I tried to model a NN using softmax regression.
After 999 iterations, I got error of about 0.02% for per data point, which i thought was good. But when I visualize the model on tensorboard, my cost function did not reach towards 0 instead I got something like this
And for weights and bias histogram this
I am a beginner and I can't seem to understand the mistake. May be I am using a wrong method to define cost?
Here is my full code for reference.
import tensorflow as tf
import numpy as np
import random
lorange= 1
hirange= 10
amplitude= np.random.uniform(-10,10)
t= 10
random.seed()
tau=np.random.uniform(lorange,hirange)
x_node = tf.placeholder(tf.float32, (10,))
y_node = tf.placeholder(tf.float32, (10,))
W = tf.Variable(tf.truncated_normal([10,10], stddev= .1))
b = tf.Variable(.1)
y = tf.nn.softmax(tf.matmul(tf.reshape(x_node,[1,10]), W) + b)
##ADD SUMMARY
W_hist = tf.histogram_summary("weights", W)
b_hist = tf.histogram_summary("biases", b)
y_hist = tf.histogram_summary("y", y)
# Cost function sum((y_-y)**2)
with tf.name_scope("cost") as scope:
cost = tf.reduce_mean(tf.square(y_node-y))
cost_sum = tf.scalar_summary("cost", cost)
# Training using Gradient Descent to minimize cost
with tf.name_scope("train") as scope:
train_step = tf.train.GradientDescentOptimizer(0.00001).minimize(cost)
sess = tf.InteractiveSession()
# Merge all the summaries and write them out to logfile
merged = tf.merge_all_summaries()
writer = tf.train.SummaryWriter("/tmp/mnist_logs_4", sess.graph_def)
error = tf.reduce_sum(tf.abs(y - y_node))
init = tf.initialize_all_variables()
sess.run(init)
steps = 1000
for i in range(steps):
xs = np.arange(t)
ys = amplitude * np.exp(-xs / tau)
feed = {x_node: xs, y_node: ys}
sess.run(train_step, feed_dict=feed)
print("After %d iteration:" % i)
print("W: %s" % sess.run(W))
print("b: %s" % sess.run(b))
print('Total Error: ', error.eval(feed_dict={x_node: xs, y_node:ys}))
# Record summary data, and the accuracy every 10 steps
if i % 10 == 0:
result = sess.run(merged, feed_dict=feed)
writer.add_summary(result, i)
I got the same plot like you a couple of times.
That happened mostly when I was running tensorboard on multiple log-files. That is, the logdir I gave to TensorBoard contained multiple log-files. Try to run TensorBoard on one single log-file and let me know what happens
Related
I want to run some neural net experiments with PyTorch, but a minimal test case is giving wrong answers. The test case sets up a simple neural network with two input variables and an output variable that is just the sum of the inputs, and tries learning it as a regression problem; I expect it to converge on zero mean squared error, but it actually converges on 0.165. It's probably because of the issue alluded to in the warning message; how can I fix it?
Code:
import torch
import torch.nn as nn
# data
Xs = []
ys = []
n = 10
for i in range(n):
i1 = i / n
for j in range(n):
j1 = j / n
Xs.append([i1, j1])
ys.append(i1 + j1)
# torch tensors
X_tensor = torch.tensor(Xs)
y_tensor = torch.tensor(ys)
# hyperparameters
in_features = len(Xs[0])
hidden_size = 100
out_features = 1
epochs = 500
# model
class Net(nn.Module):
def __init__(self, hidden_size):
super(Net, self).__init__()
self.L0 = nn.Linear(in_features, hidden_size)
self.N0 = nn.ReLU()
self.L1 = nn.Linear(hidden_size, 1)
def forward(self, x):
x = self.L0(x)
x = self.N0(x)
x = self.L1(x)
return x
model = Net(hidden_size)
criterion = nn.MSELoss()
optimizer = torch.optim.Adam(model.parameters(), lr=0.1)
# train
print("training")
for epoch in range(1, epochs + 1):
# forward
output = model(X_tensor)
cost = criterion(output, y_tensor)
# backward
optimizer.zero_grad()
cost.backward()
optimizer.step()
# print progress
if epoch % (epochs // 10) == 0:
print(f"{epoch:6d} {cost.item():10f}")
print()
output = model(X_tensor)
cost = criterion(output, y_tensor)
print("mean squared error:", cost.item())
Output:
training
C:\Users\russe\Anaconda3\envs\torch2\lib\site-packages\torch\nn\modules\loss.py:445: UserWarning: Using a target size (torch.Size([100])) that is different to the input size (torch.Size([100, 1])). This will likely lead to incorrect results due to broadcasting. Please ensure they have the same size.
