I have developed an application with Laravel5.1. Now I need hosting suggestion for deploying my application. I know it's a silly question but I want a reliable answer. Before buying a hosting I want to know which hosting service will provide proper environment to run a laravel5.1 application.
Php version required >= 5.5.9
This is such a hard question to answer as it all depends on what you're after.
Some questions to consider:
Do you want to set the server up yourself?
If this is the case then any unmanaged provider will do the trick, you'll just need to set it all up; LAMP, Git, Composer etc.
Do you want to manage the server itself but you aren't sure how to set it up?
Digital Ocean (and other providers I'm sure) offer one-click apps where you can deploy whatever you want. For Laravel you would probably want to pick the LAMP app install. These deploy all the packages you will require and set them up for you so that you don't need to - the rest of the server management would be up to you from there.
Do you want to use Managed Hosting where they do it all for you?
OVH have been pretty good for me in the past, I've never used their managed option, although I know they have it - and I've had great service from them too.
If you're still not sure then I would suggest looking for a provider that provides servers that come with a LAMP stack (as this covers everything you need for Laravel) or one that supports PHP applications - if you're not sure then just contact the company and ask. Or find someone (a friend or a professional) who can help you get started online.
One suggestion because you are using Laravel is to look at https://forge.laravel.com/ where you can handle servers that runs in Digital Ocean and other providers.
Fits perfectly for Laravel.
Related
I'm a little confused with how deployment of an application works.
I've been looking up tutorials and numerous times it is suggested that it goes live with DigitalOcean, Heroku or something similar, but some are monthly payment services (albeit not a large amount).
I resell hosting to my clients when I build websites for them so I manage everything on my side. My question is: is there a way to deploy a Rails app to my own web hosting space rather than having to use a third-party service? Have I missed something in the documentation?
I'm certain that my hosting can support everything that's needed. If anyone could explain how or why not I'd really appreciate it :-)
You can set up the stack on your own server without problems. When you are using apache or nginx, the easiest might be to use passenger for serving your rails application.
You just need to make sure you have the right ruby version and bundler installed. Services like DO are just simpler to work with as they already do all the needed server setup and most of the configuration for you.
I was wondering if there was around a hosting as those that have existed for years for PHP that would give the opportunity to publish many Ruby and Rails applications and not as Heroku that forces a single application for dyno.
In classical hosting PHP I can create a folder, upload some files in php and navigate them through links.
You can something like that on some Web hosting?
For small projects, Heroku is really the best deal. Their free tier does everything you'd need for something that's occasionally used and doesn't have a lot of scaling issues. You are restricted to one application per "dyno", per account.
For anything more demanding it's not hard to set up a hosting environment on a VPS provider. Although it takes some additional knowledge, you'll be able to set up and configure a web server using a tool like Passenger and manage your own instances. For $10/mo. you can have a very capable server instance that will handle way more than a $7/mo. dyno can manage. Even the $5/mo. server from a provider like Digital Ocean is a fantastic deal.
PHP's fire and forget method of hosting is convenient, but it's actually a lot more work in the long haul compared to an efficient workflow based around Rails and Passenger.
For example, using Capistrano and a version control system like Git you can make changes, test locally, package up into a commit and deploy on your server within minutes. It's basically effortless once you get it working.
For small production projects, I use webfaction, it's easier to push to production than to configure a complete VPS as it's more like a managed hosting (with all the tools and documentation you need for rails) .
I use mina for deployment and Git for version control.
To complete #Tadman answer you can check OpenShift if you want a more Heroku like alternative.
When I started using Rails I was also tempted to compare and seek for a 'php-hosting' like solution. But it's just a different approach.
To answer your question more precisely, you don't drop files in a folder and navigate with links in a classic rails project. You have to understand the concept of MVC, routing ...
I suggest that you give the rails-tutorial a try, it is a good starting point for understanding the whole rails ecosystem.
You can try Ruby hosting on Jelastic PaaS with automated deployment to containers and scaling, as well as pay-per-use pricing model that makes it not so pricy.
There are pre-configured Apache and NGINX containers for running Ruby application, supported different Ruby versions, built-in Ruby on Rails framework, Passenger, Puma, Unicorn, Bundler dependency manager etc.
When deploying a Ruby application, only a single context (ROOT) can be used. However, you can switch between three deployment types: deployment, production and test.
More details are described here https://jelastic.com/blog/ruby-paas-hosting/
You can start with a free trial and test how it suits your project before investing any budget. This Ruby PaaS is available on different local service providers https://jelastic.cloud/
So after beginning my azure websites-adventure, I have been encountering disappointment after disappointment to the point of 'almost' regretting taking the azure route..the latest: my app uses wkhtmltopdf(Rotativa) for all its PDF generation. And as I discovered now during my staging testing...that doesnt work. According to most info on the web, azure websites cannot run .exe's. However, most info I've seen is by now 2 years old and I know Azure development is going fast.
Is there by now a way to run wkhtmltopdf on azure websites, or a workaround atleast? I cannot really find a free alternative like wkhtmltopdf to seems to be working.(Itextsharp doesnt seem to like my html, so thats no option).
Running wkhtmltopdf is now supported in Azure Web Apps - just make sure you are using Basic, Standard, or Premium App Service Plan. Consumption Service Plan and Free App Service Plan have a more limited sandbox and are NOT supported in my testing. MS confirms supportability of wkhtmltopdf in Azure Web Apps.
Hosting - App Service Plan
There are numerous wrappers available (TuesPechkin, Codaxy, etc.). Codaxy is an EXE wrapper in .NET while TuesPechkin is a .NET wrapper around C++ runtime using P/Invoke over wkhtmltox.dll.
Running wkhtmltopdf in Azure Websites in a simple way seems to be impossible, still.
Static .NET wrappers like Pechkin wont work either in WebSites, there are very few alternatives that are 1. free and 2. dont use wkhtmltopdf or similar under the hood. Most alternatives like iTestSharp are not very advanced when it comes to html/css3/javascript reading (as I do some design changing with .js on page load).
I ended up creating a Azure Cloud Service, that runs wkhtmltopdf.exe without any issues. I send the html to the service, and get a byte[] in return. So far this seems to be working fine.
Hope this helps others with similar problems.
I would like to ask you a question about deploying a rails application onto a physical server.
Briefly, our dinosaur client doesn't want to store anything on the cloud hence he wants us to deploy everything onto his servers instead of heroku.
What should be the most efficient way to solve this problem? Won't he be able to reach the source code of our application?
That would be great if you can help me,
Thanks!
You might think on the variant when you keep only production database (and assets if client want) on the client's server and deploy your code to Heroku or whatever else.
I am trying to develop my iOS application that requires a backend for simple CRUD functionality and also a server that helps me link up players and handle real-time multiplayer game logic.
I am using AWS DynamoDB to store my user's data and believe I would need to set up an EC2 instance to help me with my multiplayer game feature. I am completely new in this area and I hope to get some help in these few elementary questions:
Does the different instance (linux or windows) matter?
What language is it required to set up the server-side code? Or is server-side coding necessary?
If the language in the server-side is different from that of xcode's how does it handle the calls? (Please bear with me if this is really fundamental)
Is there any guide for setting up AWS EC2, and must those guide be specific to iOS for my app to work?
Thank you so much for all your help!
Probably
Whatever you want to use, and yes it is necessary
You have different options here, you can do everything from sockets to REST or SOAP.
An EC2 instance is, as far as your concerned, just a server running a back end service for your application. You need to figure how you want the application to work first. It doesn't matter if you decide to host it on ec2 or another service.