I have been reading a lot on the recommended project structure in TFS. I am considering moving my company to Visual Studio Team Services (was VS Online) and have been trying to set up and test to get my head around how it will work. Based on articles I have been reading, it is recommended to have one team project with many areas/iterations/teams (http://nkdagility.com/one-team-project/, http://nkdagility.com/working-within-a-single-team-project-with-team-foundation-server-2012/).
What I am struggling with is how to make this work for my specific environment and what I would like to see. We are a small development team consisting of myself as a manager and 2 developers. With our current structure (outlined below), I cannot see across team projects for our full backlog. To see how individual work is progressing, I would have to go into the individual team projects.
Current Structure
TFS (Server)
Accounting (Collection)
Application 1 (Team Project)
Release
Test
Application 2
Engineering
Application 3
Application 4
I like the idea of being able to see a master backlog and then assign work items to the individual projects. However, I would still want to be able to manage sprints and see burndown charts down to the individual project level. For example, if developer 1 is working on Project 2, I would like to assign PBI's to that project and see the burndown chart at that level.
New Structure
Team Services (Service)
DefaultCollection (Collection)
DefaultProject (Team Project)
Accounting (Area)
Application 1 (Application)
Application 2
Engineering
Application 3
Application 4
Basically, as a manager, I am looking to be able to see a status of where we as a department stand in our overall backlog. As a developer, I want to know what items are assigned to me, regardless of which application they are related to. Am I on the right track for this? In typing this question, I've almost convinced myself that I don't actually need to know backlog of an individual application. Rather, I should be managing all of the work across all applications and using that as a sprint backlog. Sometimes this sprint will be multiple releases in larger application and sometimes this sprint will be updates across multiple smaller applications. Any help that can be provided to help point me in the right direction will be appreciated.
You can create multiple teams in the same Team Project and you can nest them to facilitate hierarchy.
http://nkdagility.com/creating-nested-teams-visual-studio-alm/
You can see how to configure this in my post above. It's fairly easy to use...
The new structure is good. And you can create two teams from your project Control Panel\Overview: one for Accounting and one for Engineering. Check "Create an area path with the name of the team" option when you create the team. Then you will have 1 overall project page for your team project and 2 sub project page for Accounting and Engineering like following:
In the overall project page, you can manage your overall backlogs, check the Burndown charts for the whole project. And in the sub project page, you can manage the backlogs and check the Burndown chart for individual project.
Related
I've recently completed the deployment of TFS 2015 Update 1, we have around 15 development teams in the UK and previously we have always structured our TFS projects as follows:
Default Collection
Application 1 (Team Project)
Application 2 (Team Project)
This caused issues with sharing work items across teams as it is difficult to move WI's across the project boundary.
Rather than create a new team project for each team, I want to manage things with a single team project and create separate areas\iterations\teams for each one. So:
Project Collection > Master Team Project > Area 1
Area 2
Area 3
etc
in terms of permissions I would like to add in each of the standard TFS permission groups to each area. I would also like to create a root folder for source control for each area.
At the moment I can't work out how to do this? Can anyone help?
I suggest you to look at the some community suggestion on this topic.
One Team Project to rule them all
Why You Should use a Single (Giant) TFS Team Project
How to implement a multiple team strategy in Team Foundation Server 2013
In general it is a good practice (I won't say best practice as it is not the right thing to do in some cases).
Regarding you question, you should focus on Team to define developers access, and TFS groups for general (e.g. administrative) access.
I'd recommend you to use the multiple teams feature in TFS2015. It allows you to manage the team members, permissions, work items more easily. And you can track the entire project status from the team project page and track the individual feature team status from their own project page. The work items can be also moved between the teams easily (Just change the area path). Refer to this link for details: Multiple Teams
What is the recommended organizational structure of team projects in TFS 2010? Let's say we have 4 big departments within our enterprise. Is the recommended approach to create a team project for each department or logical representation of one's organization and have different folders for VS projects within those TFS team projects? Or should each reasonable big project have their own team project?
I am asking more from a perspective of code storage and TFS artifacts. If we are to store both code and user stories, tasks, etc. in one big team project, does that hinder the agile development process? We can still setup separate queries and a separate dashboard for each "project" within the big team project. However, the builds would be in this giant list of builds.
If we had many smaller team projects, it would be more difficult for QA to span their work across multiple team projects. They'd need to know where to enter bugs - knowledge that we don't necessarily want to rely on.
So what is the best practice?
Storing everything in a single project will not hinder "the agile development process". My recommendation would be to create an area path for each project, and organize your work items under those area paths. You'll have a product backlog query for each area. Use the iteration path field to then drive a schedule across all the projects. That should work fine. All the reports can then be filtered by area and/or iteration.
For builds, I see many teams prefixing build definitions to provide better organization. Here's a blog post that describes an extension you can download to help better organize builds.
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/bharry/archive/2011/04/01/build-folders.aspx
I would like to know what is the concept of Team Project in TFS 2010. In my company, there is a single team working on multiple products at the same time. There is a visual studio solution for each product. We are following SCRUM methodology. Our product back log and sprint back log basically comprises of items related to multiple products, so during the sprint the team works on backlog items relating to multiple products. We are looking forward to use SCRUM Process template for TFS 2010.
I was wondering what approach should i take in terms of organising the projects in TFS Source Control and making full use of the TFS Process Template(SCRUM)?
Should I create a Team project for each product? But that would mean I will have to maintain process template, product backlog and sprint backlog for each Team project. Especially when creating and querying work items, it will involve lot of switching between team projects in team explorer. Similarly, when creating burn down charts/reports, there is going to be one for each of the Team project. This seems like a nightmare!
Or should I create one Team project and put all the products(Visual Studio solutions) under it? This sounds better to me because, there will be one process template, one product and sprint backlog and one place to look at/query all work items.