return F.mse_loss(input, target, reduction=self.reduction)
50 0.167574
100 0.165108
150 0.165070
200 0.165052
250 0.165039
300 0.165028
350 0.165020
400 0.165013
450 0.165009
500 0.165006
mean squared error: 0.1650056540966034
And the message:
UserWarning: Using a target size (torch.Size([100])) that is different to the input size (torch.Size([100, 1])). This will likely lead to incorrect results due to broadcasting. Please ensure they have the same size.
You're going to be a bit more specific on which tensors (X, or Y), but we can can reshape our tensors by using the torch.view function.
For example:
Y_tensor = torch.tensor(Ys)
print(Y_tensor.shape)
>> torch.Size([5])
new_shape = (len(Ys), 1)
Y_tensor = Y_tensor.view(new_shape)
print(Y_tensor.shape)
>> torch.Size([5, 1])
However, I'm skeptical that this broadcasting behavior is why you're having accuracy issues.
This question might have been asked, but I got confused.
I am trying to apply one of RNN types, e.g. LSTM for time-series forecasting. I have inputs, y (stock returns). For each timestamp, I'd like to get the predictions. Q1 - Am I correct choosing seq2seq approach?
I also want to use predictions from previous timestamp (initializing initial values with some constant) as additional (still using my existing inputs) input in the form of squared residuals, i.e. using
eps_{t-1} = (y_{t-1} - y^_{t-1})^2 as additional input at t (as well as previous inputs).
So, how can I do this in tensorflow or in pytorch?
I tried to depict what I want on the attached graph. The graph
p.s. Sorry, it the question is poorly formulated
Let say your input if of dimension (32,10,1) with batch_size 32, time steps of length 10 and dimension of 1. Same for your target (stock return). This code make use of the tf.scan function, which is usefull when implementing custom recurrent networks (it will iterate over the timesteps). It remains to use the residual of t-1 in t somewhere, as you would like to.
ps: it is a very basic implementation of lstm from scratch, without any bias or output activation.
import tensorflow as tf
import numpy as np
tf.reset_default_graph()
BS = 32
TS = 10
inputs_dim = 1
target_dim = 1
inputs = tf.placeholder(shape=[BS, TS, inputs_dim], dtype=tf.float32)
stock_returns = tf.placeholder(shape=[BS, TS, target_dim], dtype=tf.float32)
state_size = 16
# initial hidden state
init_state = tf.placeholder(shape=[2, BS, state_size],
dtype=tf.float32, name='initial_state')
# initializer
xav_init = tf.contrib.layers.xavier_initializer
# params
W = tf.get_variable('W', shape=[4, state_size, state_size],
initializer=xav_init())
U = tf.get_variable('U', shape=[4, inputs_dim, state_size],
initializer=xav_init())
W_out = tf.get_variable('W_out', shape=[state_size, target_dim],
initializer=xav_init())
#the function to feed tf.scan with
def step(prev, inputs_):
#unpack all inputs and previous outputs
st_1, ct_1 = prev[0][0], prev[0][1]
x = inputs_[0]
target = inputs_[1]
#get previous squared residual
eps = prev[1]
"""
here do whatever you want with eps_t-1
like x += eps if x if of the same dimension
or include it somewhere in your graph
"""
# lstm gates (add bias if needed)
#
# input gate
i = tf.sigmoid(tf.matmul(x,U[0]) + tf.matmul(st_1,W[0]))
# forget gate
f = tf.sigmoid(tf.matmul(x,U[1]) + tf.matmul(st_1,W[1]))
# output gate
o = tf.sigmoid(tf.matmul(x,U[2]) + tf.matmul(st_1,W[2]))
# gate weights
g = tf.tanh(tf.matmul(x,U[3]) + tf.matmul(st_1,W[3]))
ct = ct_1*f + g*i
st = tf.tanh(ct)*o
"""
make prediction, compute residual in t
and pass it to t+1
Normaly, we would compute prediction outside the scan function,
but as we need it here, we could just keep it and return it back
as an output of the scan function
"""
prediction_t = tf.matmul(st, W_out) # + bias
eps = (target - prediction_t)**2
return [tf.stack((st, ct), axis=0), eps, prediction_t]
states, eps, preds = tf.scan(step, [tf.transpose(inputs, [1,0,2]),
tf.transpose(stock_returns, [1,0,2])], initializer=[init_state,
tf.zeros((32,1), dtype=tf.float32),
tf.zeros((32,1),dtype=tf.float32)])
with tf.Session() as sess:
sess.run(tf.global_variables_initializer())
out = sess.run(preds, feed_dict=
{inputs:np.random.rand(BS,TS,inputs_dim),
stock_returns:np.random.rand(BS,TS,target_dim),
init_state:np.zeros((2,BS,state_size))})
out = tf.transpose(out,[1,0,2])
print(out)
And the output :
Tensor("transpose_2:0", shape=(32, 10, 1), dtype=float32)
Base code from here
I just too an ML course and am trying to get better at tensorflow. To that end, I purchased the book by Nishant Shukhla (ML with tensorflow) and am trying to run the 2 feature example with a different data set.
