to be used on all attributes)
That said... why do you go through every single attribute and only do something if the attribute is called answer? why not just not bother with going through the attributes and look directly at answer?
eg:
def link_to_article
linked_attrs = []
self.answer.split(';').each do |i|
a = Article.where('lower(specific) = ?', i.downcase.strip).first
if a && a.approved?
linked_attrs.push("<a href='/questions/#{a.slug}' target=_blank>#{i.strip}</a>")
else
linked_attrs.push(i.strip)
end
end
self.answer = linked_attrs.join('; ')
end
I have a User model in a ROR application that has multiple methods like this
#getClient() returns an object that knows how to find certain info for a date
#processHeaders() is a function that processes output and updates some values in the database
#refreshToken() is function that is called when an error occurs when requesting data from the object returned by getClient()
def transactions_on_date(date)
if blocked?
# do something
else
begin
output = getClient().transactions(date)
processHeaders(output)
return output
rescue UnauthorizedError => ex
refresh_token()
output = getClient().transactions(date)
process_fitbit_rate_headers(output)
return output
end
end
end
def events_on_date(date)
if blocked?
# do something
else
begin
output = getClient().events(date)
processHeaders(output)
return output
rescue UnauthorizedError => ex
refresh_token()
output = getClient().events(date)
processHeaders(output)
return output
end
end
end
I have several functions in my User class that look exactly the same. The only difference among these functions is the line output = getClient().something(date). Is there a way that I can make this code look cleaner so that I do not have a repetitive list of functions.
The answer is usually passing in a block and doing it functional style:
def handle_blocking(date)
if blocked?
# do something
else
begin
output = yield(date)
processHeaders(output)
output
rescue UnauthorizedError => ex
refresh_token
output = yield(date)
process_fitbit_rate_headers(output)
output
end
end
end
Then you call it this way:
handle_blocking(date) do |date|
getClient.something(date)
end
That allows a lot of customization. The yield call executes the block of code you've supplied and passes in the date argument to it.
The process of DRYing up your code often involves looking for patterns and boiling them down to useful methods like this. Using a functional approach can keep things clean.
Yes, you can use Object#send: getClient().send(:method_name, date).
BTW, getClient is not a proper Ruby method name. It should be get_client.
How about a combination of both answers:
class User
def method_missing sym, *args
m_name = sym.to_s
if m_name.end_with? '_on_date'
prop = m_name.split('_').first.to_sym
handle_blocking(args.first) { getClient().send(prop, args.first) }
else
super(sym, *args)
end
end
def respond_to? sym, private=false
m_name.end_with?('_on_date') || super(sym, private)
end
def handle_blocking date
# see other answer
end
end
Then you can call "transaction_on_date", "events_on_date", "foo_on_date" and it would work.
I have a method that looks something like
class Student < ActiveRecord::Base
def self.search(options = {})
all.tap do |s|
s.where(first_name: options[:query]) if options[:query]
s.where(graduated: options[:graduated]) if options[:graduated]
# etc there are many more things that can be filtered on...
end
end
end
When calling this method though, I am getting back all of the results and not a filtered set as I would expect. It seems like my tap functionality is not working as I expect. What is the correct way to do this (without assigning all to a variable. I would like to use blocks here if possible).
tap will not work for this.
all is an ActiveRecord::Relation, a query waiting to happen.
all.where(...) returns a new ActiveRecord::Relation the new query.
However checking the documentation for tap, you see that it returns the object that it was called on (in this case all) as opposed to the return value of the block.
i.e. it is defined like this:
def tap
yield self # return from block **discarded**
self
end
When what you wanted was just:
def apply
yield self # return from block **returned**
end
Or something similar to that.
This is why you keep getting all the objects returned, as opposed to the objects resulting from the query. My suggestion is that you build up the hash you send to where as opposed to chaining where calls. Like so:
query = {}
query[:first_name] = options[:query] if options[:query]
query[:graduated] = options[:graduated] if options[:graduated]
# ... etc.
all.where(query)
Or a possibly nicer implementation:
all.where({
first_name: options[:query],
graduated: options[:graduated],
}.delete_if { |_, v| v.empty? })
(If intermediate variables are not to your taste.)
You can easily create a let function:
class Object
def let
return yield self
end
end
And use it like this:
all.let do |s|
s=s.where(first_name: options[:query]) if options[:query]
s=s.where(graduated: options[:graduated]) if options[:graduated]
# etc there are many more things that can be filtered on...
s
end
The difference between tap and let is that tap returns the object and let returns the blocks return value.
These days (ruby >= 2.5) you can use Object.yield_self:
def self.search(options = {})
all.yield_self do |s|
s = s.where(first_name: options[:query]) if options[:query]
s = s.where(graduated: options[:graduated]) if options[:graduated]
s
end
end