To me it seems like Team project should map to a Team and not to a Product or Visual Studio Solution. However in my past experience, I have come across places where Team Project is mapped to product/visual studio solution and I am a bit confused.
The term "Team Project" is confusing. I really wish Microsoft had used a different phrase.
Having said that, I don't know what other word or phrase would apply.
A Team Project does not necessarily correspond to a Visual Studio project or solution
A Team Project certainly doesn't correspond to what SourceSafe used to call projects (those were just folders)
A Team Project doesn't necessarily correspond to a single source control tree. The people working on a Team Project may use code from multiple source control trees (assuming this can be mapped into your workspace correctly).
A Team Project more closely corresponds to an endeavor of some kind. This may or may not involve some source code. It will involve some people. It may or may not involve some work items, or builds, or reports, or portal sites, or lab environments, or any combination of those artifacts that are scoped on a per-team-project basis. These will usually be artifacts that will be useful to some "Team" in accomplishing their "endeavor" (which may just happen to ba a matter of producing and releasing some code, using the help of work items, reports, source control, builds, etc.)
I would advise you to create one team project and multiple folders for different solutions.
In other words leave your work as it is and create just one team project.When checking in products codes use server folders. This way you have a unique repository with shared work items and reports
We have a project that will be developed in multiple phases over the next 12- 18 months. It's an agile-esque project in a waterfall environment, it that matters.
My initial thought was to create one team project named 'Project X'. Under Project X could be multiple solution folders but the main development would be in a folder called Main. Branching would be done as appropriate.
The other solution folders under the Project X team project would be for some of the tools we need to build for this project that are independ of the main app, which is a web app. For example, we needed to build an app for processing data and sending it to a web service but it never interacted or merged in any way with the main web app.
The advantages I see to this approach are a) all the code for the project is kept under a single team project and b) all the work items, bugs, wishlist items, are accessible from all the other projects.
Does this approach make sense? Any ideas to improve this? I haven't created the team project yet.
I will simply comment on the advantages you listed to help you understand why this approach isn't ideal.
The advantages I see to this approach
are a) all the code for the project is
kept under a single team project and
Both your tools and your web application are for "This project." That right there is a key indicator that you should use one Team Project inside of TFS. You gain nothing by having two separate Team Projects. In fact, you may make it more difficult to manage.
Consider if you have a requirement that has work one both a tool and the main application to complete. In your scenario, there would be no way to track work history associated to one requirement because you are using two Team Projects. There are many more reasons, you have to manage permissions in two places, have two sets of mappings etc etc.
I would highly recommend you opt to use one Team Project. You, and your entire team, will thank me later.
b) all the work items, bugs, wishlist
items, are accessible from all the
other projects
If you have two Team Projects, you cannot access WIs etc across the projects. In fact, you will have the exact opposite- you will have to create the WIs in both projects if the work crossed over between the two.
You should have one Team Project. A folder for the tools and a folder for the web application. From there you can take it further having it branched off- a branch for development and a branch for main is a good start. Inside each, have the tools and web application so the versions stay in sync.
Here is a good place to start reading before setting up your project: Microsoft Team Foundation Server Branching Guidance.
What you're describing is not a Team Project. You're simply describing the structure of some source control folders in TFS.
A Team Project is a lot more than just source control. From T (Visual Studio ALM Glossary):
team project
The named collection of work items,
code, tests, work products, metrics,
and so forth, used by a defined team
with Visual Studio Team Foundation to
track a common set of related work.
We're starting to user Team Foundation Server and my boss would like some way to "archive" projects. Meaning after they are completed, remove them from an "active" state so that only "active" projects are visible.
Does anyone have any experience with this?
I've thought of 2 options.
1) Create 2 base projects. 1 for active projects and 1 for achived projects
2) Remove all users from the archived projects.
Thanks,
Sam
I would personally recommend waiting for TFS 2010 when more functionality will be introduced that will assist you in the ability to "archive" Team Projects.
In TFS 2010 you will hopefully be able to move a team project to a new Team Project Collection. Actually you do this by duplicating your "active" project collection and then deleting all the team projects from it apart from the one that you want archived. In this active project collection, delete the archived project that you have a copy of in the duplicated project collection. This archived team project will then live in it's own project collection which means it has it's own database etc which can be easily backed up / archived etc.
The archived team project project collection can then be left as it is as it doesn't slow down the server any if not being used - or it could even be detached from the TFS Application instance so that it doesn't show up at all and re-attached at any time.
An advantage of using project collections in TFS 2010 is that full Version Control and Work Item Tracking history will be maintained.
I would use it just as you normally do, but when you are done with the project then you remove it from the visible list. (In Visual Studio you can right click on a project in the team explorer and say remove.)
If you are worried about changes after the project is done, then remove the users from the contributors list. If you really want to boot the users out (so they cannot even see it) then you can deny them rights to the project.
This way you don't have to see it, but you can keep all your projects on the base level.
I would NOT recommend having just 2 base project for active and in-active. A TFS project should not be based on a state.
We created an "Archive" team project and we regularly move unused source code to that team project. It has worked out well for us, the history is preserved so we can always reference the archive project for old code or information on past changes. We also limit access such that developers have read access but only TFS administrators have write access. I haven't checked to see how these moves impact the association of check-ins with work items - mostly because everything we archived was checked in before we moved to TFS.
As for the one active team project, I was led to believe by knowledge experts and online documentation that this wasn't the best way to organize team projects. I think ideally you group projects/solutions together into a single team project if they are related (i.e. by line of business or dependencies).
I'm sure you've already done your research, but there is plenty of documentation out there that might assist (especially if your team maintains a single application or a handful of applications). I would suggest starting with patterns & practices: Team Development with TFS.