With the fake dataset in the book, my code runs fine. However, with data I used in the ML course, the code refuses to converge. With a really small learning rate it does converge, but the learned weights are wrong.
Also attaching the plot of the feature data. It should not a feature scaling issue as values on both features vary between 30-100 units.
I am really struggling with how opaque tensorflow is- any help would be appreciated:
""" Solution for simple logistic regression model
"""
import os
os.environ['TF_CPP_MIN_LOG_LEVEL']='2'
import numpy as np
import tensorflow as tf
import time
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
# Define paramaters for the model
learning_rate = 0.0001
training_epochs = 300
data = np.loadtxt('ex2data1.txt', delimiter=',')
x1s = np.array(data[:,0]).astype(np.float32)
x2s = np.array(data[:,1]).astype(np.float32)
ys = np.array(data[:,2]).astype(np.float32)
print('Plotting data with + indicating (y = 1) examples and o \n indicating (y = 0) examples.\n')
color = ['red' if l == 0 else 'blue' for l in ys]
myplot = plt.scatter(x1s, x2s, color = color)
# Put some labels
plt.xlabel("Exam 1 score")
plt.ylabel("Exam 2 score")
# Specified in plot order
plt.show()
# Step 2: Create datasets
X1 = tf.placeholder(tf.float32, shape=(None,), name="x1")
X2 = tf.placeholder(tf.float32, shape=(None,), name="x2")
Y = tf.placeholder(tf.float32, shape=(None,), name="y")
w = tf.Variable(np.random.rand(3,1), name='w', dtype='float32',trainable=True)
y_model = tf.sigmoid(w[2]*X2 + w[1]*X1 + w[0])
cost = tf.reduce_mean(-tf.log(y_model*Y + (1-y_model)*(1-Y)))
train_op = tf.train.GradientDescentOptimizer(learning_rate).minimize(cost)
writer = tf.summary.FileWriter('./graphs/logreg', tf.get_default_graph())
with tf.Session() as sess:
sess.run(tf.global_variables_initializer())
prev_error = 0.0;
for epoch in range(training_epochs):
error, loss = sess.run([cost, train_op], feed_dict={X1:x1s, X2:x2s, Y:ys})
print("epoch = ", epoch, "loss = ", loss)
if abs(prev_error - error) < 0.0001:
break
prev_error = error
w_val = sess.run(w, {X1:x1s, X2:x2s, Y:ys})
print("w learned = ", w_val)
writer.close()
sess.close()
Both X1 and X2 range from ~20-100. However, once I scaled them, the solution converged just fine.
Out of curiosity, I am trying to build a simple fully connected NN using tensorflow to learn a square wave function such as the following one:
Therefore the input is a 1D array of x value (as the horizontal axis), and the output is a binary scalar value. I used tf.nn.sparse_softmax_cross_entropy_with_logits as loss function, and tf.nn.relu as activation. There are 3 hidden layers (100*100*100) and a single input node and output node. The input data are generated to match the above wave shape and therefore the data size is not a problem.
However, the trained model seems to fail completed, predicting for the negative class always.
So I am trying to figure out why this happened. Whether the NN configuration is suboptimal, or it is due to some mathematical flaw in NN beneath the surface (though I think NN should be able to imitate any function).
Thanks.
As per suggestions in the comment section, here is the full code. One thing I noticed saying wrong earlier is, there were actually 2 output nodes (due to 2 output classes):
"""
See if neural net can find piecewise linear correlation in the data
"""
import time
import os
import tensorflow as tf
import numpy as np
def generate_placeholder(batch_size):
x_placeholder = tf.placeholder(tf.float32, shape=(batch_size, 1))
y_placeholder = tf.placeholder(tf.float32, shape=(batch_size))
return x_placeholder, y_placeholder
def feed_placeholder(x, y, x_placeholder, y_placeholder, batch_size, loop):
x_selected = [[None]] * batch_size
y_selected = [None] * batch_size
for i in range(batch_size):
x_selected[i][0] = x[min(loop*batch_size, loop*batch_size % len(x)) + i, 0]
y_selected[i] = y[min(loop*batch_size, loop*batch_size % len(y)) + i]
feed_dict = {x_placeholder: x_selected,
y_placeholder: y_selected}
return feed_dict
def inference(input_x, H1_units, H2_units, H3_units):
with tf.name_scope('H1'):
weights = tf.Variable(tf.truncated_normal([1, H1_units], stddev=1.0/2), name='weights')
biases = tf.Variable(tf.zeros([H1_units]), name='biases')
a1 = tf.nn.relu(tf.matmul(input_x, weights) + biases)
with tf.name_scope('H2'):
weights = tf.Variable(tf.truncated_normal([H1_units, H2_units], stddev=1.0/H1_units), name='weights')
biases = tf.Variable(tf.zeros([H2_units]), name='biases')
a2 = tf.nn.relu(tf.matmul(a1, weights) + biases)
with tf.name_scope('H3'):
weights = tf.Variable(tf.truncated_normal([H2_units, H3_units], stddev=1.0/H2_units), name='weights')
biases = tf.Variable(tf.zeros([H3_units]), name='biases')
a3 = tf.nn.relu(tf.matmul(a2, weights) + biases)
with tf.name_scope('softmax_linear'):
weights = tf.Variable(tf.truncated_normal([H3_units, 2], stddev=1.0/np.sqrt(H3_units)), name='weights')
biases = tf.Variable(tf.zeros([2]), name='biases')
logits = tf.matmul(a3, weights) + biases
return logits
def loss(logits, labels):
labels = tf.to_int32(labels)
cross_entropy = tf.nn.sparse_softmax_cross_entropy_with_logits(labels=labels, logits=logits, name='xentropy')
return tf.reduce_mean(cross_entropy, name='xentropy_mean')
def inspect_y(labels):
return tf.reduce_sum(tf.cast(labels, tf.int32))
def training(loss, learning_rate):
tf.summary.scalar('lost', loss)
optimizer = tf.train.GradientDescentOptimizer(learning_rate)
global_step = tf.Variable(0, name='global_step', trainable=False)
train_op = optimizer.minimize(loss, global_step=global_step)
return train_op
def evaluation(logits, labels):
labels = tf.to_int32(labels)
correct = tf.nn.in_top_k(logits, labels, 1)
return tf.reduce_sum(tf.cast(correct, tf.int32))
def run_training(x, y, batch_size):
with tf.Graph().as_default():
x_placeholder, y_placeholder = generate_placeholder(batch_size)
logits = inference(x_placeholder, 100, 100, 100)
Loss = loss(logits, y_placeholder)
y_sum = inspect_y(y_placeholder)
train_op = training(Loss, 0.01)
init = tf.global_variables_initializer()
sess = tf.Session()
sess.run(init)
max_steps = 10000
for step in range(max_steps):
start_time = time.time()
feed_dict = feed_placeholder(x, y, x_placeholder, y_placeholder, batch_size, step)
_, loss_val = sess.run([train_op, Loss], feed_dict = feed_dict)
duration = time.time() - start_time
if step % 100 == 0:
print('Step {}: loss = {:.2f} {:.3f}sec'.format(step, loss_val, duration))
x_test = np.array(range(1000)) * 0.001
x_test = np.reshape(x_test, (1000, 1))
_ = sess.run(logits, feed_dict={x_placeholder: x_test})
print(min(_[:, 0]), max(_[:, 0]), min(_[:, 1]), max(_[:, 1]))
print(_)
if __name__ == '__main__':
population = 10000
input_x = np.random.rand(population)
input_y = np.copy(input_x)
for bin in range(10):
print(bin, bin/10, 0.5 - 0.5*(-1)**bin)
input_y[input_x >= bin/10] = 0.5 - 0.5*(-1)**bin
batch_size = 1000
input_x = np.reshape(input_x, (population, 1))
run_training(input_x, input_y, batch_size)
Sample output shows that the model always prefer the first class over the second, as shown by min(_[:, 0]) > max(_[:, 1]), i.e. the minimum logit output for the first class is higher than the maximum logit output for the second class, for a sample size of population.
My mistake. The problem occurred in the line:
for i in range(batch_size):
x_selected[i][0] = x[min(loop*batch_size, loop*batch_size % len(x)) + i, 0]
y_selected[i] = y[min(loop*batch_size, loop*batch_size % len(y)) + i]
Python is mutating the whole list of x_selected to the same value. Now this code issue is resolved. The fix is:
x_selected = np.zeros((batch_size, 1))
y_selected = np.zeros((batch_size,))
for i in range(batch_size):
x_selected[i, 0] = x[(loop*batch_size + i) % x.shape[0], 0]
y_selected[i] = y[(loop*batch_size + i) % y.shape[0]]
After this fix, the model is showing more variation. It currently outputs class 0 for x <= 0.5 and class 1 for x > 0.5. But this is still far from ideal.
So after changing the network configuration to 100 nodes * 4 layers, after 1 million training steps (batch size = 100, sample size = 10 million), the model is performing very well showing only errors at the edges when y flips.
Therefore this question is closed.
You essentially try to learn a periodic function and the function is highly non-linear and non-smooth. So it is NOT simple as it looks like. In short, a better representation of the input feature helps.
Suppose your have a period T = 2, f(x) = f(x+2).
For a reduced problem when input/output are integers, your function is then f(x) = 1 if x is odd else -1. In this case, your problem would be reduced to this discussion in which we train a Neural Network to distinguish between odd and even numbers.
I guess the second bullet in that post should help (even for the general case when inputs are float numbers).
Try representing the numbers in binary using a fixed length precision.
In our reduced problem above, it's easy to see that the output is determined iff the least-significant bit is known.
decimal binary -> output
1: 0 0 1 -> 1
2: 0 1 0 -> -1
3: 0 1 1 -> 1
...
I created the model and the structure for the problem of recognizing odd/even numbers in here.
If you abstract the fact that:
decimal binary -> output
1: 0 0 1 -> 1
2: 0 1 0 -> -1
3: 0 1 1 -> 1
Is almost equivalent to:
decimal binary -> output
1: 0 0 1 -> 1
2: 0 1 0 -> 0
3: 0 1 1 -> 1
You may update the code to fit your need.
I have a data set which contains a list of stock prices. I need to use the tensorflow and python to predict the close price.
Q1: I have the following code which takes the first 2000 records as training and 2001 to 20000 records as test but I don't know how to change the code to do the prediction of the close price of today and 1 day later??? Please advise!
#!/usr/bin/env python2
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
import tensorflow as tf
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
def feature_scaling(input_pd, scaling_meathod):
if scaling_meathod == 'z-score':
scaled_pd = (input_pd - input_pd.mean()) / input_pd.std()
elif scaling_meathod == 'min-max':
scaled_pd = (input_pd - input_pd.min()) / (input_pd.max() -
input_pd.min())
return scaled_pd
def input_reshape(input_pd, start, end, batch_size, batch_shift, n_features):
temp_pd = input_pd[start-1: end+batch_size-1]
output_pd = map(lambda y : temp_pd[y:y+batch_size], xrange(0, end-start+1, batch_shift))
output_temp = map(lambda x : np.array(output_pd[x]).reshape([-1]), xrange(len(output_pd)))
output = np.reshape(output_temp, [-1, batch_size, n_features])
return output
def target_reshape(input_pd, start, end, batch_size, batch_shift, n_step_ahead, m_steps_pred):
temp_pd = input_pd[start+batch_size+n_step_ahead-2: end+batch_size+n_step_ahead+m_steps_pred-2]
print temp_pd
output_pd = map(lambda y : temp_pd[y:y+m_steps_pred], xrange(0, end-start+1, batch_shift))
output_temp = map(lambda x : np.array(output_pd[x]).reshape([-1]), xrange(len(output_pd)))
output = np.reshape(output_temp, [-1,1])
return output
def lstm(input, n_inputs, n_steps, n_of_layers, scope_name):
num_layers = n_of_layers
input = tf.transpose(input,[1, 0, 2])
input = tf.reshape(input,[-1, n_inputs])
input = tf.split(0, n_steps, input)
with tf.variable_scope(scope_name):
cell = tf.nn.rnn_cell.BasicLSTMCell(num_units=n_inputs)
cell = tf.nn.rnn_cell.MultiRNNCell([cell]*num_layers)
output, state = tf.nn.rnn(cell, input, dtype=tf.float32) yi1
output = output[-1]
return output
feature_to_input = ['open price', 'highest price', 'lowest price', 'close price','turnover', 'volume','mean price']
feature_to_predict = ['close price']
feature_to_scale = ['volume']
sacling_meathod = 'min-max'
train_start = 1
train_end = 1000
test_start = 1001
test_end = 20000
batch_size = 100
batch_shift = 1
n_step_ahead = 1
m_steps_pred = 1
n_features = len(feature_to_input)
lstm_scope_name = 'lstm_prediction'
n_lstm_layers = 1
n_pred_class = 1
learning_rate = 0.1
EPOCHS = 1000
PRINT_STEP = 100
read_data_pd = pd.read_csv('./stock_price.csv')
temp_pd = feature_scaling(input_pd[feature_to_scale],sacling_meathod)
input_pd[feature_to_scale] = temp_pd
train_input_temp_pd = input_pd[feature_to_input]
train_input_nparr = input_reshape(train_input_temp_pd,
train_start, train_end, batch_size, batch_shift, n_features)
train_target_temp_pd = input_pd[feature_to_predict]
train_target_nparr = target_reshape(train_target_temp_pd, train_start, train_end, batch_size, batch_shift, n_step_ahead, m_steps_pred)
test_input_temp_pd = input_pd[feature_to_input]
test_input_nparr = input_reshape(test_input_temp_pd, test_start, test_end, batch_size, batch_shift, n_features)
test_target_temp_pd = input_pd[feature_to_predict]
test_target_nparr = target_reshape(test_target_temp_pd, test_start, test_end, batch_size, batch_shift, n_step_ahead, m_steps_pred)
tf.reset_default_graph()
x_ = tf.placeholder(tf.float32, [None, batch_size, n_features])
y_ = tf.placeholder(tf.float32, [None, 1])
lstm_output = lstm(x_, n_features, batch_size, n_lstm_layers, lstm_scope_name)
W = tf.Variable(tf.random_normal([n_features, n_pred_class]))
b = tf.Variable(tf.random_normal([n_pred_class]))
y = tf.matmul(lstm_output, W) + b
cost_func = tf.reduce_mean(tf.square(y - y_))
train_op = tf.train.GradientDescentOptimizer(learning_rate).minimize(cost_func)
optimizer = tf.train.GradientDescentOptimizer(learning_rate).minimize(loss, global_step=global_step)
init = tf.initialize_all_variables()
with tf.Session() as sess:
sess.run(init)
for ii in range(EPOCHS):
sess.run(train_op, feed_dict={x_:train_input_nparr, y_:train_target_nparr})
if ii % PRINT_STEP == 0:
cost = sess.run(cost_func, feed_dict={x_:train_input_nparr, y_:train_target_nparr})
print 'iteration =', ii, 'training cost:', cost
Very simply, prediction (a.k.a. scoring or inference) comes from running the input through only the forward pass, and collecting the score for each input vector. It's the same process flow as testing. The difference is the four stages of model use:
Train: learn from the training data set; adjust weights as needed.
Test: evaluate the model's performance; if accuracy has converged, stop training.
Validate: evaluate the accuracy of the trained model. If it doesn't meet acceptance criteria, change something and start over with the training.
Predict: you've passed validation -- release the model for use by the intended application.
All four steps follow the same forward logic flow; training includes back-propagation; the others do not. Simply follow the forward-only process, and you'll get the result form you need.
I worry about your data partition: only 10% for training, 90% for testing, and none for validation. A more typical split is 50-30-20, or something in that general area.
Q-1 : You should change your LSTM parameter to return a sequence of size two which will be prediction for that day and the day after.
Q-2 it's clearly that your model is underfitting the data, which is so obvious with your 10% train 90% test data ! You should more equilibrated ratio as suggested in the previous answer.